Literature DB >> 26437955

Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience.

Florian Ebner1, Thomas W P Friedl2, Elena Leinert2, Amelie Schramm2, Frank Reister2, Kristian Lato2, Wolfgang Janni2, Nikolaus DeGregorio2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The external cephalic version (ECV) is one of the options patients presenting with a breech pregnancy should be offered. Various fetal, maternal and other predictors for a successful ECV have been published in the past.
METHODS: This is a retrospective multivariate analysis of our ECV patient database at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the University Hospital Ulm. In an outpatient setting, patients with fetal breech position were routinely offered an ECV attempt after 36 weeks of gestation if the patient was willing to consent. Contraindications for ECV were placental abruption, placenta praevia, uterus malformations, regular contractions, premature rupture of membranes, and non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns.
RESULTS: From January 1st 2010 to July 31st 2013, 444 patients with a minimum of 36 weeks gestational age (i.e. >35 + 6 weeks) attended our clinic with a breech presentation. Of those 118 had an ECV attempt and an extended ultrasound examination within 21 days. In 33 patients the procedure was successful (success rate 28 %). A multivariate binary logistic regression analysis revealed that an increased Amniotic Fluid Index (AFI; p < 0.001), at least one prior vaginal delivery (p = 0.002) or a high estimated fetal weight (p = 0.045) were significant independent predictors for a successful ECV. In our series no delivery occurred within 48 h after the ECV.
CONCLUSIONS: An ECV is a safe procedure. ECV should be offered as an option for the mother-to-be on the basis of an informed consent. Identified fetal and maternal factors can help to estimate the chances of success and in particular multi-parity and increased amniotic fluid seem to be associated with successful ECV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breech; Delivery; ECV; External cephalic version; Position

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26437955     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-015-3902-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  4 in total

1.  Factors influencing the effect of external cephalic version: a retrospective nationwide cohort analysis.

Authors:  Ambrogio P Londero; Anjeza Xholli; Claudia Massarotti; Arrigo Fruscalzo; Angelo Cagnacci
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 2.  Reviving external cephalic version: a review of its efficacy, safety, and technical aspects.

Authors:  Gwang Jun Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-10-08

3.  Clinical analysis of 40 cases of external cephalic version without anesthesia.

Authors:  Zheng Zhi; Lin Xi
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  A prospective study using an individualized nomogram to predict the success rate of external cephalic version.

Authors:  Jing Lin; Wei Liu; Wei Gu; Ye Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.