Literature DB >> 35973215

A Chemical Approach to Introduce 2,6-Diaminopurine and 2-Aminoadenine Conjugates into Oligonucleotides without Need for Protecting Groups.

Mimouna Madaoui1, Dhrubajyoti Datta1, Kelly Wassarman1, Ivan Zlatev1, Martin Egli2, Bruce S Ross3, Muthiah Manoharan1.   

Abstract

We report a simple, postsynthetic strategy for synthesis of oligonucleotides containing 2,6-diaminopurine nucleotides and 2-aminoadenine conjugates using 2-fluoro-6-amino-adenosine. The strategy allows introduction of 2,6-diaminopurine and other 2-amino group-containing ligands. The strongly electronegative 2-fluoro deactivates 6-NH2 obviating the need for any protecting group on adenine, and simple aromatic nucleophilic substitution of fluorine makes reaction with aqueous NH3 or R-NH2 feasible at the 2-position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35973215      PMCID: PMC9425559          DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c01848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Org Lett        ISSN: 1523-7052            Impact factor:   6.072


The 2,6-diaminopurine (DAP) nucleobase was discovered in S-L2 cyanophage DNA in 1977.[1] DAP can form three hydrogen bonds with thymidine in DNA (Figure ) and uridine in RNA,[2−4] enhancing duplex stability by approximately 1–2 °C per modification relative to adenine.[5,6] NMR and circular dichroism studies showed that a duplex between DNA modified with DAP and complementary RNA adopts the A-form conformation[7,8] and that the duplex formed between DNA modified with DAP and complementary DNA adopts the B-form, which transitions to the A-form in high salt.[9,10] Thus, the DAP modification does not significantly alter the conformation of nucleic acid duplexes.
Figure 1

Three hydrogen bonds between DAP (D) and thymine as seen in the crystal structure of [d(CDCGTG)]2 (PDB ID 1VTY).[2]

Three hydrogen bonds between DAP (D) and thymine as seen in the crystal structure of [d(CDCGTG)]2 (PDB ID 1VTY).[2] The DAP modification has been studied in the context of numerous nucleic acid sugar modifications, including 2′-O-methyl (2′-OMe),[11−13] 2′-O-allyl,[14] and 2′-O-propargyl,[15] as well as in combination with anhydrohexitol,[16,17] threose nucleic acid,[18] locked nucleic acid (LNA),[13,19,20] unlocked nucleic acid,[21] double headed dimers,[22] 2′-5′ linked dimers,[23−25] N3′-P5′ linked dimers,[26,27] peptide nucleic acid,[28] and serinol nucleic acid.[29,30] Generally, DAP building blocks have been obtained from the guanosine analogue, but yields are low.[3,4,31−34] Synthetic routes have been developed using halogenated purines such as the 6-chloro-2-aminopurine,[11,13,14,16,17,20,35] 2,6-dicholoropurine,[36−38] and the commercially available 2,6-diaminopurine.[29,39] However, these strategies involve multiple, tedious synthetic steps. Because of the different reactivities of the two amines, the protection and deprotection strategies are difficult, and purification can be a challenge. Starting from the free 2,6-diaminopurine containing nucleosides, various protected DAP phosphoramidites have been obtained using homoprotecting group approaches with benzoyl,[5,19] acetyl,[13] isobutyl,[13] dimethylformamidine,[40] phenoxyacetyl,[11] or Fmoc.[20,41,40] Again, because of the different reactivities of the two amines, protection and deprotection are difficult. Thus, the yields of protected DAP phosphoramidites are generally low, and deprotection is inefficient.[42] The heteroprotecting group strategy has also been employed, but synthesis becomes more complicated.[15,39] We previously reported the use of 2-fluoro-6-amino purines as novel precursors for DAP,[43,44] but these patent protocols have not been embraced. This prompted us to revisit this area, and herein we describe a synthetic route for simple and efficient incorporation of DAP into oligonucleotides using a postsynthetic strategy. To avoid oligonucleotide deprotection issues, we used the 2-fluoro-6-amino-adenosine monomer as the oligonucleotide building block. The combination of the fluorine inductive effect (−I) and the resonance effect (+R) of the N6 amino meant that no protecting group was required during phosphoramidite or solid-support synthesis. We describe synthesis of 2′-deoxy, 2′-OMe, 2′-fluoro (2′-F), ribo, and LNA phosphoramidites and solid supports containing 2-fluoro-6-aminopurine (Figure ). A postsynthetic treatment with ammonia yielded the DAP-modified oligonucleotide or, if an amine functionality was used, a 2-position conjugate.
Figure 2

