Nathan H Dimmitt1, Matthew R Arkenberg2, Mariana Moraes de Lima Perini3, Jiliang Li3, Chien-Chi Lin1. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue School of Engineering & Technology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States. 2. Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, United States. 3. Department of Biology, Purdue School of Science, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States.
Abstract
Hydrogels cross-linked by inverse electron demand Diels-Alder (iEDDA) click chemistry are increasingly used in biomedical applications. With a few exceptions in naturally derived and chemically modified macromers, iEDDA click hydrogels exhibit long-term hydrolytic stability, and no synthetic iEDDA click hydrogels can undergo accelerated and tunable hydrolytic degradation. We have previously reported a novel method for synthesizing norbornene (NB)-functionalized multiarm poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), where carbic anhydride (CA) was used to replace 5-norbornene-2-carboxylic acid. The new PEGNBCA-based thiol-norbornene hydrogels exhibited unexpected fast yet highly tunable hydrolytic degradation. In this contribution, we leveraged the new PEGNBCA macromer for forming iEDDA click hydrogels with [methyl]tetrazine ([m]Tz)-modified macromers, leading to the first group of synthetic iEDDA click hydrogels with highly tunable hydrolytic degradation kinetics. We further exploited Tz and mTz dual conjugation to achieve tunable hydrolytic degradation with an in vitro degradation time ranging from 2 weeks to 3 months. Finally, we demonstrated the excellent in vitro cytocompatibility and in vivo biocompatibility of the new injectable PEGNBCA-based iEDDA click cross-linked hydrogels.
Hydrogels cross-linked by inverse electron demand Diels-Alder (iEDDA) click chemistry are increasingly used in biomedical applications. With a few exceptions in naturally derived and chemically modified macromers, iEDDA click hydrogels exhibit long-term hydrolytic stability, and no synthetic iEDDA click hydrogels can undergo accelerated and tunable hydrolytic degradation. We have previously reported a novel method for synthesizing norbornene (NB)-functionalized multiarm poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), where carbic anhydride (CA) was used to replace 5-norbornene-2-carboxylic acid. The new PEGNBCA-based thiol-norbornene hydrogels exhibited unexpected fast yet highly tunable hydrolytic degradation. In this contribution, we leveraged the new PEGNBCA macromer for forming iEDDA click hydrogels with [methyl]tetrazine ([m]Tz)-modified macromers, leading to the first group of synthetic iEDDA click hydrogels with highly tunable hydrolytic degradation kinetics. We further exploited Tz and mTz dual conjugation to achieve tunable hydrolytic degradation with an in vitro degradation time ranging from 2 weeks to 3 months. Finally, we demonstrated the excellent in vitro cytocompatibility and in vivo biocompatibility of the new injectable PEGNBCA-based iEDDA click cross-linked hydrogels.
Hydrogels cross-linked by inverse electron
demand Diels–Alder
(iEDDA) click reaction are increasingly being developed for applications
in controlled release and cell encapsulation.[1] iEDDA click chemistry, a noncatalytic cycloaddition between an electron-rich
dienophile (e.g., norbornene, trans-cyclooctene) and an electron-poor
diene (e.g., tetrazine, methyltetrazine),[2,3] proceeds
rapidly in ambient conditions and produces a nonlytic adduct with
nitrogen gas as the only byproduct. iEDDA click reactions involving
norbornene (NB) moiety are particularly useful in creating modularly
cross-linked hydrogels owing to the reactivity of NB to free sulfhydryl
groups. For example, our group has reported the development of photopolymerized
thiol-norbornene hydrogels amenable to a secondary tetrazine-norbornene
(Tz-NB) iEDDA click reaction for dynamic hydrogel stiffening.[4]The irreversibility of the iEDDA click
reaction renders the Tz-NB
click hydrogels nonhydrolytically degradable, unless degradation motifs
are intentionally designed/incorporated in the hydrogel network. The
long-term hydrolytic stability of iEDDA hydrogels was demonstrated
recently by Goepferich and colleagues with an 8-arm poly(ethylene
glycol)-tetrazine (PEGTz) and PEG-norbornene (PEGNB) synthesized via
Steglich esterification.[5] As the hydrolysis
rate of ester bonds formed by Steglich esterification is known to
be extraordinarily slow,[6] no noticeable
hydrogel degradation was observed before 100–400 days (depending
on the formulations) and the time for complete gel degradation in
vitro ranged from ∼150 to 500 days. The long-term stability
of Tz-NB click hydrogels could also be attributed to the noncovalent
secondary supramolecular interactions between the Tz-NB adducts. For
example, Alge and colleagues demonstrated slow gelation between the
4-arm PEGNB and linear monofunctional methoxy-PEG-Tz (gel point ∼7
min at 21 °C). Unlike conventional thiol-norbornene cross-linked
PEG-based hydrogels, PEG-based iEDDA cross-linked hydrogels were found
to resist hydrolysis induced by a strong base (0.1 N NaOH).[7,8]If desirable, iEDDA click hydrogels may be rendered enzymatically
degradable via incorporating protease-labile linkers or peptides.
The Anseth group first described the cross-linking of biomimetic peptide-cross-linked
iEDDA click hydrogels using multiarm PEGTz and bis-norbornene-modified
peptide cross-linkers.[9] The Tz-NB hydrogels
reached G′/G″ crossover
within minutes and demonstrated a high cytocompatibility for in situ
encapsulation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). The Mooney
group later modified alginate with Tz or NB groups for their cross-linking
into iEDDA click hydrogels.[10] The cell
adhesive peptide (e.g., CGGGGRGDSP) was photoconjugated to the norbornene
group to permit cell adhesion on the otherwise non-cell-adhesive alginate
hydrogels. As alginate was not degradable by mammalian proteases,
oligopeptide (e.g., GCRD-VPMSMRGG-DRCG)[11,12] or Tz/NB-modified
gelatin (Gel-Tz and Gel-NB) was cross-linked to permit cell-mediated
matrix degradation.[13,14] In particular, gelatin-based
“ClickGels” achieved gelation in minutes, demonstrated
high cell attachment and viability for hMSCs and 3T3 fibroblasts,
were enzymatically degradable, and were capable of being injected
in vivo.[14] Similarly, the Shoichet group
conjugated methylphenyltetrazine (mTz) onto hyaluronic acid (HA-mTz)
via amide coupling, permitting iEDDA click cross-linking of HA-based
hydrogels that were sensitive to hyaluronidase-mediated degradation.[15]In addition to using protease-labile linkers,
iEDDA click cross-linked
hydrogels can be designed to contain linkers susceptible to oxidation,
such as disulfide exchange. For example, the Shoichet group synthesized
dithiopropionic acid dihydrazide (DTP) and methylphenyltetrazine containing
methylcellulose (i.e., MC–DTP-mTz).[16] Addition of glutathione (GSH) to the MC-based iEDDA hydrogels led
to disulfide exchange-induced hydrogel degradation. Similarly, Vu
and colleagues installed the disulfide bond in a bifunctional tetrazine
PEG cross-linker for GSH-triggered release of doxorubicin (DOX), an
anticancer drug, from alginate-based iEDDA click hydrogels.[17] These exogenously triggered degradation strategies,
however, cannot be easily controlled in an in vivo setting, where
hydrogels with pre-engineered degradation kinetics may be beneficial
to tissue regeneration. In this regard, iEDDA click cross-linked hydrogels
with engineered ester hydrolysis kinetics will significantly benefit
the use of iEDDA click hydrogels as injectable and degradable scaffolds
for in vivo tissue regeneration. For example, Lueckgen et al. rendered
the saccharide units of alginate chains susceptible to hydrolysis
via sequential oxidation and reduction, followed by conjugating NB
and Tz to the modified alginates.[18] While
the resulting alginate-based Tz-NB hydrogels were found to undergo
hydrolytic degradation, the degradation was slow and not precisely
engineered.We have previously reported a new class of NB-modified
PEG-based
macromers (i.e., PEGNBCA) for forming thiol-norbornene
photoclick hydrogels with fast and tunable hydrolytic degradation
kinetics.[19] PEGNBCA was synthesized
by reacting the hydroxyl-terminated multiarm PEG with carbic anhydride
(CA). Hydrogels cross-linked by PEGNBCA possessed the same
characteristics of rapid cross-linking and spatiotemporal tunability
afforded by the thiol-norbornene photopolymerization, while providing
accelerated ester hydrolysis rates when compared with conventional
PEGNB hydrogels. Critically, the new PEGNBCA hydrogels
supported in situ encapsulation and growth of cancer cells and stem
cells, including human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). In
this report, we leveraged PEGNBCA to fabricate and engineer
the first PEG-based iEDDA click hydrogels susceptible to accelerated
and highly tunable hydrolytic degradation.
