Literature DB >> 30130163

The Emotional-Ambiguity Hypothesis: A Large-Scale Test.

C J Brainerd1.   

Abstract

Valence and arousal are core dimensions of emotion, but the relation between them has eluded scientific consensus. The emotional-ambiguity hypothesis is the first new model of this relation to appear in some years. It introduces the novel principle that the relation between valence and arousal is controlled by a variable that is not traditionally measured: the uncertainty of perceived valence. A comprehensive evaluation of this principle was conducted using publicly available emotional word and emotional picture databases. There was compelling support for the hypothesis in both types of databases and for both positive and negative valence: The strength of the relation between perceived arousal and perceived positivity or negativity decreased linearly as valence perceptions became more ambiguous. These results explain some puzzling facts about the valence-arousal relation that figure prominently in literature reviews, and they provide a solution to the problem of how to remove arousal confounds from valence effects.

Keywords:  emotional control; emotions

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30130163      PMCID: PMC6180667          DOI: 10.1177/0956797618780353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  19 in total

1.  Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases.

Authors:  K Fiedler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  Retrieval of emotional memories.

Authors:  Tony W Buchanan
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Remembering the Details: Effects of Emotion.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  Emot Rev       Date:  2009

Review 4.  Emotion and false memory: The context-content paradox.

Authors:  S H Bookbinder; C J Brainerd
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  The Simpson's paradox and fMRI: Similarities and differences between functional connectivity measures derived from within-subject and across-subject correlations.

Authors:  Reece P Roberts; Sylvia Hach; Lynette J Tippett; Donna Rose Addis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Developmental reversals in false memory: Effects of emotional valence and arousal.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; R E Holliday; V F Reyna; Y Yang; M P Toglia
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2010-06-12

Review 7.  The relation between valence and arousal in subjective experience.

Authors:  Peter Kuppens; Francis Tuerlinckx; James A Russell; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  A mechanism for impaired fear recognition after amygdala damage.

Authors:  Ralph Adolphs; Frederic Gosselin; Tony W Buchanan; Daniel Tranel; Philippe Schyns; Antonio R Damasio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  A Mathematical Model Captures the Structure of Subjective Affect.

Authors:  Alison M Mattek; George L Wolford; Paul J Whalen
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-05

10.  The Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS): introduction to a novel, standardized, wide-range, high-quality, realistic picture database.

Authors:  Artur Marchewka; Łukasz Zurawski; Katarzyna Jednoróg; Anna Grabowska
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-06
View more
  5 in total

1.  Affective norms for emotional ambiguity in valence, origin, and activation spaces.

Authors:  Adrianna Wielgopolan; Kamil K Imbir
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-05-17

2.  Memory effects of semantic attributes: A method of controlling attribute contamination.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; D M Bialer; M Chang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-08-24

3.  The shared signal hypothesis: Facial and bodily expressions of emotion mutually inform one another.

Authors:  Daniel N Albohn; Joseph C Brandenburg; Kestutis Kveraga; Reginald B Adams
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.157

4.  Identifying the representational structure of affect using fMRI.

Authors:  Alison M Mattek; Daisy A Burr; Jin Shin; Cady L Whicker; M Justin Kim
Journal:  Affect Sci       Date:  2020-04-18

5.  A network model of affective odor perception.

Authors:  Yingxuan Liu; Alexander Toet; Tanja Krone; Robin van Stokkum; Sophia Eijsman; Jan B F van Erp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.