| Literature DB >> 36080355 |
Haifa A A Omer1,2, Giovanni Caprioli3, Doaa Abouelenein3, Ahmed M Mustafa3, Abdullahi Ibrahim Uba4, Gunes Ak5, Refiye Beyza Ozturk5, Gokhan Zengin5, Sakina Yagi2.
Abstract
Several species within the genera Cassia or Senna have a treasure of traditional medicines worldwide and can be a promising source of bioactive molecules. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the phenolic content and antioxidant and enzyme inhibition activities of leaf methanolic extracts of C. fistula L., C. grandis L., S. alexandrina Mill., and S. italica Mill. The two Cassia spp. contained higher total polyphenolic content (42.23-49.75 mg GAE/g) than the two Senna spp., and C. fistula had significantly (p ˂ 0.05) the highest concentration. On the other hand, the Senna spp. showed higher total flavonoid content (41.47-59.24 mg rutin equivalent per g of extract) than that found in the two Cassia spp., and S. alexandrina significantly (p ˂ 0.05) accumulated the highest amount. HPLC-MS/MS analysis of 38 selected bioactive compounds showed that the majority of compounds were identified in the four species, but with sharp variations in their concentrations. C. fistula was dominated by epicatechin (8928.75 µg/g), C. grandis by kaempferol-3-glucoside (47,360.04 µg/g), while rutin was the major compound in S. italica (17,285.02 µg/g) and S. alexandrina (6381.85). The methanolic extracts of the two Cassia species exerted significantly (p ˂ 0.05) higher antiradical activity, metal reducing capacity, and total antioxidant activity than that recorded from the two Senna species' methanolic extracts, and C. fistula displayed significantly (p ˂ 0.05) the highest values. C. grandis significantly (p ˂ 0.05) exhibited the highest metal chelating power. The results of the enzyme inhibition activity showed that the four species possessed anti-AChE activity, and the highest value, but not significantly (p ≥ 0.05) different from those obtained by the two Cassia spp., was exerted by S. alexandrina. The Cassia spp. exhibited significantly (p ˂ 0.05) higher anti-BChE and anti-Tyr properties than the Senna spp., and C. grandise revealed significantly (p ˂ 0.05) the highest values. C. grandise revealed significantly (p ˂ 0.05) the highest α- amylase inhibition, while the four species had more or less the same effect against the α-glucosidase enzyme. Multivariate analysis and in silico studies showed that many of the identified phenols may play key roles as antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory properties. Thus, these Cassia and Senna species could be a promising source of natural bioactive agents with beneficial effects for human health.Entities:
Keywords: Cassia spp.; Senna spp.; antioxidant; enzyme inhibition; phenolic compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36080355 PMCID: PMC9457634 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27175590
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Total polyphenolic and flavonoid contents of leaf methanolic extracts of the Cassia and Senna species.
| Plant Name | TPC (mg GAE/g) | TFC (mg RE/g) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 49.75 ± 0.37 a | 39.15 ± 0.29 c |
|
| 42.23 ± 0.27 b | 30.38 ± 0.22 d |
|
| 22.25 ± 0.29 c | 59.24 ± 0.08 a |
|
| 21.54 ± 0.28 c | 41.47 ± 0.28 b |
Values are reported as mean ± SD. TPC: total phenolic content; TFC: total flavonoid content; GAE: gallic acid equivalent; RE: rutin equivalent; TE: Trolox equivalent. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences in the samples (p < 0.05).
Content (µg g−1 of dried extract) of bioactive compounds in leaf methanolic extracts of the Cassia and Senna species.
| No | Compound |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gallic acid | 37.80 | 88.03 | 53.98 | 37.53 |
| 2 | Neochlorogenic acid | 0.15 | n.d. | 0.69 | n.d. |
| 3 | Catechin | 1361.85 | 32.94 | 3.19 | n.d. |
| 4 | Procyanidin B2 | 1767.78 | 62.43 | n.d. | 17.20 |
| 5 | Chlorogenic acid | 2.29 | 3.55 | 11.45 | 5.54 |
| 6 | 4-Hydroxy benzoic acid | 200.01 | 466.62 | 364.13 | 258.74 |
| 7 | Epicatechin | 8928.75 | 492.80 | 5.72 | n.d. |
| 8 | 3-Hydroxybenzoic acid | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| 9 | Caffeic acid | 101.65 | 76.69 | 63.16 | 48.40 |
| 10 | Vanillic acid | 179.59 | 207.39 | 102.62 | 155.01 |
| 11 | Resveratrol | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| 12 | Syringic acid | 112.42 | 85.02 | 24.59 | 78.69 |
| 13 | Procyanidin A2 | 35.90 | 7.34 | 3.63 | 4.60 |
| 14 | P-Coumaric acid | 177.89 | 198.16 | 354.55 | 314.18 |
| 15 | Ferulic acid | 21.43 | 5.52 | 49.04 | 7.73 |
| 16 | 3,5-Dicaffeoylquinic acid | 0.67 | n.d. | 0.61 | n.d. |
| 17 | Rutin | 684.39 | 2.89 | 6381.85 | 17,285.02 |