Materials and Methods
Materials
The hydroxyl-terminated 8-arm PEG (20 kDa)
and 4-arm PEG-amino succinic acid (PEG-ASA) (10 kDa) were purchased
from JenKem Technology and Laysan Bio Inc., respectively. Carbic anhydride,
pyridine, dichloromethane (DCM), and 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide
hydrochloride (EDC) were all purchased from Thermo Scientific. 5-Norbornene-2-carboxylic
acid, tetrahydrofuran (THF), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP), and N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC)
were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Tetrazine-amine and methyltetrazine-amine
were purchased from Click Chemistry Tools. N-hydroxylsuccinimide
(NHS) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine
(DIEA) were obtained from Tokyo Chemical Industry (TCI). N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), 1-[bis(dimethylamino)methylene]-1H-1,2,3-triazolo[4,5-b]pyridinium 3-oxide
hexafluorophosphate (HATU), and cold soluble gelatin were purchased
from Alfa Aesar, AnaSpec, and Modernist Pantry, respectively. Calcein-AM
and ethidium homodimer stains were obtained from Biotium. F-actin
stain was purchased from Cytoskeleton, Inc.
Macromer Synthesis and Purification
Synthesis of PEGNB and PEGNBCA
The 8-arm
PEGNB was synthesized according to an established protocol.[20,21] Briefly, 10 parts of norbornene acid were reacted with 5 parts of
DCC in DCM to form norbornene anhydride with dicyclohexylurea as a
byproduct. Dicyclohexylurea was removed through vacuum filtration
with a filter paper (size 52). Norbornene anhydride was then added
dropwise into a flask containing hydroxyl-terminated 8-arm PEG (20
kDa), pyridine (10-fold to −OH), and DMAP (1-fold to −OH).
All reactions occurred under nitrogen gas and the product was precipitated
with diethyl ether and filtered using a fritted glass funnel. The
PEGNB product was redissolved in double-distilled water (DDH2O). The 8-arm PEGNB-carbic anhydride (PEGNBCA) was synthesized
using our published protocol.[19,22] Briefly, the hydroxyl-terminated
8-arm PEG (20 kDa) was reacted with 5-fold carbic anhydride and 0.5-fold
DMAP in THF at 60 °C for 12 h. After 12 h, a second portion of
5-fold carbic anhydride and 0.5-fold DMAP was added and proceed to
react for another 24 h. The PEGNBCA product was precipitated
with diethyl ether and redissolved in DDH2O.
Synthesis of PEGTz, PEG-mTz, and PEG-mTz/Tz
Tetrazine-amine
(Tz-amine) and/or methyltetrazine-amine (mTz-amine) were conjugated
onto the 4-arm PEG-ASA (10 kDa) following a previously reported protocol.[4] Briefly, PEG-ASA and 5-fold HATU was dissolved
in DMF and allowed to react in order to form an active ester. Subsequently,
either 1.2-fold Tz-amine or mTz-amine and 5-fold DIEA were added and
allowed to react for 16 h at room temperature. Similar to PEGTz and
PEG-mTz syntheses, dual-functional PEG-mTz/Tz ratios were obtained
by the one-pot reaction of various molar ratios of methyltetrazine-amine
and tetrazine-amine on the 4-arm PEG-ASA. The feed molar ratios between
mTz-amine and Tz-amine were controlled at 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1.Gel-mTz/Tz synthesis: Cold soluble gelatin solution (0.5 g in 10
mL DDH2O), EDC (0.15 mmol), and NHS (0.15 mmol) were first
added and allowed to react for 30 min. Equal moles of Tz-amine and
mTz-amine (0.075 mmol) were then added to the reaction flask and reacted
overnight. The crude product was dialyzed with SpectraPor regenerated
cellulose dialysis membrane with a molecular weight cutoff (MWCO)
of 3.5 kDa for 3 days, lyophilized, and stored at −20 °C
until use.
Macromer Characterization
The substitution of norbornene
onto the 8-arm PEG was done using 1H NMR (deuterium oxide,
500 MHz, Bruker Advance 500) by obtaining the integral peaks of the
protons on the PEG backbone to the alkene protons on the norbornene
group. Substitution of tetrazine and/or methyltetrazine onto PEG-ASA
and cold soluble gelatin was done using ultraviolet-visible (UV–vis)
spectroscopy against a standard curve (1–0.015 mg/mL) of the
respected ratio of free Tz-amine and/or mTz-amine. At these low concentrations,
both Tz-amine and mTz-amine were completely soluble in water. The
actual ratio of Tz and mTz conjugated onto PEG-ASA was determined
by comparing the integral peaks of the protons on the benzyl ring
to the integral peaks on the methyl group of mTz.
