| Literature DB >> 36097028 |
Mojtaba Bagherzadeh1, Moein Safarkhani2, Amir Mohammad Ghadiri2, Mahsa Kiani2, Yousef Fatahi3,4,5, Fahimeh Taghavimandi2, Hossein Daneshgar2, Nikzad Abbariki2, Pooyan Makvandi6, Rajender S Varma7, Navid Rabiee8,9.
Abstract
Nanotechnology is one of the most impressive sciences in the twenty-first century. Not surprisingly, nanoparticles/nanomaterials have been widely deployed given their multifunctional attributes and ease of preparation via environmentally friendly, cost-effective, and simple methods. Although there are assorted optimized preparative methods for synthesizing the nanoparticles, the main challenge is to find a comprehensive method that has multifaceted properties. The goal of this study has been to synthesize aminated (nano)particles via the Rosmarinus officinalis leaf extract-mediated copper oxide; this modification leads to the preparation of (nano)particles with promising biological and photocatalytic applications. The synthesized NPs have been fully characterized, and biological activity was evaluated in antibacterial assessment against Bacillus cereus as a model Gram-positive and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a model Gram-negative bacterium. The bio-synthesized copper oxide (nano)particles were screened by MTT assay by applying the HEK-293 cell line. The aminated (nano)particles have shown lower cytotoxicity (~ 21%), higher (~ 50%) antibacterial activity, and a considerable increase in zeta potential value (~ + 13.4 mV). The prepared (nano)particles also revealed considerable photocatalytic activity compared to other studies wherein the dye degradation process attained 97.4% promising efficiency in only 80 min and just 7% degradation after 80 min under dark conditions. The biosynthesized copper oxide (CuO) (nano)particle's biomedical investigation underscores an eco-friendly synthesis of (nano)particles, their noticeable stability in the green reaction media, and impressive biological activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36097028 PMCID: PMC9467996 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19553-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Bio-engineeringly synthesized CuO nanoparticles with various plants extract.
| Metal salt | Plant | Size (nm) | Features | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CuSO4 | 50 | Crystalline | [ | |
| CuSO4 | 10 | Quasi-spherical | [ | |
| CuSO4 | 30 | Spherical | [ | |
| CuSO4 | 75 | Spherical | [ | |
| CuSO4 | 30 | Spherical | [ | |
| CuSO4 | 25 | Spherical | [ | |
| CuSO4 | 20 | Spherical | [ | |
| CuSO4 | 50 | Spherical | [ | |
| CuSO4 | 35 | Spherical | [ | |
| CuSO4 | 35 | Spherical | [ | |
| CuSO4 | 260 | Crystalline | [ | |
| CuSO4 | 170 | Spherical | [ | |
| CuSO4 | 20 | Spherical | [ | |
| CuSO4 | 30 | Spherical | [ | |
| CuSO4 | 35 | Spherical | [ | |
| CuSO4 | 30 | Granular nature | [ | |
| CuSO4.5H2O | 30 | Spherical | [ | |
| CuSO4.5H2O | 20 | Crystalline | [ | |
| CuSO4.5H2O | 35 | Spherical | [ | |
| Cu (NO3)3.6H2O | 55 | Spherical | [ | |
| Cu (NO3)2.3H2O | 300 | Spherical | [ | |
| Cu (NO3)2.3H2O | 20 | Spherical | [ | |
| CuCl2.2H2O | 50 | Spherical | [ | |
| CuCl2.2H2O | 15 | Spherical | [ | |
| CuCl2.2H2O | 20 | Spherical | [ | |
| Cu (CH3COO)2.H2O | 12 | Spherical | [ | |
| Cu (CH3COO)2.H2O | 40 | Spherical | [ | |
| Cu (CH3COO)2.H2O | 45 | Spherical | [ | |
| Cu (CH3COO) | 40 | Spherical | [ | |
| Cu (CH3COO).2H2O | 40 | Spherical | [ |
Recently reported photocatalytic activity of various plant extract mediated CuO nanoparticles.
| Source | Dye | Time (min) | Efficiency (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visible light | Rhodamine B (RB) | 180 | 91 | [ |
| Visible light | Methylene blue (MB) | 150 | 77 | [ |
| Hg lamp λ = 365 | Methylene blue (MB) | 120 | 79.11 | [ |
| Visible light | Crystal violet (CV) | 300 | 97 | [ |
| Sunlight UV light | Methylene blue (MB) | 120 | 96.9 | [ |
| 125 W UV lamp | Methylene orange (MO) | 180 | 94.4 | [ |
Figure 1Schematic illustration for the synthesis of CuO.
