Literature DB >> 15755215

Effects of direct and averted gaze on the perception of facially communicated emotion.

Reginald B Adams1, Robert E Kleck.   

Abstract

Research has largely neglected the effects of gaze direction cues on the perception of facial expressions of emotion. It was hypothesized that when gaze direction matches the underlying behavioral intent (approach-avoidance) communicated by an emotional expression, the perception of that emotion would be enhanced (i.e., shared signal hypothesis). Specifically, the authors expected that (a) direct gaze would enhance the perception of approach-oriented emotions (anger and joy) and (b) averted eye gaze would enhance the perception of avoidance-oriented emotions (fear and sadness). Three studies supported this hypothesis. Study 1 examined emotional trait attributions made to neutral faces. Study 2 examined ratings of ambiguous facial blends of anger and fear. Study 3 examined the influence of gaze on the perception of highly prototypical expressions. Copyright 2005 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15755215     DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  134 in total

1.  Effective processing of masked eye gaze requires volitional control.

Authors:  Shahd Al-Janabi; Matthew Finkbeiner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Does it make a difference if I have an eye contact with you or with your picture? An ERP study.

Authors:  Laura M Pönkänen; Annemari Alhoniemi; Jukka M Leppänen; Jari K Hietanen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review.

Authors:  Jennifer L Goetz; Dacher Keltner; Emiliana Simon-Thomas
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Eye-gaze and arrow cues influence elementary sound perception.

Authors:  Jeremy I Borjon; Stephen V Shepherd; Alexander Todorov; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Physiological regulation and social-emotional processing in female carriers of the FMR1 premutation.

Authors:  Molly Winston; Kritika Nayar; Abigail L Hogan; Jamie Barstein; Chelsea La Valle; Kevin Sharp; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Molly Losh
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2019-11-22

Review 6.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of gaze-expression interactions in face processing and social attention.

Authors:  Reiko Graham; Kevin S Labar
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Interaction between trait anxiety and trait anger predict amygdala reactivity to angry facial expressions in men but not women.

Authors:  Justin M Carré; Patrick M Fisher; Stephen B Manuck; Ahmad R Hariri
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 8.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.

Authors:  Alexandra Frischen; Andrew P Bayliss; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Culture, gaze and the neural processing of fear expressions.

Authors:  Reginald B Adams; Robert G Franklin; Nicholas O Rule; Jonathan B Freeman; Kestutis Kveraga; Nouchine Hadjikhani; Sakiko Yoshikawa; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Emotional face processing and emotion regulation in children: an ERP study.

Authors:  Tracy A Dennis; Melville M Malone; Chao-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.