| Literature DB >> 35978386 |
A Pascual1, M Pauletto2, A Trocino3, M Birolo1, M Dacasto2, M Giantin2, F Bordignon1, C Ballarin2, M Bortoletti2, G Pillan2, G Xiccato1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recently, interest in the use of herbs and phytogenic compounds has grown because of their potential role in the production and health of livestock animals. Among these compounds, several tannins have been tested in poultry, but those from chestnut wood and grape-industry byproducts have attracted remarkable interest. Thus, the present study aimed to gain further insights into the mechanisms involved in the response to the dietary supplementation with extracts of chestnut wood or grape pomace. To this purpose, 864 broiler chickens were fed a control diet (C) or the same diet supplemented 0.2% chestnut wood (CN) extract or 0.2% grape pomace (GP) extract from hatching until commercial slaughtering (at 45 days of age) to assess their effects on performance, meat quality, jejunum immune response and whole-transcriptome profiling in both sexes at different ages (15 and 35 d).Entities:
Keywords: Growth; Immunohistochemistry; Meat quality; Tannins; Transcriptome
Year: 2022 PMID: 35978386 PMCID: PMC9387010 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-022-00736-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Biotechnol ISSN: 1674-9782
Ingredients and chemical composition measured in the lab (if not specified otherwise) of the control (C) diets. These diets were supplemented with 0.2% chestnut wood (CN) extracts or 0.2% grape pomace (GP) extracts to obtain the CN and GP diets, respectively
| Period of administration | 1-15 d | 15-29 d | 29 d to slaughtering |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingredients | |||
| Corn meal, % | 56.60 | 59.25 | 63.15 |
| Soybean meal (CP 48%), % | 34.50 | 30.00 | 24.60 |
| Toasted full-fat soybean meal, % | 3.00 | 5.00 | 7.00 |
| Animal fat, % | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.50 |
| Dicalcium phosphate, % | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.25 |
| Calcium carbonate, % | 0.92 | 1.33 | 1.30 |
| Sodium chloride, % | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.27 |
| L-lysine base, liquid (50%), % | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.16 |
| Methionine hydroxy analogue, % | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.23 |
| Vitamin-mineral premixa, % | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| 6-phytase (EC 3.1.3.26), % | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| L-Threonine, % | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.04 |
| Coccidiostatb, % | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.00 |
| Chemical composition | |||
| Dry matter, % | 89.2 | 89.2 | 89.3 |
| Crude protein, % | 22.2 | 20.8 | 20.2 |
| Ether extract, % | 5.4 | 5.5 | 6.4 |
| Crude fiber, % | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| Ash, % | 5.7 | 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Starch, % | 41.1 | 43.3 | 40.2 |
| Calciumc, % | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.71 |
| Phosphorousc, % | 0.58 | 0.47 | 0.42 |
| Digestible phosphorousc, % | 0.34 | 0.24 | 0.18 |
| Digestible lysinec, % | 1.32 | 1.23 | 1.05 |
| Digestible methionine + cysteinec, % | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.76 |
| Digestible threoninec, % | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.66 |