Figure 2(A) The FT-IR spectra, (B) the PXRD, (C) the UV–Vis spectra, and (D) the photoluminescence spectra of prepared (nano)particles.
The survey on the recent advancements on the biomedical potentials of the CuO nanoparticles.
| Plant | Functional group (cm−1) | Shape | Size (nm) | UV–Vis | Antibacterial activity | Diffraction peaks (2θ°) | Photocatalytic activity | ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eupatorium odoratum | (O–H, 3976) (C–H, 2936) (C=O, 1618) | Spherical | 12–30 | 211, 305 | – | − | [ | |
| Kalopanax pictus | (N–H, 3467) (C=C, 1584) (C–N, 1360) | Spherical | 26–67 | 368 | – | + | [ | |
| Eichhornia crassipes | (O–H, 3314) (N–H, 1624) (C–O–C, 1217) | Spherical | 15–30 | 310 | – | − | [ | |
| Oak | (3415, O–H) (1654, C=O) | Quasi-cubic | 34 | 590 | (110), (− 111), (111), (− 202), (020), (202), (− 113), (− 311), (220), (004) | + | [ | |
| Terminalia catappa L | (3209, O–H) (2920, C–H) (1557, C=O) | Spherical | 29–103 | 215, 260 372 | (110), (112), (202), (220), (004) | + | [ | |
| Euphorbia pulcherrima | (3384, O–H) (1595, C=O) | Cubic | 19 | 240 | (110), (002), (111), (202), (020), (202), (11–3), (31–1), (113), (004) | − | [ | |
| Rosa canina | (3200–3550, O–H) (1670, C=O) (1405, C=C) | Spherical | 15–25 | 262 | (110), (111), (200), (202), (020), (202), (113), (311), (220), (400) | − | [ | |
| Calotropis procera | (3414, O–H) (2923, C–H) (1598, C=C) | Cylindrical | 46 | 291, 355 | (100), (002), (200), (202), (020), (202), (113), (311), (220), (222) | − | [ | |
| Sambucus nigra | (3300–3500, O–H) (2299, C–H) (1621, C=C) | – | – | 270 | 36, 39, 49, 54, 59, 62, 67, 69, 73, 75 | − | [ | |
| Punica granatum | (3379, O–H) (1577, C=O) | Spherical | 10–100 | 282 | 35, 38, 48, 52, 56, 61, 65, 74 | + | [ | |
| Aloe barbadensis | (3405, O–H) (1538, C=C) (944, C–C) | Spherical | 15–30 | 265, 285 | (110), (111), (200), (202), (020), (202), (113), (311), (220), (400) | − | [ | |
| Sida Rhombifolia | (3439, O–H) (1658, C=C) | Spherical | 10 | 260, 321 | 33, 35, 38, 49, 53, 57, 63, 66, 67 | + | [ |
“− “ and “+ ” represent the absence and presence of the activity.
Figure 3FESEM images of the synthesized CuO: (A–A), CuO–NH2: (B–B), and CuO–NH2 after photocatalysis process: (C–C).
Figure 4The EDS and mapping analysis of prepared nanoparticles, (A–F) CuO, (G–L) CuO–Cl, (M–R) CuO–NH2, and (S–X) CuO–NH2 after photocatalysis activity (CuO–NH2)’. Green: carbon, Red: nitrogen, Gold: oxygen, Violet: chlorine, and Blue: copper.
Figure 5Antibacterial activity of the synthesized (A) CuO, (B) CuO–NH2 (nano)particles.
Figure 6The CuO–NH2 (nano)particles (A) photocatalytic activity on the methylene blue and (B) the efficiency of photodegradation under light or dark condition.
Figure 7Schematic for the MB photodegradation mechanism.
Figure 8The average results of MTT assay after 24 h (A) and 48 h (D) of treatment on HEK-293 cell line. The heat map graphs of MTT assay with various concentration from 0.1 to 1000 µg/mL of different (nano)materials on HEK-293 after 24 h (B) and 48 h (E). The dose-dependent MTT assay results and IC-50 values on HEK-293 after 24 h (C) and 48 h (F) treatment.