| Literature DB >> 36000212 |
Tae Hyung Kim1, Jung Ho Ko2, Jaewoo Chung2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms is considered effective and safe, its durability is still debated. Also, few studies have described angiographic follow-up plan after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysm, especially in ruptured cases. Hence, we report the long-term results of follow-up angiography protocol.Entities:
Keywords: Angiography, follow up; Endovascular treatment; Intracranial aneurysm; Ruptured aneurysm
Year: 2022 PMID: 36000212 PMCID: PMC9452379 DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2022.0088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Neurosurg Soc ISSN: 1225-8245
Fig. 1.Flowchart demonstrating the selection process used for the present study.
Fig. 2.The follow-up angiography protocol set by this institution.
Details of follow-up data
| The 1st period | The 2nd period | The 3rd period | No. of cases | No. of Re-Tx. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | 218 | 14 | ||
| + | 143 | 5 | ||
| + | 97 | 0 | ||
| + | - | - | 64 | |
| - | + | - | 8 | |
| - | - | + | 4 | |
| + | + | - | 65 | |
| - | + | + | 4 | |
| + | - | + | 23 | |
| + | + | + | 66 |
Tx. : treatment
Details of recurred aneurysms
| Case No. | Age (years) | Sex | Location | Size (mm) | Stent assisted | Immediate Post-op | 1st period follow-up | 2nd period follow -up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 67 | M | AcomA | 4.0 | - | Class I | Re-Tx. | |
| 2 | 48 | F | MCAbif | 6.6 | - | Class I | Re-Tx. | |
| 3 | 38 | M | MCAbif | 7.0 | - | Class II | Re-Tx. | |
| 4 | 32 | M | AcomA | 3.3 | - | Class I | Re-Tx. | |
| 5 | 33 | F | AcomA | 4.3 | - | Class I | Re-Tx. | |
| 6 | 46 | F | AcomA | 4.5 | - | Class II | Re-Tx. | |
| 7 | 37 | M | AcomA | 6.9 | - | Class I | Re-Tx. | |
| 8 | 48 | M | MCAbif | 4.7 | - | Class II | Re-Tx. | |
| 9 | 45 | M | PcomA | 6.6 | - | Class I | Re-Tx. | |
| 10 | 51 | M | AcomA | 4.3 | - | Class I | Re-Tx. | |
| 11 | 50 | M | AcomA | 4.2 | - | Class II | Re-Tx. | |
| 12 | 45 | M | MCAbif | 5.8 | + | Class II | Re-Tx. | |
| 13 | 49 | M | MCAbif | 6.4 | - | Class II | Re-Tx. | |
| 14 | 70 | M | PcomA | 2.9 | - | Class II | Re-Tx. | |
| 15 | 30 | M | AcomA | 6.0 | - | Class I | Class II | Re-Tx. |
| 16 | 54 | F | AcomA | 5.6 | - | Class II | Class II | Re-Tx. |
| 17 | 42 | F | MCAbif | 5.2 | - | Class II | Class II | Re-Tx. |
| 18 | 39 | F | PcomA | 3.3 | - | Class I | Class II | Re-Tx. |
| 19 | 59 | F | AcomA | 6.4 | - | Class I | Class I | Re-Tx. |
Post-op : post-operative, M : male, AcomA : the anterior communicating artery, class I : Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification (RROC) class I, Tx. : treatment, F : female, MCAbif : the bifurcation of the middle cerebral artery, class II : RROC class II, PcomA : the posterior communicating artery
Details of long-term follow-up data
| Case No. | Age (years) | Sex | Location | Size (mm) | Stent assisted | Immediate Post-op | 1st period follow-up | 2nd period follow-up | 3rd period follow-up | Long-term follow-up | Long-term period (years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 77 | F | MCAbif | 3.5 | - | Class I | Class I | 10 | |||