| Apparent metabolizable energyc, kcal/kg | 2982 | 3045 | 3087 |
aPremix provided per kg of feed: vit. A, 10,000 IU; vit. D3, 3500 IU; vit. E acetate, 90 mg; vit. K3, 6 mg; Biotin, 0.38 mg; Thiamine, 3.75 mg; Riboflavin, 8 mg; vit. B6, 5.75 mg; vit. B12, 0.1 mg; Niacin, 70 mg; Pantothenic acid, 17.5 mg; Folic acid, 2.25 mg; Fe, 45 mg; Cu, 10 mg; Mn, 70 mg; Zn, 65 mg; Se, 0.25 mg
bSodium Monensin, 100 mg/kg feed
cValues calculated according to FEDNA [21]
Growth performance1 (LS means) and mortality of broiler chickens until slaughter
| Diet (D) | Sex (S) | MSE | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Items | C | CN | GP | Females | Males | D | S | D×S | |
| Chickens, n | 258 | 252 | 255 | 383 | 382 | ||||
| Pens, n | 12 | 12 | 12 | 18 | 18 | ||||
| Live weight, g | |||||||||
| Initial (1 d) | 44.3 | 43.9 | 44.5 | 43.7 | 44.9 | 0.15 | <0.001 | 0.16 | 3.45 |
| 15 d | 512 | 510 | 518 | 498 | 529 | 0.23 | <0.001 | 0.12 | 50.7 |
| 29 d | 1689ab | 1669a | 1703b | 1559 | 1815 | <0.01 | <0.001 | 0.12 | 124 |
| Final (44 d)2 | 3099a | 3087a | 3146b | 2816 | 3406 | <0.01 | <0.001 | 0.02 | 217 |
| Whole trial (1-44 d) | |||||||||
| Daily weight gain2, g/d | 69.4a | 69.1a | 70.5b | 63.0 | 76.4 | <0.01 | <0.001 | 0.02 | 4.94 |
| Daily feed intake, g/d | 111 | 110 | 112 | 102 | 119 | 0.16 | <0.001 | 0.70 | 2.47 |
| Feed conversion | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.59 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 0.26 | 0.36 |
| Losses3, % | 2.27 | 4.55 | 3.41 | 3.28 | 3.54 | 0.33 | 0.70 | 0.70 | - |
MSE root mean square error. C, control diet. CN, control diet supplemented with 0.2% chestnut wood extracts. GP, control diet supplemented with 0.2% grape pomace extracts
1Individual data: live weight and daily growth rate. Pen data: feed intake and feed conversion
2Interaction Diet × Sex, Final live weight: P = 0.02: 2827 g, 2789 g and 2822 g in females fed C, CN and GP diets; 3372 g, 3381 g and 3473 g in males fed C, CN, and GP diets, respectively. Daily weight gain: P = 0.02: 63.2 g/d, 62.4 g/d and 63.1 g/d in females fed C, CN, and GP diets, 75.6 g/d, 75.8 g/d and 77.9 g/d in males fed C, CN, GP diets, respectively.
3Dead and lame chickens
a,bValues with different superscript letters significantly differ (P < 0.05)
Slaughter results, carcass traits (LS means) and myopathy rates in chickens slaughtered at 45 days of age
| Items | Diet (D) | Sex (S) | MSE | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | CN | GP | Females | Males | D | S | D×S | ||
| Chickens1, n | 258 | 252 | 255 | 383 | 382 | ||||
| Pens, n | 12 | 12 | 12 | 18 | 18 | ||||
| Cold carcasses2, g | 2352a | 2342a | 2392b | 2122 | 2602 | 0.03 | <0.001 | <0.01 | 173.06 |
| Dressing out percentage, % | 76.6 | 76.8 | 76.8 | 76.4 | 77.1 | 0.45 | <0.001 | 0.51 | 1.48 |
| Chickens, n | 48 | 48 | 48 | 72 | 72 | ||||
| Cold carcasses3 (CC), g | 2274 | 2243 | 2306 | 2063 | 2486 | 0.32 | <0.001 | 0.10 | 143.58 |
| Dressing percentage, % | 73.3 | 73.0 | 73.0 | 73.3 | 73.0 | 0.48 | 0.18 | 0.92 | 1.32 |
| Breast yield4, % CC | 39.3 | 38.8 | 39.5 | 40.0 | 38.3 | 0.16 | <0.001 | 0.56 | 1.76 |
| | 12.2 | 12.1 | 13.4 | 12.5 | 11.9 | 0.33 | <0.001 | 0.37 | 0.85 |
| Wings, % CC | 9.8 | 10.0 | 9.9 | 9.9 | 9.9 | 0.06 | 0.44 | 0.65 | 0.51 |
| Legs (thighs+drumsticks), % CC | 30.1 | 30.1 | 29.8 | 29.6 | 30.3 | 0.67 | 0.04 | 0.43 | 2.02 |
| Myopathy rates at | |||||||||
