Literature DB >> 3614792

Sex differences in polysaccharide and sugar preferences in rats.

A Sclafani, H Hertwig, M Vigorito, M B Feigin.   

Abstract

The preferences of adult male and female rats for sucrose and polysaccharide (Polycose) solutions were measured in three experiments. In Experiment 1, male and female rats did not differ in their preference for molar solutions of sucrose or Polycose as measured by 24-hr solution vs. water tests. In Experiment 2, however, male rats displayed a greater preference for Polycose, and females a greater preference for sucrose as measured in 3-min and 30-min/day sucrose vs. Polycose tests. Both sexes preferred Polycose to sucrose at low concentrations, but switched their preference at higher concentrations. Experiment 3 revealed that both male and female rats strongly preferred 32% sucrose to 32% Polycose in 30-min/day two-solution tests, but this preference did not persist when the rats were given 24-hr/day access to the two solutions. Male rats lost their sucrose preference, while female rats developed a preference for Polycose over sucrose. The sexes also differed in that the female rats increased their total caloric intake more and consumed proportionately more carbohydrate than did the male rats during the 24-hr/day test. The findings demonstrate that while both male and female rats have an avid appetite for polysaccharide and sucrose solutions, they differ in their short-term and long-term relative preferences for the two carbohydrates, as well as in their caloric and diet selection responses to the carbohydrate solutions. The possible functional significance of these sex differences are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3614792     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(87)80032-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  15 in total

1.  Rats' preferences for high fructose corn syrup vs. sucrose and sugar mixtures.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-01-12

Review 2.  Sex differences in the physiology of eating.

Authors:  Lori Asarian; Nori Geary
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Bisphenol-A exposure during adolescence leads to enduring alterations in cognition and dendritic spine density in adult male and female rats.

Authors:  Rachel E Bowman; Victoria Luine; Samantha Diaz Weinstein; Hameda Khandaker; Sarah DeWolf; Maya Frankfurt
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.587

4.  Oxycodone self-administration in male and female rats.

Authors:  Maria Mavrikaki; Marco Pravetoni; Sarah Page; David Potter; Elena Chartoff
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-12

6.  Sucrose taste but not Polycose taste conditions flavor preferences in rats.

Authors:  Kristine B Bonacchi; Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-06-17

7.  Behavioral and monoamine perturbations in adult male mice with chronic inflammation induced by repeated peripheral lipopolysaccharide administration.

Authors:  Saritha Krishna; Celia A Dodd; Nikolay M Filipov
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Preferences of 14 rat strains for 17 taste compounds.

Authors:  Michael G Tordoff; Laura K Alarcon; Maureen P Lawler
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-06-29

9.  Linoleic acid increases chorda tympani nerve responses to and behavioral preferences for monosodium glutamate by male and female rats.

Authors:  Jennifer M Stratford; Kathleen S Curtis; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  A quantitative reward prediction error signal in the ventral pallidum.

Authors:  David J Ottenheimer; Bilal A Bari; Elissa Sutlief; Kurt M Fraser; Tabitha H Kim; Jocelyn M Richard; Jeremiah Y Cohen; Patricia H Janak
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.