Literature DB >> 36045309

The shared signal hypothesis: Facial and bodily expressions of emotion mutually inform one another.

Daniel N Albohn1, Joseph C Brandenburg2, Kestutis Kveraga3,4, Reginald B Adams5.   

Abstract

Decades of research show that contextual information from the body, visual scene, and voices can facilitate judgments of facial expressions of emotion. To date, most research suggests that bodily expressions of emotion offer context for interpreting facial expressions, but not vice versa. The present research aimed to investigate the conditions under which mutual processing of facial and bodily displays of emotion facilitate and/or interfere with emotion recognition. In the current two studies, we examined whether body and face emotion recognition are enhanced through integration of shared emotion cues, and/or hindered through mixed signals (i.e., interference). We tested whether faces and bodies facilitate or interfere with emotion processing by pairing briefly presented (33 ms), backward-masked presentations of faces with supraliminally presented bodies (Experiment 1) and vice versa (Experiment 2). Both studies revealed strong support for integration effects, but not interference. Integration effects are most pronounced for low-emotional clarity facial and bodily expressions, suggesting that when more information is needed in one channel, the other channel is recruited to disentangle any ambiguity. That this occurs for briefly presented, backward-masked presentations reveals low-level visual integration of shared emotional signal value.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bodies; Emotion expressions; Emotion recognition; Faces

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36045309     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02548-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.157


  23 in total

1.  Perceived gaze direction and the processing of facial displays of emotion.

Authors:  Reginald B Adams; Robert E Kleck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-11

2.  Exposure to subliminal arousing stimuli induces robust activation in the amygdala, hippocampus, anterior cingulate, insular cortex and primary visual cortex: a systematic meta-analysis of fMRI studies.

Authors:  S J Brooks; V Savov; E Allzén; C Benedict; R Fredriksson; H B Schiöth
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Effects of direct and averted gaze on the perception of facially communicated emotion.

Authors:  Reginald B Adams; Robert E Kleck
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2005-03

4.  Garner interference reveals dependencies between emotional expression and gaze in face perception.

Authors:  Reiko Graham; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2007-05

5.  The Emotional-Ambiguity Hypothesis: A Large-Scale Test.

Authors:  C J Brainerd
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-08-21

6.  Thrill of victory or agony of defeat? Perceivers fail to utilize information in facial movements.

Authors:  Hillel Aviezer; Daniel S Messinger; Shiri Zangvil; Whitney I Mattson; Devon N Gangi; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2015-05-25

7.  Holistic person processing: faces with bodies tell the whole story.

Authors:  Hillel Aviezer; Yaacov Trope; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-02-20

8.  Social Vision: Applying a Social-Functional Approach to Face and Expression Perception.

Authors:  Reginald B Adams; Daniel N Albohn; Kestutis Kveraga
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-06-14

9.  Understanding face recognition.

Authors:  V Bruce; A Young
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1986-08

10.  What Facial Appearance Reveals Over Time: When Perceived Expressions in Neutral Faces Reveal Stable Emotion Dispositions.

Authors:  Reginald B Adams; Carlos O Garrido; Daniel N Albohn; Ursula Hess; Robert E Kleck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.