Literature DB >> 35991750

Complications associated with PEAK PlasmaBlade from 2010 to 2020 from MAUDE.

Esther Lee1,2, Amir Elzomor1, Sameh Boulos1, Olivia Silva1, Luke J Pasick3, Daniel A Benito1, Jane Tong4, Philip Zapanta1, Arjun S Joshi1, Joseph F Goodman1, Punam G Thakkar1.   

Abstract

The pulse-electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade 3.0 and 4.0 (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) is an electrosurgical technology that is widely used in surgery. Our study aimed to summarize device malfunctions, patient injuries, and interventions related to PEAK PlasmaBlade 3.0 and 4.0. The US Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was queried for reports of PlasmaBlade adverse events from June 6, 2010, to August 30, 2020. Data were extracted from reports pertaining to PlasmaBlade 3.0 and 4.0. A total of 384 medical device reports were identified, from which 424 adverse events were extracted. Of those, 348 (82.1%) were device malfunctions, 53 (12.5%) were patient injuries, and 23 (5.4%) were operator injuries. Device malfunctions were most frequently caused by delaminated coating (110, 25.9%), followed by ignition or fire (56, 13.2%). Operator injury was most frequently caused by thermal injury (19, 4.5%), followed by laceration (4, 0.9%). Pacemakers (22, 57.9%) were the most common devices causing interference. PEAK PlasmaBlade 3.0 and 4.0 have demonstrated utility during surgeries but are associated with adverse events. Interventions that aim to educate physicians on potential risks may help reduce the incidence of complications. Future studies with standardized reporting protocols are warranted.
Copyright © 2022 Baylor University Medical Center.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; MAUDE; PlasmaBlade; patient safety

Year:  2022        PMID: 35991750      PMCID: PMC9373757          DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2075686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)        ISSN: 0899-8280


  10 in total

Review 1.  Surgical fires, a clear and present danger.

Authors:  I E Yardley; L J Donaldson
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 2.392

2.  Electrosurgery: history, principles, and current and future uses.

Authors:  Nader N Massarweh; Ned Cosgriff; Douglas P Slakey
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Fire/burn risk with electrosurgical devices and endoscopy fiberoptic cables.

Authors:  Lee P Smith; Soham Roy
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  Comparative healing of surgical incisions created by the PEAK PlasmaBlade, conventional electrosurgery, and a scalpel.

Authors:  Shang A Loh; Grace A Carlson; Edward I Chang; Eric Huang; Daniel Palanker; Geoffrey C Gurtner
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Rare electrosurgical complications in tonsillectomy: Analysis of national adverse event reporting.

Authors:  Alisa Yamasaki; Neil Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Frequency of pacemaker malfunction associated with monopolar electrosurgery during pulse generator replacement or upgrade surgery.

Authors:  Yun Lin; Daniel P Melby; Balaji Krishnan; Selcuk Adabag; Venkatakrishna Tholakanahalli; Jian-Ming Li
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Comparative analysis on the effect of low-thermal plasma dissection device (PEAK PlasmaBlade) vs conventional electrosurgery in post-bariatric abdominoplasty: A retrospective randomised clinical study.

Authors:  Torsten Schlosshauer; Marcus Kiehlmann; Marc-Oliver Riener; Robert Sader; Ulrich M Rieger
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Complications associated with PlasmaBlade TnA during tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy from 2010 to 2020: A MAUDE study.

Authors:  Esther Lee; Jane Y Tong; Luke J Pasick; Daniel A Benito; Arjun Joshi; Joseph F Goodman; Punam G Thakkar
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 1.808

9.  Electromagnetic interference caused by common surgical energy-based devices on an implanted cardiac defibrillator.

Authors:  Alessandro Paniccia; Marc Rozner; Edward L Jones; Nicole T Townsend; Paul D Varosy; James E Dunning; Guillaume Girard; Christopher Weyer; Gregory V Stiegmann; Thomas N Robinson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Plasma Technology Reduces Blood Loss in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Andrea Piazzolla; Davide Bizzoca; Giuseppe Solarino; Claudia Parato; Biagio Moretti
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-06-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.