| Literature DB >> 36090223 |
Abdelrahim Alqudah1, Esam Y Qnais2, Mohammed A Wedyan2, Muna Oqal3, Mohammed Alqudah4, Rawan AbuDalo1, Nabil Al-Hashimi5.
Abstract
Background: Ceratonia siliqua L. (Leguminosae) has neuroprotective, mutagenic, hypotensive, anti-bacterial, hypoglycaemic, and anti-inflammatory effects through extracts from its leaves. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the anti-nociceptive activity of ethanol extracts of Ceratonia siliqua leaves.Entities:
Keywords: Ceratonia siliqua; Inflammation; Naloxone; Nociception
Year: 2022 PMID: 36090223 PMCID: PMC9449564 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Ceratonia siliqua leaves ethanol extract activity on the non-inflammatory (A) phase and the inflammatory (B) phase in formalin test. In comparison to the control group, Ceratonia siliqua leaves ethanol extract significantly reduced the time of paw licking. One-way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey posthoc (∗<0.05, ∗∗∗<0.001, n = 6).
Figure 2Ceratonia siliqua leaves ethanol extract activity on baseline percent of mice subjected to hotplate test. Baseline percent was increased in the groups received Ceratonia siliqua leaves ethanol extract in comparison to control group. One-way ANOVA test was performed followed by Tukey posthoc (∗<0.05, ∗∗∗<0.001, n = 6).
Naloxone effect on Ceratonia siliqua leaves extracts’ anti-nociceptive activity.
| Type of treatment | Percent of baseline (hotplate test) | formalin-induced late time (Late phase) |
|---|---|---|
| Vehicle | 10 ± 0.79 | 147 ± 11.9 |
| 60 ± 6.9∗∗∗ | 50 ± 5.3∗∗∗ | |
| 59 ± 3.8∗∗∗ | 47 ± 3.5∗∗∗ | |
| 130 ± 10.2∗∗∗ | 33 ± 7.1∗∗∗ | |
| 13 ± 1.4$$$ | 133 ± 14.2$$$ |
Results are represented as mean ± SEM. The % of inhibition was calculated comparing with vehicle group. ∗: compared to control, $ compared to morphine.
Ceratonia siliqua leaves ethanol extract activity on paw oedema induced by carrageenan in mice.
| Swelling volume (ml) (mean ± SEM) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Dose (mg/kg) | 1 h | 2 h | 3 h | 5 h |
| Control | ----- | 1.26 ± 0.04 | 2.31 ± 0.12 | 2.91 ± 0.13 | 1.91 ± 0.04 |
| 10 | 1.24 ± 0.05 | 2.20∗ ± 0.22 | 2.69∗ ± 0.06 | 1.82∗ ± 0.10 | |
| 31.6 | 1.25 ± 0.07 | 2.12∗ ± 0.05 | 2.55∗ ± 0.11 | 1.75∗ ± 0.08 | |
| 100 | 1.24 ± 0.02 | 1.87∗ ± 0.10 | 2.46∗ ± 0.05 | 1.71∗ ± 0.03 | |
| 316 | 1.25 ± 0.05 | 1.56∗ ± 0.11 | 2.23∗ ± 0.03 | 1.59∗ ± 0.12 | |
| Indomethacin | 10 | 0.71∗ ± 0.08 | 1.45∗ ± 0.17 | 1.35∗ ± 0.10 | 0.92∗ ± 0.11 |
Dataset are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc. ∗ Denote a significant difference compared to control (P < 0.05).
Figure 3Ceratonia siliqua leaves ethanol extract activity on paw oedema induced by carrageenan in mice. Paw oedema was reduced in mice received 316 mg/kg Ceratonia siliqua leaves ethanol extract as indicated by area under the curve compared to control. One-way ANOVA test was performed followed by Tukey posthoc (∗<0.05, ∗∗∗<0.001, n = 6).
Ceratonia siliqua leaves ethanol extract effect against cotton pellet granuloma weight in mice.
| Treatment | Extract dose (mg/kg) | Pellet weight (mg) | Percent of inhibition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | ----- | 59.1 ± 1.9 | |
| 10 | 54.3∗ ± 2.1 | 8.1 | |
| 31.6 | 43.6∗ ± 1.1 | 26.2 | |
| 100 | 37.5∗ ± 3.1 | 36.5 | |
| 316 | 27.2∗ ± 4.2 | 54 | |
| Indomethacin | 10 | 23.1∗ ± 1.6 | 61 |
Dataset are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ∗ Denote a significant difference compared to control (P < 0.05).