2-fluoro-6-aminopurine phosphoramidites and solid supports synthesized.

2-fluoro-6-aminopurine phosphoramidites and solid supports synthesized. Two different synthetic approaches were undertaken to afford five different 2-fluoro-6-aminopurine nucleosides depending on the available starting materials. For 2′-deoxy, 2′-F, and 2′-OMe analogues, 2,6-diaminopurine nucleosides were used as the starting material. Following the literature procedure,[45] 2-fluoro-6-aminopurine nucleosides were obtained from 2,6-diaminopurine (Schemes and 2). Diazotization reactions of the diaminopurines 11, 12, and 14(11) in the presence of 70% HF-pyridine and tert-butyl nitrite afforded the 2-fluoro analogues. Diazotization is highly selective for the 2-NH2 vs 6-NH2 as demonstrated earlier.[45,46]
Scheme 1

Synthesis of Phosphoramidites 1–4 and CPGs 6–9

Reaction conditions: (a) (i) 70% HF-pyridine, tert-butyl nitrite, (ii) DMTrCl, pyridine for 15 (27%), 16 (66%), and 18 (60%); (b) (i) DMTrCl, pyridine; (ii) AgNO3, pyridine, TBDMSCl, separation of 3′-isomer for 17 (17%); (c) PClN(Pr)2OCH2CH2CN, DIPEA, NMI, DCM, room temperature, 1 h for 1 (71%), 2 (84%), 3 (89%), and 4 (85%); (d) succinic anhydride, DMAP, DCM, room temperature, 3 h for 19 (71%), 20 (77%), 21 (93%), and 22 (78%); (e) NH2–CPG (171 μmol/g), HBTU, DIPEA, acetonitrile for 6 (96 μmol/g), 7 (107 μmol/g), 8 (89 μmol/g), and 9 (124 μmol/g). Yields are over two steps for 15–18.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of Phosphoramidite 5 and CPG 10

Reaction conditions: (a) (i) NaOH, MeOH, 1 M HCl, (ii) trifluoroacetic anhydride, liq. NH3, −60 °C; (b) 70% HF/30% pyridine, tert-butyl nitrite for 25 (34% over two steps); (c) PClN(Pr)2OCH2CH2CN, DIPEA, NMI, DCM, room temperature, 1 h for 5 (85%); (d) succinic anhydride, DMAP, DCM, room temperature, 3 h for 26 (95%); (e) NH2–CPG (171 μmol/g), HBTU, DIPEA, acetonitrile for 10 (104 μmol/g).

Synthesis of Phosphoramidites 1–4 and CPGs 6–9

Reaction conditions: (a) (i) 70% HF-pyridine, tert-butyl nitrite, (ii) DMTrCl, pyridine for 15 (27%), 16 (66%), and 18 (60%); (b) (i) DMTrCl, pyridine; (ii) AgNO3, pyridine, TBDMSCl, separation of 3′-isomer for 17 (17%); (c) PClN(Pr)2OCH2CH2CN, DIPEA, NMI, DCM, room temperature, 1 h for 1 (71%), 2 (84%), 3 (89%), and 4 (85%); (d) succinic anhydride, DMAP, DCM, room temperature, 3 h for 19 (71%), 20 (77%), 21 (93%), and 22 (78%); (e) NH2–CPG (171 μmol/g), HBTU, DIPEA, acetonitrile for 6 (96 μmol/g), 7 (107 μmol/g), 8 (89 μmol/g), and 9 (124 μmol/g). Yields are over two steps for 15–18.

