| Literature DB >> 36005484 |
Hanaa Ali Hussein1, Muhammad Shahid Nazir2, Nizakat Azra2, Zeenat Qamar2, Azman Seeni3, Tengku Ahmad Damitri Al-Astani Tengku Din4, Mohd Azmuddin Abdullah3,5.
Abstract
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) have great potential for applications as a drug delivery system (DDS) due to their unique properties such as large pore size, high surface area, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and stable aqueous dispersion. The MSN-mediated DDS can carry chemotherapeutic agents, optical sensors, photothermal agents, short interfering RNA (siRNA), and gene therapeutic agents. The MSN-assisted imaging techniques are applicable in cancer diagnosis. However, their synthesis via a chemical route requires toxic chemicals and is challenging, time-consuming, and energy-intensive, making the process expensive and non-viable. Fortunately, nature has provided a viable alternative material in the form of biosilica from marine resources. In this review, the applications of biosilica nanoparticles synthesized from marine diatoms in the field of drug delivery, biosensing, imaging agents, and regenerative medicine, are highlighted. Insights into the use of biosilica in the field of DDSs are elaborated, with a focus on different strategies to improve the physico-chemical properties with regards to drug loading and release efficiency, targeted delivery, and site-specific binding capacity by surface functionalization. The limitations, as well as the future scope to develop them as potential drug delivery vehicles and imaging agents, in the overall therapeutic management, are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: biosilica nanoparticle; diatoms; drug delivery system; gene therapy; imaging agent
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36005484 PMCID: PMC9410069 DOI: 10.3390/md20080480
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 6.085
Applications, advantages, and disadvantages of various nanocarriers for drug delivery (modified from [20,21,22,23]).
| Delivery System | Applications | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biopolymer-based | Prostate cancer; improving skin elasticity; enhancing skin cell activation energy; tissue-engineering. | Prolonged drug delivery and circulation time in the body. | Mechanically weak; rapid degradability. |
| Solid Lipid-based | Can be combined with different drugs; effective against different types of tumors (breast, lung, colon, liver, and brain). | Controlled release of drugs; increased bioavailability and biocompatibility of entrapped bioactive agents, good stability of unstable active components; enhanced skin hydration and penetration of drug. | Poor hydrophilic drug loading and releasing capacity; irregular gelation tendency, and high-water content. |
| Micelles. | Menopause hormone therapy; cancer therapy. | Sustained-release, less toxicity and can be removed by renal filtration; can draw the water-insoluble drugs into their hydrophobic core. | Instability in the blood stream; concentration reduced by blood dilution; the loaded drugs can leak out, reduced drug dosage at the targeted site. |
| Liposomes. | Anticancer activity; anti-fungal and protozoal infection; adjuvants in vaccination; signal enhancers/carriers in medical diagnostics and analytical biochemistry. | Decreased toxicity; increased delivery for smaller volume; biocompatible and biodegradable; ease of penetration in dermal layer. | High production cost; low stability and solubility; loss of drug. |
| Niosomes. | Pulmonary and protein delivery; cancer chemotherapy; carrier for hemoglobin; vaccine and antigen delivery. | Controlled and targeted drug delivery; osmotically active and stable; enhanced dermal penetration and oral bioavailability; nontoxic; biocompatible and biodegradable. | May show fusion, leakage, or hydrolysis of entrapped drug; low drug loading capacity; physically unstable; aggregation; expensive |
| Nanoemulsion. | Wastewater treatment; personalized medicine; 3D printing; biomedical and pharmaceutical applications | Higher stability and loading capacity; low production cost; suitable for hydrophobic drugs; control drug release. | Low permeability and bioavailability of drugs; low viscosity and spreadability. |
| Protein nanoparticles (Albumin, Glutamate, etc.). | Breast and pancreatic cancer; delivery of genetic materials, anticancer drugs, peptide hormones, growth factors, DNA, and RNA. | Enhanced solubility and delivery to tumor site; biodegradability; bioavailability; relatively low cost. | Large particle size; rapid degradation speed. |
| Dendrimers. | Antineoplastic; antibacterial; anti-inflammatory; cardiovascular therapy; imaging diagnostic. | Ease of functionalization; biocompatible; controllable molecular weight and size. | Low solubility but can be modulated by surface moieties. |
Figure 1MSNs as versatile drug carriers (modified from [11] under Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license).
