| Literature DB >> 35972974 |
Natalia Andújar-Tenorio1, Isabel Prieto2, Antonio Cobo1, Ana M Martínez-Rodríguez3, Marina Hidalgo1, Ana Belén Segarra2, Manuel Ramírez2, Antonio Gálvez1, Magdalena Martínez-Cañamero1.
Abstract
Butter and virgin olive oil (EVOO) are two fats differing in their degree of saturation and insaponifiable fraction. EVOO, enriched in polyphenols and other minority components, exerts a distinct effect on health. Using next generation sequencing, we have studied early and long-term effects of both types of fats on the intestinal microbiota of mice, finding significant differences between the two diets in the percentage of certain bacterial taxa, correlating with hormonal, physiological and metabolic parameters in the host. These correlations are not only concomitant, but most noticeably some of the changes detected in the microbial percentages at six weeks are correlating with changes in physiological values detected later, at twelve weeks. Desulfovibrionaceae/Desulfovibrio/D. sulfuricans stand out by presenting at six weeks a statistically significant higher percentage in the butter-fed mice with respect to the EVOO group, correlating with systolic blood pressure, food intake, water intake and insulin at twelve weeks. This not only suggests an early implication in the probability of developing altered physiological and biochemical responses later on in the host lifespan, but also opens the possibility of using this genus as a marker in the risk of suffering different pathologies in the future.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35972974 PMCID: PMC9380944 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271634
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Physiological responses of mice after six weeks of diet.
| SD | EVOO | BT | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3.75±0.39 | 4.06±0.51 | 4.08±0.50 | n.s. |
|
| 9.27±0.76 | 9.28±1.24 | 10.4±1.14 | n.s. |
|
| 1.77±0.60 | 2.24±0.55 | 1.67±0.34 | n.s. |
|
| 41.13±1.60 | 39.01±0.79 | 42.3±1.11 | n.s. |
|
| 164.75±6.4 | 134.3±2.77 | 165.67±12.14 | a |
a: Differences in extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) vs standard (SD) and butter (BT) diets, p<0.01.
Fig 1Global bacterial phyla distribution for each diet as a percentage of total sequences after 6 weeks of treatment.
Each column corresponds to one animal fed a diet enriched with butter (BT), virgin olive oil (EVOO) or standard chow (SD). Legend shows upwards the eight phyla detected.
Fig 2Box-plot representation of the percentage distribution of phyla Tenericutes, Proteobacteria and Cyanobacteria in mice fed a diet enriched with butter (BT), virgin olive oil (EVOO) or standard chow (SD).
Regression fits for each of the physiological variables studied using as independent variables those phyla that show statistical differences in the percentage of sequences retrieved from faecal samples.
| SBP | Glu | Leptin | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.18 | |
|
| 1213.20 | ||
|
| -20.61 | 1230.34 | |
|
| -2.55 |
For each case, regression coefficient estimate, s.e. and p values are shown. R2 and p values of the model are also indicated under each physiological variable.
* indicates that logarithms of data have been used for the analysis. FI, food intake; WI, water intake; BW, body weight; SBP, systolic blood pressure; T-CHO, total cholesterol.
Fig 3Box-plot representation of the percentage distribution of the eleven families with significant differences (p<0.05) among mice fed a diet enriched with butter (BT), virgin olive oil (EVOO) or standard chow (SD).
Regression fits for each of the physiological variables studied using as independent variables those families that show statistical differences in the percentage of sequences retrieved from faecal samples.
| BW | FI | WI | DIU | SBP | HDL/LDL | Insulin | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6w | 12w | 6w | 12w | 6w | 12w | 6w | 12w | 6w | 12w | 12w | 12w | |
| 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.68 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.72 | 0.42 | 0.24 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.21 | |
|
| -0.46 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.32 | 0.27 | 0.10 | ||||||
|
| 1.34 | 0.34 | ||||||||||
|
| 1.49 | -0.51 | -0.23 | 10.53 | ||||||||
|
| 5.90 | 34.93 | 30.96 | |||||||||
|
| 9.63 | -3.46 | -1.33 | -1.54 | ||||||||
|
| 41.65 | 0.80 | 1.36 | |||||||||
|
| -35.79 | 17.14 | -193.50 | |||||||||
|
| 7.84 | 5.02 | -1.69 | |||||||||
|
| 6.24 | 17.24 | ||||||||||
|
| 86.94 | 59.86 | -20.21 | -14.20 | -84.99 | -19.20 | 606.01 | |||||
|
| 54.54 | 15.87 | ||||||||||
For each case, regression coefficient estimate, s.e. and p values are shown. R2 and p values of the model are also indicated under each physiological variable.
