| Literature DB >> 35799926 |
Jaewook Lee1, Ji-Heon Lee1, Kushal Chakraborty2, Joon Hwang1,3, Yong-Kyu Lee1,4.
Abstract
In the past few decades, scientists have actively worked on developing effective drug delivery systems (DDSs) as means to control life-threatening diseases and challenging illnesses. In order to develop such DDSs, nanobiotechnological strategies have been introduced, and many nanomaterial-based DDS platforms have been proposed. Among these nanomaterials, DDSs based on exosomes and hybrids of exosomes have been focused upon and developed due to their low toxicity, high bioactivity, and biocompatibility. In this review, we describe the processes involved in drug loading into exosomes and the surface modification of exosomes with treatment agents. Furthermore, we describe the synthesis methods of hybrid exosomes with organic or inorganic nanoparticles. Moreover, we focus on the effective therapeutic applications of exosome-based DDSs against various diseases. In conclusion, we show that exosomes and hybrids of exosomes show excellent drug carrier potential and capacity. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35799926 PMCID: PMC9218984 DOI: 10.1039/d2ra02351b
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1(A) Schematic illustration of the sonication-assisted encapsulation process for PLGA-loaded exosome structure (EM-PLGA) and (B) TEM image of EM-PLGA. Reprinted with permission.[63] Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 2Preparation scheme of engineered exosome-based DDS and its treatment application. Reprinted with permission.[68] Copyright 2020, BioMed Central.
Fig. 3(A) Diagram representing synthesis of AB680-EMVs-aPDL1 and (B) its immunotherapy mechanism. Reprinted with permission.[78] Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Examples of exosome-based DDSs
| Exosome origin | Encapsulated agent | Loading methodology | Loading efficiency (LE)/loading amount (LA) | Application | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw 264.7 | Catalase | (1) Incubation, (2) incubation with saponin, (3) freeze–thaw cycles, (4) sonication, (5) extrusion | LE: (1) 4.9 ± 0.5%, (2) 18.5 ± 1.3%, (3) 14.7 ± 1.1%, (4) 26.1 ± 1.2%, (5) 22.2 ± 3.1% | Parkinson's disease treatment |
|
| A549 | Dye/PEG | Sonication under microfluidics | N/A | Cancer therapy and image |
|
| RAW 264.7 | PTX | Sonication | LE: 19.55 ± 2.48% | Cancer therapy |
|
| HFL-1 | Erastin | Sonication | LA: 3.2 mg erastin per mg protein | Cancer therapy |
|
| Macrophage | PTX | Sonication | LE: 33% | Cancer therapy |
|
| imDC | Curcumin | Sonication | LE: 70% | Parkinson's disease treatment |
|
| (1) HepG2, (2) HDFa, (3) RIN-m | Insulin | Electroporation | LE: (1) 50.75 ± 1.2%, (2) 57.42 ± 5.47%, (3) 49.70 ± 4.32% | Diabetes treatment |
|
| imDC | DOX | Electroporation | LE: 20% | Cancer therapy |
|
| MSC | DOX | Electroporation | LE: 35% | Cancer therapy |
|
| RAW 264.7 | Dex | Electroporation | LE: 11.12 ± 1.82% | Rheumatoid arthritis |
|
| Dendritic cell | miR-140 | Electroporation | LA: 0.03 μmol miR per μg exosome | Osteoarthritis |
|
| Dendritic cell | GAPDH siRNA | Electroporation | LE: 25% | Alzheimer's disease treatment |
|
| M2 macrophage | (1) BSP and (2) IL10pDNA | Electroporation and gene transfection | LE: (1) 29.03% and (2) 6.97% | Rheumatoid arthritis |
|
| Engineered HEK293T | (1) 5-FU and (2) miR-21i | Electroporation and incubation | LE: (1) 3.1% and (2) 0.5% | Cancer therapy |
|
| LIM1215 c | DOX | Incubation | LE: 9.06% | Cancer therapy |
|
| LNCaP l | PTX | Incubation | LE: 9.2 ± 4.5% | Cancer therapy |
|
| MSC | miR-155 inhibitor | Incubation with CaCl2 | LE: 60% | Diabetic wound treatment |
|