Synthesis of Phosphoramidite 5 and CPG 10

Reaction conditions: (a) (i) NaOH, MeOH, 1 M HCl, (ii) trifluoroacetic anhydride, liq. NH3, −60 °C; (b) 70% HF/30% pyridine, tert-butyl nitrite for 25 (34% over two steps); (c) PClN(Pr)2OCH2CH2CN, DIPEA, NMI, DCM, room temperature, 1 h for 5 (85%); (d) succinic anhydride, DMAP, DCM, room temperature, 3 h for 26 (95%); (e) NH2–CPG (171 μmol/g), HBTU, DIPEA, acetonitrile for 10 (104 μmol/g). The 5′-OH groups were then protected with 4,4′-dimethoxytriphenylmethyl chloride (DMTrCl) to afford the 5′-O-DMTr-2-fluoro-6-aminopurines 15, 16, and 18, respectively. Subsequent phosphitylation reactions of 15, 16, and 18 with 2-cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropylchlorophosphoramidite under basic conditions afforded the 2′-deoxy, 2′-F, and 2′-OMe analogues of 2-fluoro-6-aminopurine phosphoramidites 1, 2, and 4, respectively, in good yields. The 2′-ribo analogue 13 was synthesized from the 2,6-diaminopurine ribonucleoside following the literature procedure.[47] The 5′-OH group of 13 was protected first with DMTr, and then the 2′-OH group was protected with TBS to afford compound 17. The 3′-O-TBS-protected minor isomer was separated from the desired product 17 by column chromatography, and 17 was converted to the corresponding phosphoramidite 3 in good yield. To obtain solid supports on controlled pore glass (CPG),[48]15–18 were reacted with succinic anhydride in the presence of N,N-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) to afford compounds 19–22, respectively. The carboxylic acid groups of these succinates were coupled with the free amine groups of the CPG beads under standard coupling conditions.[49,50] Unreacted sites on CPG were then capped with acetic anhydride, and loading values were calculated for the resulting nucleoside-modified CPGs 6–9 (Scheme ). For the LNA analogue, commercially available guanosine nucleoside 23 was converted to corresponding 2,6-diaminopurine compound 24 and used for the next step without further purification. Compound 24 was converted to the corresponding 2-fluoro-6-aminopurine compound 25 via diazotization, followed by fluorination, with moderate yield over the two steps. Compound 25 was then converted to the corresponding phosphoramidite 5 and CPG 10 in good yields (Scheme ). To evaluate the efficacy of the postsynthetic conversion of 2-fluoro-6-aminopurine to DAP, we synthesized several oligonucleotides containing single or multiple incorporations using standard solid-phase synthesis methods. As models, we used previously described small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting mouse Ttr,[51] single stranded antisense oligonucleotides called REVERSIRs,[52] and an antagomir targeting miR-122.[53] For oligonucleotide sequences, see Supporting Information (SI) Tables S1–S4. The standard ammonia deprotection step at 60 °C for 5 h caused displacement of 2-fluoro by ammonia and deprotection of the oligonucleotides and simultaneous cleavage from solid support, yielding the DAP-modified strands for all oligonucleotides with the exception of the oligonucleotides modified with the ribo monomer. For the oligonucleotides modified with the ribo 2-fluoro-6-aminopurine, ammonia treatment at room temperature followed by Et3N.3HF treatment resulted in 2′-silyl deprotection without 2-fluoro substitution. To overcome this problem, a second ammonia treatment for 5 h at 60 °C was attempted; however, the second ammonia treatment led to degradation of RNA due to base hydrolysis. Therefore, to obtain the pure ribo-DAP-modified oligonucleotides, oligonucleotides were first treated with ammonia at 65 °C for 5 h followed by triethylamine trihydrofluoride treatment to yield the desired oligonucleotides (see SI Table S3). After purification, the strands were analyzed and characterized by ion exchange chromatography and LCMS respectively. The LCMS analyses of representative strands modified with deoxy-2,6-diaminopurine (ON5), 2′-F-2,6-diaminopurine (ON10), LNA-2,6-diaminopurine (ON15), 2′-OMe-2,6-diaminopurine (ON21), and mixed 2′-F- and 2′-OMe-2,6-diaminopurine (ON22) demonstrated that 2,6-diaminopurine was present and that there were no unexpected modifications to other positions (Figure ).
Figure 3

