Literature DB >> 35992051

Diagnostic and Prognostic Impact of Progesterone Receptor Immunohistochemistry: A Study Evaluating More Than 16,000 Tumors.

Florian Viehweger1, Lisa-Marie Tinger1, David Dum1, Natalia Gorbokon1, Anne Menz1, Ria Uhlig1, Franziska Büscheck1, Andreas M Luebke1, Claudia Hube-Magg1, Andrea Hinsch1, Doris Höflmayer1, Christoph Fraune1, Patrick Lebok1,2, Sören Weidemann1, Maximilian Lennartz1, Frank Jacobsen1, Till S Clauditz1, Rainer Krech2, Till Krech1,2, Andreas H Marx1,3, Ronald Simon1, Eike Burandt1, Stefan Steurer1, Guido Sauter1, Sarah Minner1, Christian Bernreuther1.   

Abstract

Progesterone receptor (PR) is a member of the nuclear/steroid hormone receptor family of ligand-dependent transcription factors. It plays an important role in reproduction and mammary gland development and has various tissue-specific effects in nonreproductive organs. In diagnostic pathology, positive PR immunostaining is used to support a diagnosis of breast or gynecologic origin in a tumor. In this study, the expression of PR was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in 18,176 (interpretable: 16,445) samples from 147 different tumor types and subtypes in a tissue microarray format. PR immunostaining was detected in 57.4% of breast tumors, 28.6% of other gynecological tumors, and 1.8% of nongynecological and nonmammary tumors. Among the group of nongynecological and nonmammary tumors, particularly high rates of PR positivity were seen in neuroendocrine tumors (54.3%) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (35.7%) of the pancreas. A comparison with clinico-pathological parameters showed that reduced PR immunostaining was significantly associated with adverse histopathological and clinical features in breast carcinoma, endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. In summary, our analysis of 147 different tumor types for PR immunostaining provides a ranking list of tumor entities according to their prevalence of PR positivity, helps to better understand the diagnostic utility of PR, and highlights the distinct PR positivity among neuroendocrine neoplasms of pancreatic origin.
Copyright © 2022 Florian Viehweger et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35992051      PMCID: PMC9381849          DOI: 10.1155/2022/6412148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol (Amst)        ISSN: 2210-7177            Impact factor:   4.133


1. Introduction

Progesterone receptor (PR) is a member of the nuclear/steroid hormone receptor family of ligand-dependent transcription factors. PR mediates the physiological effects of progesterone which plays an important role in the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy, hence the hormone's name, which comes from the Latin pro gestationem. In addition to its effects in reproduction and mammary gland development [1], PR is involved in the regulation of various genes, affects cellular proliferation and differentiation in various nonreproductive tissues, exerts a neurosteroid activity in the central nervous system (reviewed in [2]), inhibits smooth muscle contractile activity in the gastrointestinal tract [3], and plays a role in development and maturation of the lung [4]. In diagnostic pathology, immunohistochemical detection of PR supports the diagnosis of a carcinoma of breast or gynecologic origin if cancers of unknown primary (CUP) are being evaluated [5]. However, many studies have shown that nonbreast and nongynecological tumors can also express estrogen and/or progesterone receptor. Data on PR immunostaining in the literature typically lacks associations with patient age, gender, or stage in cancer [6-14] and is overall highly variable. For example, the reported range of PR positivity ranges from 0 to 76% in colorectal cancer [6-8], from 0 to 52% in adenocarcinoma of the gall bladder [9, 10, 15, 16], from 0 to 85% in prostate cancer [11, 17, 18], from 0 to 63% in non-small-cell lung cancer [12, 19, 20], from 38.7 to 75.8% in papillary thyroid carcinoma [13, 14, 21–24], and from 15.2 to 100% in angiomyolipoma of the kidney [25-27]. These conflicting data are likely to be caused by the use of different antibodies, staining protocols, and interpretation criteria in these studies. To better understand the diagnostic impact of PR immunohistochemistry, a comprehensive and highly standardized study analyzing a large number of tumors, especially from nongynecological and nonbreast tissues, is needed. Therefore, PR expression was successfully analyzed in more than 16,000 tumor tissue samples from 147 different tumor types and subtypes as well as 76 different nonneoplastic tissue types by immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray (TMA) format in this study.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Tissue Microarrays (TMAs)

