BACKGROUND: With the increasing use of endovascular techniques in the treatment of both ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms, the issue of obliteration efficacy has become increasingly important. OBJECTIVE: To systematically develop a comprehensive model for predicting retreatment with various types of endovascular treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records that were prospectively collected for 305 patients who received endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms from 2007 to 2013. Multivariable logistic regression was performed on candidate predictors identified by univariable screening analysis to detect independent predictors of retreatment. A composite risk score was constructed based on the proportional contribution of independent predictors in the multivariable model. RESULTS: Size (>10 mm), aneurysm rupture, stent assistance, and posttreatment degree of aneurysm occlusion were independently associated with retreatment, whereas intraluminal thrombosis and flow diversion demonstrated a trend toward retreatment. The Aneurysm Recanalization Stratification Scale was constructed by assigning the following weights to statistically and clinically significant predictors: aneurysm-specific factors: size (>10 mm), 2 points; rupture, 2 points; presence of thrombus, 2 points. Treatment-related factors were stent assistance, -1 point; flow diversion, -2 points; Raymond Roy occlusion class 2, 1 point; Raymond Roy occlusion class 3, 2 points. This scale demonstrated good discrimination with a C-statistic of 0.799. CONCLUSION: Surgical decision making and patient-centered informed consent require comprehensive and accessible information on treatment efficacy. We constructed the Aneurysm Recanalization Stratification Scale to enhance this decision-making process. This is the first comprehensive model that has been developed to quantitatively predict the risk of retreatment after endovascular therapy.
BACKGROUND: With the increasing use of endovascular techniques in the treatment of both ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms, the issue of obliteration efficacy has become increasingly important. OBJECTIVE: To systematically develop a comprehensive model for predicting retreatment with various types of endovascular treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records that were prospectively collected for 305 patients who received endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms from 2007 to 2013. Multivariable logistic regression was performed on candidate predictors identified by univariable screening analysis to detect independent predictors of retreatment. A composite risk score was constructed based on the proportional contribution of independent predictors in the multivariable model. RESULTS: Size (>10 mm), aneurysm rupture, stent assistance, and posttreatment degree of aneurysm occlusion were independently associated with retreatment, whereas intraluminal thrombosis and flow diversion demonstrated a trend toward retreatment. The Aneurysm Recanalization Stratification Scale was constructed by assigning the following weights to statistically and clinically significant predictors: aneurysm-specific factors: size (>10 mm), 2 points; rupture, 2 points; presence of thrombus, 2 points. Treatment-related factors were stent assistance, -1 point; flow diversion, -2 points; Raymond Roy occlusion class 2, 1 point; Raymond Roy occlusion class 3, 2 points. This scale demonstrated good discrimination with a C-statistic of 0.799. CONCLUSION: Surgical decision making and patient-centered informed consent require comprehensive and accessible information on treatment efficacy. We constructed the Aneurysm Recanalization Stratification Scale to enhance this decision-making process. This is the first comprehensive model that has been developed to quantitatively predict the risk of retreatment after endovascular therapy.
Authors: W P Daugherty; A Ehteshami Rad; J B White; P M Meyers; G L Lanzino; H J Cloft; J Gordon; D F Kallmes Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-01-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: J S McDonald; R E Carter; K F Layton; J Mocco; J B Madigan; R G Tawk; R A Hanel; S S Roy; H J Cloft; A M Klunder; S H Suh; D F Kallmes Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Timothy J Kaufmann; John Huston; Jay N Mandrekar; Cathy D Schleck; Kent R Thielen; David F Kallmes Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Nohra Chalouhi; Pascal Jabbour; Saurabh Singhal; Ross Drueding; Robert M Starke; Richard T Dalyai; Stavropoula Tjoumakaris; L Fernando Gonzalez; Aaron S Dumont; Robert Rosenwasser; Ciro G Randazzo Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Christopher J Stapleton; Jay I Kumar; Brian P Walcott; Collin M Torok; Pankaj K Agarwalla; Matthew J Koch; Aman B Patel Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2016-02-27 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: N Adeeb; J M Moore; M Wirtz; C J Griessenauer; P M Foreman; H Shallwani; R Gupta; A A Dmytriw; R Motiei-Langroudi; A Alturki; M R Harrigan; A H Siddiqui; E I Levy; A J Thomas; C S Ogilvy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Angela Bohnen; Jonathan H Sherman; Panayiotis Pelargos; Isaac Yang; Visish M Srinivasan; Edward A M Duckworth; Winward Choy; Zachary A Smith Journal: Surg Neurol Int Date: 2016-10-07