LCMS analysis of purified oligonucleotides (A) ON5, (B) ON10, (C) ON15, (D) ON21, and (E) ON22 demonstrating incorporation of 2,6-diaminopurines with calculated (blue) and observed (green) masses. In bead diagrams of strands, black and green indicate 2′-OMe and 2′-F sugar modifications, respectively. Pink, red, gray, and light blue beads represent deoxy-DAP, 2′-fluoro-DAP, LNA-DAP, and 2′-OMe-DAP, respectively. Phosphorothioate linkages are indicated by a yellow vertical line.

LCMS analysis of purified oligonucleotides (A) ON5, (B) ON10, (C) ON15, (D) ON21, and (E) ON22 demonstrating incorporation of 2,6-diaminopurines with calculated (blue) and observed (green) masses. In bead diagrams of strands, black and green indicate 2′-OMe and 2′-F sugar modifications, respectively. Pink, red, gray, and light blue beads represent deoxy-DAP, 2′-fluoro-DAP, LNA-DAP, and 2′-OMe-DAP, respectively. Phosphorothioate linkages are indicated by a yellow vertical line. Delivery of RNA molecules to the appropriate tissue or cell has been a challenge. However, liver hepatocyte-specific delivery of three clinically approved siRNAs, givosiran, lumasiran, and inclisiran is made possible by conjugation to N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc), the ligand for the asialoglycoprotein receptor.[51] In earlier examples, conjugation to lipophilic molecules like cholesterol and fatty acids resulted in broad tissue distribution and cellular uptake in liver and central nervous system.[54−57] We have recently demonstrated that siRNAs can be targeted to extrahepatic tissues using a 2′-O-lipophile-functionalized nucleoside conjugate.[58] As fluorine is a good leaving group for the nucleophilic aromatic substitution reaction, we reasoned that 2-fluoro-6-aminopurine could serve as a site for postsynthetic conjugation of lipid amines at the 2-position of adenine of an oligonucleotide on solid support or in solution. To test this, the 2-fluoro-6-aminopurine monomer was incorporated at the 5′ end or the 3′ end of the Ttr siRNA sense strand or at position 5 of the Ttr siRNA antisense strand (see SI Figure S1–S2 and Tables S5 and S6). Hexadecylamine was used as the ligand (Figure A–C). The CPGs were first heated by microwave for 2 to 3 h. Due to high loading and the narrow space (500 Å) of the CPG pore size, 3′-end conjugation needed to be performed at 90 °C. In contrast, 5′ conjugation was completed in 2 h at 75 °C. Conjugation at an internal position was also performed at 90 °C.
Figure 4

(A–C) Schematic of conjugation of hexadecylamine at position 2 of adenosine at (A) the 5′ end, (B) the 3′ end, and (C) an internal position of the oligonucleotide on solid support. (D) Schematic of solution-phase conjugation of hexadecylamine at position 2 of adenosine at the 5′ end of an oligonucleotide. Reaction conditions: (a) 0.1 M hexadecylamine in DMSO/EtOH/H2O (v/v/v, 1:2:1), DIPEA, 90 °C, MW, 2–4 h; (b) 28–30% NH4OH, 60 °C, 5 h; (c) 28–30% NH4OH, room temperature, 1 h.

