Maria Mavrikaki1, Marco Pravetoni2, Sarah Page3, David Potter3, Elena Chartoff3. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA, 02478, USA. mmavrikaki@mclean.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Medicine and Pharmacology, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA, 02478, USA.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Oxycodone is one of the most widely prescribed painkillers in the USA. However, its use is complicated by high abuse potential. As sex differences have been described in drug addiction, the present study tested for sex differences in intravenous oxycodone self-administration in rats. METHODS: Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with jugular vein catheters and trained to self-administer oxycodone (0.03 mg/kg/infusion) under fixed ratio 1 (FR1), FR2, and FR5 schedules of reinforcement followed by a dose-response study to assess sensitivity to the reinforcing effects of oxycodone. In separate rats, sucrose pellet self-administration was assessed under an FR1 schedule to determine whether sex differences in oxycodone self-administration could be generalized across reinforcers. In separate rats, oxycodone distribution to plasma and brain was measured after intravenous drug delivery. RESULTS: In the first 3 trials under an FR1 schedule of reinforcement, male rats self-administered more oxycodone than females. In contrast, females self-administered more sucrose pellets. Under FR2 and FR5 schedules, no significant sex differences in oxycodone intake were observed, although female rats had significantly more inactive lever presses. Male and female rats showed similar inverted U-shaped dose-effect functions, with females tending to self-administer more oxycodone than males at higher doses. No significant sex differences were observed in plasma or brain oxycodone levels, suggesting that sex differences in oxycodone self-administration behavior were not due to pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest subtle sex differences in oxycodone self-administration, which may influence the abuse liability of oxycodone and have ramifications for prescription opioid addiction treatment.
RATIONALE: Oxycodone is one of the most widely prescribed painkillers in the USA. However, its use is complicated by high abuse potential. As sex differences have been described in drug addiction, the present study tested for sex differences in intravenous oxycodone self-administration in rats. METHODS: Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with jugular vein catheters and trained to self-administer oxycodone (0.03 mg/kg/infusion) under fixed ratio 1 (FR1), FR2, and FR5 schedules of reinforcement followed by a dose-response study to assess sensitivity to the reinforcing effects of oxycodone. In separate rats, sucrose pellet self-administration was assessed under an FR1 schedule to determine whether sex differences in oxycodone self-administration could be generalized across reinforcers. In separate rats, oxycodone distribution to plasma and brain was measured after intravenous drug delivery. RESULTS: In the first 3 trials under an FR1 schedule of reinforcement, male rats self-administered more oxycodone than females. In contrast, females self-administered more sucrose pellets. Under FR2 and FR5 schedules, no significant sex differences in oxycodone intake were observed, although female rats had significantly more inactive lever presses. Male and female rats showed similar inverted U-shaped dose-effect functions, with females tending to self-administer more oxycodone than males at higher doses. No significant sex differences were observed in plasma or brain oxycodone levels, suggesting that sex differences in oxycodone self-administration behavior were not due to pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest subtle sex differences in oxycodone self-administration, which may influence the abuse liability of oxycodone and have ramifications for prescription opioid addiction treatment.
Entities:
Keywords:
Motivation; Oxycodone; Self-administration; Sex differences; Sucrose reward
Authors: Carrie L Wade; Leandro F Vendruscolo; Joel E Schlosburg; Daniel O Hernandez; George F Koob Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Marilyn E Carroll; Andrew D Morgan; Wendy J Lynch; Una C Campbell; Nancy K Dess Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2002-03-27 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Shayla E Russell; Anna B Rachlin; Karen L Smith; John Muschamp; Loren Berry; Zhiyang Zhao; Elena H Chartoff Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: R Kathryn McHugh; Elise E Devito; Dorian Dodd; Kathleen M Carroll; Jennifer Sharpe Potter; Shelly F Greenfield; Hilary Smith Connery; Roger D Weiss Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2013-01-11
Authors: Patrick M Beardsley; Mario D Aceto; Charles D Cook; Edward R Bowman; Jennifer L Newman; Louis S Harris Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: James D Ryan; Yan Zhou; Natalina H Contoreggi; Farah K Bshesh; Jason D Gray; Joshua F Kogan; Konrad T Ben; Bruce S McEwen; Mary Jeanne Kreek; Teresa A Milner Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: E Andrew Townsend; S Stevens Negus; S Barak Caine; Morgane Thomsen; Matthew L Banks Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Christopher A Blackwood; Michael Leary; Aaron Salisbury; Michael T McCoy; Jean Lud Cadet Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2019-07-24 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Fair M Vassoler; Michelle L Oranges; Anika M Toorie; Elizabeth M Byrnes Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Sarah L Withey; Rachel J Doyle; Erica N Porter; Jack Bergman; Brian D Kangas Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jacques D Nguyen; Yanabel Grant; Kevin M Creehan; Candy S Hwang; Sophia A Vandewater; Kim D Janda; Maury Cole; Michael A Taffe Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Natalie N Nawarawong; Megan Slaker; Matt Muelbl; Alok S Shah; Rachel Chiariello; Lindsay D Nelson; Matthew D Budde; Brian D Stemper; Christopher M Olsen Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 3.386