The normal tissue TMA was composed of 8 samples from 8 different donors for each of 76 different normal tissue types (608 samples on one slide). The tumor TMAs contained a total of 18,176 primary tumors from 147 tumor types and subtypes. Detailed histopathological data on grade, pT, and pN status (HER2 status for breast cancer) were available from 2,139 breast cancers, 259 endometrial cancers, 192 neuroendocrine neoplasms, and 524 ovarian tumors. Clinical follow-up data were available from 877 patients with breast cancer. In these patients, the median follow-up time was 43 (range 1-88) months. The composition of both normal and tumor TMAs is described in detail in the results section. All samples were from the archives of the Institutes of Pathology, University Hospital of Hamburg, Germany; the Institute of Pathology, Clinical Center Osnabrueck, Germany; and Department of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, Germany. Tissues were fixed in 4% buffered formalin and then embedded in paraffin. One tissue spot (diameter: 0.6 mm) was transmitted from a tumor containing donor block in an empty recipient paraffin block. The use of archived remnants of diagnostic tissues for manufacturing of TMAs and their analysis for research purposes as well as patient data analysis has been approved by local laws (HmbKHG, §12) and by the local ethics committee (Ethics commission Hamburg, WF-049/09). All work has been carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration.

2.2. Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Freshly prepared TMA sections were immunostained in one day in one experiment. Slides were deparaffinized with xylol, rehydrated through a graded alcohol series, and exposed to heat-induced antigen retrieval for 5 minutes in an autoclave at 121°C in pH 7.8 buffer. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with Dako Peroxidase Blocking Solution™ (Agilent, CA, USA; #52023) for 10 minutes. Primary antibody specific against PR (rabbit recombinant, MSVA-570R, #3332-570R; MS Validated Antibodies GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) was applied at 37°C for 60 minutes at a dilution of 1 : 50 (final concentration: 4 μg/ml). Bound antibody was then visualized using the EnVision Kit™ (Agilent, CA, USA; #K5007) according to the manufacturer's directions. The sections were counterstained with haemalaun. For the purpose of antibody validation, immunohistochemical staining of the normal tissue TMA was performed with a different antiprogesterone antibody (mouse monoclonal, PgR636, Agilent, CA, USA; # IR068) on the DAKO autostainer system. Only nuclear staining was scored. For normal tissues, the staining intensity of positive cells was semiquantitively recorded (+, ++, +++). For tumor tissues, the percentage of PR positive tumor cells was estimated, and the staining intensity was semiquantitatively recorded (0, 1+, 2+, 3+). For statistical analyses, the staining results were categorized into four groups as follows: negative: no staining at all, weak staining: staining intensity of 1+ in ≤70% or staining intensity of 2+ in ≤30% of tumor cells, moderate staining: staining intensity of 1+ in >70%, staining intensity of 2+ in >30% but in ≤70% or staining intensity of 3+ in ≤30% of tumor cells, and strong staining: staining intensity of 2+ in >70% or staining intensity of 3+ in >30% of tumor cells.

2.3. Statistics

Statistical calculations were performed with JMP 14 software (SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA). Contingency tables and the chi2-test were performed to search for associations between PR and tumor phenotype. Survival curves were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier. The log-rank test was applied to detect significant differences between groups. A p value of ≤0.05 was defined as significant.

3. Results

3.1. Technical Issues

An interpretable result was found in 16,445 (90.5%) tumors. Noninterpretable samples were due to lack of unequivocal tumor cells or loss of the tissue spot during technical procedures for one or both of the markers. A sufficient number of samples of each normal tissue type was evaluable.

