Literature DB >> 11733374

Tissue microarrays for rapid linking of molecular changes to clinical endpoints.

J Torhorst1, C Bucher, J Kononen, P Haas, M Zuber, O R Köchli, F Mross, H Dieterich, H Moch, M Mihatsch, O P Kallioniemi, G Sauter.   

Abstract

Advances in genomics and proteomics are dramatically increasing the need to evaluate large numbers of molecular targets for their diagnostic, predictive or prognostic value in clinical oncology. Conventional molecular pathology techniques are often tedious, time-consuming, and require a lot of tissue, thereby limiting both the number of tissues and the number of targets that can be evaluated. Here, we demonstrate the power of our recently described tissue microarray (TMA) technology in analyzing prognostic markers in a series of 553 breast carcinomas. Four independent TMAs were constructed by acquiring 0.6 mm biopsies from one central and from three peripheral regions of each of the formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumors. Immunostaining of TMA sections and conventional "large" sections were performed for two well- established prognostic markers, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), as well as for p53, another frequently examined protein for which the data on prognostic utility in breast cancer are less unequivocal. Compared with conventional large section analysis, a single sample from each tumor identified about 95% of the information for ER, 75 to 81% for PR, and 70 to 74% for p53. However, all 12 TMA analyses (three antibodies on four different arrays) yielded as significant or more significant associations with tumor-specific survival than large section analyses (p < 0.0015 for each of the 12 comparisons). A single sample from each tumor was sufficient to identify associations between molecular alterations and clinical outcome. It is concluded that, contrary to expectations, tissue heterogeneity did not negatively influence the predictive power of the TMA results. TMA technology will be of substantial value in rapidly translating genomic and proteomics information to clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11733374      PMCID: PMC1850582          DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63075-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9440            Impact factor:   4.307


  27 in total

1.  Prognostic usefulness of estrogen receptor immunocytochemical assays for human breast cancer.

Authors:  E R DeSombre; S M Thorpe; C Rose; R R Blough; K W Andersen; B B Rasmussen; W J King
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Heterogeneity in hormone receptor status in primary and metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  C K Osborne
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Association of c-erbB-2 protein over-expression with high rate of cell proliferation, increased risk of visceral metastasis and poor long-term survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  O P Kallioniemi; K Holli; T Visakorpi; T Koivula; H H Helin; J J Isola
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1991-11-11       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Immunocytochemical estrogen and progestin receptor assays in breast cancer with monoclonal antibodies. Histopathologic, demographic, and biochemical correlations and relationship to endocrine response and survival.

Authors:  L P Pertschuk; D S Kim; K Nayer; J G Feldman; K B Eisenberg; A C Carter; Z T Rong; W L Thelmo; J Fleisher; G L Greene
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Tissue microarrays for gene amplification surveys in many different tumor types.

Authors:  P Schraml; J Kononen; L Bubendorf; H Moch; H Bissig; A Nocito; M J Mihatsch; O P Kallioniemi; G Sauter
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  HER-2/neu oncogene protein and prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  A K Tandon; G M Clark; G C Chamness; A Ullrich; W L McGuire
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene.

Authors:  D J Slamon; G M Clark; S G Wong; W J Levin; A Ullrich; W L McGuire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The multitumor (sausage) tissue block: novel method for immunohistochemical antibody testing.

Authors:  H Battifora
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.662

9.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C W Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  Human breast cancer: heterogeneity of estrogen binding sites.

Authors:  H S Poulsen; J Jensen; C Hermansen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  141 in total

1.  Software tools for high-throughput analysis and archiving of immunohistochemistry staining data obtained with tissue microarrays.

Authors:  Chih Long Liu; Wijan Prapong; Yasodha Natkunam; Ash Alizadeh; Kelli Montgomery; C Blake Gilks; Matt van de Rijn
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Expression of cytokeratins 17 and 5 identifies a group of breast carcinomas with poor clinical outcome.

Authors:  Matt van de Rijn; Charles M Perou; Rob Tibshirani; Phillippe Haas; Olli Kallioniemi; Juha Kononen; Joachim Torhorst; Guido Sauter; Markus Zuber; Ossi R Köchli; Frank Mross; Holger Dieterich; Rob Seitz; Doug Ross; David Botstein; Pat Brown
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 3.  Demystified...tissue microarray technology.

Authors:  J Packeisen; E Korsching; H Herbst; W Boecker; H Buerger
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2003-08

4.  Tissue microarrays for predictive molecular pathology.

Authors:  G Sauter; M Mirlacher
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  [Tissue microarrays. High-throughput procedures to verify potential biomarkers].

Authors:  R Kuefer; M D Hofer; J E Gschwend; M A Rubin
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Interrogating mouse mammary cancer models: insights from gene expression profiling.

Authors:  Antonio A Fargiano; Kartiki V Desai; Jeffrey E Green
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 7.  Tissue microarrays.

Authors:  Susan Henshall
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.673

8.  Breast Biomarkers-Comparison on Whole Section and Tissue Microarray Section.

Authors:  Sneha S Chavan; Savithri Ravindra; Msn Prasad
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

9.  Immunoprofile of cervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas using a tissue microarray.

Authors:  A Alkushi; J Irving; F Hsu; B Dupuis; C L Liu; M Rijn; C B Gilks
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2003-02-12       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Sequence analysis and high-throughput immunohistochemical profiling of KIT (CD 117) expression in uveal melanoma using tissue microarrays.

Authors:  Mona Pache; Katharina Glatz; Doris Bösch; Stephan Dirnhofer; Martina Mirlacher; Ronald Simon; Peter Schraml; Alex Rufle; Josef Flammer; Guido Sauter; Peter Meyer
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.