| Literature DB >> 36004971 |
Cátia Leitão1, Sónia O Pereira1, Carlos Marques1, Nunzio Cennamo2, Luigi Zeni2, Madina Shaimerdenova3, Takhmina Ayupova3, Daniele Tosi3,4.
Abstract
In the last years, optical fiber sensors have proven to be a reliable and versatile biosensing tool. Optical fiber biosensors (OFBs) are analytical devices that use optical fibers as transducers, with the advantages of being easily coated and biofunctionalized, allowing the monitorization of all functionalization and detection in real-time, as well as being small in size and geometrically flexible, thus allowing device miniaturization and portability for point-of-care (POC) testing. Knowing the potential of such biosensing tools, this paper reviews the reported OFBs which are, at the moment, the most cost-effective. Different fiber configurations are highlighted, namely, end-face reflected, unclad, D- and U-shaped, tips, ball resonators, tapered, light-diffusing, and specialty fibers. Packaging techniques to enhance OFBs' application in the medical field, namely for implementing in subcutaneous, percutaneous, and endoscopic operations as well as in wearable structures, are presented and discussed. Interrogation approaches of OFBs using smartphones' hardware are a great way to obtain cost-effective sensing approaches. In this review paper, different architectures of such interrogation methods and their respective applications are presented. Finally, the application of OFBs in monitoring three crucial fields of human life and wellbeing are reported: detection of cancer biomarkers, detection of cardiovascular biomarkers, and environmental monitoring.Entities:
Keywords: POC monitoring; cancer biomarkers; cardiovascular biomarkers; environmental monitoring; optical interrogation methods; smartphone optical biosensors
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36004971 PMCID: PMC9405647 DOI: 10.3390/bios12080575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosensors (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6374
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the main contents of this review.
Figure 2Schematics of OFB working in (a) transmission and (b) reflection.
Figure 3Schematic and implementation of U-shape fiber biosensors: schematic of a U-bent fiber section with light propagation within the curved portion of the fiber (a) with inset showing the surface-penetrating meridional rays providing RI sensitivity, and functionalization of the biosensor for glucose detection (b) (ARS—Alizarin Red S) (images reproduced from [27]); (c) U-bent LSPR sensor proposed by Yang et al. with the respective production steps, namely, U-shape production and photographs, and formation of ITO coating for plasmonic-based sensing, with results of the change in transmission spectrum for three different values of RI (d) and the response of the sensor, measuring the wavelength shift over time, for different DNA concentrations (e) (images adapted from [28]).
Figure 4Schematic and implementation of tapered OFB: (a) taper production highlighting the respective fiber taper regions and (b) optical microscopy image of the tapered fiber showing the three regions; (c) taper coated with Au NPs and respective interrogation scheme, and (d) results showing the variation in wavelength and transmittance with RI variation with respective linear fittings (e) (images reproduced from [39]).
Figure 5Schematics of D-shaped OFBs: (a) core-less D-shape in different perspectives (images adapted from [42]); (b) SPR-POF D-shaped biosensing platform (image adapted from [46]. Copyright ©2021, with permission from Elsevier); (c) LSPR D-shaped tapered-POF biosensor based on gold nanostars (GNS) and MIPs (image reprinted from [47]. Copyright ©2015, with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 6Schematic of a tip OFB: (a) components and measurement procedure; (b) magnification of the sensor surface biofunctionalized with aptamer-modified GNR; (c) schematization of LSPR wavelength shift when the analyte, in this case, OTA, is recognized by the specific aptamer; (d) GNR-coated tip OFS response to RI; (e) LSPR wavelength shift with different concentrations of OTA, and (f) experimental response of the biosensor to different concentrations of OTA with respective linear fitting (images adapted with permission from ref. [53]. Copyright ©2018, with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 7Image of the ball resonator: (a) 3D picture of optical ball resonator; (b) photographs taken by X and Y cameras of CO2 laser splicer. Image reproduced from [57].
Figure 8Plasmonic sensor configurations based on extrinsic POF sensors: (a) PMMA-based nanoplasmonic sensor chip monitored by exploiting the transparency of the substrate (image adapted from [63]); (b) PMMA-based plasmonic chips monitored by a custom setup produced to excite the plasmonic phenomena via the multimode slab waveguide (image adapted from [64]); (c) 3D printed SPR sensor chip with the respective setup (image adapted from [62]).
Figure 9Silica LDF-based SPR sensor system: (a) data acquisition and working scheme; (b) SPR spectra obtained at different refractive indices from 1.332 to 1.394. Image reproduced from [70].
Figure 10Example of proposed packaging for fiber optic biosensing applications: (a) Endoscopic packaging for in situ detection of cancer biomarkers (image reproduced from [78]); (b) Urologic packaging, with pressure sensors embodied in a rectal catheter (left fiber) and an abdominal catheter (right fiber) (image reproduced from [79]); (c) SencilTM (sensory cilia) packaging for subcutaneous fluorescence sensing (image reproduced from [80]); (d) Epidural needle for percutaneous insertion embodying a network of fiber sensors (image reproduced from [81]).
Figure 11Illustration of the main architectures (left) and applications (right) of optical fiber biosensors based on smartphones.
Figure 12Schematic representation (a) and photograph (b) of the smartphone optical fiber sensing system for Fabry–Perot sensor interrogation (image reproduced from [106]).
Review of the fiber optic smartphone sensors and their applications.
| Ref. | Application | Smartphone | Operative System | Optical | Internal | External |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Remote detection of hydrogen sulfide | Samsung | Android | POF, | Flashlight, camera | 3D-printed connector |
| [ | Breathing pattern detection | Redmi | Android | POF, | Flashlight, camera | 3D-printed connector |
| [ | Multiplexed | Redmi | Android | 3xPOF, Ø0.98/1 mm, NA 0.47 | Flashlight, camera | 3D-printed connector |
| [ | SPR sensor | Huawei | Android | Thorlabs BFL48, Ø400 μm, | Flashlight, camera | Diffraction grating, couplers |
| [ | Vitamin D | Apple | iOS | Tapered waveguide, 200–1200 μm | Flashlight, camera | Diffraction grating, external mount |
| [ | Interrogation of Fabry–Perot sensor | Huawei | Android | Graded-index MMF, core Ø62.5 μm | Flashlight, camera | Slit, grating, 2× FC/PC connectors |
| [ | Interrogation of chirped fiber | Huawei | Android | Graded-index MMF, core Ø62.5 μm | Flashlight, camera | Slit, grating, 2× FC/PC connectors |
| [ | Temperature | Multimode glass fiber, Ø300 μm | Flashlight, camera | Diffraction grating, | ||
| [ | Identification of walking pattern | Motorola, Moto G3 Turbo | Android | Glass single-mode fiber | Camera | External phone mount, LED |
| [ | Detection of | Nubia Z17 Mini | Android | Multimode glass fiber, Ø105/125 μm | Camera | Red laser, connecting module |
| [ | On-site | Nubia Z17 Mini | Android | Multimode glass fiber, Ø105/125 μm | Camera | Red laser, connecting module |
| [ | Dual-channel | Nubia Z17 Mini | Android | Multimode glass fiber, Ø105/125 μm | Camera | Red laser, connecting module |
Figure 13Schematic of functionalization of spherical tip-biosensor used for detection of CD44 biomarker (image reproduced from [131]).