Literature DB >> 36068364

Factors influencing the effect of external cephalic version: a retrospective nationwide cohort analysis.

Ambrogio P Londero1, Anjeza Xholli2, Claudia Massarotti2, Arrigo Fruscalzo3, Angelo Cagnacci2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the factors associated with the success and failure rate of the external cephalic version (ECV) in breech fetuses. Secondary outcomes were fetal presentation in labor and mode of delivery.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study examined the live birth certificates from 2003 through 2020 from US states and territories that implemented the 2003 revision. A total of 149,671 singleton pregnancies with information about ECV success or failure were included. The outcome was ECV success/failure, while the exposures were possible factors associated with the outcome.
RESULTS: The successful ECV procedures were 96,137 (64.23%). Among the successful ECV procedures, the prevalence of spontaneous vaginal delivery was 71.63%. Among the failed ECV procedures, 24.74% had a cephalic presentation at delivery, but 63.11% of these pregnancies were delivered by cesarean section. Nulliparity, female sex, low fetal weight centile, high pre-pregnancy BMI, high BMI at delivery, and high maternal weight gain during pregnancy were associated with an increased ECV failure (p < 0.001). African American, American Indian and Alaska Native race categories were significant protective factors against ECV failure (p < 0.001). Maternal age had a U-shape risk profile, whereas younger maternal age (< 25 years) and old maternal age (> 40 years) were significant protective factors against ECV failure (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of successful ECV procedures and subsequent spontaneous vaginal delivery were found. The present results found nulliparity, maternal race, maternal age, female fetal sex, low fetal weight, and maternal anthropometric features correlated to ECV results. These findings can potentially improve the knowledge about the factors involved in ECV, allowing more informed counseling to the women undergoing this procedure.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breech; Cesarean section; External cephalic version; Female; Male; Operative delivery

Year:  2022        PMID: 36068364     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06763-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.493


  44 in total

1.  In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard.

Authors:  F P Hadlock; R B Harrist; J Martinez-Poyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Prognostic parameters for successful external cephalic version.

Authors:  Assaf Ben-Meir; Yair Erez; Hen Yitzhak Sela; David Shveiky; Avi Tsafrir; Yossef Ezra
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2008-09

3.  Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Florian Ebner; Thomas W P Friedl; Elena Leinert; Amelie Schramm; Frank Reister; Kristian Lato; Wolfgang Janni; Nikolaus DeGregorio
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group.

Authors:  M E Hannah; W J Hannah; S A Hewson; E D Hodnett; S Saigal; A R Willan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-10-21       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Births: Final Data for 2020.

Authors:  Michelle Osterman; Brady Hamilton; Joyce A Martin; Anne K Driscoll; Claudia P Valenzuela
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2021-02

6.  The Charité external cephalic version for leading twin breech without regional anesthesia and tocolysis. A prospective study on feasibility, sonographic assessment and outcomes.

Authors:  Larry Hinkson; Madeleine Schauer; Elisabetta Latartara; Maria Alonso-Espias; Emma Rossetti; Pimrapat Gebert; Susan Hinkson; Wolfgang Henrich
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Maternal outcomes of term breech presentation delivery: impact of successful external cephalic version in a nationwide sample of delivery admissions in the United States.

Authors:  Carolyn F Weiniger; Deirdre J Lyell; Lawrence C Tsen; Alexander J Butwick; BatZion Shachar; William M Callaghan; Andreea A Creanga; Brian T Bateman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Term cesarean breech delivery in the first pregnancy is associated with an increased risk for maternal and neonatal morbidity in the subsequent delivery: a national cohort study.

Authors:  Georg Macharey; Anna Toijonen; Pia Hinnenberg; Mika Gissler; Seppo Heinonen; Volker Ziller
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Association of Maternal Cigarette Smoking and Smoking Cessation With Preterm Birth.

Authors:  Samir Soneji; Hiram Beltrán-Sánchez
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-04-05

10.  A comparison of risk factors for breech presentation in preterm and term labor: a nationwide, population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Anna E Toijonen; Seppo T Heinonen; Mika V M Gissler; Georg Macharey
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.