Hydrogel Cross-linking and Degradation
PEGNB or PEGNBCA was cross-linked with PEGTz, PEG-mTz, or PEG-mTz/Tz with
stoichiometric ratios of [Tz] to [Nb] (i.e., R) at 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0
at a fixed PEGNB macromer concentration of 2.5 wt %, as well as different
PEGNB macromer concentrations (i.e., 1.75, 2.5, and 4 wt %) at a fixed
stoichiometric ratio of 1. To prepare hydrogels, 45 μL of polymer
precursor solution was injected between two glass slides separated
by 1 mm Teflon spacers. The slides containing the hydrogel precursor
solution were then placed into a sealed container and allowed to react
for 16 h at room temperature. After 16 h, the hydrogels were swelled
in pH 7.4 phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Using an Anton-Paar MCR102
rheometer fitted with an 8 mm diameter parallel geometry plate, elastic
(G′) and viscous (G″)
moduli of the fabricated hydrogels were evaluated through strain sweep
tests operating at 0.1–5% strain and 1 Hz oscillation frequency.
The gelation kinetics was determined using in situ rheometry performed
with a 25 mm diameter parallel geometry plate. The hydrogel precursor
solution was mixed briefly, and then 200 μL of the solution
was dispensed on the rheology stage. The plate was lowered to a gap
size of 0.2 mm and time sweep was conducted at 1% strain and 1 Hz
frequency over 1 h. In situ rheology was performed either at 25 or
at 37 °C.
Cell Encapsulation and Analysis
hMSC Culture
Adherent human mesenchymal stem cells
(hMSCs) were isolated from donor bone marrow (acquired from Lonza)
and cultured in low-glucose (1 g/L) Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s
medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% antibiotic-antimycotics,
and 1 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). The media was changed
every 3–4 days. Once cell confluency reached ∼80%, cells
were passaged using trypsin. hMSCs were used at passage numbers 4–6.
Cell Encapsulation
All polymers were sterilized by
sterile filtering through a membrane with 0.22 μm pore size.
Detached and dispersed hMSCs were encapsulated in 2.5 wt % PEGNB or
PEGNBCA hydrogels cross-linked with PEG-25mTz/75Tz at R = 0.5. To improve the biocompatibility, 3 wt % Gel-50mTz/50Tz
was reacted 1 h before at 37 °C before gelation occurred. After
7 min of reacting at 37 °C for PEGNBCA hydrogels and
2 min for PEGNB hydrogels, 25 μL of the hydrogel precursor solution
containing hMSCs was placed in open-tip 1 mL syringes. The cell-laden
hydrogels were then allowed to react for another 20 min before being
placed in cell culture media. As before, media changes occurred every
3–4 days.
Live/Dead and F-actin/DAPI Staining
On day 1 and day
14, cell-laden hydrogels were washed with Dulbecco’s PBS (DPBS)
for 5 min. Next, the cell-laden hydrogels were incubated with 0.3
μL/mL of Calcein-AM and 0.26 μL/mL of ethidium homodimer
for 1 h at room temperature protected from light. After 1 h, the cell-laden
hydrogels were washed three times for 5 min using DPBS. On day 14,
the cell-laden hydrogels were washed twice for 5 min with DPBS and
fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 45 min. Fixed cells within the
hydrogel were then stained with 140 nM of F-actin (Acti-stain 555
Fluorescent Phalloidin, Cytoskeleton, Inc.) in the presence of 1%
(v/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.3% (v/v) Triton X100 at 4 °C
overnight. F-actin-stained cells in the hydrogel were washed three
times for 30 min with 1% (v/v) BSA and 0.3% (v/v) Triton X100, and
then counterstained with DAPI for 1 h at room temperature. The stained
cells in the hydrogel were washed with DPBS, and then imaged using
confocal microscopy (Olympus Fluoview, FV1000). For analysis, a total
of three hydrogels were imaged per condition with at least three random
images per gel.
Image Analysis
ImageJ was used to quantify the morphology
of the F-actin/DAPI-stained hMSCs in PEGNB and PEGNBCA hydrogels.
Briefly, images were processed using fill holes and water-shed features.
Subsequently, the analyze particle feature was applied with the appropriate
size threshold set and shape descriptor for each image. Circularity
was calculated using the following equationAspect ratio was also calculated through
ImageJ using the equation
In Vivo Injection and Histological Evaluation
All animal
studies were approved by the Indiana University-Purdue University
Indianapolis School of Science Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
(Approval number: SC303R). A total of six C57BL/6 mice were used.
All polymers were sterilized by sterile filtering through a membrane
with 0.22 μm pore size before injection. PEGNBCA and
PEGNB were prereacted with Gel-mTz/Tz for 1 h at 37 °C. Next,
the PEG-mTz/Tz macromer was added to PEGNBCA/Gel-mTz/Tz
solution and allowed to react for 8 min at 37 °C before injection.
As PEGNB reacted faster, the PEG-mTz/Tz macromer was added to the
PEGNB solution and allowed to react for 2 min at room temperature
before injection. Under sterile conditions, 50 μL of 2.5 wt
% PEGNB or PEGNBCA cross-linked with PEG-25mTz/75Tz with R = 0.8 and 3 wt % Gel-50mTz/50Tz was injected into the
region of the quadriceps muscle of the left hindlimb of each mouse.
The body weights of the mice were measured weekly. After two weeks,
mice were sacrificed and the quadriceps muscle from the left hindlimb
was collected. The collected muscle tissue was fixed in formalin for
one day and subsequently stored in 70% ethanol. Tissue specimens were
embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin and
eosin (HE), CD45 (Cell Signaling Technology, Rabbit mab), and CD68
(Cell Signaling, Rabbit mab). Images were processed using ImageJ to
calculate the area positive for either CD45 or CD68.
Statistics
The data is presented as mean ± standard
error of the mean (SEM). When there are more than two conditions,
one-way ANOVA or two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparison test
was used to determine the statistical significance between groups
when p < 0.05. When there are only two conditions,
unpaired t-test was used to determine the statistical
significance with p < 0.05. Using GraphPad Prism
9, normalized elastic moduli data over time was fitted to a one-phase
decay. From here, khydrolysis constants
and R2 values were obtained.
Results
Cross-linking of PEG-Based iEDDA Click Hydrogels
Norbornene-functionalized
PEG can be synthesized by reacting hydroxyl-terminated
PEG with either 5-norbornene-2-carboxylic acid (NB-acid) or carbic
anhydide (CA) (Figure a). We have previously demonstrated that thiol-norbornene photoclick
hydrogels cross-linked by PEGNBCA degraded unexpectedly
fast.[19] In this work, we sought to exploit
the accelerated degradation of hydrogels cross-linked by PEGNBCA and establish the first hydrolytically degradable PEG-based
iEDDA click hydrogels. We found that the CA synthesis route produced
a high degree of NB substitution efficiency (∼91%, ca. 3.6
mM per wt % macromer), a value similar to that of PEGNB synthesized
through conventional Steglich esterification between PEG and NB-acid
(∼95%, ca. 3.8 mM per wt %) (Figure S1). To afford iEDDA click hydrogel cross-linking, we conjugated mTz-amine
or Tz-amine to the 4-arm PEG-ASA using standard carbodiimide chemistry
with HATU as the acid activator (Figure b). NMR and UV–vis spectophotometry
(at 523 nm) analyses showed that (m)Tz-modified PEGs were synthesized
with a high degree of substitution efficiency (∼85% for PEGTz
to 95% for PEG-mTz, data not shown).
