| Literature DB >> 32715145 |
Sunday Adewale Akintelu1,2, Aderonke Similoluwa Folorunso3, Femi Adekunle Folorunso4, Abel Kolawole Oyebamiji2,5.
Abstract
Recent development in nanoscience and nanotechnology has contributed to the wide applications of metal and metal oxides nanoparticles in several field of sciences, research institutes and industries. Among all metal oxides, copper oxide nanoparticles (CuONPs) has gained more attention due to its distinctive properties and applications. The high cost of reagents, equipment and environmental hazards associated with the physical and chemical methods of synthesizing CuONPs has been a major setback. In order to puffer solution to the aforementioned challenges by reducing environmental pollution and production of cheaper nanoparticles with good properties and efficiency, this review focus on collection of comprehensive information from recent developments in the synthesis, characterization and applications from previous scientific findings on biological method of synthesizing CuONPs due to the acclaimed advantages of been cheap, environmentally friendly, convenient and possibility of been scale up in into large scale production reported by numerous researchers. Our finding also support the synthesis of CuONPs from plant sources due to relative abundance of plants for the production of reducing and stabilizing agents required for CuONPs synthesis, potential efficiency of plant biomolecules in enhancing the toxicity effect of CuONPs against microbes, prevention of environmental pollution due of nontoxic chemicals and degradation effectiveness of CuONPs synthesized from plant sources. Furthermore, this study provide useful information on the rapid synthesis of CuONPs with desired properties from plant extracts.Entities:
Keywords: Applications; Characterization; Copper oxide nanoparticles; Inorganic chemistry; Plants extracts; Synthesis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32715145 PMCID: PMC7378697 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04508
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Flow chat representing the various methods of synthesis of CuONPs
Characterization techniques for synthesized CuONPs.
| S/N | Techniques | Properties | Parameters | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UV visible spectroscopy | NP formation | Confirmation for the synthesis | [ |
| 2 | Scanning tunneling microscope | Size and morphology analysis | Topology and chemical analysis | [ |
| 3 | Atomic force microscope | Size and morphology analysis | Size, morphology, surface roughness and texture | [ |
| 4 | Scanning electron microscope | Size and morphology analysis | Topology, size, morphology, crystallographic structure and composition | [ |
| 5 | Dynamic light scattering | Size and morphology analysis | Amorphous contents and polymorphism | [ |
| 6 | Transmission electron microscope | Size and morphology analysis | Topology, size, morphology and crystallographic structure | [ |
| 7 | Differential scanning calorimetry | Thermal analysis | Amorphous contents and polymorphism | [ |
| 8 | Fourier transmission infrared spectroscopy | Optical characterization and Functional group analysis | Identification of functional groups | [ |
| 9 | Zeta potential | Surface analysis | Colloidal stability and surface charge | [ |
| 10 | Energy dispersive X-ray | Elemental analysis | Chemical composition and purity | [ |
| 11 | X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy | Elemental analysis | Chemical composition and thickness of coating | [ |
| 12 | X-ray absorption spectrometry | Elemental analysis | Electronic structure and elemental composition | [ |
| 13 | Particle size analysis (PSA) | size analysis | To measure the distribution of size | [ |
Advantages and disadvantages of different methods of CuONPs synthesis.
| Methods | Advantages | Disadvantages | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical | It enhance large scale production. | Generation of non-ecofriendly products, it energy intensive processes, use of toxic solvents as reducing and stabilizing agents. | [ |
| physical | Control crystallinity, shape and production of CuONPs with uniform, controlled sized and high purity are achievable | require high capital costs and consume high energy | [ |
| Biological | This method is cost effectiveness, non-use of toxic materials and simple | using microorganisms is non-attractive due to the requirement of aseptic cultivation and increased production costs at industrial scale | [ |
SPR bands, and functional groups, characterization techniques of biosynthesized CuONPs from some plant sources.