3.2. Progesterone Receptor Immunostaining in Normal Tissues

In normal tissues, PR was expressed in various organs of the female reproductive organs, such as ovarian stroma, corpus luteum of the ovary, epithelial and stromal cells of the fallopian tube, stromal cells and basal cell layer of the squamous epithelium of the ectocervix, stromal and epithelial cells of the endocervix, stromal and epithelial cells of the endometrium, and decidual cells. In the female breast, some epithelial cells showed a moderate to strong staining. A positive immunostaining was also observed in islets of Langerhans of the pancreas, in a subset of epithelial cells of the adenohypophysis, a subset of adrenocortical cells, in a small number of epithelial cells of the submandibular gland, in subsets of glomerular, tubular and stromal cells of the kidney, in epithelial cells of the cauda epididymis, and a fraction of smooth muscle cells of the ileum, esophagus, and aorta. In some organs, only stromal cells showed a positive immunostaining. This included the prostate gland, the seminal vesicle, and the urinary bladder. PR staining was completely absent in skeletal muscle, heart muscle, fat, skin (including hair follicle and sebaceous glands), oral mucosa of the lip, oral cavity, surface epithelium of the tonsil, and transitional mucosa of the anal canal, squamous epithelium of the esophagus, urothelium of the renal pelvis and urinary bladder, corpus spongiosum of the penis, placental trophoblastic cells, mucosa of the stomach, duodenum, ileum, appendix, colon, rectum and gall bladder, liver, parotid gland, sublingual gland, Brunner gland of the duodenum, testis, respiratory epithelium and glands of bronchi and sinus paranasales, lung, thyroid and parathyroid gland, spleen, lymph node, thymus, cerebellum, and cerebrum. Images of PR staining in normal tissues are shown in Figure 1. By using the antibody PgR636, all positive stainings described above were confirmed. An additional staining of occasional mast cells, intracellular mucin within goblet cells in the tubular gut, and colloid of the thyroid gland was only seen by this antibody and was considered a tolerable antibody-specific cross-reactivity (Supplementary Figure 1).
Figure 1

PR immunostaining in normal tissues. Positive PR immunostaining in (a) stromal cells and epithelial cells in proliferative endometrium, (b) stromal cells and epithelial cell in endocervix, (c) luminal cells of breast epithelium, (d) islets of Langerhans in pancreas, (e) stromal cells of the prostate, and (f) stromal cells of seminal vesicle.

3.3. Progesterone Receptor Immunostaining in Neoplastic Tissues

A PR immunostaining was found in 1,856 (11.3%) of 16,445 cases (573 weak, 333 moderate, 950 strong; Table 1). 55 of 147 (37.4%) different tumor entities included at least one PR-positive case and 31 (21%) entities contained at least one tumor with strong PR staining. PR immunostaining was detected in 57.4% of breast tumors, 28.6% of other gynecological tumors, and 1.8% of nongynecological and nonmammary tumors. A ranking of tumor categories according to the rate of PR positivity is given in Table 2. Particularly, high rates of PR positivity were seen in neuroendocrine tumors (54.3%) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (35.7%) of the pancreas. The group of nonbreast and nongynecological tumors expressing PR in at least 10% of cases included also Leydig cell tumor of the testis (36.7%), medullary thyroid carcinoma (20.4%), small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the prostate (16.7%), small cell carcinoma of the lung (12.5%), angiomyolipoma (12.5%), adrenal cortical carcinoma (11.5%), follicular thyroid carcinoma (11.3%), and papillary thyroid carcinoma (10.6%). Images of progesterone receptor staining in “nonmammary” and “nongynecological” tumors are shown in Figure 2.
Table 1

PR immunostaining in tumors.

Tumor entityOn TMA (n)PR immunostaining
Analyzable (n)Negative (%)Weak (%)Moderate (%)Strong (%)
Tumors of the skin (n = 410)Pilomatrixoma3534100.00.00.00.0
Basal cell carcinoma8882100.00.00.00.0
Benign nevus2929100.00.00.00.0
Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin9090100.00.00.00.0
Malignant melanoma4646100.00.00.00.0
Malignant melanoma lymph node metastasis8684100.00.00.00.0
Merkel cell carcinoma4645100.00.00.00.0

Tumors of the head and neck (n = 1,188)Squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx6054100.00.00.00.0
Squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx6059100.00.00.00.0
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (floor of the mouth)8080100.00.00.00.0
Warthin tumor of the parotid gland5553100.00.00.00.0
Adenocarcinoma, NOS (papillary cystadenocarcinoma)1411100.00.00.00.0
Salivary duct carcinoma1513100.00.00.00.0
Acinic cell carcinoma of the salivary gland181135100.00.00.00.0
Adenocarcinoma NOS of the salivary gland1098197.50.01.21.2
Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary gland180126100.00.00.00.0
Basal cell adenocarcinoma of the salivary gland2521100.00.00.00.0
Basal cell adenoma of the salivary gland8666100.00.00.00.0
Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary gland5352100.00.00.00.0
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary gland34332799.70.00.30.0
Myoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary gland211794.10.05.90.0
Myoepithelioma of the salivary gland1110100.00.00.00.0
Oncocytic carcinoma of the salivary gland128100.00.00.00.0
Polymorphous adenocarcinoma, low grade, of the salivary gland4134100.00.00.00.0
Pleomorphic adenoma of the salivary gland5341100.00.00.00.0

