| Literature DB >> 36079813 |
Chiu-Li Yeh1,2, Jin-Ming Wu3, Kuen-Yuan Chen3, Ming-Hsun Wu3, Po-Jen Yang3, Po-Chu Lee3, Po-Da Chen3, Sung-Ling Yeh3, Ming-Tsan Lin3.
Abstract
This study compared the efficacies of enteral cholecalciferol and/or intravenous (IV) calcitriol administration on mesenteric lymph node (MLN) cluster-of-differentiation-4-positive (CD4+) T cell distribution and intestinal barrier damage in obese mice complicated with sepsis. Mice were fed a high-fat diet for 16 weeks and then sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Mice were divided into the following sepsis groups: without vitamin D (VD) (S); with oral cholecalciferol 1 day before CLP (G); with IV calcitriol 1 h after CLP (V); and with both cholecalciferol before and IV calcitriol after CLP (GV). All mice were sacrificed at 12 or 24 h after CLP. The findings show that the S group had a higher T helper (Th)17 percentage than the VD-treated groups at 12 h after CLP. The V group exhibited a higher Th1 percentage and Th1/Th2 ratio than the other groups at 24 h, whereas the V and GV groups had a lower Th17/regulatory T (Treg) ratio 12 h post-CLP in MLNs. In ileum tissues, the VD-treated groups had higher tight junction protein and cathelicidin levels, and higher mucin gene expression than the S group at 24 h post-CLP. Also, aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and its associated cytochrome P450 1A1 and interleukin 22 gene expressions were upregulated. In contrast, levels of lipid peroxides and inflammatory mediators in ileum tissues were lower in the groups with VD treatment after CLP. These results suggest that IV calcitriol seemed to have a more-pronounced effect on modulating the homeostasis of Th/Treg subsets in MLNs. Both oral cholecalciferol before and IV calcitriol after CLP promoted cathelicidin secretion, alleviated intestinal inflammation, and ameliorated the epithelial integrity in obese mice complicated with sepsis possibly via VD receptor and AhR signaling pathways.Entities:
Keywords: AhR; T helper cell; calcitriol; cholecalciferol; interleukin-22; mucin; regulatory T cell; tight junction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36079813 PMCID: PMC9460651 DOI: 10.3390/nu14173557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Composition of the high-fat diet.
| Ingredient (g) | High-Fat Diet |
|---|---|
| Casein, lactic | 258.45 |
| L-Cystine | 3.88 |
| Corn starch | - |
| Maltodextrin | 161.53 |
| Sucrose | 94.08 |
| Cellulose | 64.61 |
| Lard | 316.60 |
| Soybean oil | 32.31 |
| Mineral mix 1 | 64.61 |
| Choline bitartrate | 2.58 |
| Vitamin mix 2 | 1.29 |
| Dye | 0.06 |
| Total | 1000 |
| Protein/Fat/Carbohydrates (%) | 20/60/20 |
| Energy density (kcal/g) | 5.21 |
1 The composition of the mineral mixture is listed as follows (g/1000 g): potassium citrate, 330; calcium phosphate, 260; calcium carbonate, 110; sodium chloride, 51.8; magnesium sulfate, 51.52; magnesium oxide, 8.38; ferric citrate 4.2; manganese carbohydrate hydrate, 2.45; zinc carbonate, 1.12; chromium potassium sulfate, 0.39; copper carbonate, 0.21; ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate, 0.06; sodium fluoride, 0.04; sodium selenite, 0.01; potassium iodate, 0.01. 2 The composition of the vitamin mixture is listed as follows (g/100 g): vitamin E acetate, 10; niacin, 3; biotin (1%), 2; pantothenic acid, 1.6; vitamin D3, 1; vitamin B12, 1; vitamin A acetate, 0.8; pyridoxine hydrochloride (HCL), 0.7; riboflavin, 0.6; thiamine HCL, 0.6; folic acid, 0.2; menadione sodium bisulfite, 0.08.
Sequences of oligonucleotide primers used for PCR amplification.
| Gene Name | Primer Sequence (5′ → 3′) | Accession No. |
|---|---|---|
|
| F: GGCTTTCAGCAGTCTGATGTC | AF405563.1 |
| R: CATGAAAGAAGCGTTCTCTGG | ||
|
| F: CAATGAGTTTGGGGAGGTTACTG | NM_009992.4 |
| R: CCCTTCTCAAATGTCCTGTAGTG | ||
|
| F: GGTTCTCCGGAGCTTGTCTG | NM_010009.2 |
| R: AAACTGTGCGAAGTGTCCCA | ||
|
| F: TTTCCTGACCAAACTCAGCA | XM_006513865.4 |
| R: TCTGGATGTTCTGGTCGTCA | ||
|
| F: CACACCGGTCCTCTCGGAAG | NM_178257.2 |
| R: GGCACTTTCCTTGGACAATATCGG | ||
|
| F: ATGCCCACCTCCTCAAAGAC | BC039285.1 |
| R: GTAGTTTCCGTTGGAACAGTGAA | ||
|
| F: TAATGCTGTTGGTGGTCCTG | NM_011575.2 |
| R: CAGCCACGGTTGTTACACTG | ||
|
| F: ACCAGCTCTACGCCAAGATG | NM_009504.4 |
| R: CTTCATGCTGTTCTCCGGCT | ||
|
| F: AACGACCCCTTCATTGAC | M32599.1 |
| R: TCCACGACATACTCAGCAC |
AhR: aryl hydrocarbon receptor; CYP1A1: cytochrome P450 1A1; CYP27B1: cytochrome P450 27B1; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; IL-22: interleukin-22; IL-22Rα: interleukin-22 receptor alpha; Muc2: mucin 2; Tff3: trefoil factor 3; VDR: vitamin D receptor; F: forward; R: reverse.
