Literature DB >> 19889168

Breast cancer prevention: patient decision making and risk communication in the high risk setting.

Elissa M Ozanne1, Eve Wittenberg, Judy E Garber, Jane C Weeks.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate prevention decision making among women at high risk for breast cancer, including patient preferences for preventive interventions, patient understanding of disease risk, and patient preferences for risk communication methods, and the corresponding physician understanding of these factors. A prospective interview and survey study was conducted of consecutive new patients seen at a cancer risk and prevention clinic and their physicians. One hundred and forty-six of 217 eligible patients participated and completed all components of the study (67%), and they were seen by a four physicians. Women's preferences for prevention intervention varied widely across women but were stable across time. Physicians were very often unable to predict their patients' preferences for prevention efforts. Patients overestimated their risk of disease, and physicians overestimated the decrease in perceived risk resulting from counseling (p < 0.001). As risk stratification for breast cancer improves, and prevention options become more tolerable, it becomes increasingly important to appropriately counsel women considering such options. This study provides insight into the decision making process of women at high risk for breast cancer and highlights the importance of addressing patient preferences for interventions and risk perception during risk assessment and counseling consultations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19889168     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00857.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  12 in total

1.  Gastroesophageal reflux causing nutritional failure and vomiting in a teenager with cystic fibrosis and respiratory failure.

Authors:  Alexandra Higton; Sarah Collins; Diana Bilton
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Atypical hyperplasia of the breast--risk assessment and management options.

Authors:  Lynn C Hartmann; Amy C Degnim; Richard J Santen; William D Dupont; Karthik Ghosh
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  How do women who are informed that they are at increased risk of breast cancer appraise their risk? A systematic review of qualitative research.

Authors:  Victoria G Woof; Anthony Howell; Lorna McWilliams; D Gareth Evans; David P French
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 9.075

4.  Giving voice to study volunteers: comparing views of mentally ill, physically ill, and healthy protocol participants on ethical aspects of clinical research.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Jane Paik Kim
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 4.791

5.  Intentions for bilateral mastectomy among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Lesley King; Suzanne C O'Neill; Elizabeth Spellman; Beth N Peshkin; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Shawna Willey; Kara Grace Leventhal; Tiffani DeMarco; Rachel Nusbaum; Elizabeth Feldman; Lina Jandorf; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Making the decision to participate in predictive genetic testing for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  April Manuel; Fern Brunger
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Seeking balance: decision support needs of women without cancer and a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  Meghan L Underhill; Cheryl B Crotser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Premenopausal serum androgens and breast cancer risk: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Yelena Afanasyeva; Rudolf Kaaks; Sabina Rinaldi; Stephanie Scarmo; Mengling Liu; Alan A Arslan; Paolo Toniolo; Roy E Shore; Karen L Koenig
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Aromatase expression in atypical ductal hyperplasia in women.

Authors:  R J Santen; D C Radisky; A Degnim; M H Frost; C M Vachon; K Ghosh; F Guestini; K M McNamara; H Sasano
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.624

10.  How do women at increased, but unexplained, familial risk of breast cancer perceive and manage their risk? A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Louise A Keogh; Belinda J McClaren; Carmel Apicella; John L Hopper
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 2.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.