Literature DB >> 3612019

Tests of transitivity in choices between fixed and variable reinforcer delays.

J E Mazur, D Coe.   

Abstract

This experiment tested for transitivity in pigeons' choices between variable-time (VT) and fixed-time (FT) schedules. In a discrete-trials procedure, a subject chose between two alternatives by making a single key peck. Each choice was between a "standard alternative," which was the same schedule throughout a condition, and an "adjusting alternative," in which the delay to reinforcement was systematically increased or decreased many times a session. These adjustments enabled an approximate indifference point to be identified--the value of the adjusting delay at which the subject chose each alternative about equally often. Each test of transitivity involved four conditions. In one, the standard alternative was a variable-time schedule with a 2-s reinforcer, and the adjusting alternative also delivered a 2-s reinforcer. A second condition was similar except that the adjusting alternative delivered a 5-s reinforcer. The indifference point from each of these conditions was then converted to a fixed-time schedule for subsequent comparisons in the third and fourth conditions, respectively. Each of these last two conditions compared one of the fixed-time schedules (based upon the previous conditions and including their different reinforcer durations) with an adjusting schedule that delivered the alternative reinforcer duration, to determine whether the obtained indifference points would be those predicted from the prior alternative-duration comparisons with the VT schedule. There was little evidence for intransitivity of choice: Averaged across subjects and replications, the obtained indifference points deviated from perfect transitivity by less than 8%, and these deviations were not statistically significant. These results contrast with those of Navarick and Fantino (1972), who found frequent violations of transitivity between periodic and aperiodic schedules using a concurrent-chains procedure with variable-interval schedules in the initial links.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3612019      PMCID: PMC1348312          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  B Duncan; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Transitivity as a property of choice.

Authors:  D J Navarick; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Fixed and variable ratios and delays: further tests of an equivalence rule.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1986-04

9.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total
  17 in total

1.  Pigeons' choices between fixed-interval and random-interval schedules: utility of variability?

Authors:  Matthew E Andrzejewski; Claudia D Cardinal; Douglas P Field; Barbara A Flannery; Michael Johnson; Kathleen Bailey; Philip N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Violations of transitivity: Implications for a theory of contextual choice.

Authors:  Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Violations of stochastic transitivity on concurrent chains: Implications for theories of choice.

Authors:  A Houston
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The representation of economic value in the orbitofrontal cortex is invariant for changes of menu.

Authors:  Camillo Padoa-Schioppa; John A Assad
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-09       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Influences of task concreteness upon transitive responding in humans.

Authors:  M Siemann; J D Delius
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1996

6.  Estimation of indifference points with an adjusting-delay procedure.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Positive urgency is related to difficulty inhibiting prepotent responses.

Authors:  Sheri L Johnson; Jordan A Tharp; Andrew D Peckham; Amy H Sanchez; Charles S Carver
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2016-04-11

8.  Delay discounting and task performance consistency in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Rosalyn Eve Weller; Kathy Burton Avsar; James Edward Cox; Meredith Amanda Reid; David Matthew White; Adrienne Carol Lahti
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  fMRI brain activation during a delay discounting task in HIV-positive adults with and without cocaine dependence.

Authors:  Christina S Meade; Steven B Lowen; Robert R MacLean; Mary D Key; Scott E Lukas
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 10.  Dissecting impulsivity and its relationships to drug addictions.

Authors:  J David Jentsch; James R Ashenhurst; M Catalina Cervantes; Stephanie M Groman; Alexander S James; Zachary T Pennington
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.