Ruben M F Tomás1, Akalabya Bissoyi1, Thomas R Congdon2, Matthew I Gibson3,1. 1. Division of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K. 2. Cryologyx Ltd., 71-75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ, U.K. 3. Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.
Abstract
Cell monolayers underpin the discovery and screening of new drugs and allow for fundamental studies of cell biology and disease. However, current cryopreservation technologies do not allow cells to be stored frozen while attached to tissue culture plastic. Hence, cells must be thawed from suspension, cultured for several days or weeks, and finally transferred into multiwell plates for the desired application. This inefficient process consumes significant time handling cells, rather than conducting biomedical research or other value-adding activities. Here, we demonstrate that a synthetic macromolecular cryoprotectant enables the routine, reproducible, and robust cryopreservation of biomedically important cell monolayers, within industry-standard tissue culture multiwell plates. The cells are simply thawed with media and placed in an incubator ready to use within 24 h. Post-thaw cell recovery values were >80% across three cell lines with low well-to-well variance. The cryopreserved cells retained healthy morphology, membrane integrity, proliferative capacity, and metabolic activity; showed marginal increases in apoptotic cells; and responded well to a toxicological challenge using doxorubicin. These discoveries confirm that the cells are "assay-ready" 24 h after thaw. Overall, we show that macromolecular cryoprotectants can address a long-standing cryobiological challenge and offers the potential to transform routine cell culture for biomedical discovery.
Cell monolayers underpin the discovery and screening of new drugs and allow for fundamental studies of cell biology and disease. However, current cryopreservation technologies do not allow cells to be stored frozen while attached to tissue culture plastic. Hence, cells must be thawed from suspension, cultured for several days or weeks, and finally transferred into multiwell plates for the desired application. This inefficient process consumes significant time handling cells, rather than conducting biomedical research or other value-adding activities. Here, we demonstrate that a synthetic macromolecular cryoprotectant enables the routine, reproducible, and robust cryopreservation of biomedically important cell monolayers, within industry-standard tissue culture multiwell plates. The cells are simply thawed with media and placed in an incubator ready to use within 24 h. Post-thaw cell recovery values were >80% across three cell lines with low well-to-well variance. The cryopreserved cells retained healthy morphology, membrane integrity, proliferative capacity, and metabolic activity; showed marginal increases in apoptotic cells; and responded well to a toxicological challenge using doxorubicin. These discoveries confirm that the cells are "assay-ready" 24 h after thaw. Overall, we show that macromolecular cryoprotectants can address a long-standing cryobiological challenge and offers the potential to transform routine cell culture for biomedical discovery.
Convenient, ready-to-use from the freezer,
cell-based assays could
accelerate and simplify the discovery of pharmaceutically active compounds,
biocompatibility testing, assay development, and discovery of cell
signaling and disease pathways. Cryopreservation enables the long-term
storage of cells to prevent phenotypic drift associated with continuous
culture and allows the distribution of standardized cells around the
globe. However, the cold stress of cryopreservation can lead to cell
death as described by Mazur’s two-factor hypothesis.[1] This includes excessive dehydration by slow freezing,
due to excessive exposure to high salt concentrations from residual
unfrozen water, and intracellular ice formation (IIF) (and recrystallization
during slow warming) during rapid freezing. To mitigate the damage
caused during cryopreservation, a cryoprotective agent (CPA) is essential,
with DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) being the most widely used cryoprotectant
for nucleated mammalian cells.[2] During
typical slow-freezing cryopreservation (1 °C min–1), as cellular dehydration occurs, DMSO replaces lost water to reduce
cell death from excessive dehydration and IIF.[3,4] DMSO
also minimizes osmotic shock by reducing electrolyte concentration
in residual unfrozen solution during freezing.[5]Mammalian cells are typically cryopreserved in suspension,
which
often gives high yields,[6−8] however for most laboratory-based
applications (such as toxicity or uptake screening) cells are used
as adherent monolayers, thus, creating a mismatch between the format
used for storage and that used to generate data. From suspension,
cryopreserved cells must be thawed, seeded, and propagated through
several flasks until enough cells can be plated into well plates for
the desired application. Hence, a cell biologist is required to devote
a large portion of their time to cell preparation, approximately 1–3
weeks depending on the cell proliferation rates. In essence, more
time is spent “handling” the cells rather than conducting
research or “value-adding” activities with the cells.
The routine handling of cells is also plagued with significant single-use
plastic waste,[9] which presents environmental
concerns. Furthermore, exploring different cell lines (e.g., to look
for a toxic response or drug delivery) can require time, financial
resources, and extensive cell culture knowledge to establish, such
as optimum confluency for activity and substrate specificity.[10−13]A (deceptively) simple solution to the abovementioned challenges
would be to cryopreserve cells directly in microwell plate substrates.