| S/N | Plants name | Plants parts | SPR peak (nm) | Functional group prediction | Techniques for Morphological Assessment | Shape | Size | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leaf | 301 | 3976 | O–H | UV, FTIR, XRD, TEM | spherical | - | [ | |
| 2936 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1618 | C=O | ||||||||
| 2 | Leaf | 305 | 3406 | O–H | UV, FTIR, XRD, TEM | spherical | - | [ | |
| 2838 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1520 | C=C | ||||||||
| 3 | Flower | 350 | 3388 | O–H | UV, FTIR, SEM, TEM, XRD,EDX | spherical | 83 | [ | |
| 1980 | C=O | ||||||||
| 4 | Leaf | 368 | 3,467 | N–H | UV, FTIR, SEM, TEM, EDX, XPS | spherical | 26–67 | [ | |
| 1,584 | C=C | ||||||||
| 1,360 | C–N | ||||||||
| 5 | Leaf | 274 | 3420 | O–H | XUV, FTIR, RD, TEM, and EDX | spherical | 10–50 | [ | |
| 2915 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1625 | C=C | ||||||||
| 6 | Seed | - | - | - | XRD,FESEM,DLS | Irregular | 18.2 | [ | |
| 7 | Fruit | - | 3415 | O–H | UV,FTIR, FESEM,XRD | quasi-cubic | 34 | [ | |
| 1654 | C=O | ||||||||
| 8 | Leaf | 413 | SEM, EDS, UV,XRD, TEM | spherical | 100 | [ | |||
| 9 | Leaf | 310 | 3314 | O–H | UV, FTIR, FESEM, TEM, EDX | spherical | 15–30 | [ | |
| 1624 | N–H | ||||||||
| 1217 | C–O–C | ||||||||
| 10 | Leaf | 305 | 3000–3350 | UV, FTIR, XRD, SEM and FTIR. EDS | spherical | 54–68 | [ | ||
| 820–880 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1357 | C=O | ||||||||
| 11 | Leaf | 350 | 3442 | O–H | UV, FTIR, XRD, SEM, FTIR | spherical | - | [ | |
| 2922 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1616 | C=O | ||||||||
| 12 | Flower | 240 | 3384 | O–H | FTIR, XRD, HRTEM | cubic | 19.2 | [ | |
| 1595 | C=O | ||||||||
| 13 | Leaf | 471 | 3439 | UV, FTIR, XRD, FESEM | spherical | 10 | [ | ||
| 1658 | |||||||||
| 14 | Bark ashes | 385 | 3346 | O–H | UV, FTIR, XRD, FESEM | 26 | [ | ||
| 2900 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1500 | C=O | ||||||||
| 15 | Leaf | 264 | - | - | UV, XRD, EDS, SEM, TEM | 30 | [ | ||
| 16 | Leaf | 372 | 3209 | O–H | UV, XRD, FTIR, SEM, TEM | spherical | 103–29 | [ | |
| 2920 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1557 | C=O | ||||||||
| 17 | Fruits Peel | 282 | 3379 | O–H | UV, XRD, FTIR, SEM | spherical | 10–100 | [ | |
| 1577 | C=O | ||||||||
| 18 | Leaf | 3323 | O–H | UV, XRD, FTIR, SEM,SEAD | - | - | [ | ||
| 1550 | C=C | ||||||||
| 1338 | C–N | ||||||||
| 19 | Fruit | 262 | 3550–3200 | O–H | UV, XRD, FTIR, FESEM, WDX, EDX, TEM | spherical | 15–25 | [ | |
| 1670 | C=O | ||||||||
| 1405 | C=C | ||||||||
| 20 | Leaf | 285 | 3405 | O–H | UV–Vis, PL, FT-IR, XRD, SEM, | spherical | 15–30 | [ | |
| 1538 | C=C | ||||||||
| 944 | C–C | ||||||||
| 21 | Fruit | 278 | 3300–3500 | O–H | UV, XRD, FTIR, | - | - | [ | |
| 2299 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1621 | C=C | ||||||||
| 22 | Leaf | 355 | 3414 | O–H | UV, XRD, FTIR,SEM | cylindrical | 46 | [ | |
| 2923 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1598 | C=C | ||||||||
X-ray photo electron spectroscopy XPS, Selected Area Electron Diffraction (SAED) wavelength-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (WDX).