Tumors of the lung, pleura, and thymus (n = 382)Adenocarcinoma of the lung196191100.00.00.00.0
Squamous cell carcinoma of the lung8075100.00.00.00.0
Small cell carcinoma of the lung161687.56.36.30.0
Mesothelioma, epitheloid3930100.00.00.00.0
Mesothelioma, other types7670100.00.00.00.0

Tumors of the female genital tract (n = 1,534)Squamous cell carcinoma of the vagina7874100.00.00.00.0
Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva130123100.00.00.00.0
Squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix12912699.20.80.00.0
Adenocarcinoma of the cervix212190.54.84.80.0
Endometrioid endometrial carcinoma23619733.521.813.731.0
Endometrial serous carcinoma826879.414.72.92.9
Carcinosarcoma of the uterus484187.84.90.07.3
Endometrial carcinoma, high grade, G3131283.38.30.08.3
Endometrial clear cell carcinoma86100.00.00.00.0
Endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary1109238.018.514.129.3
Serous carcinoma of the ovary55952067.922.14.25.8
Mucinous carcinoma of the ovary967794.80.00.05.2
Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary504588.96.72.22.2
Carcinosarcoma of the ovary474465.922.76.84.5
Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary373718.929.729.721.6
Leydig cell tumor of the ovary4450.050.00.00.0
Sertoli cell tumor of the ovary11100.00.00.00.0
Sertoli Leydig cell tumor of the ovary3333.366.70.00.0
Steroid cell tumor of the ovary33100.00.00.00.0
Brenner tumor414095.00.00.05.0

Tumors of the breast (n = 2,051)Invasive breast carcinoma of no special type1764160542.910.710.735.8
Lobular carcinoma of the breast36330243.09.99.637.4
Medullary carcinoma of the breast343387.93.03.06.1
Tubular carcinoma of the breast292317.48.78.765.2
Mucinous carcinoma of the breast655123.57.87.860.8
Phyllodes tumor of the breast503727.00.018.954.1

Tumors of the digestive system (n = 3,911)Adenomatous polyp, low-grade dysplasia5050100.00.00.00.0
Adenomatous polyp, high-grade dysplasia5050100.00.00.00.0
Adenocarcinoma of the colon2482214699.90.00.00.0
Gastric adenocarcinoma, diffuse type176150100.00.00.00.0
Gastric adenocarcinoma, intestinal type174157100.00.00.00.0
Gastric adenocarcinoma, mixed type6249100.00.00.00.0
Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus8383100.00.00.00.0
Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus7575100.00.00.00.0
Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal8988100.00.00.00.0
Cholangiocarcinoma5050100.00.00.00.0
Gallbladder adenocarcinoma3131100.00.00.00.0
Gallbladder klatskin tumor4139100.00.00.00.0
Hepatocellular carcinoma300299100.00.00.00.0
Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas61250597.81.00.60.6
Pancreatic/ampullary adenocarcinoma8975100.00.00.00.0
Acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas1615100.00.00.00.0
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)5049100.00.00.00.0

Tumors of the urinary system (n = 3,181)Noninvasive papillary urothelial carcinoma, pTa G2 low grade177170100.00.00.00.0
Noninvasive papillary urothelial carcinoma, pTa G2 high grade141135100.00.00.00.0
Noninvasive papillary urothelial carcinoma, pTa G3219195100.00.00.00.0
Urothelial carcinoma, pT2-4 G373563699.70.00.00.3
Squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder2222100.00.00.00.0
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bladder232395.74.30.00.0
Sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma2523100.00.00.00.0
Urothelial carcinoma of the kidney pelvis626198.41.60.00.0
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma1287117999.90.10.00.0
Papillary renal cell carcinoma36832999.70.30.00.0
Clear cell (tubulo) papillary renal cell carcinoma262495.80.04.20.0
Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma17015395.43.30.01.3
Oncocytoma25723193.16.50.40.0

Tumors of the male genital organs (n = 1,350)Adenocarcinoma of the prostate, Gleason 3 + 38383100.00.00.00.0
Adenocarcinoma of the prostate, Gleason 4 + 48080100.00.00.00.0
Adenocarcinoma of the prostate, Gleason 5 + 58585100.00.00.00.0
Adenocarcinoma of the prostate (recurrence)25825799.60.40.00.0
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the prostate191883.316.70.00.0
Seminoma621586100.00.00.00.0
Embryonal carcinoma of the testis5045100.00.00.00.0
Leydig cell tumor of the testis303063.333.33.30.0
Sertoli cell tumor of the testis210.0100.00.00.0
Sex cord stromal tumor of the testis110.00.0100.00.0
Spermatocytic tumor of the testis11100.00.00.00.0
Yolk sac tumor5044100.00.00.00.0
Teratoma504195.10.00.04.9
Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis8078100.00.00.00.0

