| Literature DB >> 36077015 |
Jaewook Lee1, Ji-Heon Lee1, Jagannath Mondal2, Joon Hwang1,3, Han Sang Kim4, Vinoth Kumar1, Akhil Raj5, Seung Rim Hwang5, Yong-Kyu Lee1,2.
Abstract
Multi-functionalized carbon nanomaterials have attracted interest owing to their excellent synergic properties, such as plasmon resonance energy transfer and surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Particularly, nanoparticle (NP)-decorated graphene (GRP) has been applied in various fields. In this study, silver NP (AgNP)- and magnetic iron oxide NP (IONP)-decorated GRP were prepared and utilized as biosensing platforms. In this case, AgNPs and GRP exhibit plasmonic properties, whereas IONPs exhibit magnetic properties; therefore, this hybrid nanomaterial could function as a magnetoplasmonic substrate for the magnetofluoro-immunosensing (MFI) system. Conversely, exosomes were recently considered high-potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of diseases. However, exosome diagnostic use requires complex isolation and purification methods. Nevertheless, we successfully detected a prostate-cancer-cell-derived exosome (PC-exosome) from non-purified exosomes in a culture media sample using Ag/IO-GRP and dye-tetraspanin antibodies (Ab). First, the anti-prostate-specific antigen was immobilized on the Ag/IO-GRP and it could isolate the PC-exosome from the sample via an external magnetic force. Dye-tetraspanin Ab was added to the sample to induce the sandwich structure. Based on the number of exosomes, the fluorescence intensity from the dye varied and the system exhibited highly sensitive and selective performance. Consequently, these hybrid materials exhibited excellent potential for biosensing platforms.Entities:
Keywords: binary nanoparticle-decorated graphene; cancer diagnosis; cancer-derived exosome; magnetofluoro-immunoassay; magnetoplasmonic graphene; prostate cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36077015 PMCID: PMC9455968 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23179619
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Structure observation of Ag/IO-GRP: SEM images of (A) bare GRP and (B) Ag/IONP-GRP, TEM image of (C) Ag/IO-GRP and EDS results, (D) bright field image, (E) Ag L mapping image, and (F) Fe K mapping image of Ag/MNP-GRP.
Figure 2Physicochemical properties of Ag/IO-GRP: (A) UV/Vis spectrum, (B) Raman spectra, (C) XRD diffraction pattern, (D,E) XPS spectra, and (F) SQUID hysteresis.
Figure 3Tetraspanin characterization of PC-exosomes: (A) concentration of LF-exos and FL images of a dye-tetraspanin-labeled exosome (B) on a CD81 capture spot and (C) on a CD9 capture spot.
Figure 4FL images after LF-exo conjugation with Ag/IO-GRP and AF488-CD9 via antibody and exosome binding: (A) bright field image, (B) FL image, and (C) bright field and FL merged condition image.
Figure 5Disease-specific exosome detection performance based on a magnetofluoro-immunoassay using Ag/IO-GRP and AF488-CD9: (A) sensitivity test and (B) selectivity test against other exosomes.
Comparison of recent research into exosome detection via various detection methods.
| Detection Method | Target Exosome | Detection Range/LOD | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| SERS-based detection | LNCaP-derived exosome | 1.8 × 102–1.8 × 107 NPs/μL | [ |
| 203 NPs/μL | |||
| Aptamer assisted colorimetry | MCF-7-derived exosome | 5.6 × 104–8.9 × 105 NPs/μL | [ |
| 4.5 × 103 NPs/μL | |||
| Localized surface plasmonic resonance-based detection | PD-L1-positive exosome | 1.2 × 103–6.2 × 103 NPs/μL | [ |
| 1.2 × 103 NPs/μL | |||
| FRET-based magnetofluoro-immunoassay | Exosome in serum | 0.88–8.80 mg/mL (total protein of exosome) | [ |
| 0.28 mg/mL | |||
| Magnetofluoro-immunoassay | Non-purified LF-exo | 102–106 NPs/mL | This work |
| 134.32 NPs/mL |
Figure 6Schematic illustration of a Ag/IO-GRP-based MFI system for the detection of cancer-cell-derived exosomes.