Literature DB >> 3609662

Measurement of upper esophageal sphincter pressure. Effect of acute emotional stress.

I J Cook, J Dent, S Shannon, S M Collins.   

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that resting upper esophageal sphincter pressure is more labile than previously thought, being augmented during rapid manometric pull-through and markedly decreased during sleep and anesthesia. The effect of acute emotional stress on resting upper esophageal sphincter pressure was evaluated in 13 normal subjects with a manometric sleeve assembly. Manometric sideholes were positioned in the pharynx and cervical and thoracic esophagus while the sleeve sensor straddled the upper esophageal sphincter. Subjects were stressed intermittently by 14-min periods of a dichotic listening task. As incentive, a financial reward was offered and made commensurate with performance. Alterations of heart rate, blood pressure, and skin conductance confirmed the effectiveness of the stressor. The overall mean upper esophageal sphincter pressure during control periods was 46.5 mmHg (SEM = 4.7). During stress there was a significant mean increase (11.8 +/- 2.9 mmHg; p = 0.002) in upper esophageal sphincter pressure from control levels, and the pressure increase during the first 2-min epoch of stress was 20.8 +/- 3.9 mmHg (p = 0.0003). Emotional stress causes significant elevation of upper esophageal pressure in normal subjects. This effect is likely to influence resting sphincter pressure measurements, particularly if measurement conditions are stressful to the subject.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3609662     DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90915-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  19 in total

1.  Stress and oesophageal motility in normal subjects and patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  R C Ayres; D A Robertson; K Naylor; C L Smith
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Upper esophageal sphincter tone and reactivity to stress in patients with a history of globus sensation.

Authors:  I J Cook; J Dent; S M Collins
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Esophageal Sensorimotor Function and Psychological Factors Each Contribute to Symptom Severity in Globus Patients.

Authors:  Nathalie Rommel; Lukas Van Oudenhove; Joris Arts; Philip Caenepeel; Jan Tack; Ans Pauwels
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Normal pharyngoesophageal motility. A study of 50 healthy subjects.

Authors:  J A Wilson; A Pryde; A Cecilia; C C Macintyre; R C Heading
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  The use of intraluminal manometry to assess upper esophageal sphincter function.

Authors:  B T Massey
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 6.  Effect of aging on the deglutitive oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal motor function.

Authors:  R Shaker; I M Lang
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 7.  The role of cricopharyngeus muscle in pharyngoesophageal disorders.

Authors:  R K Goyal; S B Martin; J Shapiro; S J Spechler
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Pharyngeal Pressure and Timing During Bolus Transit.

Authors:  Chelsea C Walczak; Corinne A Jones; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 9.  Modern solid state computerized manometry of the pharyngoesophageal segment.

Authors:  J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  Insult of gastroesophageal reflux on airway: clinical significance of pharyngeal nozzle.

Authors:  Zhonggao Wang; Zhiwei Hu; Jimin Wu; Feng Ji; Hongtao Wang; Yungang Lai; Xiang Gao; Yachan Ning; Chengchao Zhang; Zhitong Li; Weitao Liang; Jianjun Liu
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.