| Literature DB >> 36066430 |
Lisa Carlson Hanse1,2, Marcell J Tjørnild1,2, Simon G Sørensen2,3, Peter Johansen4, Ignacio Lugones5, Vibeke E Hjortdal6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Residual regurgitation is common after congenital surgery for right ventricular outflow tract malformation. It is accepted as there is no competent valve solution in a growing child. We investigated a new surgical technique of trileaflet semilunar valve reconstruction possessing the potential of remaining sufficient and allowing for some growth with the child. In this proof-of-concept study, our aim was to evaluate if it is achievable as a functional pulmonary valve reconstruction in vitro.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 In vitrozzm321990 ; Congenital; Neo-valve; Pulmonary valve reconstruction; TSVR
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36066430 PMCID: PMC9462423 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivac227
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ISSN: 1569-9285
Figure 1:Illustration of the right heart simulator: (A) atrial chamber; (B) ventricular chamber; (C) compliance chamber; (D) mechanical valve; (E) recirculation tube; (F) piston pump; (G) pulmonary trunk holder, ventricular; and (G) pulmonary trunk holder, main pulmonary artery.
Figure 2:Illustration of the surgical technique used for replacing the native pulmonary cusps with oversized pericardial cusp patches. (A) The oversized cusp patch. Striped lines: the reinforcement areas; (B) excision of the native pulmonary cusps; (C) attachment of the oversized pericardial cusp patch to the base of the annulus using 3 suture loops; dotted line: annulus; (D) parachuting of the leaflet to the base of the annulus; (E) attachment of 1 side of the leaflet to the annulus with continuous suture; (F) attachment of the reinforcement area on the leaflet with horizontal mattresses; (G) penetration of the suture through the pulmonary artery at the level of the leaflet; securing suture from the (H) outside and (I) inside; and (J) attachment with felt pledgets.
In vitro hydrodynamics
| Variable | 4 l/min | 7 l/min |
|---|---|---|
| Flowmax (l/min) | ||
| Native | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 7.3 ± 0.2 |
| Neo-valve | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 7.3 ± 0.2 |
| Flowmin (l/min) | ||
| Native | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 4.0 ± 0.2 |
| Neo-valve | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 3.9 ± 0.5 |
| RVSP (mmHg) | ||
| Native | 29.0 ± 1.8 | 48.6 ± 1.8 |
| Neo-valve | 28.9 ± 1.1 | 48.0 ± 1.5 |
| PASP (mmHg) | ||
| Native | 27.5 ± 2.4 | 47.2 ± 2.3 |
| Neo-valve | 27.4 ± 2.3 | 46.1 ± 2.5 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD.
Flowmax: maximum flow; Flowmin: minimum flow; PASP: pulmonary artery systolic pressure; RVSP: right ventricular systolic pressure; SD: standard deviation.
Figure 3:Grouped bars chart with mean and standard deviation at 4 and 7 l/min: (A) mean systolic pulmonary artery gradient and (B) mean diastolic pulmonary artery gradient.
Figure 4:Box plots and whiskers with median and upper/lower interquartile range × 1.5 depicting (A) GOA and (B) PCSSA for the native valve and neo-valve in both systole and diastole at 4 and 7 l/min, respectively. GOA: geometric orifice area; PCSSA: planimetric cross-sectional sinus area.
Figure 5:Box plots and whiskers with median and upper/lower interquartile range × 1.5 depicting (A) coaptation in all 3 echocardiographic views and (B) billow for each leaflet in all 3 echocardiographic views the native valve and neo-valve at 4 and 7 l/min, respectively.
Figure 6:Box plots and whiskers with median and upper/lower interquartile range × 1.5 depicting (A) the annulus and (B) the STJ for the native valve and neo-valve in both systole and diastole at 4 and 7 l/min, respectively. STJ: sinotubular junction.
Figure 7:Echocardiographic images of the native and the neo-valve in (A) short-axis view and a (B) long-axis view.