In an ideal world, cells could be removed from cold storage in an
“assay-ready” format, thawed, and used 24 h post-thaw,
removing weeks of laboratory researcher time, facilitating high-throughput
screening, and ensuring phenotypically identical cells. Furthermore,
highly desirable characteristics of adherent cells could be preserved,
including neuron networks and tight cellular junctions.[14,15] However, DMSO is unable to cryopreserve cells in the monolayer format,
with typically ≤30% of cells recovered after freeze/thaw and
the presence of cell debris, which could compromise assay results.[16] IIF is a particular problem for the cryopreservation
of cells as monolayers (and spheroids), compared to suspension cells,
as cell–cell contacts promote the propagation of intracellular
ice,[17−19] which is usually fatal and contributes to the low
cell recovery rates (although IIF is not always deleterious).[20] To increase post-thaw cell recovery, IIF can
be reduced by directional freezing[21] or
manually inducing nucleation at warmer temperatures, for example using
N2 ice mist,[22] or pollen extracts[23] however reproducibly inducing nucleation is
difficult using manual methods and chemically defined nucleating agents
are not available.To address the challenges of cryopreservation,
natural[7,24−27] and synthetic[28−31] small molecules and macromolecules
have been explored, which are
inspired by extremophiles[32] and capable
of inhibiting ice recrystallization (IRI) and modulating ice growth
and formation.[33] IRI has been shown to
benefit red blood cell cryopreservation;[28,30,34,35] however, the
magnitude of benefit during monolayer or suspension cryopreservation
of nucleated cells is limited.[36−38] Protective osmolytes such as
trehalose and l-proline can mitigate some damage during monolayer
freezing,[36] increasing the recovery of
Neuro-2a cell monolayers from 13 to 53%[39] and HepG2 cells from 13 to 42%.[40] Matsumura
and Hyon reported the cryoprotective properties of polyampholytes,
polymers bearing mixed anionic/cationic side chains, using carboxylated
poly(ε-lysine) (PLL) and 10% (v/v) DMSO, which performed twice
as well as DMSO alone for freezing of L929 and rat bone marrow mesenchymal
stem cells as monolayers.[41] The mechanism
of protection of polyampholytes is not yet clear, but there is evidence
that salts are trapped by a matrix surrounding the cells to minimize
osmotic damage, while ensuring sufficient dehydration to prevent spontaneous
IIF.[42,43] Polyampholytes may also interact/protect
the cell membrane,[44] similar to how antifreeze
proteins can protect liposome models.[45] COOH-PLL has also been used to preserve oocytes,[46] chondrocyte sheets,[47] and human
stem mesenchymal stem cells.[48,49] However, in these systems,
vitrification is often required to achieve high cell recovery, necessitating
significant volumes of organic solvent cryoprotectants, such as 6.5
M ethylene glycol.[48] The broad applicability
of the ampholyte scaffold has been shown by deploying backbones with
mixed charged side-chains, with reports suggesting that either excess
anionic[48,50] or 1:1 anionic/cationic groups yield the
strongest cryoprotective activity.[51−53] Bailey et al. introduced
a synthetically scalable polyampholyte based on the ring open polymerization
poly(methyl vinyl ether-alt-maleic anhydride).[54] The use of a maleic anhydride-containing polymer
ensures a 1:1 ratio of cationic to anionic groups, unlike heterogeneous
materials based on random copolymerization[52] or carboxylation of PLL.[41] This polyampholyte
enhanced the post-thaw recovery of a panel of cell lines (A549, MC-3T3,
and Neuro-2a cells) compared to DMSO alone and the suspension cryopreservation
of stem cells.[54,55] Despite these advances, there
is still no demonstration that cells frozen as monolayers are “assay
ready”, whereby they can be removed from the freezer and, with
minimal user intervention, be ready to use. To achieve this, an in-depth
analysis of cellular health and function is required and the cell
lines selected should be of crucial importance to toxicological or
screening assays (such as liver cells) to have a significant impact.[56,57]Herein, we demonstrate that the polyampholyte derived from
poly(methyl
vinyl ether-alt-maleic anhydride) and dimethylamino
ethanol enables near-quantitative recovery of intact and viable cell
monolayers 24 h following removal from a −80 °C freezer,
with minimal processing and handling. High cell recovery was demonstrated
for adherent cell lines that are widely used in the drug discovery
field including A549, HepG2, and Caco-2 cells. Banked “assay-ready”
cells were frozen at multiple cell densities, designed for adaptability
toward desired applications, and could be stored for over 1 month
in a conventional −80 °C freezer. A large panel of post-thaw
proliferation, metabolic, membrane integrity, apoptosis, cell cycle,
and morphological analyses confirmed that cell monolayers are healthy,
function as normal, and are “assay ready”. Finally,
a model drug screening test was undertaken using doxorubicin, a chemotherapeutic
drug. Our work demonstrates that adherent cells can be cryopreserved
so that they are “assay ready” direct from the freezer
with minimal handling, facilitating the drug discovery process and
reducing the significant time burden associated with routine cell
culture.