Figure 2Diatom structure in the form of microcapsules as observed under light microscope; and the MSNs under transmission electron microscope exhibiting ordered porous structure (modified from [3] under Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; and [15] with permission, Copyright © 2021, Elsevier).
Figure 3Surface functionalization methods of the MSNs based on surfactant displacement, co-condensation, and post-synthesis grafting methods (modified from [41] under Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license).
Description, advantages, and disadvantages of surface functionalization methods (modified from [74,75]).
| Method | Description | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co-condensation | Co-condensation (precipitation) method uses various (organo) siloxane precursors in a one-pot (hydrothermal) sol–gel process. | Appropriate to a wide variety of organoalkoxysilanes; | Produced materials with less ordered structure. |
| Suitable for various reaction conditions; | |||
| Allows preparation of organic–inorganic hybrid materials in a short time. | The coverage of functional groups is homogeneous; | ||
| High loading of drugs. | |||
| Grafting | Carried out by silylation on free (≡ Si–OH) and geminal silanol | Maintain a large amount of surface silanol groups after removal of the surfactant; | Non-uniformed distribution of the grafted groups on the surface. |
| Higher concentration of functional groups in the final product. | |||
| Imprint coating method. | Specific control of the | Uniform distribution of pore size allows the formation of uniform imprints; | High amount of coating agent; |
| Optimizes the binding of targeted metal ion. | Limits the number of other complexes. | Thickness of coating layer not easy to control. |
Figure 4Schematic illustration of diatom microparticles with different organosilane functionalizations (APTES, GPTMS) and phosphonic acid (2-CEPA, 16-PHA) to increase the hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity of surface for the release of indomethacin (hydrophobic) and gentamicin (hydrophilic) drug from diatomaceous structure [26] (modified with permission, Copyright © 2014, Elsevier).
Figure 5Loading of IMC onto GO–DE nanohybrid depending on the pH of the medium [83] (modified with permission, Copyright © 2013, Royal Society of Chemistry).
Figure 6Schematic diagram of compartment-based and rate-controlled dDDS with PTX-DOX drug combination [91] (modified with permission, Copyright © 2020, Elsevier).
Figure 7Natural biosilica “DEMs” coated with B12 and loaded with poorly water-soluble drugs. The loaded micro-shuttles target and interact with HT29 colon cancer cells before releasing the drug [99] (modified with permission, Copyright © 2018, Royal Society of Chemistry).
Figure 8Stimuli-responsive drug delivery based on the MSNs: (a) The endogenous-stimuli response (pH, redox potential, and enzyme); and exogenous stimuli-response (magnetic fields (AMField), ultrasound (US), and visible light (Vis)) (adapted from [117] under Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license); (b) The loading and controlled drug release of the MSNs (adapted from [67] under Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license).
Stimuli-responsive drug release of MSNs and the mechanism involved.
| Stimuli | Principle |
|---|---|
| pH | Depends on the pH of the tumor and inflammatory tissue, |
| Redox | Based on the difference of redox concentrations of the normal tissues |
| Temperature | Depends on the variation of the ambient temperature, |
| Antibody | The pores covered with polyclonal antibody specific for the drug. |
| Enzyme | Regular expression profile of specific enzymes in disease conditions. |
| Light | Non-interference feature, spatio-temporal remote control. |
| Magnetic | Temperature-dependant, able to generate thermal energy. |
| Ultrasound | Sensitive polymer changing its water resistance, |
Figure 9Stimuli-responsive drug delivery based on MSNs—(a) Release of drug from β-CD-capped-MSNs in response to endogenous stimuli (reproduced from [67] under Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license); (b) The drug is loaded into the mesopore ducts. The pore openings are then closed with nanocaps to block the early release of the cargo. At the target site, the stimulation removes the gatekeepers, allowing the trapped drug to be released (reproduced from [11] under Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license).
Figure 10Co-delivery system based on MSNs to deliver DOX and Bcl-2-targeted siRNA simultaneously to A2780/AD human ovarian cancer cells for enhanced chemotherapeutic efficacy [140] (modified with permission, Copyright © 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.).
Figure 11Image of stained biosilica exhibiting high porosity in the structure [164] (reproduced with permission, Copyright © 2019, American Chemical Society).
Figure 12MSNs as a dual imaging probe [172] (reproduced with permission, Copyright © 2012, American Chemical Society).