| 2 | 49 | M | AcomA | 5.1 | - | Class II | Class I | Class I | Class I | 11 | |
| 3 | 44 | F | AcomA | 2.5 | - | Class I | Class I | Class I | 14 | ||
| 4 | 55 | F | PcomA | 5.8 | + | Class II | Class I | Class I | Class I | Class I | 6 |
| 5 | 46 | F | AcomA | 3.8 | + | Class I | Class I | Class I | Class I | 5 | |
| 6 | 41 | M | AcomA | 7.0 | - | Class I | Class I | Class I | Class I | 6 | |
| 7 | 59 | F | AcomA | 3.4 | - | Class I | Class I | Class I | Class I | 6 | |
| 8 | 44 | M | MCAbif | 7.0 | - | Class II | Class I | Class I | Class I | Class I | 6 |
| 9 | 60 | F | Lt. M1 | 4.0 | - | Class I | Class I | Class I | 6 | ||
| 10 | 41 | F | MCAbif | 4.6 | - | Class I | Class I | Class I | Class I | 6 | |
| 11 | 67 | F | MCAbif | 3.8 | - | Class II | Class II | Class I | Class I | 6 | |
| 12 | 49 | M | MCAbif | 6.0 | + | Class I | Class I | Class I | Class I | 6 | |
| 13 | 44 | M | Rt. A1 | 3.0 | - | Class II | Class I | 7 | |||
| 14 | 46 | M | Rt. AChoA | 5.2 | - | Class I | Class I | 7 | |||
| 15 | 39 | M | AcomA | 5.0 | - | Class I | Class I | 7 | |||
| 16 | 66 | F | PcomA | 6.6 | + | Class II | Class I | Class I | Class I | 7 | |
| 17 | 53 | F | AcomA | 4.5 | - | Class I | Class II | Class II | Class II | 9 | |
| 18 | 48 | F | PcomA | 4.1 | - | Class I | Class II | Class II | Class II | 10 | |
| 19 | 40 | F | MCAbif | 5.5 | - | Class II | Class II | Class II | Class II | 11 | |
| 20 | 59 | F | DACA | 3.0 | - | Class I | Class I | Class I | Class II | 11 | |
| 21 | 50 | F | MCAbif | 7.0 | + | Class I | Class II | Class II | Class II | 5 | |
| 22 | 48 | F | AcomA | 5.2 | - | Class I | Class II | Class II | Class II | 5 | |
| 23 | 40 | F | AcomA | 3.7 | - | Class I | Class I | Class II | 7 | ||
| 24 | 45 | F | AcomA | 4.0 | - | Class I | Class I | Class II | Class II | Class II | 7 |
| 25 | 56 | F | AcomA | 3.6 | - | Class I | Class I | Class II | Class II | Class II | 7 |
| 26 | 69 | F | DACA | 6.1 | - | Class I | Class II | Class II | Class II | 7 | |
| 27 | 50 | F | AcomA | 3.5 | - | Class I | Class II | Class II | Class II | 9 | |
| 28 | 60 | F | MCAbif | 4.0 | - | Class II | Class I | Class II | Class II | 6 |
Post-op : post-operative, F : female, MCAbif : the bifurcation of the middle cerebral artery, class I : Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification (RROC) class I, M : male, AcomA : the anterior communicating artery, class II : RROC class II, PcomA : the posterior communicating artery, Lt. : left, M1 : the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery, Rt. : right, A1 : the A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery, AChoA : the anterior choroidal artery, DACA : the distal anterior cerebral artery
Fig. 3.A 45-year-old male treated with stent assisted coil embolization for right middle cerebral artery ruptured aneurysm (case 12 in Table 2). A : Transfemoral angiographic finding of the right middle cerebral artery aneurysm. B : Immediate post-embolization angiography shows nearly completely occluded aneurysm with small amount of contrast filling of the residual neck (Raymond-Roy Occlusion classification class II, white arrowhead). C : On post-embolization 10-month angiography, the aneurysm was filled with contrast, which showed recurrence which required retreatment.