Figure 1
Cross-linking of PEG-based iEDDA click
hydrogels using PEGNB or
PEGNBCA. (a) Synthesis of norbornene-functionalized multiarm
PEG macromers: method 1: PEGNB and method 2: PEGNBCA. (b)
Synthesis of (methyl)tetrazine-functionalized multiarm PEG (R = CH3, PEG-mTz; R = H, PEGTz). (c) iEDDA click reaction between
PEGNBCA and PEGTz/PEG-mTz. (d) In situ rheometry of iEDDA
click hydrogel cross-linking using PEGNBCA with PEGTz or
PEG-mTz. (e) Shear moduli of 2.5 wt % PEGNBCA or PEGNB
cross-linked with either PEGTz or PEG-mTz (R = 1). ***p < 0.001.
Cross-linking of PEG-based iEDDA click
hydrogels using PEGNB or
PEGNBCA. (a) Synthesis of norbornene-functionalized multiarm
PEG macromers: method 1: PEGNB and method 2: PEGNBCA. (b)
Synthesis of (methyl)tetrazine-functionalized multiarm PEG (R = CH3, PEG-mTz; R = H, PEGTz). (c) iEDDA click reaction between
PEGNBCA and PEGTz/PEG-mTz. (d) In situ rheometry of iEDDA
click hydrogel cross-linking using PEGNBCA with PEGTz or
PEG-mTz. (e) Shear moduli of 2.5 wt % PEGNBCA or PEGNB
cross-linked with either PEGTz or PEG-mTz (R = 1). ***p < 0.001.The cross-linking of the iEDDA click hydrogel occurred
upon simple
mixing of PEGNBCA and PEG(m)Tz (Figure c). In particular, when 2.5 wt % of PEGNBCA was mixed with PEG(m)Tz at a stoichiometric ratio (R) of 1, the G′/G″ crossover time was ∼4 min for PEGTz, whereas that
for PEG-mTz hydrogels was slower, at ∼30 min (Figure d). The initial shear moduli
of PEGNBCA/PEGTz hydrogels (G′)
were ∼26 kPa, a value lower than that obtained from hydrogels
cross-linked by conventional PEGNB (G′ ∼
38 kPa, Figure e).
Compared with PEGNB, the lower cross-linking efficiency of hydrogels
cross-linked by PEGNBCA was similar to that observed in
hydrogels prepared from thiol-norbornene photocross-linking.[19] PEGNB hydrogels cross-linked with PEG-mTz showed
a slightly higher but not statistically significant difference in G′ (∼10 kPa) than those cross-linked by PEGNBCA (G′ ∼ 6.5 kPa) (Figure e). After one day
of swelling, the average G′ of PEGNBCA hydrogels cross-linked with PEG-mTz increased to over 8 kPa, whereas,
that of PEGNB hydrogels was essentially the same (data not shown).
Hydrolytic Degradation of PEG-Based iEDDA Click Hydrogels
The degradation of synthetic PEG-based NB-Tz click hydrogels was
possible due to the presence of the ester bond on PEGNB or PEGNBCA (Figure a). However, iEDDA click hydrogels cross-linked by PEGNB and PEGTz
showed little degradation over the course of 80 days (PEGNB + PEGTz)
(Figure b). PEGNB
+ PEG-mTz iEDDA click hydrogels degraded noticeably faster than those
with PEGTz, with a pseudo-first-order hydrolysis rate constant (khyd) of ∼0.0114 day–1 (Table ). More strikingly,
iEDDA click hydrogels cross-linked by PEGNBCA with either
PEGTz or PEG-mTz exhibited a fast hydrolysis rate. Surprisingly, however,
PEGNBCA + PEG-mTz iEDDA click hydrogels degraded much slower
than PEGNBCA + PEGTz hydrogels, with complete degradation
occurring on day 80 and day 18 and khyd values of 0.0481 and 0.1021 day–1, respectively.
Gel fractions were obtained to show a similar degree of cross-linking
efficiency between PEGTz and PEG-mTz with PEGNBCA (Figure S2a). The hydrogel mass was tracked over
time to determine the swelling ratio and the mode of hydrogel degradation
(e.g., surface erosion or bulk degradation; Figure S2b). Due to increased swelling ratio within the 28-day period
for PEGNBCA + PEGTz hydrogels, we reasoned that the hydrogels
degraded following a bulk degradation mechanism.
Figure 2
Hydrolytic degradation
of PEG-based iEDDA click hydrogels. (a)
Hydrolysis scheme. (b) Characterization of hydrogel degradation via
shear moduli change (i.e., G′/G′0) as a function of time. The curves’ fitting
represents the best fit of the pseudo-first-order hydrolytic degradation
kinetics.
Table 1
Pseudo-First-Order Hydrolytic Degradation
Kinetics of iEDDA Click Hydrogels Cross-linked by PEGNB or PEGNBCAa
NB macromer
m(Tz) macromer
khyd (day–1)
ester hydrolysis
half-life
(day)
R2
PEGNB
PEGTz
N/A
+
N/A
–0.35
PEG-mTz
0.0114
++
60.69
0.88
PEGNBCA
PEG-mTz
0.0481
+++
14.41
0.97
PEGTz
0.1021
++++
6.788
0.86
All NB macromers were fixed at 2.5
wt % with an NB/(m)Tz stoichiometric ratio of 1.
Hydrolytic degradation
of PEG-based iEDDA click hydrogels. (a)
Hydrolysis scheme. (b) Characterization of hydrogel degradation via
shear moduli change (i.e., G′/G′0) as a function of time. The curves’ fitting
represents the best fit of the pseudo-first-order hydrolytic degradation
kinetics.All NB macromers were fixed at 2.5
wt % with an NB/(m)Tz stoichiometric ratio of 1.
Engineering the Cross-linking and Degradation of PEG-Based iEDDA
Click Hydrogels
Encouraged by the discovery that using PEGTz
or PEG-mTz led to strikingly different hydrolytic degradation kinetics
in PEGNB/PEGNBCA-based iEDDA click hydrogels, we synthesized
mTz/Tz dually modified PEG macromers in an attempt to engineer the
degradation kinetics of iEDDA click hydrogels. mTz/Tz dually modified
PEGs were synthesized by controlling the feed ratios of methyltetrazine-amine
(mTz-amine) to tetrazine-amine (Tz-amine), yielding three sets of
macromers with 75–25, 50–50, and 25–75% (% represents
the molar feed ratio of mTz to Tz) (Figure a). The actual functional group ratios were
determined by NMR spectra using the integral peaks from the protons
on the methyl group to the protons on the benzene ring (Figure S3, 85–15, 69–31, and 35–65%,
respectively). PEG-75mTz/25Tz, PEG-50mTz/50Tz, and PEG-25mTz/75Tz
will now be labeled as PEG-85mTz/15Tz, PEG-69mTz/31Tz, and PEG-35mTz/65Tz,
respectively. The substitution efficiencies, as determined spectrophotometrically
(at 523 nm), were ∼93% (ca. 3.7 mM per wt %) for PEG-85mTz/15Tz
and PEG-69mTz/31Tz, and ∼85% (ca. 3.4 mM per wt %) for PEG-35mTz/65Tz.
