| Literature DB >> 33946788 |
Maram B Alhawarri1, Roza Dianita1, Khairul Niza Abd Razak1, Suriani Mohamad1,2, Toshihiko Nogawa2,3, Habibah A Wahab1,2.
Abstract
Despite being widely used traditionally as a general tonic, especially in South East Asia, scientific research on Cassia timoriensis, remains scarce. In this study, the aim was to evaluate the in vitro activities for acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitory potential, radical scavenging ability, and the anti-inflammatory properties of different extracts of C. timoriensis flowers using Ellman's assay, a DPPH assay, and an albumin denaturation assay, respectively. With the exception of the acetylcholinesterase activity, to the best of our knowledge, these activities were reported for the first time for C. timoriensis flowers. The phytochemical analysis confirmed the existence of tannins, flavonoids, saponins, terpenoids, and steroids in the C. timoriensis flower extracts. The ethyl acetate extract possessed the highest phenolic and flavonoid contents (527.43 ± 5.83 mg GAE/g DW and 851.83 ± 10.08 mg QE/g DW, respectively) as compared to the other extracts. In addition, the ethyl acetate and methanol extracts exhibited the highest antioxidant (IC50 20.12 ± 0.12 and 34.48 ± 0.07 µg/mL, respectively), anti-inflammatory (92.50 ± 1.38 and 92.22 ± 1.09, respectively), and anti-AChE (IC50 6.91 ± 0.38 and 6.40 ± 0.27 µg/mL, respectively) activities. These results suggest that ethyl acetate and methanol extracts may contain bioactive compounds that can control neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, through high antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-AChE activities.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer; Cassia timoriensis; acetylcholinesterase; anti-inflammatory; antioxidant
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33946788 PMCID: PMC8125573 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26092594
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The chemical structures of rivastigmine, physostigmine, and galantamine.
Screening of phytochemical content of four different extracts of Cassia timoriensis flower.
| No. | Class | Test | HE | EE | ME | AE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alkaloids | Mayer’s test | - | - | - | - |
| Wagner’s test | - | - | - | - | ||
| Dragendorff’s test | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2 | Flavonoids | Alkaline reagent test | + | + | + | - |
| Zn/HCL reduction test | + | + | + | - | ||
| 3 | Tannins | Ferric chloride test | + | + | + | + |
| 4 | Saponins | Frothing test | - | - | - | + |
| 5 | Cardiac glycosides | Keller–Killiani test | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | Anthraquinones glycoside | Borntrager’s test | - | + | - | - |
| 7 | Steroids | Liebermann–Burchard test | + | + | + | - |
| Salkowski test | + | + | + | + | ||
| 8 | Terpenoids | Modified Salkowski test | + | - | + | - |
| 9 | Coumarins | - | + | + | + | - |
| 10 | Quinones | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | Proteins | Millon’s test | - | + | + | + |
| 12 | Carbohydrates | Benedict’s test (reducing sugar) | - | + | + | + |
(+) indicates the presence of a compound class, (-) indicates the absence of a compound class. HE: hexane extract; EE: ethyl acetate extract; ME: methanol extract; AE: aqueous extract.
Total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity of Cassia timoriensis flower extracts.
| Sample | TPC | TFC | Antioxidant Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Inhibition * | IC50 (µg/mL) | |||
| 136.36 ± 9.58 | 300.58 ± 10.78 | 45.18 ± 0.51 | 54.08 ± 0.78 | |
| Ethyl acetate extract | 527.43 ± 5.83 | 851.83 ± 10.08 | 97.80 ± 0.29 | 20.12 ± 0.12 |
| Methanol extract | 321.75 ± 11.33 | 493.92 ± 9.27 | 71.74 ± 0.39 | 34.48 ± 0.07 |
| Aqueous extract | 31.05 ± 7.94 | 61.83 ± 9.10 | 12.18 ± 2.58 | - |
| Ascorbic acid | - | - | 98.73 ± 0.25 | 20.22 ± 0.03 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD, with n = 3; * % Inhibition was measured at a final concentration of 50 µg/mL. DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; GAE: gallic acid equivalent; QE: quercetin equivalent; DW: dry weight.
Figure 2(A) Relationship between total phenolic content and total flavonoid content of Cassia timoriensis extracts. (B) Relationship between total phenolic content and flavonoid content with in vitro bioassays for Cassia timoriensis flower extracts.