| EL 4 | Curcumin | Agitation | LA: 2.9 g cur per g exosome | Brain inflammatory diseases |
|
| THP-1 | (1) DOX and (2) Cho-miR159 | Agitation and shaking | (1) LA: 160 ng DOX per μg exosome | Cancer therapy |
|
| Autologous breast cancer cell | siS100A4/CBSA NP | Extrusion | LE: 86.70 ± 1.22% | Cancer therapy |
|
| HEK293T | Melatonin | Extrusion | LA: 97.1 ng mel per μg exosome | Atopic dermatitis |
|
| HEK293T | DOX | Surface modification with BPA | LE: 35% | Cancer therapy |
|
| Macrophage | (1) anti-PD-L1 and (2) AB680 | (1) Surface modification by PEGylation and (2) extrusion | LE: (1) 5.47 ± 0.36%. (2) 61.0 ± 3.1% | Cancer therapy |
|
| Serum | DOX | Surface modification with strep/biotin | N/A | Cancer therapy |
|
| HUVEC | KV11 peptide | Surface modification with CP05 linker | LE: 83.1% | Pathological retinal angiogenesis |
|
| Engineered Expi293 | Anti-CD3 and Anti-HER2 | Cell engineering | N/A | Cancer therapy |
|
| Engineered HEK293T | Cargo protein–CRY2 protein | Cell engineering and light irradiation | LA: 1.4 molecules per exosome | Protein-based therapy |
|
| Engineered Expi293 | Cargo protein–photocleavable protein | Cell engineering and light irradiation | N/A | Protein-based therapy |
|
Fig. 4Schematic figure of synthesis of MOF–exosome hybrid structure and its anti-tumor activity. Reprinted with permission.[85] Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 5Schematic illustration of the preparation of exosome–DOX–Fe3O4–PDA–MB and its multiple therapeutic applications. Reprinted with permission.[87] Copyright 2021, Elsevier.
Types of hybrid exosome-based DDSs
| Exosome origin | Combined NP | Assembly strategy | Loaded agent | Application | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT26 | Liposome | Freeze–thaw | ICG/R837 | Cancer therapy |
|
| MSC | Liposome | Extrusion | mTHPC | Cancer therapy |
|
| Macrophage | Liposome | Extrusion | DOX | Cancer therapy |
|
| Fibroblast | Liposome | Freeze–thaw | DTX and GM-CSF | Cancer therapy |
|
| L-929 | Liposome | Extrusion | Clodronate | Pulmonary fibrosis treatment |
|
| BMSC | Liposome | Freeze–thaw | Polypyrrole NPs | Peripheral neuropathy treatment |
|
| Murine melanoma cell | Hollow gold NPs | Incubation, freeze–thaw method, sonication and electroporation | N/A | Photothermal cancer therapy and imaging |
|
| HEK293T | Gold NP | Extrusion | N/A | Brain imaging |
|
| MSC | Gold NP | Incubation with PEG | N/A | Brain imaging |
|
| Macrophage | Iron oxide NP | Surface modification with strep/biotin | DOX and miRNA21 | Cancer therapy |
|
| MSC | Iron oxide NP | Cell-mediated process | N/A | Cutaneous wound treatment |
|
| MDA-MB-231 | MOF | Sonication and extrusion | Protein drug | Cancer therapy |
|
| H22 and Bel7402 | MPS | Cell-mediated process | DOX | Cancer therapy |
|
Fig. 6Synthetic scheme of gETL NPs (exosome/liposome hybrid structure) and their anti-tumor activity. Reprinted with permission.[92] Copyright 2020, John Wiley and Sons.
Fig. 7Micro-CT analysis of the hind limbs of the mice from different treatment groups. (a) Representative 3D reconstructed images from each treatment group. (b–g) Bone morphometric parameters of ROI within calcaneus bone (n = 3, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 vs. mice treated with saline, #p < 0.05 is mice treated with Lip/Dex compared to Exo/Dex). Reprinted with permission.[102] Copyright 2020, BioMed Central.
Fig. 8(A) Schematic illustration of the treatment of oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) mouse model, (B) confocal images of retina vasculature stained with IsoB4, (C) vascular area, and (D) neovascularization quantification. Reprinted with permission.[109] Copyright 2021, Ivyspring International Publisher.