Figure 3
Cross-linking
of PEGNB/PEGNBCA iEDDA click hydrogels
with dual-functional (m)Tz macromers. (a) Schematics of mTz/Tz dual-functionalized
PEG macromers. (b) In situ rheometry of PEGNB or PEGNBCA (2.5 wt %) gel cross-linking using PEG-50mTz/50Tz at 37 °C
(R = 1). (c) In situ rheometry of PEGNBCA (2.5 wt %) gel cross-linking using PEG-mTz/Tz at different mTz/Tz
ratios at 37 °C. (d) In situ rheometry of PEGNBCA (2.5
wt %) gel cross-linking using PEG-mTz/Tz cross-linkers (R = 1). (f) Effect of (m)Tz/NB molar ratio on the shear moduli of
PEGNBCA hydrogels with different PEG-mTz/Tz macromers.
Hydrogel shear moduli were measured after 1 h of swelling.
Cross-linking
of PEGNB/PEGNBCA iEDDA click hydrogels
with dual-functional (m)Tz macromers. (a) Schematics of mTz/Tz dual-functionalized
PEG macromers. (b) In situ rheometry of PEGNB or PEGNBCA (2.5 wt %) gel cross-linking using PEG-50mTz/50Tz at 37 °C
(R = 1). (c) In situ rheometry of PEGNBCA (2.5 wt %) gel cross-linking using PEG-mTz/Tz at different mTz/Tz
ratios at 37 °C. (d) In situ rheometry of PEGNBCA (2.5
wt %) gel cross-linking using PEG-mTz/Tz cross-linkers (R = 1). (f) Effect of (m)Tz/NB molar ratio on the shear moduli of
PEGNBCA hydrogels with different PEG-mTz/Tz macromers.
Hydrogel shear moduli were measured after 1 h of swelling.In situ rheology was performed to determine the
gelation point
of PEGNBCA compared to PEGNB cross-linked with the PEG-mTz/Tz
cross-linker. The iEDDA click cross-linked PEGNBCA hydrogels
demonstrated slower gelation times with G′/G″ crossover at ∼11 min compared to PEGNB
hydrogels with crossover point at ∼4 min (2.5 wt % PEGNB with
PEG-69mTz/31Tz at R = 1, 37 °C; Figure b). Different gelation times
were observed using the three mTz/Tz cross-linkers (Figure c). The G′/G″ crossover time for 2.5 wt % PEGNBCA cross-linked with PEG-35mTz/65Tz, PEG-69mTz/31Tz, and PEG-85mTz/15Tz
(at R = 1 and 37 °C) was ∼7, ∼11,
and ∼18 min, respectively. Further, the iEDDA click cross-linked
PEGNBCA demonstrated temperature-sensitive gelation behavior
(Figure d). For 2.5
wt % PEGNBCA hydrogels cross-linked with PEG-69mTz/31Tz
(R = 1), the G′/G″ crossover time was ∼24 min at 25 °C compared
to ∼11 min at 37 °C.As with other click-based hydrogels,
the initial G′ could be readily tuned by varying
the polymer weight percent
and the ratio between tetrazine and norbornene (Figure e,f). At a constant R, PEGNBCA cross-linked with PEG-35mTz/65Tz had significantly higher
elastic moduli compared to equivalent hydrogels cross-linked with
PEG-69mTz/31Tz and PEG-85mTz/15Tz. The same trend was observed at
different R ratios besides at R =
2, where the initial G′ for all three macromers
showed no statistically significant difference. Further, no statistical
difference was observed in the gel fraction and initial swelling ratio
of PEGNBCA cross-linked with the various PEG-mTz/Tz hydrogels
(Figure S4a,b). However, hydrogels cross-linked
by PEGNBCA and PEG-85mTz/15Tz supported a slightly higher
mesh size compared to PEGNBCA cross-linked with PEG-69mTz/31Tz
or PEG-35mTz/65Tz (Figure S4c).To
assess the hydrolytic degradation of PEGNBCA-based
iEDDA click hydrogels, the fabricated hydrogels were swelled in PBS
pH 7.4 at 37 °C and elastic moduli were tracked over time. In
general, the degradation kinetics were governed by the supramolecular
interactions between Tz-NB adducts (Figure a) and the hydrolysis kinetics of ester bonds
on PEGNBCA (Figure b). At a lower PEGNBCA concentration (e.g., 1.75
wt %, R = 1), the hydrogels exhibited significant
stiffening during the first week (Figure S5a), followed by accelerated degradation over 30–60 days. In
addition, increasing the mTz content in PEG-mTz/Tz led to slower degradation
(Figure c–h).
At higher PEGNBCA concentration (e.g., 2.5 and 4 wt % at R = 1), no stiffening was observed (Figure S5b,c). At the high R ratio (R = 2), the initial stiffening was not significant (Figure S5d), but at the low R ratio (R = 0.5), significant stiffening was observed
(Figure S5e). Further, the relative content
of mTz/Tz determined the degradation rates (Figure c–h). For instance, for 4 wt % PEGNBCA cross-linked with PEG-35mTz/65Tz, PEG-69mTz/31Tz, and PEG-85mTz/15Tz,
the hydrogels completely degraded within 28, 55, and 80 days with khyd values of 0.1186, 0.0778, and 0.0486 day–1, respectively (Table S1). The hydrolytic degradation of PEGNBCA-based hydrogels
was inversely proportional to the R ratio. For example,
hydrogels cross-linked with PEG-85mTz/15Tz at R =
0.5, 1, and 2 (Figure e) proceeded with khyd values of 0.1930,
0.0532, and 0.0281 day–1, respectively (Table S1). The swelling ratio was tracked over
time as another method for observing the rate of hydrolysis. Over
a 50-day period, PEGNBCA hydrogels cross-linked with PEG-69mTz/31Tz
or PEG-85mTz/15Tz had a swelling ratio twice as large as their initial
values, while PEGNBCA + PEG-35mTz/65Tz hydrogels achieved
the maximum swelling ratio on day 38, followed by complete degradation
the next day (Figure S6).
Figure 4
Hydrolytic degradation
of PEGNBCA-based iEDDA click
hydrogels. (a) Schematic of delayed supramolecular interactions of
PEG-mTz with PEGNBCA causing hydrogel stiffening over time.
(b) Schematic of ester hydrolysis of iEDDA PEGNBCA hydrogels
causing hydrogel softening over time. PEGNBCA was cross-linked
with PEG-mTz/Tz ratios of 2.5 wt % with R at 0.5,
1.0, and 2.0 (c: PEG35mTz65Tz, d: PEG-69mTz/31Tz, and e: PEG85mTz15Tz).