Figure 1Concentrations of inflammatory mediators in peritoneal lavage fluid after cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) at two time points. IL-1β, interleukin-1β; IL-6, interleukin-6; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; MCP, macrophage chemoattractant protein; S, sepsis group without vitamin D (VD) before or after CLP; G, sepsis group with cholecalciferol gavage before CLP; V, sepsis group with an intravenous calcitriol injection after CLP; GV, sepsis group with both cholecalciferol before and intravenous calcitriol after CLP (n = 8 in each group). Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Differences among groups at the same time point were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance using Tukey’s post hoc test. * Significantly differs from the other groups at the same time point (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Representative flow cytometry plots and percentages of T helper (Th) and regulatory T (Treg) cell subpopulations in mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) after cecal ligation and puncture at two time points. (a) Gating strategy for Th type 1 (Th1), Th2, and Th17. Lymphocytes were first identified based on Side Scatter (SSC) and Forward Scatter (FSC) characteristics. Cluster-of-differentiation-4-positive (CD4+) lymphocytes were gated to analyze the percentages of interferon (IFN)-γ-expressing, interleukin (IL)-4-expressing, and IL-17-expressing CD4 T cells. (b) Gating strategy for Treg cells. Forkhead box p3 (Foxp3)-expressing CD4+ lymphocytes were gated to identify the percentages of Treg cells. (c) Percentages of Th, Th2, Th17, and Treg cell subpopulations and the ratios of Th1/Th2 and Th17/Treg. The groups are described in the legend of Figure 1 (n = 8 in each group). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Differences among groups at the same time point were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance using Tukey’s post hoc test. * Significantly differs from the other groups at the same time point. + Significantly differs from the S and G groups at the same time point (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Concentrations of inflammatory mediators in ileum tissues after cecal ligation and puncture at two time points. IL, interleukin; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; MCP, macrophage chemoattractant protein. The groups are described in the legend of Figure 1 (n = 8 in each group). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Differences among groups at the same time point were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance using Tukey’s post hoc test. * Significantly differs from the other groups at the same time point (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Messenger (m)RNA expression levels of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and cytochrome p450 27B1 (CYP27B1) genes in ileum tissues after cecal ligation and puncture at two time points. mRNA changes were quantitated and analyzed by real-time PCR and were calculated using the comparative CT (2−ΔΔCt) method. mRNA expression levels in the S group were used as a calibrator. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). n = 8 for each group. The groups are described in the legend of Figure 1. Differences among groups at the same time point were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance using Tukey’s post hoc test. * Significantly differs from the other groups at the same time point (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Cathelicidin concentrations in ileum tissues after cecal ligation and puncture at two time points. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). n = 8 for each group. The groups are described in the legend of Figure 1. Differences among groups at the same time point were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance using Tukey’s post hoc test. * Significantly differs from the other groups at the same time point (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1), interleukin (IL)-22, and IL-22 receptor (IL-22R) mRNA levels in ileum tissues after cecal ligation and puncture at two time points. mRNA changes were quantitated and analyzed by real-time PCR and were calculated by the comparative CT (2−ΔΔCt) method. mRNA expression levels in the S group were used as a calibrator. The groups are described in the legend of Figure 1. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 8 for each group). Differences among groups at the same time point were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance using Tukey’s post hoc test. * Significantly differs from the other groups at the same time point. + Significantly differs from the S and G groups at the same time point (p < 0.05).
Figure 7(a) Tight junction protein levels and (b) mRNA levels of mucins in ileum tissues after cecal ligation and puncture at two time points. ZO-1, Zona occludens-1; Muc2, mucin 2; Tff3, trefoil factor 3. mRNA changes were quantitated and analyzed by real-time PCR and were calculated by the comparative CT (2−ΔΔCt) method. mRNA expression levels in the S group were used as a calibrator. The groups are described in the legend of Figure 1. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 8 for each group). Differences among groups at the same time point were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance using Tukey’s post hoc test. * Significantly differs from the other groups at the same time point. + Significantly differs from the S and G groups at the same time point. ‡ Significantly differs from the S group at the same time point (p < 0.05).
Figure 8Thiobarbituric-acid-reactive substance (TBARS) levels in ileum tissues after cecal ligation and puncture at two time points. The groups are described in the legend of Figure 1 (n = 8 in each group). Values are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Differences among groups at the same time point were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance using Tukey’s post hoc test. * Significantly differs from the other groups at the same time point (p < 0.05).