Literature DB >> 21621906

The EORTC tables overestimate the risk of recurrence and progression in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin: external validation of the EORTC risk tables.

Jesus Fernandez-Gomez1, Rosario Madero, Eduardo Solsona, Miguel Unda, Luis Martinez-Piñeiro, Antonio Ojea, Jose Portillo, Manuel Montesinos, Marcelino Gonzalez, Carlos Pertusa, Jesus Rodriguez-Molina, Jose Emilio Camacho, Mariano Rabadan, Ander Astobieta, Santiago Isorna, Pedro Muntañola, Anabel Gimeno, Miguel Blas, Jose Antonio Martinez-Piñeiro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk tables only included 171 patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the external validity of the EORTC tables in patients with NMIBC treated with BCG over 5-6 mo. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data on 1062 patients treated with BCG were analyzed. MEASUREMENTS: Discrimination was assessed using the concordance index (c-index) and the prognostic separation index (PSEP). For calibration, probabilities of recurrence and progression obtained with the EORTC risk tables in our series were compared with those reported by the EORTC. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: With respect to the discriminative ability of the EORTC model, c-index was similar to those reported in the EORTC series for recurrence. However, c-indices for progression in our series were lower than c-indices reported by Sylvester et al. [1]. Although PSEP in our series was lower than in the EORTC series for recurrence at 1 yr, similar results were found at 5 yr. Regarding progression, PSEP in our series was lower than in the EORTC series. Whilst a successful stratification of recurrence and progression probability at 1 and 5 yr was achieved using the EORTC tables in our series, model calibration showed lower risks of recurrence than those reported by Sylvester et al. [1] in all groups. For progression, lower risks were found in higher-risk groups. There are some limitations in the present study. A different distribution of patients was found, with higher proportions of primary grade 3 T1 tumors and tumors in situ than in the EORTC series. An additional limitation is that prior recurrence of the EORTC table was not included in our parameters. Consequently, two separate analyses were performed for recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: The EORTC model successfully stratified recurrence and progression risks in our cohort. However, the discriminative ability of the EORTC tables decreased in our patients for progression. Moreover, these tables overestimated risks of recurrence and progression after BCG therapy.
Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21621906     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  43 in total

Review 1.  Defining and treating the spectrum of intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ashish M Kamat; J Alfred Witjes; Maurizio Brausi; Mark Soloway; Donald Lamm; Raj Persad; Roger Buckley; Andreas Böhle; Marc Colombel; Joan Palou
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Is it possible to stop follow-up of patients with primary T1G3 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder managed with intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy?

Authors:  Thomasz Golabek; Joan Palou; Oscar Rodríguez; Josep Maria Gaya; Alberto Breda; Humberto Villavicencio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Bladder cancer: validating the EORTC risk tables in BCG-treated patients.

Authors:  David D Buethe; Wade J Sexton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  [Aftercare of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer].

Authors:  G B Schulz; B Schlenker; C G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: definition, treatment and future efforts.

Authors:  Sandip M Prasad; G Joel Decastro; Gary D Steinberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  [Short version of the German S3 guideline for bladder cancer].

Authors:  M Retz; J E Gschwend; P Maisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Current Clinical Trials in Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Timo K Nykopp; Jose Batista da Costa; Miles Mannas; Peter C Black
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  A systematic review of the tools available for predicting survival and managing patients with urothelial carcinomas of the bladder and of the upper tract in a curative setting.

Authors:  Sarah J Drouin; David R Yates; Vincent Hupertan; Olivier Cussenot; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  High-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: update for a better identification and treatment.

Authors:  Oscar Rodriguez Faba; Joan Palou; Alberto Breda; H Villavicencio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Chronic kidney disease as an important risk factor for tumor recurrences, progression and overall survival in primary non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Chia-En Li; Chia-Shen Chien; Yao-Chi Chuang; Ye-In Chang; Hsiu-Pei Tang; Chih-Hsiung Kang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.