Tumors of endocrine organs (n = 1,171)Adenoma of the thyroid gland11411292.94.52.70.0
Papillary thyroid carcinoma39237989.49.01.10.5
Follicular thyroid carcinoma15415188.75.33.32.6
Medullary thyroid carcinoma11110879.616.71.91.9
Parathyroid gland adenoma4342100.00.00.00.0
Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma454397.72.30.00.0
Adrenal cortical adenoma504495.52.30.02.3
Adrenal cortical carcinoma262688.511.50.00.0
Phaeochromocytoma5049100.00.00.00.0
Appendix, neuroendocrine tumor (NET)221794.10.05.90.0
Colorectal, neuroendocrine tumor (NET)1211100.00.00.00.0
Ileum, neuroendocrine tumor (NET)4949100.00.00.00.0
Lung, neuroendocrine tumor (NET)1918100.00.00.00.0
Pancreas, neuroendocrine tumor (NET)979445.717.09.627.7
Colorectal, neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC)1210100.00.00.00.0
Gallbladder, neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC)44100.00.00.00.0
Pancreas, neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC)141464.37.114.314.3

Tumors of haematopoetic and lymphoid tissues (n = 353)Hodgkin lymphoma5853100.00.00.00.0
Small lymphocytic lymphoma, B-cell type (B-SLL/B-CLL)5044100.00.00.00.0
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)113103100.00.00.00.0
Follicular lymphoma8880100.00.00.00.0
T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma2524100.00.00.00.0
Mantle cell lymphoma1817100.00.00.00.0
Marginal zone lymphoma1614100.00.00.00.0
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the testis1616100.00.00.00.0
Burkitt lymphoma52100.00.00.00.0

Tumors of soft tissue and bone (n = 914)Tenosynovial giant cell tumor4545100.00.00.00.0
Granular cell tumor5345100.00.00.00.0
Leiomyosarcoma383789.22.70.08.1
Liposarcoma132130100.00.00.00.0
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST)1313100.00.00.00.0
Myofibrosarcoma2626100.00.00.00.0
Angiosarcoma7366100.00.00.00.0
Angiomyolipoma918887.59.10.03.4
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans2117100.00.00.00.0
Ganglioneuroma1414100.00.00.00.0
Kaposi sarcoma85100.00.00.00.0
Neurofibroma11710495.24.80.00.0
Sarcoma, not otherwise specified (NOS)747098.60.00.01.4
Paraganglioma4141100.00.00.00.0
Ewing sarcoma2318100.00.00.00.0
Rhabdomyosarcoma66100.00.00.00.0
Schwannoma121112100.00.00.00.0
Synovial sarcoma1211100.00.00.00.0
Osteosarcoma4339100.00.00.00.0
Chondrosarcoma3822100.00.00.00.0
Rhabdoid tumor55100.00.00.00.0
Table 2

Ranking of PR immunostaining in tumors (only tumor entities with ≥3 evaluable tumors were included in the ranking. Mammary tumors are italicized. Gynecological tumors are in bold).

