| Literature DB >> 34099930 |
Paula Montero Llopis1, Rebecca A Senft2, Tim J Ross-Elliott3, Ryan Stephansky3, Daniel P Keeley4, Preman Koshar4, Guillermo Marqués5, Ya-Sheng Gao6, Benjamin R Carlson6, Thomas Pengo7, Mark A Sanders5, Lisa A Cameron6, Michelle S Itano4.
Abstract
Although fluorescence microscopy is ubiquitous in biomedical research, microscopy methods reporting is inconsistent and perhaps undervalued. We emphasize the importance of appropriate microscopy methods reporting and seek to educate researchers about how microscopy metadata impact data interpretation. We provide comprehensive guidelines and resources to enable accurate reporting for the most common fluorescence light microscopy modalities. We aim to improve microscopy reporting, thus improving the quality, rigor and reproducibility of image-based science.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34099930 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-021-01156-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Methods ISSN: 1548-7091 Impact factor: 28.547