| White striping, % | 72.9 | 60.4 | 79.2 | 66.7 | 75.0 | 0.12 | 0.26 | - | - |
| Wooden breast, % | 41.7 | 25.0 | 41.7 | 16.7 | 55.6 | 0.11 | <0.001 | - | - |
| Spaghetti meat, % | 29.5 | 25.5 | 25.0 | 48.6 | 4.2 | 0.83 | <0.001 | - | - |
MSE root mean square error. C, control diet. CN, control diet supplemented with 0.2% chestnut wood extracts. GP, control diet supplemented with 0.2% grape pomace extracts
1Carcasses with feet. 2Interaction Diet × Sex, Cold carcasses: P < 0.01: 2126 g, 2103 g, 2126 g in females fed C, CN and GP diets, respectively; 2571 g, 2580 g, and 2652 g in males fed CN and GP diets. 3Without feet. 4With bone
a,bValues with different superscript letters significantly differ (P < 0.05)
Rheological traits and lipid oxidation status (TBARs) of the pectoralis major muscle in chickens slaughtered at 45 days of age
| Items | Diet (D) | Sex (S) | MSE | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | CN | GP | Females | Males | D | S | D×S | ||
| 48 | 48 | 48 | 72 | 72 | |||||
| pH | 5.99 | 5.99 | 5.95 | 5.94 | 6.02 | 0.56 | <0.01 | 0.99 | 0.16 |
| L* | 50.4 | 50.2 | 49.7 | 49.9 | 50.1 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.10 | 2.40 |
| a* | -0.04 | -0.07 | -0.15 | -0.03 | -0.15 | 0.56 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.54 |
| b* | 10.4 | 10.3 | 10.2 | 10.5 | 10.1 | 0.70 | 0.09 | 0.65 | 1.38 |
| 24 | 24 | 24 | 36 | 36 | |||||
| Cooking losses, % | 12.0 | 11.7 | 11.8 | 11.4 | 12.3 | 0.99 | 0.65 | 0.92 | 12.4 |
| Shear force, kg/g | 4.17 | 4.06 | 4.30 | 4.17 | 4.18 | 0.39 | 0.96 | 0.72 | 0.83 |
| TBARs, mg MDA/kg | 0.083 | 0.080 | 0.075 | 0.078 | 0.080 | 0.38 | 0.74 | 0.22 | 0.021 |
MSE root mean square error. C, control diet. CN, control diet supplemented with 0.2% chestnut wood extracts. GP, control diet supplemented with 0.2% grape pomace extracts
Jejunum morphometry, number of goblet cells and densities of CD45+ and CD3+ cells at 15 and 35 days of age
| Items | Diet (D) | Age (A) | Sex (S) | MSE | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | CN | GP | 15 | 35 | F | M | D | A | S | D×A | A×S1 | D×S2 | D×A×S | ||
| Broilers, n | 24 | 24 | 24 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 36 | ||||||||
| Villi height, μm | 1033b | 934a | 954ab | 866 | 1082 | 936 | 1011 | <0.001 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.44 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 111 |
| Crypt depth, μm | 145 | 139 | 144 | 138 | 147 | 140 | 145 | 0.45 | 0.04 | 0.23 | 0.70 | 0.29 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 18,5 |
| Villi / Crypt ratio | 7.49 | 7.06 | 6.96 | 6.67 | 7.67 | 7.06 | 7.28 | <0.001 | 0.16 | 0.37 | 0.70 | 0.37 | 0.20 | 0.68 | 1,00 |
| Goblet cells, n/300 μm | 21.02 | 21.67 | 22.25 | 22.84 | 20.45 | 22.20 | 21.09 | 0.24 | 0.001 | 0.06 | 0.34 | 0.12 | 0.43 | 0.27 | 2.46 |
| CD3+ cells, n/10,000 μm2 | 2242 | 2219 | 2297 | 2069 | 2436 | 2223 | 2283 | 0.16 | <0.001 | 0.09 | 0.23 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.46 | 459 |
| CD45+ cells, n/10,000 μm2 | 2879ab | 2793a | 2925b | 2437 | 3295 | 2915 | 2816 | 0.02 | <0.001 | 0.01 | 0.18 | <0.001 | 0.01 | 0.45 | 537 |
MSE root mean square error. C, control diet. CN, control diet supplemented with 0.2% chestnut wood extracts. GP, control diet supplemented with 0.2% grape pomace extracts
1Averages of traits according to Age × Sex are provided in Table S1. 2Averages of traits according to Diet × Sex are provided in Table S2.