(A–C) Schematic of conjugation of hexadecylamine at position 2 of adenosine at (A) the 5′ end, (B) the 3′ end, and (C) an internal position of the oligonucleotide on solid support. (D) Schematic of solution-phase conjugation of hexadecylamine at position 2 of adenosine at the 5′ end of an oligonucleotide. Reaction conditions: (a) 0.1 M hexadecylamine in DMSO/EtOH/H2O (v/v/v, 1:2:1), DIPEA, 90 °C, MW, 2–4 h; (b) 28–30% NH4OH, 60 °C, 5 h; (c) 28–30% NH4OH, room temperature, 1 h. Inspired by synthesis of the 2-fluoro derivative at the N2 position of deoxyguanosine,[59] we developed a solution route to the synthesis of the 5′-end conjugate ON62 (Figure D). The oligonucleotide was cleaved from solid support by treatment with concentrated NH4OH solution for 1 h at room temperature. Under these conditions, the 2-fluoro substituent remained intact. Ammonia was evaporated from the solution, and conjugation with hexadecylamine was performed. More than 80% conjugation was achieved after 4 h at 75 °C assisted by microwave (Figure , see SI Figure S2 and Table S7).
Figure 5

(A–C) LCMS analysis of purified (A) 5′-end conjugate ON62, (B) 3′-end conjugate ON63, and (C) internal conjugate ON64 obtained after on solid support conjugation. (D) LCMS analysis of crude reaction of 5′-end conjugate ON62 obtained by solution-phase conjugation. Calculated masses are in blue, and observed masses are in green. In the bead diagrams, black, green, light blue, and pink beads indicate 2′-OMe, 2′-F, 2-(-NHC16H33)-2′-O-methyl-adenosine, and 2-(-NHC16H33)-2′-fluoro-adenosine, respectively.

(A–C) LCMS analysis of purified (A) 5′-end conjugate ON62, (B) 3′-end conjugate ON63, and (C) internal conjugate ON64 obtained after on solid support conjugation. (D) LCMS analysis of crude reaction of 5′-end conjugate ON62 obtained by solution-phase conjugation. Calculated masses are in blue, and observed masses are in green. In the bead diagrams, black, green, light blue, and pink beads indicate 2′-OMe, 2′-F, 2-(-NHC16H33)-2′-O-methyl-adenosine, and 2-(-NHC16H33)-2′-fluoro-adenosine, respectively. In summary, we have described the synthesis of 2-fluoro-6-aminopurine nucleoside phosphoramidites and CPG building blocks with five different sugar modifications (2′-H, 2′-OH, 2′-OMe, 2′-F, and LNA) and their use in oligonucleotide synthesis. No protecting groups were required on the 2-fluoro-6-amino-adenosine. Oligonucleotides containing these monomers were also conjugated to an amine-containing lipophilic ligand to yield oligonucleotide conjugates at the position 2 of the adenine by the displacement of fluorine. Conjugation was carried out both on solid support and in solution. Work to use this conjugation strategy to attach bulky ligands, such as trivalent GalNAc,[51] in the minor groove is in progress. We also anticipate that strategic placement of conjugate within both sense strand and antisense strands of siRNAs apart from terminal ends will be valuable.[60,61] The effect of the DAP modification on RNAi activity is also under investigation. Based on our previous work, chemical modifications are tolerated in most of the positions by the enzymes of the RNAi machinery,[61] and the stabilizing effect of DAP on duplex formation may enhance siRNA activity in strategic positions. Overall, our methodologies will enable synthesis of oligonucleotides containing DAP, various N2-position minor groove conjugates, and other modifications for therapeutic and diagnostic applications and also for structural studies.
  44 in total

Review 1.  Peptide coupling reagents, more than a letter soup.

Authors:  Ayman El-Faham; Fernando Albericio
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Base-Pairing Properties of Double-Headed Nucleotides.