In vitro inhibition of protein denaturation by Cassia timoriensis flowers.
| Sample | Concentration | % Inhibition ** |
|---|---|---|
| 100 | 43.13 ± 2.63 | |
| 200 | 85.25 ± 2.50 | |
| Ethyl acetate extract | 100 | 92.38 ± 0.74 |
| 200 | 92.50 ± 1.38 | |
| Methanol extract | 100 | 89.45 ± 1.25 |
| 200 | 92.22 ± 1.09 | |
| Aqueous extract | 100 | 36.76 ± 1.50 |
| 200 | 87.16 ± 2.02 | |
| Indomethacin | 100 | 90.04 ± 0.87 |
| 200 | 91.15 ± 0.32 |
** Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
The activity of Cassia timoriensis against acetylcholinesterase enzymes.
| Sample | % Inhibition * | IC50 (µg/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| Galantamine | 98.64 ± 0.01 | 1.33 ± 0.03 |
| Aqueous extract | 38.32 ± 0.09 | - |
| Methanol extract | 96.55 ± 0.02 | 6.40 ± 0.27 |
| Ethyl acetate extract | 96.87 ± 0.05 | 6.91 ± 0.38 |
| 92.35 ± 0.014 | 12.08 ± 0.95 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3); * % Inhibition at 200 µg/mL.
Qualitative phytochemical tests used for the screening of Cassia timoriensis extracts.
| No. | Class | Test | Method | Positive Result | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alkaloids | Mayer’s test | A few milligrams of each extract were dissolved individually in dilute HCL and filtered. Then, the filtrates were separately treated with Mayer’s, Wagner’s, and Dragendorff’s Reagents to test for the presence of alkaloids. | Turbidity or creamy precipitate | [ |
| Wagner’s test | Yellow–brown precipitate | [ | |||
| Dragendorff’s test | Turbidity or orange–red precipitate | [ | |||
| 2 | Flavonoids | Alkaline test | About 2 mL of 20% NaOH solution was added to 1 mL of alcoholic solution of each plant extract individually. | Observation of intense yellow color | [ |
| Zn/HCl test | A pinch of zinc dust added to 2 mL of the alcoholic solution of sample. Then, a few drops of concentrated HCL were added slowly. | Observation of pink to red color | [ | ||
| 3 | Tannins | Ferric chloride test | About 10 mg of the extracts was boiled in 10 mL of water in a test tube and then filtered. Then, a few drops of 1% ferric chloride wew added to the filtrate. | Hydrolysable tannins give bluish-black color, while condensed give brownish-green color | [ |
| 4 | Saponin | Frothing test | A few milligrams of each extract were mixed separately with 5 mL of distilled water and mixed vigorously. | Persistent foam | [ |
| 5 | Cardiac glycoside | Keller–Killiani test | About 3 mg of each extract was dissolved in 3 mL of concentrated acetic acid. Then, one drop of 5% FeCl3 solution was added, followed by few drops of concentrated sulphuric acid. | A reddish-brown ring forms at the interface | [ |
| 6 | Anthraquinone glycoside | Borntrager’s test | A few milligrams of each extract were treated with dilute HCL and boiled for 5 min, cooled, and shaken with an equal volume of chloroform, benzene, or any other organic layer; then, the organic layer was separated and treated with ammonia. | Pink to red color in aqueous alkaline layer | [ |
| 7 | Steroids | Salkowski’s test | A few milligrams of sample were treated with chloroform and filtered. The filtrates were then treated with a few drops of concentrated sulfuric acid. | Greenish-yellow color indicates the presence of steroids | [ |
| Liebermann–Burchard test | About 2 mg of each extract was dissolved in acetic anhydride, heated, and cooled before adding 1 mL of concentrated sulphuric acid along the test tube’s sides. | Green color indicates the presence of steroids nucleus | [ | ||
| 8 | Triterpenoids | Modified Salkowoski’s test | About 1 mL of each of the four extracts was added to 1 mL of chloroform and filtered to clarify the solution, followed by dropwise addition of a few drops of concentrated sulphuric acid at the wall side of test tube. | Observation of reddish-brown color | |
| 9 | Coumarins | - | To 2 mL of each extract, a few drops of 10% alcoholic NaOH were added. | Observation of yellow color | [ |
| 10 | Quinone | - | To 1 mL of each extract, a few drops of NaOH were added. | Observation of red or blue green color | [ |
| 11 | Protein | Million’s test | A few drops of Million’s reagent were added to 2 mL of each sample and mixed. | Red color or precipitate indicated the presence of protein | [ |
| 12 | Carbohydrate | Benedict’s test | A few drops of Benedict’s reagent were added to an aqueous solution of each plant extract and mixed. | Observation of orange–red color | [ |