Ranking PR≥ weak (%)≥ mod (%)Strong (%)
Tubular carcinoma of the breast 82.673.965.2
Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary 81.151.421.6
Mucinous carcinoma of the breast 76.568.660.8
Phyllodes tumor of the breast 73.073.054.1
Sertoli Leydig cell tumor of the ovary 66.70.00.0
Endometrioid endometrial carcinoma 66.544.731.0
Endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary 62.043.529.3
Invasive breast carcinoma of no special type 57.146.535.8
Lobular carcinoma of the breast 57.047.037.4
Pancreas, neuroendocrine tumor (NET)54.337.227.7
Leydig cell tumor of the ovary 50.00.00.0
Leydig cell tumor of the testis36.73.30.0
Pancreas, neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC)35.728.614.3
Carcinosarcoma of the ovary 34.111.44.5
Serous carcinoma of the ovary 32.110.05.8
Endometrial serous carcinoma 20.65.92.9
Medullary thyroid carcinoma20.43.71.9
Endometrial carcinoma, high grade, G3 16.78.38.3
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the prostate16.70.00.0
Small cell carcinoma of the lung12.56.30.0
Angiomyolipoma12.53.43.4
Carcinosarcoma of the uterus 12.27.37.3
Medullary carcinoma of the breast 12.19.16.1
Adrenal cortical carcinoma11.50.00.0
Follicular thyroid carcinoma11.36.02.6
Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary 11.14.42.2
Leiomyosarcoma10.88.18.1
Papillary thyroid carcinoma10.61.60.5
Adenocarcinoma of the cervix 9.54.80.0
Adenoma of the thyroid gland7.12.70.0
Oncocytoma6.90.40.0
Myoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary gland5.95.90.0
Appendix, neuroendocrine tumor (NET)5.95.90.0
Mucinous carcinoma of the ovary 5.25.25.2
Brenner tumor 5.05.05.0
Teratoma4.94.94.9
Neurofibroma4.80.00.0
Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma4.61.31.3
Adrenal cortical adenoma4.52.32.3
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bladder4.30.00.0
Clear cell (tubulo) papillary renal cell carcinoma4.24.20.0
Adenocarcinoma NOS of the salivary gland2.52.51.2
Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma2.30.00.0
Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas2.21.20.6
Urothelial carcinoma of the kidney pelvis1.60.00.0
Sarcoma, not otherwise specified (NOS)1.41.41.4
Squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix 0.80.00.0
Adenocarcinoma of the prostate (recurrence)0.40.00.0
Urothelial carcinoma, pT2-4 G30.30.30.3
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the salivary gland0.30.30.0
Papillary renal cell carcinoma0.30.00.0
Adenocarcinoma of the colon0.10.00.0
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma0.10.00.0
Figure 2

Moderate to strong PR immunostaining in “nonmammary” and “nongynecological” tumors. (a) Neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas. (b) Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas. (c) Small cell carcinoma of the lung. (d) Leydig cell tumor of the testis. (e) Medullary thyroid carcinoma. (f) Follicular thyroid carcinoma. (g) Papillary thyroid carcinoma. (h) Angiomyolipoma.

3.4. Progesterone Receptor Immunostaining, Tumor Phenotype, and Prognosis

Reduced PR immunostaining was significantly associated with adverse histopathological and clinical features in breast carcinoma, endometroid endometrial carcinoma, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (Table 3). In breast carcinomas of no special type, reduced PR immunostaining was linked to advanced tumor stage (p < 0.0001), lymph node metastasis (p < 0.0001), high tumor grade (p < 0.0001), distant metastasis (p < 0.0001), positive HER2 status (p < 0.0001), and shorter overall survival (negative vs. any positivity, HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.5, p = 0.0127; Supplementary Figure 2). In endometroid endometrial carcinoma, low PR immunostaining was linked to lymph node metastasis (p = 0.0327). In 49 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, low PR immunostaining was linked to lymph node metastasis (p = 0.0345). PR staining was unrelated to histopathological features in 343 serous ovarian carcinomas. Within nonmammary, nongynecological, and nonprostate tumors, PR positivity was more common in tumors from female (3.2% of 3,085) than from male patients (1.6% of 4,752; p < 0.0001).
Table 3

PR immunostaining and tumor phenotype in breast carcinoma of no special type, endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

n Progesterone receptor IHC result p
Negative (%)Weak (%)Moderate (%)Strong (%)
Breast carcinoma of no special typeTumor stagepT174936.79.911.941.5<0.0001
pT261344.511.411.432.6
pT3-412254.911.54.129.5
GradeG118323.010.912.653.6<0.0001
G279934.310.413.441.9
G354359.710.77.222.5
Nodal stagepN068240.28.89.841.2<0.0001
pN132538.214.514.233.2
pN211447.413.210.528.9
pN36863.213.25.917.6
Distant metastasispM019938.77.510.643.2<0.0001
pM110464.411.55.818.3
HER2 statusNegative85037.810.511.140.7<0.0001
Positive12063.312.56.717.5

Endometrioid endometrial carcinomaTumor stagepT19429.822.313.834.00.8885
pT22334.817.48.739.1
pT3-42934.524.117.224.1
Nodal stagepN04320.925.618.634.90.0327
pN+2556.016.08.020.0

Serous ovarian carcinomaTumor stagepT13351.518.29.121.20.0750
pT24369.820.92.37.0
pT326772.318.73.75.2
Nodal stagepN08365.126.56.02.40.0534
pN117176.015.82.35.8

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumorsTumor stagepT11040.010.020.030.00.0954
pT21526.733.36.733.3
pT32268.24.513.613.6
pT420.050.00.050.0
Nodal stagepN02429.220.816.733.30.0345
pN+2171.49.59.59.5

