Literature DB >> 32409926

Term cesarean breech delivery in the first pregnancy is associated with an increased risk for maternal and neonatal morbidity in the subsequent delivery: a national cohort study.

Georg Macharey1, Anna Toijonen2, Pia Hinnenberg2, Mika Gissler3, Seppo Heinonen2, Volker Ziller4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether there is an association between term cesarean breech delivery in the first pregnancy and maternal and neonatal morbidities in the subsequent pregnancy and delivery.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, nationwide Finnish population-based cohort study, including all deliveries from January 2000 to December 2017. We included all women with the first two consecutive singleton deliveries of which the first one was a breech delivery regardless of mode of delivery (n = 11,953), and constructed a data set in which the first two deliveries for these women were connected. The outcomes of the second delivery of the women with a first pregnancy that resulted in cesarean breech delivery at term were compared with women whose first pregnancy resulted in a vaginal breech delivery at term. P-value, odds ratio, and adjusted odds ratio were calculated.
RESULTS: Neonates of a subsequent delivery after cesarean breech delivery had an increased risk for arterial umbilical cord pH below seven, a higher rate of a 5 min APGAR score < 7 and a higher rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission. The women with a history of cesarean section with the fetus in breech presentation were more often in need of a blood transfusion and suffered more often a uterus rupture. In this group, the second delivery was more often a planned cesarean section, an emergency cesarean section, or an instrumental vaginal delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary cesarean breech section in the first pregnancy is associated with adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes in the subsequent delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breech delivery; Caesarean section; Postpartum hemorrhage; Subsequent; Uterine rupture; Vaginal birth after caesarean

Year:  2020        PMID: 32409926     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05575-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  4 in total

1.  Depression, anxiety and stress in women with breech pregnancy compared to women with cephalic presentation-a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Madeleine Schauer; Elisabetta Latartara; Maria Alonso-Espias; Emma Rossetti; Pimrapat Gebert; Wolfgang Henrich; Larry Hinkson
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Factors influencing the effect of external cephalic version: a retrospective nationwide cohort analysis.

Authors:  Ambrogio P Londero; Anjeza Xholli; Claudia Massarotti; Arrigo Fruscalzo; Angelo Cagnacci
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Learning Breech Birth in an Upright Position Is Influenced by Preexisting Experience-A FRABAT Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lukas Jennewein; Dörthe Brüggmann; Kyra Fischer; Florian J Raimann; Hemma Roswitha Pfeifenberger; Lena Agel; Nadja Zander; Christine Eichbaum; Frank Louwen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Pediatrics Consequences of Caesarean Section-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak; Jacek Krzysztof Szymański; Michał Ciebiera; Beata Sarecka-Hujar; Grzegorz Jakiel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.