PEGNBCA-PEG-mTz/Tz ratio of hydrogels at different weight
percents (1.75, 2.5, and 4 wt %) at R = 1 (f: PEG85mTz15Tz,
g: PEG69mTz31Tz, and h: PEG-35mTz/65Tz). The values of G′0 were obtained on day 0 after 1 h of swelling.
Hydrolytic degradation
of PEGNBCA-based iEDDA click
hydrogels. (a) Schematic of delayed supramolecular interactions of
PEG-mTz with PEGNBCA causing hydrogel stiffening over time.
(b) Schematic of ester hydrolysis of iEDDA PEGNBCA hydrogels
causing hydrogel softening over time. PEGNBCA was cross-linked
with PEG-mTz/Tz ratios of 2.5 wt % with R at 0.5,
1.0, and 2.0 (c: PEG35mTz65Tz, d: PEG-69mTz/31Tz, and e: PEG85mTz15Tz).
PEGNBCA-PEG-mTz/Tz ratio of hydrogels at different weight
percents (1.75, 2.5, and 4 wt %) at R = 1 (f: PEG85mTz15Tz,
g: PEG69mTz31Tz, and h: PEG-35mTz/65Tz). The values of G′0 were obtained on day 0 after 1 h of swelling.
Three-Dimensional (3D) Encapsulation of hMSCs in iEDDA Click
Cross-linked PEG Hydrogels
To test the cytocompatibility
of the iEDDA click cross-linked PEGNBCA hydrogels, hMSCs
were encapsulated in 2.5 wt % PEGNBCA or PEGNB hydrogels
cross-linked by PEG-35mTz/65Tz with R = 0.5. Additionally,
gelatin functionalized with 50mTz/50Tz (3 wt %) was added to provide
cell adhesion and protease-labile sequences. Live/dead staining and
confocal imaging demonstrated the excellent cytocompatibility of both
PEGNBCA and PEGNB-based hydrogels, with both gels supporting
higher than 95% of viable cells one day post encapsulation (Figure a). After 14 days
of culture, hMSCs displayed an extensive spreading morphology only
within the highly degradable PEGNBCA hydrogels, whereas
the cells remained largely rounded in the relatively stable PEGNB
hydrogels. The difference in morphology between the two gel formulations
was evaluated using anti-F-actin and DAPI staining on day 14 (Figure b), which reaffirmed
the extensive spreading morphology of hMSCs within the iEDDA click
cross-linked PEGNBCA hydrogels. Image analysis demonstrated
the statistical difference in aspect ratio and circularity between
the two conditions (Figure c,d). The mass of iEDDA click cross-linked PEGNB and PEGNBCA hydrogels with gelatin was measured in the presence of collagenase
to demonstrate that both hydrogels were equally susceptible to proteolytic
degradation (Figure S7a). Further, strain
sweep tests were performed on day 1, day 7, and day 14 (Figure S7b). Initially, iEDDA click cross-linked
PEGNBCA hydrogels had an average shear modulus greater
than 4 kPa. After 14 days, the average elastic modulus was ∼0.5
kPa. Alternatively, iEDDA click cross-linked PEGNB hydrogels had an
average shear modulus close to 3 kPa. On day 7 and day 14, the average
shear moduli decreased compared to day 1 due to the quick degradation
of gelatin in nonsterile conditions causing the shear moduli to decrease
to ∼2 kPa. The inclusion of the gelatin component was necessary
as it provided cell adhesive ligands and protease degradation sites.
In the presence of encapsulated cells, one could expect that the degradation
of gelatin eventually would lead to reduction of hydrogel cross-linking
density.[13,14] Since the two sets of hydrogels contained
the same amount of gelatin, we reasoned that the spreading morphology
observed in PEGNBCA hydrogels relative to PEGNB hydrogels
may be attributed to accelerated hydrolysis.
Figure 5
Cytocompatibility of
PEGNBCA iEDDA click cross-linked
hydrogels. (a) Representative confocal images of live/dead stained
hMSCs encapsulated in 2.5 wt % PEGNBCA-based iEDDA hydrogels
cross-linked with PEG-35mTz/65Tz at R = 0.5 with
3 wt % Gel-50mTz/50Tz. (b) Representative F-actin staining confocal
images (day 14). hMSCs were encapsulated in 2.5 wt % PEGNBCA. (c) Aspect ratio. (d) Circularity (c, d results obtained from F-actin
staining images).
Cytocompatibility of
PEGNBCA iEDDA click cross-linked
hydrogels. (a) Representative confocal images of live/dead stained
hMSCs encapsulated in 2.5 wt % PEGNBCA-based iEDDA hydrogels
cross-linked with PEG-35mTz/65Tz at R = 0.5 with
3 wt % Gel-50mTz/50Tz. (b) Representative F-actin staining confocal
images (day 14). hMSCs were encapsulated in 2.5 wt % PEGNBCA. (c) Aspect ratio. (d) Circularity (c, d results obtained from F-actin
staining images).
In Vivo Performance of iEDDA Click Cross-linked PEG Hydrogels
To demonstrate the injectability, 2.5 wt % PEGNBCAR = 0.8 cross-linked with PEG-35mTz/65Tz was preincubated
at 37 °C for 10 min followed by injection into a star mold using
a 23 G needle. Less than 10 min later, a gel was formed (Figure S8). To test the in vivo biocompatibility
of the iEDDA click cross-linked PEGNBCA hydrogels, 2.5
wt % PEGNBCA or PEGNB cross-linked with PEG-35mTz/65Tz
was injected subcutaneously into the left hindlimb of C57BL/6 mice.
After two weeks, the mice were sacrificed and immunohistochemical
staining (H&E, CD45, and CD68) was performed. No remnants of PEGNBCA hydrogels were present in any of the histology samples,
indicating complete degradation of the hydrogel before sample recovery.
Gel fragments of PEGNB hydrogels were present in two of the three
samples (Figure S9). While the initial
elastic moduli of the injected iEDDA PEGNB or PEGNBCA hydrogels
were similar (Figure a), after 14 days the average elastic moduli of PEGNBCA hydrogels decreased to ∼2 kPa, while those of PEGNB hydrogels
were significantly higher (∼7.5 kPa, Figure a). No noticeable difference in H&E staining
of the tissue was observed between the two conditions, as shown in
the microscope images (Figure b). CD68 and CD45 staining of histology samples showed higher
macrophage and lymphocyte activity, respectively, in the PEGNB condition
compared to PEGNBCA (Figure c). Image analysis showed a higher percent positive
area of CD68 and CD45 images of the histology samples with PEGNB hydrogel
compared to PEGNBCA (Figure d). In fact, the CD68 percent positive area was statistically
higher in the histology samples with the PEGNB hydrogel compared to
the PEGNBCA hydrogel.