Experimental Section
Materials
Poly(methyl vinyl ether-alt-maleic anhydride) (Mn ≈ 80 kDa),
tetrahydrofuran (THF), dimethylamino ethanol, deuterium oxide (D2O), type I solution from rat tail, doxorubicin hydrochloride
(98%), Eagle’s minimum essential media (MEM), fetal bovine
serum (FBS) (non-USA origin), MEM nonessential amino acid (NEAA) solution
(100×), 0.4% Trypan blue, dimethyl sulfoxide Hybri-Max, and RNase
A from bovine pancreas were purchased from Merck (Gillingham, UK).
Dulbecco phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS), Ham’s F-12K (Kaighn’s)
medium (F-12K), Antibiotic–Antimycotic (100×) (PSA), Trypsin–EDTA
(0.25%), CellEvent Caspase-3/7 Detection Reagent, Live/Dead Viability/Cytotoxicity
Kit for mammalian cells, phenol-free DMEM/F-12, and propidium iodide
were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Loughborough, UK). Resazurin
tablets were purchased from Scientific Laboratory Supplies (Nottingham,
UK). P450-Glo CYP3A4 Assay and P450-Glo CYP2C9 Assay were purchased
from Promega (Wisconsin, USA).
Physical and Analytical Methods
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker HD-400
spectrometer, operating at 293 K using deuterated solvents purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich. Chemical shifts were reported as δ in parts
per million (ppm) relative to residual nondeuterated solvent resonances
(D2O 1H: δ = 4.71 ppm). Bruker Topspin
3.5 Software was used to process and export spectra.
Infrared Spectroscopy
FTIR spectra were acquired using
an Agilent Cary 630 FTIR (Agilent Technologies, Connecticut, USA)
spectrometer equipped with a single reflection diamond ATR accessory
with a 45° angle of incidence, a 1 mm diameter sampling surface
(200 μm active area), and a rotating pressure clamp (applying
maximum pressure). Scans (128) were obtained of dried, crushed samples
between 4000 and 650 cm–1 with a spectral resolution
<2 cm–1, wavenumber accuracy of 0.05 cm–1, and wavenumber reproducibility of 0.005 cm–1.
Gain, aperture, scan speed, and filter were all set to auto. Agilent
MicroLab Software, version B.05.4, was used to process and export
spectra.
Microscopy
An Olympus CX41 microscope equipped with
a UIS-2 20×/0.45/∞/0–2/FN22 lens and blue and green
excitation lasers were used for imaging. Image processing was completed
using ImageJ (v1.52).
Flow Cytometry
A BD Accuri C6, equipped with 488 (solid)
and 640 (diode) nm lasers and 533/30, 585/40, and 670 LP filters,
was used for flow cytometry experiments. Instrument calibration was
completed using BD Biosciences CS&T beads. Maintenance was completed
with BD Biosciences cleaning solutions. All samples were analyzed
with a flow rate of 14 μL min–1 (10 μm
core) and thresholding maintained at 10,000. BD CSampler Plus software
(v 1.0.34.1) was used for data collection and processing. FlowJo X
10.0.7r2 (Tree Star, Ashland, USA) was used for all statistical analysis
and plotting of flow cytometry data.
Statistical Analysis
Data were plotted and analyzed
using Graphpad Prism 9 with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
followed by a comparison of experimental groups with the appropriate
control group (Tukey’s post hoc test).
Cryomicroscopy
Intracellular ice growth was assessed
as described previouslys[58] Cells were seeded
on a 14 mm round glass coverslip at a density of 1 × 106 cells mL–1. The coverslip of adhered cells was
placed on a quartz crucible containing cryoprotectant solution (5
μL), consisting of polyampholyte (40 mg mL–1) and 10% DMSO, which was subsequently placed on a Linkam BCS 196
cryostage (Linkam Scientific Instruments, Salford, UK). Cells were
incubated at 20 °C for 10 min, to achieve equilibrium, frozen
at −40 °C at 1–5 °C min–1, and warmed to RT at 20 °C/min. Lynksis 32 software was used
to control the cryostage parameters. All images were captured using
an Olympus CX41 microscope equipped with a UIS-2 20×/0.45/∞/0–2/FN22
lens (Olympus Ltd.) and a Canon EOS 500D SLR digital camera. Image
processing was completed using ImageJ (v1.52).