Figure 2Flow chart showing some applications of CuONPs.
Applications of CuONPs synthesized from plants extracts.
| S/N | Plants name | Plants part | Salt | Applications | Activities | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leaf | copper sulphate | Antibacterial | 12–30 mm | [ | |
| 2 | Leaf | Copper sulphate | Degradation antibacterial activity | 98.89% maximum removal of removal of hazardous dye methylene blue. | [ | |
| 3 | Root | Copper chloride | catalytic activity | Five times efficient catalyst reduction of methylene blue and rhodamine B without decrease in catalytic activity. | [ | |
| 4 | Leaf | Copper nitrate | antibacterial activity | Showed remarkable antibacterial activity against | [ | |
| 5 | Leaf | copper sulphate | Anticancer | cell cycle disruption and upregulation of pro-apoptotic genes in MCF-7 cells | [ | |
| 6 | Leaf | copper sulphate | Antibacterial | Potential ROS generation for interruption of bacterial cells | [ | |
| 7 | bark | Copper nitrate | catalytic activity | effective degradation of methyl blue dye | [ | |
| 8 | Leaf | cupric acetate | Anticancer | remarkable cytotoxic effect of 50% mortality at 50 μg/ml against breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) | [ | |
| 9. | Leaf | copper nitrate | oxidative stress | improved in conditions of oxidative stress | [ | |
| 10. | Leaf | Copper acetate | Antifungal | 86% and 85% inhibition against A. niger and A. flavus at 1000 ppm | [ | |
| 11. | Leaf | Copper sulphate | solar | fast degradation of methylene blue in aqueous solution at room temperature under solar simulator irradiation. | [ | |
| 12 | Leaf | Copper sulphate | Anticancer | It offered an efficient platform for intracellular miRNA delivery and improving therapeutic outcomes for lung cancer | [ | |
| 13 | Leaf | Copper acetate | anticancer activity | cytotoxicity against the tested cancer cell lines without affect the human cell | [ | |
| 14 | Leaf | Copper acetate | anticancer activity | Great cytotoxicity against the tested cancer cell lines | [ | |
| 15 | Leaf | Copper acetate | anticancer activity | High cytotoxicity against the tested cancer cell lines without affect the human cell | [ | |
| 16 | Leaf | Copper acetate | antioxidant | Efficient antioxidant potency | [ | |
| 17 | Leaf | Copper acetate | antioxidant | promising antioxidant potency | [ | |
| 18 | Aerial part | Copper sulphate | photocatalytic activities | CuO NPs display higher catalytic activity compare to Ni@Fe3O4 NPs | [ | |
| 19 | Leaf | Copper sulphate | Antibacterial | Higher antimicrobial activity against the growth of studied infectious pathogens. | [ | |
| 20 | Leaf | Copper sulphate | Antibacterial | CuO NPs offered antibacterial efficacy qualify for utilization in biomedical applications | [ | |
| 21 | Leaf | Copper sulphate | Iron Sensing | The sensing potency of CuONPs towards Fe2+ and Fe3+ was higher than other tested metal ions | [ | |
| 22 | Fruit | Copper sulphate | Sensing and remediation | The CuONPs sensor exhibited quality reproducibility and selectivity towards the analyte | [ | |
| 23 | Leaf | Copper sulphate | cytotoxicity activity | CuONPs exhibit good cytotoxicity activity against MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines | [ | |
| 20 | Husk | Copper acetate | Antibacterial | It showed effective inhibition against the growth of | [ | |
| 21 | Leaf | Copper sulphate | Remediation | promising nanoremediation potential for wastewaters containing heavy metals | [ | |
| 22 | Leaf | Copper sulphate | Remediation | promising properties of nanoremediation of soil, and ground waters | [ | |
| 22 | Leaf | Copper sulphate | Antibacterial | It showed maximum zone of inhibition against urinary tract pathogen at 50 Ng/ml | [ |
Figure 3Probable mechanism of CuONPs toxicity against bacteria.
Figure 4The probable mechanisms of CuONPs induced cytotoxicity in cancer cell lines.
Figure 5A schematic representation of degradation of some pollutants using the CuONPs.