Figure 6
Biocompatibility of PEGNBCA iEDDA click cross-linked
hydrogels. (a) Shear moduli of 2.5 wt % PEGNB or PEGNBCA hydrogels (R = 0.8) cross-linked with PEG-35mTz/65Tz,
with 3 wt % Gel-50mTz/50Tz. (b, c) In vivo tissue response to injectable
PEG-based iEDDA hydrogels. At 14 days post injection, tissues were
explanted and subjected to immunohistochemical staining using (b)
hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and (c) anti-CD68 and anti-CD45 antibodies.
(d) Semiquantitative analysis of histology sections stained positive
with CD68 and CD45.
Biocompatibility of PEGNBCA iEDDA click cross-linked
hydrogels. (a) Shear moduli of 2.5 wt % PEGNB or PEGNBCA hydrogels (R = 0.8) cross-linked with PEG-35mTz/65Tz,
with 3 wt % Gel-50mTz/50Tz. (b, c) In vivo tissue response to injectable
PEG-based iEDDA hydrogels. At 14 days post injection, tissues were
explanted and subjected to immunohistochemical staining using (b)
hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and (c) anti-CD68 and anti-CD45 antibodies.
(d) Semiquantitative analysis of histology sections stained positive
with CD68 and CD45.
Discussion
PEG-based hydrogels with engineered functionality
(e.g., inclusion
of cell adhesive motifs and protease-labile linkages) and degradability
(e.g., hydrolysis, proteolysis, photolysis, etc.) are invaluable in
tissue engineering and drug delivery applications.[23−25] For example,
hydrolytically degradable PEG hydrogels have been used for sustained-release
applications of therapeutics and proteins for wound healing[26−28] and cartilage repair.[29] In particular,
norbornene-functionalized PEG (i.e., PEGNB) is increasingly used in
PEG-based hydrogel fabrication owing to its high cytocompatibility
and dual reactivity towards thiol (in thiol-NB click reactions) and
(m)Tz (NB-(m)Tz click reactions).[4,7,30] We have previously reported an alternative PEGNB
synthesis protocol using CA,[19] an odorless
diacid anhydride containing the NB derivative. CA was conjugated onto
PEG terminal hydroxyl groups via esterification using DMAP as a catalyst.
The CA underwent cyclic desymmetrization, yielding PEGNBCA, a functional macromer with the norbornene group and a carboxylic
acid that can be utilized for additional functionalization (Figure a).[31] Successful synthesis of PEGNBCA and PEGTz/PEG-mTz
permitted bio-orthogonal hydrogel cross-linking via the iEDDA click
reaction (Figure c).
Our previous work showed that thiol-norbornene photoclick hydrogels
cross-linked by PEGNB degraded slowly owing to the slow ester hydrolysis
kinetics.[6] We also showed that replacing
the ester linkage with an amide bond (i.e., PEGNB synthesized by PEG-amine)
led to thiol-norbornene hydrogels resistant to hydrolysis under ambient
conditions.[32] Later, we showed that upon
cross-linking into hydrogels, PEGNBCA-based hydrogels displayed
unexpected fast hydrolytic degradation kinetics,[19] presumably a result of the accelerated hydrolysis of the
ester linkages caused by the neighboring carboxylic acid. We expected
a similar accelerated hydrolytic hydrogel degradation when PEGNBCA was used to cross-link PEGTz or PEG-mTz via the iEDDA click
reaction (Figure a).While both PEGNB and PEGNBCA provided norbornene moiety
for iEDDA click hydrogel cross-linking, the presence of carboxylic
acid on PEGNBCA appeared to slightly reduce the iEDDA hydrogel
cross-linking efficiency (Figure e). In addition to PEGNB and PEGNBCA, we
synthesized two Tz cross-linkers, PEGTz and PEG-mTz, and examined
the hydrolytic stability of these four sets of iEDDA click hydrogels
over 80 days (Figure b). We found that PEGNB + PEGTz hydrogels exhibited exceptional hydrolytic
stability with no noticeable degradation over 80 days. The result,
consistent with the literature, was attributed to the relative stability
of PEGNB-ester bonds formed by Steglich esterification, as well as
the secondary noncovalent bonding between the NB-Tz adducts.[33,34] Interestingly, iEDDA click hydrogels cross-linked by PEG-mTz (PEGNB
+ PEG-mTz group) underwent gradual stiffening (20% higher G′) and subsequently showed significant hydrolytic
degradation in the first 45 days, followed by a less pronounced degradation
afterward. The initial 20% increase in G′
when PEG-mTz was used could be attributed to the slower reaction kinetics
between NB and mTz motifs (Figure d). Following gelation, we reasoned that the presence
of the additional methyl group on mTz disrupted the supramolecular
interactions otherwise observed in the PEGNB + PEGTz hydrogels, hence
permitting the hydrolytic degradation of ester bonds on PEGNB to dominate
the structural instability of the PEGNB + PEG-mTz hydrogels. Of note,
the supramolecular interactions formed between Tz-NB adducts following
the iEDDA click reaction has been reported through experimental efforts
and molecular dynamic simulations.[7] Our
results not only corroborate the literature, but also provide additional
insights into the cross-linking and degradation of iEDDA click hydrogels
using mTz-conjugated macromers.We next examined the hydrolytic
degradation of PEGNBCA-based iEDDA click hydrogels and
found that replacing PEGNB with
PEGNBCA resulted in significant acceleration of hydrogel
degradation, regardless of the PEGTz or PEG-mTz cross-linker. It is
likely that the additional neighboring carboxylic acid on PEGNBCA prevented or reduced the supramolecular interactions otherwise
formed between NB and Tz adducts. Additionally, the presence of the
neighboring carboxylic acid was believed to accelerate the hydrolysis
rate of the ester bond as we have reported previously.[19] The degradation was not pH-dependent as no noticeable
difference in hydrogel degradation was observed when buffered solutions
of pH 2 to pH 12 were used (data not shown). Through exponential pseudo-first-order
decay fitting of the shear moduli data over time,[6,19] we
showed that the khyd for PEGNBCA + PEGTz was more than twice faster than that for the PEGNBCA + PEG-mTz group (Table ). While the additional methyl groups on mTz promoted degradation
of PEGNB-based iEDDA click hydrogels (due to disruption of π–π
stacking),[33,34] they reduced the degradation
rate of PEGNBCA-based hydrogels. In the absence of supramolecular
interactions otherwise formed between NB and Tz (due to the neighboring
carboxylic acid group on PEGNBCA), the presence of hydrophobic
mTz appeared to reduce the ester bond hydrolysis.[35] Taken together, we have presented the first group of PEG-based
iEDDA click hydrogels with pre-engineered hydrolytic degradability.To further explore the tunability of hydrolytically degradable
iEDDA click hydrogels, we synthesized dually modified mTz/Tz PEG to
control the gelation and degradation kinetics. It is known that through
the addition of electron-withdrawing groups on the dienophile (i.e.,
norbornene) and electron-donating groups on the diene (i.e., tetrazine),
the reaction kinetics are slowed.[36] Thus,
we expected PEGNBCA iEDDA click cross-linked hydrogels
to have slower gelation times compared to the equivalent PEGNB hydrogels