Osmolarity Measurement
An Osmomat 3000 (Gonotec, Berlin,
Germany) freezing point depression osmometer was used to test osmolality.
The two-point instrument calibration was completed with distilled
water, possessing an osmolality of 300 mOsmol kg–1, and sodium chloride solution, with an osmolality of 2000 mOsmol
kg–1. Solutions containing cell culture base media,
10% FBS, 10% DMSO, and/or 40 mg mL–1 of polyampholyte
were subsequently measured.
Cryoprotective Polyampholyte Synthesis
The polyampholyte
was synthesized as described by Bailey et al., at a larger scale.[54] Poly(methyl vinyl ether-alt-maleic anhydride) with an average Mn ≈ 80 kDa (10 g) was stirred in THF (100 mL) and heated
to 50 °C until dissolved. After dissolution, dimethylamino ethanol
(∼10 g) was added in excess, with the mixture turning from
clear colorless to a pink waxy solid. Following 30 min, the waxy solid
was dissolved in water (100 mL) and left to stir overnight. The remaining
THF was removed under vacuum, and the resulting solution was purified
in dialysis tubing (Spectra/Por, 12–14 kDa MWCO) for 72 h with
6 water changes. The resulting solution was freeze-dried to form a
white solid, which was analyzed using 1H and 13C NMR (in D2O) and IR spectroscopy. Polyampholyte solutions
in D2O were analyzed after 3 months to determine potential
degradation routes.1H NMR (300 MHz, D2O) δppm: 4.71 ppm (D2O solvent peak,
s), 4.38 ppm (CH–O–CH3, br s, 2H), 3.81 ppm (COO–CH, br s, 2H), 3.67 ppm (dioxane internal standard peak,
s), 3.39 ppm (backbone CH–CH, br
s), 3.18 ppm (OCH2–CH, t), 2.86 (O–CH, s), 2.82 ppm (N–(CH)2, s), 1.77 ppm (backbone CH–CH, br s, 2H), 0.78 ppm (end group CH’s, t). 13C NMR (300 MHz, D2O) δppm: 66.6 ppm (dioxane internal standard
peak), 58.8 ppm (HCOO–CH2), 55.3 ppm
(CH2–N(CH3)2),
43.1 ppm (CH–COOH), 42.8 ppm (CH3)2–N. IR ν cm–1:
3650–2940 cm–1 (br w, O–H acid stretch),
1724 cm–1 (s, C=O stretch), 1560 cm–1 (w, O=C–O– carboxylate), 1342 cm–1 (w, C–N stretch), 1225 cm–1 (w, C–O
stretch).
Cell Culture
Human Caucasian lung carcinoma cells (A549,
ATCC) were cultured in Ham’s F-12K (Kaighn’s) medium
(F-12K) supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 units mL–1 penicillin, 100 μg mL–1 streptomycin, and
250 ng mL–1 amphotericin B (1% PSA). Human liver
hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2, ECACC 85011430) were cultured
in Eagle’s MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% NEAA, and 1% PSA.
Human Caucasian colon adenocarcinoma cells (Caco-2, ECACC 86010202)
were cultured in MEM media supplemented with 20% FBS and 1% PSA. Cells
were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 and passaged every
3–4 days, before reaching 70–80% confluency. Cells were
dissociated using a balanced salt solution containing trypsin (0.25%)
and EDTA (1 mM).
Cryopreservation of “Assay-ready” Cells in 2-D
Monolayers
Confluent Monolayer Freezing
A549 (300k/well), HepG2
(400k/well), and Caco-2 (150k/well) cells were seeded on 24 well plates
(Greiner Bio-one, 662160). HepG2 and Caco-2 cells were seeded onto
collagen (Type I solution from rat tail Merck, C3867) coated plates.