4. Discussion

Our successful analysis of more than 16,000 tumors revealed PR expression in 57.4% of breast tumors, 28.6% of other gynecological tumors, and 1.8% of nongynecological and nonmammary tumors. Given the large size of our study, particular emphasis was placed on the validation of our reagents and protocols. The International Working Group for Antibody Validation (IWGAV) has proposed that antibody validation for immunohistochemistry on formalin fixed tissues should include either a comparison of the findings obtained by two independent antibodies or a comparison with expression data obtained by another independent method [28-30]. Both methods were applied in this project. A comparison of our IHC data with RNA data provided from three independent publicly available databases (Human Protein Atlas (HPA) RNA-seq tissue dataset [31], FANTOM5 project [32, 33], and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project [34]) revealed IHC positivity in all tissues with unequivocal RNA expression such as the organs of the female genital tract, prostate, seminal vesicle, epididymis, and the pituitary gland. RNA expression had previously not been recorded for several tissues with a positive PR immunostaining such as the aortic wall, pancreatic islet cells, kidney, duodenum, adrenal gland, stroma cells of urinary bladder and pyelon mucosa, smooth muscle cells of gastrointestinal tract, or salivary glands. These tissues had previously either not been analyzed on the RNA level (aortic wall, Brunner glands of the duodenum) or the PR positive cells constitute such small fractions of their respective organs total number of cells that their PR RNAs may not have occurred at detectable quantities. True PR expression in all these cell types is supported by identical stainings obtained by the antibody PgR636 (Supplementary Figure 1). Additional positivity obtained by PgR636 in goblet cells of the gut and of thyroidal colloid was considered an antibody cross-reactivity specific to PgR636 because these tissues remained unstained by MSVA-570R. The PR immunostaining results in breast and other gynecological tumors were in the range of most previous studies which is another confirmation of our experimental approach. The slightly lower PR positivity rate of breast tumors in our study (57.4%) compared to the 60-70% positivity rate described in previous studies (reviewed in [35]) may reflect a TMA effect. TMAs generally result in slightly lower positivity rates than seen in large section analysis. In a highly standardized study comparing PR immunostaining between TMAs and traditional sections in more than 500 breast cancers, Torhorst et al. [36] had found a PR positivity of 41-53% in multiple TMAs and 60% PR positivity in large sections. Although progesterone receptors are widely expressed in ovarian cancers, their distribution varies significantly by histology. Particularly, sex cord stromal tumors showed high PR positivity (50-81%), which fits well with previous studies [37-39]. PR positivity was found in 62% of endometroid but only in 32% of high grade serous ovarian carcinomas. This is in line with earlier studies describing 41-67% PR positivity in endometroid [40-43] but only 25-50% PR positivity in high-grade serous carcinomas of the ovary [43, 44]. In the uterus, endometrioid carcinomas (67%) also showed a much higher rate of PR positivity than serous carcinomas (21%). Consistent with these data, earlier reports have described PR positivity in 62.3-81.3% of endometroid [45-47] but only in 20-46% of serous carcinomas of the endometrium [48, 49]. As expected from previous studies (reviewed in [35, 50]) an absent or low expression of PR in breast and endometrium cancer was linked to unfavorable patient outcome. This observation seemingly reflects a loss of PR expression during cellular dedifferentiation as part of tumor progression. Positive PR immunostaining was found in 239 tumors from 30 different categories in nonbreast and nongynecological tumors. In this group, a particularly high rate of PR positivity was observed in sex cord stromal tumors of the testis and in several neuroendocrine neoplasms. Among neuroendocrine tumors, there was a noticeable accumulation of positive cases among tumors originating from the pancreas. PR positivity was found in 54% of neuroendocrine tumors and in 36% of neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas which is consistent with earlier studies describing PR positivity in 58-82% of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors [51-53]. Given that only 0-6% of intestinal and none of the neuroendocrine tumors of the lung showed PR immunostaining, immunohistochemical PR analysis appears to represent a relevant diagnostic tool to determine the origin of metastases from neuroendocrine tumors. In concordance with our results, PR immunostaining has thus been proposed in the differential diagnosis between metastasis of small bowel neuroendocrine tumor and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor [54]. The high rate of PR positive neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas corresponds to the strong nuclear PR immunostaining in islets of Langerhans in normal pancreatic tissue [55, 56]. It is therefore not surprising that reduced PR staining, potentially a sign of dedifferentiation, was associated with the presence of lymph node metastasis in our pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Viale et al. also found reduced PR positivity associated with presence of metastases [53]. Another rare tumor entity of the pancreas, solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (which was not analyzed in this study), also was shown to express PR and therefore could come into differential diagnosis when evaluating a PR positive pancreatic tumor [51]. Other neuroendocrine neoplasms that showed PR expression in a significant fraction of cases predominantly included poorly differentiated small-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas from various sites of origin and medullary carcinoma of the thyroid. It is of note that various other tumors of the thyroid gland also showed PR immunostaining in 7-12% of cases. Other investigators have reported even higher rates of PR positivity in 39-76% of papillary thyroid carcinoma [13, 14, 21–23] and 17% of follicular thyroid carcinoma [57]. A dependency of PR in the pathogenesis of at least some thyroid cancers could explain why thyroid cancer is more than twice as common in women compared to men [58] and is the second most common type of cancer in pregnancy [59]. Bertoni et al. have demonstrated a direct effect of progesterone on thyroid cells, upregulating genes involved in thyroid function and growth [60]. Furthermore, patients receiving mifepristone, a PR blocker, had a decrease in thyroid hormone levels [61]. Interestingly, among 7,657 nonmammary and nongynecological tumors, significantly, more PR-positive tumors were seen in women (3.2%) than in men (1.6%), although there are no great quantitative differences in the progesterone serum levels between women and men outside the luteal phase [62]. In summary, our analysis of 147 different tumor types for PR immunostaining provides a ranking list of tumor entities according to their prevalence of PR positivity. Given the highly discordant literature data, such a ranking order would have been difficult to extract from the existing literature (summarized in Supplementary Figure 3). These data help to better understand the diagnostic utility of PR IHC. The distinction of neuroendocrine neoplasms derived from the pancreas appears to represent a particularly strong and poorly known application of PR IHC.
  62 in total