(Figure b). Further,
previous studies have shown that hydrogels cross-linked with mTz have
slower gelation times compared to the same hydrogels cross-linked
with Tz.[5] Due to this, we decided to functionalize
Tz and mTz on the same polymer to allow for decreased gelation time
by the fast-reacting tetrazine to form the hydrogel initially, so
that the mTz/NB reaction can occur within the hydrogel network over
time. This design would leave sufficient time for material preparation
in injectable delivery applications while reducing cell sedimentation
during the encapsulation.[37] For all of
the three cross-linkers, relatively quick gelation times were achieved
(in under 20 min; Figure c), which is faster than that of traditional Diels–Alder
reactions.[37] As shown previously,[5,38] the gelation time of iEDDA click cross-linked PEGNBCA hydrogels is temperature sensitive, with a quicker gelation time
at physiological temperature compared to room temperature (Figure d), making them ideal
for injectable applications. Compared to thiol-norbornene cross-linking,[19] a much lower PEG macromer concentration is needed
to achieve high elastic moduli, which is consistent with the literature
(Figure e,f).[7] Further, at low macromer concentrations with R ratio equal to 1, increased shear moduli of iEDDA click
cross-linked hydrogels were observed after day 0, indicating that
the increase in stiffness is possibly from the slow reaction kinetics
of mTz or from the delayed supramolecular interactions from the tetrazine
adducts.[7,8] Due to this, we envisioned that this hydrogel
system may be useful in studying the effect of dynamic stiffening
and subsequent softening on cell fate without external stimuli such
as light or enzyme.[39−41] A highly tunable degradation was achieved through
the PEG-mTz/Tz ratio cross-linkers, with the higher ratio of mTz degrading
slower across all different formulations (Figure c–h). A higher degree of stiffening
was observed when the gels were fabricated with a lower polymer concentration
as these gels were softer and more amenable to supramolecular interactions.
However, these gels still exhibited hydrolytic degradation once they
reached the maximum degree of stiffening. Further, all conditions
adhered closely to the pseudo-first-order kinetics by having R2 values greater than 0.93, excluding 1.75 wt
% PEGNBCA cross-linked with PEG-35mTz/65Tz at R = 1, and displayed a wide range of degradation from 11 days to over
90 days (Table S1). Future work will focus
on developing a mathematical model to predict the hydrolytic degradation
of PEG-based iEDDA click hydrogels.[42,43]Due
to their prevalence in tissue engineering and mechanobiology,[44−47] hMSCs were chosen to assess the cytocompatibility and morphology
within the slow-degrading PEGNB and fast-degrading PEGNBCA iEDDA click cross-linked hydrogels. Within a degrading matrix, we
have shown that hMSCs display a spreading morphology, while in a statically
stiff matrix, hMSCs maintain a round morphology.[48] Similarly, we saw that hMSCs within the hydrolytically
degradable PEGNBCA-based iEDDA click hydrogels exhibited
a spreading morphology, whereas hMSCs within the nondegradable hydrogels
maintained a spherical morphology. Of note, in both hydrogels, mTz/Tz
functionalized (50:50) gelatin was added to promote cell adhesion
and protease-labile sites. Due to the ease of functionalizing (m)Tz
onto biopolymers (i.e., gelatin and hyaluronic acid),[13−15,38] we envision this system to be
highly adaptable for creating modular and biomimetic matrices. Future
studies may utilize this hydrogel system to observe the effect of
dynamic stiffening using Tz/NB chemistry with subsequent softening
from hydrolysis on stem cell differentiation and changes in secretome.[49,50]The spontaneous reaction of Tz/NB iEDDA click chemistry is
ideal
for biomedical applications owing to its specific and high reactivity
under ambient conditions without the need of external stimuli. In
particular, this chemistry has been applied for in vivo applications
including fluorescent imaging,[51,52] ligation of biomolecules,[53,54] and injectable, covalently cross-linked hydrogels.[17,55−57] Due to the fast gelation time and predictable degradation,
we envision PEGNBCA iEDDA click cross-linked hydrogels
to be ideal for injectable hydrogel for delivery applications. Due
to the degrading matrix, we anticipated a lesser degree of immune
response compared to the statically stiff PEGNB hydrogels, consistent
with the literature.[58] Overall, PEGNBCA iEDDA click cross-linked hydrogels produced less of an inflammatory
response, as indicated by the CD45 and CD68 staining and subsequent
image analysis (Figure c,d). Future studies of the PEGNBCA iEDDA click cross-linked
hydrogels can include further functionalization to improve the injectability
by adding either a second network that displays shear-thinning compatibilities
or a thermosensitive functional group.[59−62] Further, since the injectable
hydrogel system displayed excellent cytocompatibility with hMSCs and
can be further functionalized through norbornene chemistry, applications
in injectable cell delivery of hMSCs for musculoskeletal regeneration
should be explored.
Conclusions
We have developed the first hydrolytically
degradable PEG-based
iEDDA click hydrogels with pre-engineered and highly tunable degradation
kinetics. Accelerated hydrogel degradation was conferred by the new
PEGNBCA macromer cross-linked with the PEG-(m)Tz via iEDDA
reaction. PEGNBCA + PEG-mTz hydrogels displayed a two times
slower rate of hydrolysis compared to PEGNBCA + PEGTz.
Due to this difference, mTz/Tz cross-linkers were synthesized and
cross-linked with PEGNBCA, proving that the ratio of mTz/Tz
is an effective method for achieving a wide range of degradation from
a few weeks to more than several months. The iEDDA click cross-linked
PEGNBCA hydrogels were highly cytocompatible in vitro and
displayed a spreading morphology of hMSCs most likely due to the accelerated
hydrolysis. Further, the new iEDDA hydrogels were capable of being
injected and were highly compatible in vivo. We expect that this new
PEG-based iEDDA hydrogel system will contribute to the field of degradable
hydrogels for tissue regeneration and drug/cell delivery applications.
Authors: Rajiv M Desai; Sandeep T Koshy; Scott A Hilderbrand; David J Mooney; Neel S Joshi Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2015-02-14 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: M Mario Perera; Prathyusha Chimala; Abdul Elhusain-Elnegres; Paul Heaton; Neil Ayres Journal: ACS Macro Lett Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 6.903
Authors: Sandeep T Koshy; Rajiv M Desai; Pascal Joly; Jianyu Li; Rishi K Bagrodia; Sarah A Lewin; Neel S Joshi; David J Mooney Journal: Adv Healthc Mater Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 9.933
Authors: Benjamin D Fairbanks; Michael P Schwartz; Alexandra E Halevi; Charles R Nuttelman; Christopher N Bowman; Kristi S Anseth Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2009-10-07 Impact factor: 30.849