a,bValues with different superscript letters significantly differ (P < 0.05)
Fig. 1Multiple dimensional scaling (MDS) plot of distances between expression profiles (as log2 fold change, logFC) of RNA-seq libraries (24 samples) of the jejunum of female (F) and male (M) broiler chickens fed control diet (C diet), diet added with 0.2% chestnut extracts (CN diet), and diet added with 0.2% grape pomace extracts (GP diet) at 15 d (libraries C_15d, CN_15d, GP_15d) and 35 days of age (libraries C_35d, CN_35d, GP_35d) [1F, 2F, 1M, 2M stand for the two replicates for females and the two replicates for males per age]
Number of significantly upregulated and downregulated differentially expressed genes (Fold change ≥ 2; False Discovery Rate ≤ 0.05) in the jejunum of male or female broiler chickens fed the experimental diets at 15 or 35 days of age
| Comparison | Number of up-regulated genes | Number of down-regulated genes | Total DEGs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female chickens at 15 d | |||
| CN diet vs. C diet | 7 | 8 | 15 |
| GP diet vs. C diet | 14 | 18 | 32 |
| Male chickens at 15 d | |||
| CN diet vs. C diet | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| GP diet vs. C diet | 21 | 10 | 31 |
| Female chickens at 35 d | |||
| CN diet vs. C diet | 18 | 12 | 30 |
| GP diet vs. C diet | 197 | 74 | 271 |
| Male chickens at 35 d | |||
| CN diet vs. C diet | 8 | 8 | 16 |
| GP diet vs. C diet | 2 | 4 | 6 |
DEGs differentially expressed genes. C, control diet. CN, control diet supplemented with 0.2% chestnut wood extracts. GP, control diet supplemented with 0.2% grape pomace extracts
Top 10 upregulated ( ) and downregulated ( ) differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in broiler chickens at 35 d compared with those at 15 d. For each DEG, Ensembl gene ID, log2 fold change (logFC), and False Discovery Rate (FDR), as reported in edgeR output and the Ensembl gene description, are provided
Fig. 2Over-represented KEGG pathways among the upregulated genes in broiler chickens at 35 d compared with those in broiler chickens at 15 d. The number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) belonging to each enriched KEGG pathway is reported in the x axes. Color gradient represents the P-value significance, as specified in the legend. P-values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg method
Fig. 3Results of the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA): top-35 significantly enriched KEGG pathways in broiler chickens at 35 d compared with those in broiler chickens at 15 d. Pathways showing an enrichment value > 0 are activated in 35-d broiler chickens, whereas those with an enrichment value < 0 are activated in 15-d broiler chickens. Color gradient represents the P-value significance, as specified in the legend. The P-values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg method
Top 10 upregulated ( ) and downregulated ( ) differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in females compared with those in males. For each DEG, Ensembl gene ID, log2 fold change (logFC), and False Discovery Rate (FDR), as reported in edgeR output and the Ensembl gene description, are provided
Fig. 4Results of the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA): enriched KEGG pathways in female broiler chickens compared with those in male broiler chickens. Pathways showing an enrichment value > 0 are activated in females, whereas those with an enrichment value < 0 are activated in males. Color gradient represents the P-value significance, as specified in the legend. The P-values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg method