| Literature DB >> 36011373 |
Zhiquan Hu1,2, Siquan Ma1,2, Yi Sun1,2, Gongwei Long3, Ke Chen1,2.
Abstract
The abnormal expression of long non-coding RNAs(lncRNAs) is closely related to the prognosis of patients. This finding may indicate a new target for the treatment of malignant tumors. Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is the most common subtype of bladder cancer, and BCG intravesical therapy is the first-line treatment for NMIBC, but about half of NMIBC patients relapse within two years after BCG treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to screen out lncRNAs related to the prognosis and treatment of BGC-resistant patients. Here, we performed differential expression analysis of lncRNAs in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets, and screened MIR4435-2HG as the only BCG-response-related lncRNA. Then, the prognosis value of MIR4435-2HG was validated in several publicly available cohorts, and confirmed its prognostic value in bladder cancer of different stages. In addition, we also analyzed its genetic alterations, clinical relevance, function enrichment, and association with other biomarkers. Further validation of the expression of MIR4435-2HG might be helpful to instruct NMIBC prognosis and treatment.Entities:
Keywords: BCG; biomarkers; bladder cancer; lncRNA; prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36011373 PMCID: PMC9408477 DOI: 10.3390/genes13081462
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.141
Figure 1Study workflow. The DEGs of normal and tumor in TCGA-BLCA cohort and BCG non-durable and BCG durable patients in GSE176178 were computed. The MIR4435-2HG was screened as the only overlap lncRNA between TCGA and GEO. The prognostic value of MIR4435-2HG was validated by multiple cohorts including GSE154261, GSE13507, UROMOL, and TCGA. UROMOL and TCGA were also used to analyze the independent prognostic value of MIR4435-2HG. Then, the genetic alterations, clinical relevance, function enrichment, and association with other biomarkers of MIR4435-2HG were analyzed.
Figure 2The different expressions of MIR4435-2HG based on clinical features. (a) MIR4435-2HG expression in bladder cancer compared to normal bladder tissues. (b) MIR4435-2HG levels were compared in paired samples. (c) The expression of MIR4435-2HG was analyzed in different ages. (d) Difference of MIR4435-2HG by gender. (e) The level of MIR4435-2HG according to pathological high grade and low grade. (f–h) The different expression levels were computed in subgroups according to T stage, N stage and M stage, respectively. (i) Paired tissues before and after BCG treatment in 14 patients were analyzed. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, NS (Not significant).
Figure 3Kaplan–Meier curves for the prognostic value of MIR4435-2HG. (a) The PFS in UROMOL cohort. (b) The PFS in GSE154261 cohort. (c) The OS in TCGA cohort. The expression level was divided into high and low levels according to cut-off values.
Figure 4The genetic variations of MIR4435-2HG and association with other biomarkers. (a,b) Genetic variations of MIR4435-2HG was assessed by the cBioPortal. *** p < 0.001 and NS (Not significant). (c–e) Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis for MIR4435-2HG, genes with a Spearman’s r > 0.6 were used as input. (f,g) Immune infiltrates of TCGA-BLCA and association between MIR4435-2HG expression and these biomarkers were evaluated using Spearman’s r.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression of progression-free survival in UROMOL.
| Variable | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
| 9.08 (2.85–28.97) |
| 9.14 (2.21–37.76) |
| |
| Age (Ref: ≤50 yr) | 3.11 (0.74–13.08) | 0.1217 | ||
| Gender (Ref: Female) | 1.4 (0.74–2.62) | 0.2984 | ||
| Tumor stage T1 (Ref: Ta-CIS) | 4.59 (2.8–7.53) |
| 2.9 (1.46–5.77) |
|
| Tumor grade (Ref: Low) | 3.36 (2.01–5.63) |
| ||
| Tumor Size (Ref: <3 cm) | 1.46 (0.79–2.69) | 0.2242 | ||
| EORTC risk High (Ref: Low) | 4.42 (2.59–7.55) |
| 7.82 (1.01–60.45) |
|
| EAU risk | ||||
| Intermediate (Ref: Low) | 2.74 (0.62–12.22) | 0.1852 | ||
| High (Ref: Low) | 6.74 (1.64–27.78) |
| ||
p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and highlighted in bold.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression of overall survival in TCGA.
| Variable | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95%CI) | ||||
| 1.56 (1.11–2.18) |
| 1.52 (1.08–2.14) |
| ||
| Age (Ref: ≤50 yr) | 2.67 (1.1–6.49) |
| 2.57 (1.05–6.31) |
| |
| Gender (Ref: Female) | 0.87 (0.63–1.21) | 0.4174 | |||
| Stage M | M1 (Ref: M0) | 3.2 (1.54–6.65) |
| ||
| Mx (Ref: M0) | 1.44 (1.06–1.95) |
| |||
| Stage N | N1 (Ref: N0) | 2.29 (1.67–3.14) |
| 2.02 (1.46–2.8) |
|
| NX (Ref: N0) | 1.71 (1.05–2.78) |
| 1.77 (1.08–2.89) |
| |
| Stage T | T3 (Ref: T2) | 1.2 (0.83–1.74) | 0.3417 | ||
| T4 (Ref: T2) | 1.05 (0.65–1.68) | 0.8423 | |||
| Pathologic grade (Ref: Low) | 2.9 (0.72–11.72) | 0.1353 | |||
p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and highlighted in bold.