* indicates that logarithms of data have been used for the analysis. BW, body weight; FI, food intake; WI, water intake; DIU, diuresis; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Fig 4Box-plot representation of the percentage distribution of the sixteen genera with significant differences (p<0.05) among mice fed a diet enriched with butter (BT), virgin olive oil (EVOO) or standard chow (SD).
Regression fits for each of the physiological variables studied using as independent variables those genera that show statistical differences in the percentage of sequences retrieved from faecal samples.
| BW | FI | WI | SBP | Total CHO | Glucose | HDL/LDL | Leptin | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6w | 12w | 12w | 6w | 12w | 12w | 12w | 12w | 12w | 12w | |
| 0.39 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.59 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.31 | 0.16 | 0.86 | 0.58 | |
|
| -0.93 | 4.94 | -5.64 | |||||||
|
| 0.33 | |||||||||
|
| 2.49 | 0.17 | ||||||||
|
| 13.41 | 0.83 | ||||||||
|
| 8.67 | 5.59 | -1.40 | 1.13 | ||||||
|
| 1.90 | 0.44 | ||||||||
|
| 0.81 | -0.28 | 14.54 | |||||||
|
| -10.89 | 0.879 | 17.18 | 54.82 | ||||||
|
| -63.49 | 31.61 | -42.06 | -6.05 | ||||||
|
| 4.63 | 68.86 | -462.55 | |||||||
|
| 11.33 | -15.59 | ||||||||
|
| 13.89 | 61.70 | 161.71 | -617.78 | 9.89 | -12526.4 | ||||
|
| -50.88 | -88.11 | -6.41 | |||||||
|
| -30.43 | 38.94 | -0.86 | 3697.60 | ||||||
|
| -10.78 | -1.62 | ||||||||
|
| 16.29 | -5.64 | ||||||||
For each case, regression coefficient estimate, s.e. and p values are shown. R2 and p values of the model are also indicated under each physiological variable.
* indicates that logarithms of data have been used for the analysis. BW, body weight; FI, food intake; WI, water intake; SBP, systolic blood pressure; CHO, cholesterol.
Fig 5Box-plot representation of the percentage distribution of the six species with significant differences (p<0.05) between mice fed a diet enriched with butter (BT) and a diet enriched in virgin olive oil (EVOO).
SD, standard chow.
Regression fits for each of the physiological variables studied using as independent variables those species that show significant differences between butter and virgin olive oil enriched diets.
| BW | DIU | FI | WI | SBP | Insulin | Leptin | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6w | 6w | 12w | 12w | 12w | 6w | 12w | 12w | 12w | |
| 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.49 | 0.27 | 0.48 | 0.25 | 0.64 | 0.16 | 0.19 | |
|
| 5.31 | 9.79 | 60.84 | 1.26 | |||||
|
| 106.38 | ||||||||
|
| 25.06 | 37.65 | 96.14 | -484.62 | -11.51 | ||||
|
| 81.78 | -31.32 | -78.03 | 618.86 | |||||
For each case, regression coefficient estimate, s.e. and p values are shown. R2 and p values of the model are also indicated under each physiological variable. BW, body weight; DIU, diuresis; FI, food intake; WI, water intake; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Nutrient composition and energy content of standard and high fat diets enriched with extra virgin olive oil and butter.
| Diet | SD | EVOO | BT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g/100 g | % energy | g/100 g | % energy | g/100 g | % energy | |
|
| 16.5 | 20 | 16.5 | 14 | 16.5 | 14 |
|
| 60 | 72 | 55 | 48 | 55 | 48 |
|
| 3 | 8 | 20 | 38 | 20 | 38 |
|
| 14.2 | 19.6 | 19.6 | |||