Authors:  Mick Hornum; Julie Stendevad; Pawan K Sharma; Pawan Kumar; Rasmus B Nielsen; Michael Petersen; Poul Nielsen
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 5.236

3.  Incorporation of Pseudo-complementary Bases 2,6-Diaminopurine and 2-Thiouracil into Serinol Nucleic Acid (SNA) to Promote SNA/RNA Hybridization.

Authors:  Yukiko Kamiya; Fuminori Sato; Keiji Murayama; Atsuji Kodama; Susumu Uchiyama; Hiroyuki Asanuma
Journal:  Chem Asian J       Date:  2020-02-17

4.  A convenient method for the synthesis of 2-fluoroadenosine.

Authors:  J A Montgomery; K Hewson
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 4.354

Review 5.  Improving siRNA Delivery In Vivo Through Lipid Conjugation.

Authors:  Maire F Osborn; Anastasia Khvorova
Journal:  Nucleic Acid Ther       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 5.486

6.  Conformation of the synthetic DNA poly(amino2dA-dT) duplex in high-salt and aqueous alcohol solutions.

Authors:  M Vorlícková; J Sági; A Szabolcs; A Szemzö; L Otvös; J Kypr
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-01-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Expanding RNAi therapeutics to extrahepatic tissues with lipophilic conjugates.

Authors:  Kirk M Brown; Jayaprakash K Nair; Maja M Janas; Yesseinia I Anglero-Rodriguez; Lan T H Dang; Haiyan Peng; Christopher S Theile; Elena Castellanos-Rizaldos; Christopher Brown; Donald Foster; Jeffrey Kurz; Jeffrey Allen; Rajanikanth Maganti; Jing Li; Shigeo Matsuda; Matthew Stricos; Tyler Chickering; Michelle Jung; Kelly Wassarman; Jeff Rollins; Lauren Woods; Alex Kelin; Dale C Guenther; Melissa W Mobley; John Petrulis; Robin McDougall; Timothy Racie; Jessica Bombardier; Diana Cha; Saket Agarwal; Lei Johnson; Yongfeng Jiang; Scott Lentini; Jason Gilbert; Tuyen Nguyen; Samantha Chigas; Sarah LeBlanc; Urjana Poreci; Anne Kasper; Arlin B Rogers; Saeho Chong; Wendell Davis; Jessica E Sutherland; Adam Castoreno; Stuart Milstein; Mark K Schlegel; Ivan Zlatev; Klaus Charisse; Mark Keating; Muthiah Manoharan; Kevin Fitzgerald; Jing-Tao Wu; Martin A Maier; Vasant Jadhav
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 68.164

8.  From bench to bedside: Improving the clinical safety of GalNAc-siRNA conjugates using seed-pairing destabilization.

Authors:  Mark K Schlegel; Maja M Janas; Yongfeng Jiang; Joseph D Barry; Wendell Davis; Saket Agarwal; Daniel Berman; Christopher R Brown; Adam Castoreno; Sarah LeBlanc; Abigail Liebow; Tara Mayo; Stuart Milstein; Tuyen Nguyen; Svetlana Shulga-Morskaya; Sarah Hyde; Sally Schofield; John Szeto; Lauren Blair Woods; Vedat O Yilmaz; Muthiah Manoharan; Martin Egli; Klaus Charissé; Laura Sepp-Lorenzino; Patrick Haslett; Kevin Fitzgerald; Vasant Jadhav; Martin A Maier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 19.160

9.  Crystal structure of a Z-DNA fragment containing thymine/2-aminoadenine base pairs.

Authors:  M Coll; A H Wang; G A van der Marel; J H van Boom; A Rich
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  1986-10

10.  Syntheses and base-pairing properties of locked nucleic acid nucleotides containing hypoxanthine, 2,6-diaminopurine, and 2-aminopurine nucleobases.

Authors:  Alexei A Koshkin
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 4.354

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.