1.  A paracrine role for the epithelial progesterone receptor in mammary gland development.

Authors:  C Brisken; S Park; T Vass; J P Lydon; B W O'Malley; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Is there a role for estrogen and progesterone receptors in gall bladder cancer?

Authors:  P J Shukla; S G Barreto; P Gupta; R Neve; M Ramadwar; K Deodhar; S Mehta; S V Shrikhande; K M Mohandas
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Clinicopathological significance of the expression of estrogen receptor-beta and vascular endothelial growth factor-A in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Deepa Taggarshe; Catherine Lobocki; Boris Silberberg; Alasdair McKendrick; Vijay K Mittal
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Serum levels of sex hormones and expression of their receptors in thyroid tissue in female patients with various types of thyroid neoplasms.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Guang Chen; Xian-Ying Meng; Zhong-Hui Liu; Su Dong
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.250

5.  Investigations of the estrogen (ER-ICA-test) and the progesterone receptor in the prostate and prostatic carcinoma on immunohistochemical basis.

Authors:  N Wernert; J Gerdes; V Loy; G Seitz; O Scherr; G Dhom
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1988

6.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm: Key immunohistochemical profiles for differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Yusuke Ohara; Tatsuya Oda; Shinji Hashimoto; Yoshimasa Akashi; Ryoichi Miyamoto; Tsuyoshi Enomoto; Kaishi Satomi; Yukio Morishita; Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Update of the FANTOM web resource: expansion to provide additional transcriptome atlases.

Authors:  Marina Lizio; Imad Abugessaisa; Shuhei Noguchi; Atsushi Kondo; Akira Hasegawa; Chung Chau Hon; Michiel de Hoon; Jessica Severin; Shinya Oki; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; Piero Carninci; Takeya Kasukawa; Hideya Kawaji
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Progesterone reduces cell survival in primary cultures of endometrioid ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Enrique Pedernera; María J Gómora; Flavia Morales-Vásquez; Delia Pérez-Montiel; Carmen Mendez
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.234

9.  Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2 Receptor Markers in Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Caifeng Wang; Davis A Tran; Melinda Z Fu; Wei Chen; Sidney W Fu; Xu Li
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Expression of Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, Survivin, Enhancer of zeste homolog -2, Cyclooxygenase-2, p53 and p16 molecular markers in Gall bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Amit Gupta; Sweety Gupta; Rishit Mani; Prashant Durgapal; Bela Goyal; Deepak Rajput; Shalinee Rao; Puneet Dhar; Manoj Gupta; Sanjeev Kishore; Ravi Kant
Journal:  J Carcinog       Date:  2021-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.