Literature DB >> 18439950

Fire/burn risk with electrosurgical devices and endoscopy fiberoptic cables.

Lee P Smith1, Soham Roy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to systematically explore the fire and burn risk associated with fiberoptic cables and electrosurgical devices.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 300-W light source was connected to a standard gray fiberoptic light cable. The end of the cable was either rested atop or buried within a cotton towel or polypropylene drape in the presence or absence of 100% oxygen for up to 10 minutes. A monopolar electrosurgical device set at 1 W, 10 W, or 30 W was tested on a cotton towel or polypropylene drape for a period of 30 seconds. All trials were repeated.
RESULTS: Resting the light cable on top of the cotton towel or polypropylene drape with or without oxygen produced no result. Burying the end of the cable within the drape produced a hole in the drape within 15 seconds both with and without oxygen. Burying the end of the cable within the cotton towel produced a yellow discoloration after 2 minutes both with and without oxygen. The monopolar electrosurgical device set at 30 W burned immediately through the polypropylene drape, producing a skin burn. All other trials with monopolar electrocautery produced no result. No flame or fire was produced in any trial.
CONCLUSIONS: Fiberoptic cables and electrosurgical generators represent a serious burn risk for surgical patients, with operating room drapes and towels affording only limited protection. Otolaryngologists should be keenly aware of the risks that these devices represent because our specialty uses them frequently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18439950     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2007.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0196-0709            Impact factor:   1.808


  11 in total

1.  A novel ultralow-illumination endoscope system.

Authors:  Keri Kim; Misao Kubota; Yuji Ohkawa; Takashi Shiraishi; Teruo Kawai; Akira Kobayashi; Hiromasa Yamashita; Toshio Chiba
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Image-directed fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid with safety-engineered devices.

Authors:  Randy R Sibbitt; Dennis J Palmer; Wilmer L Sibbitt; Arthur D Bankhurst
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Risks and prevention of surgical fires : A systematic review.

Authors:  I Kezze; N Zoremba; R Rossaint; A Rieg; M Coburn; G Schälte
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Operating room fires in periocular surgery.

Authors:  Michael A Connor; Anne M Menke; Ivan Vrcek; John W Shore
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Complications associated with PEAK PlasmaBlade from 2010 to 2020 from MAUDE.

Authors:  Esther Lee; Amir Elzomor; Sameh Boulos; Olivia Silva; Luke J Pasick; Daniel A Benito; Jane Tong; Philip Zapanta; Arjun S Joshi; Joseph F Goodman; Punam G Thakkar
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2022-05-19

6.  Ethical issues in surgical innovation.

Authors:  Megan E Miller; Mark Siegler; Peter Angelos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Thermal burn injury associated with a forced-air warming device.

Authors:  Kyudon Chung; Sangmook Lee; Sae-Cheol Oh; Jihye Choi; Hyun-Sook Cho
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-04-23

Review 8.  Digital ureteroscopes: technology update.

Authors:  Chad M Gridley; Bodo E Knudsen
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2017-01-27

Review 9.  Current State of Surgical Lighting.

Authors:  Jahnavi Curlin; Charles K Herman
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2020-06-19

10.  Inadvertent thermal injury following knee arthroscopic surgery in a pediatric patient.

Authors:  Daegyu Kwon; Byung-Gun Kim; Chunwoo Yang; Jonghun Won; Yoonjung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.