| 18 | Isoquercitrin | 6526.84 | 3169.68 | 2752.63 | 1042.35 |
| 19 | Delphindin 3,5 diglucoside | 4907.12 | 2423.86 | 2071.99 | 810.07 |
| 20 | Phloridzin | 101.26 | 2106.51 | 0.56 | 10.85 |
| 21 | Naringin | 163.84 | 444.87 | n.d. | 16.14 |
| 22 | Quercitrin | 1563.25 | 139.76 | 5.30 | 2.82 |
| 23 | Myricetin | 4.26 | 1.28 | 0.71 | 1.56 |
| 24 | Kaempferol-3-glucoside | 3398.12 | 47,360.04 | 3019.95 | 1082.75 |
| 25 | Ellagic acid | 10.62 | 116.46 | 8.61 | n.d. |
| 26 | Quercetin | 106.15 | 126.86 | 522.83 | 1207.88 |
| 27 | Phloretin | 0.89 | 16.65 | 0.05 | n.d. |
| 28 | Isorhamnetin | 7.83 | 6.92 | 454.47 | 411.96 |
| 29 | Delphindin3-galactoside | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| 30 | Cyanidin-3-glucoside | 18.27 | 24.23 | 56.93 | 11.18 |
| 31 | Petunidin-3-glucoside | n.d. | n.d. | 2.51 | n.d. |
| 32 | Pelargonidin-3-rutinoside | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| 33 | Pelargonidin-3-glucoside | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| 34 | Malvidin-3-galactoside | n.d. | n.d. | 14.19 | n.d. |
| 35 | Hyperoside | 8270.74 | 3634.40 | 3299.95 | 1293.52 |
| 36 | Hesperidin | n.d. | 12.34 | 56.04 | 74.06 |
| 37 | Kaempferol | 28.04 | 49.89 | 16.81 | 37.98 |
| 38 | Trans-cinnamic acid | 177.68 | 3851.66 | 2095.98 | 803.88 |
| Total content | 38,897.47 | 65,214.79 | 21,798.71 | 25,019.64 | |
n.d., not detected.
Antioxidant activity of leaf methanolic extracts of the Cassia and Senna species.
| Plant name | DPPH | ABTS | CUPRAC | FRAP | MCA | PBD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 77.36 ± 0.69 a | 218.44 ± 13.8 a | 215.33 ± 4.37 a | 106.34 ± 5.88 a | 5,68 ± 0.55 c | 1.94 ± 0.13 a |
|
| 34.74 ± 0.26 b | 78.43 ± 0.08 b | 152.79 ± 2.19 b | 62.68 ± 0.24 b | 11.38 ± 0.96 a | 1.48 ± 0.12 b |
|
| 24.74 ± 0.64 c | 54.49 ± 1.28 c | 88.45 ± 2.11 c | 44.02 ± 0.92 c | na | 1.11 ± 0.05 c |
|
| 18.60 ± 0.20 d | 51.98± 0.05 c | 84.60 ± 2.54 c | 44.58 ± 0.26 c | 8.11 ± 0.72 b | 1.07 ± 0.11 c |
Note: Values are reported as mean ± SD. DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS: 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid); CUPRAC: cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity; FRAP: ferric reducing antioxidant power; MCA: metal chelating activity; PBD: phosphomolybdenum. * TE, Trolox equivalents. ** EDTAE, disodium edetate equivalents. Different superscript letters in the same column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Enzyme inhibitory activity of leaf methanolic extracts of the Cassia and Senna species.
| Plant name | AChE | BChE | Tyrosinase | Amylase | Glucosidase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.71 ± 0.20 b | 0.92 ± 0.02 a | 34.51 ± 0.93 b | 0.40 ± 0.02 b | 1.45 ± 0.01 a |
|
| 2.17 ± 0.22 a | 1.15 ± 0.18 a | 46.58 ± 0.32 a | 0.48 ± 0.02 a | 1.44 ± 0.00 ab |
|
| 2.41 ± 0.07 a | na | 15.12 ± 0.59 d | 0.37 ± 0.02 b | 1.43 ± 0.00 b |
|
| 2.05 ± 0.11 ab | 0.64 ± 0.02 b | 21.17 ± 0.38 c | 0.39 ± 0.01 b | 1.44 ± 0.01 ab |
Note: Values are reported as mean ± SD. * GALAE, galanthamine equivalents. ** KAE, kojic acid equivalents. *** ACAE, acarbose equivalents. Different superscript letters in the same column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05); na, not active.
Figure 1Relationship between secondary metabolites and biological activities of the tested extracts. For compound numbers refer to Table 1. The correlation is considered positive and statistically significant (r > 0.7).
Figure 2The biplot obtained from partial least squares regression describing the relationship between chemical compounds and bioactivities. For compound numbers refer to Table 1.
Figure 3(A) Homology modeled structures of glucosidase, and (B) its Ramachandran plot showing the energetically allowed regions. (C) Homology modeled structures of tyrosinase and (D) its Ramachandran plot showing the energetically allowed regions. Binding energy (docking score) values of the top bioactive compounds from two Cassia and two Senna species. The compounds are abbreviated based on their serial number in Table 2.
Figure 4Protein–ligand interactions: (A) ChE:delphindin 3,5 diglucoside; (B) BChE:delphindin 3,5 diglucoside; (C) tyrosinase: isoquercitrin; (D) amylase: phloridzin; and (E) glucosidase:isorhamnetin.
Figure 5ADMET properties of the bioactive compounds extracted from two Cassia and two Senna species predicted using the Biovia DS ADMET prediction toolkit. The four ellipses enclose the area where well-absorbed compounds should be found: at 95 and 99% confidence levels for gastrointestinal absorption (red and green), and for blood–brain barrier penetration (magenta and aqua). The compounds are shown according to their serial number in Table 2.