Cells were incubated to allow attachment to the substrate (24 h for
A549 and HepG2, 48 h for Caco-2). Cell media was removed, and cells
were incubated at RT with 40 mg mL–1 of polyampholyte
dissolved in cell media (either F12-K or MEM), 10% DMSO, and 10% FBS
for 10 min. Polyampholyte solutions were subsequently removed, and
the 24 well plates were positioned on a Corning XT CoolSink 96F and
placed in a −80 °C freezer overnight. The thermoconductive
block ensures well-to-well temperature consistency (no “edge
effect”), while eliminating the air gap between the bottom
of the well plate and the temperature source. As a control, cells
were also cryopreserved as monolayers, in the same manner, with 10%
DMSO alone. Cells were removed from the −80 °C, immediately
thawed with warm complete cell media (37 °C), and placed in the
incubator for 24 h. For variable density freezing, the freezing process
was described above, however, cells seeded were serially diluted 2-fold
across each column (i.e., 6 times along the six columns). Phase contrast
images of nonfrozen and frozen cells were taken on an Olympus CX41
microscope equipped with a UIS-2 20×/0.45/∞/0–2/FN22
lens (Olympus Ltd., Southend-on-Sea, U.K.) and a Canon EOS 500D SLR
digital camera. Images were processed using ImageJ (v1.52). Following
imaging, cells were dissociated with trypsin (0.25%) and EDTA (1 mM),
and the suspended cells were stained with trypan blue to count membrane
intact cells. Percentage cell recovery was calculated by comparing
cell counts immediately before and 24 h after thawing.
Biochemical Assays
Various assays were completed as
a demonstration of perfect cell heath following freeze-thaw, along
with immediate assay-readiness status 24 h post-thaw. The previously
described cryopreservation method was used for the banking of cells
used throughout.
Resazurin Cell Viability Assay
A549 (0–35k cells/well)
and HepG2 (0–15k cells/well) cells frozen at multiple densities
were thawed with warm complete cell media (37 °C). After 24 h,
the media was replaced with resazurin solution (500 μL), which
was prepared by dissolving 1 tablet (Scientific 300 Laboratory Supplies,
CHE3158) in 50 mL of phenol-free DMEM/F-12. Absorbance measurements
were obtained at 570 and 600 nm every 30 min/1 h for 4 h to monitor
the reduction of resazurin to resorufin by viable cells. Fluorescence
measurements were also recorded using a BioTek Synergy HT microplate
reader with a 530/25 nm excitation and 590/35 nm emission filter.
Nonfrozen cells were also treated with resazurin solution at similar
densities to compare against frozen cells. Cells were counted and
the exact cell density was plotted against either resazurin reduction
(absorbance measurements) or normalized fluorescence intensity, whereby
fluorescence measurements were normalized to readings obtained with
the highest cell density. Resazurin solutions without any cells were
used to provide background measurements.
Live/Dead Assay
A549 and HepG2 cells frozen as confluent
monolayers were thawed with warm complete cell media (37 °C)
and, 24 h post-thaw, were stained with ethidium iodide (2 μM)
and calcein (2 μM) in phenol-free DMEM/F-12 (100 μL) for
40 min at RT. Cells were imaged with an Olympus CX41 microscope using
phase contrast and blue (calcein) and green (ethidium) excitation
lasers. Nonfrozen cells were also stained to provide control images.
ImageJ was utilized to count live (calcein) and dead (red) cells to
determine the percentage of live, membrane intact, cells.
Caspase-3/-7 Real-time Activation Assay
A549 and HepG2
cells frozen as confluent monolayers were thawed with warm complete
cell media (37 °C). Following 10 min of incubation, the media
was replaced with complete media supplemented with CellEvent Caspase-3/7
Detection Reagent (5 μM). Images were taken at 1, 2, 4, and
24 h time intervals on an Olympus CX41 microscope with a phase contrast
channel and a blue excitation laser. Cells were counted using ImageJ,
and values were reported as percentage caspase positive cells relative
to the total number of cells. Nonfrozen cells were also stained with
CellEvent Caspase-3/7 Detection Reagent to provide a baseline reading.
CYP Activity
HepG2 cells were frozen at a density of
37.5–150k cells per well, as described above, for 24 h. Cells
were thawed with warm complete cell media (37 °C) and incubated
for 48 h. To determine innate CYP450 activity, CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 were
subsequently measured using the corresponding Promega CYP450 kits.
Briefly, media were replaced with a culture medium containing a luminogenic
CYP substrate, either CYP3A4/Luciferin-IPA (3 μM, 300 μL,
1 h) or CYP2C9/Luciferin-H (100 μM, 300 μL, 3 h). The
CYP substrate was also added to empty wells as a background measurement.
The culture medium containing the CYP substrate (25 μL) was
transferred to an opaque white 96 well plate, and luciferin detection
reagent (25 μL) was added for 20 min at RT. Luminescence was
measured on a BioTek Synergy HT microplate reader. The CYP activity
of nonfrozen cells was also measured for comparison. Nonfrozen and
Frozen HepG2 monolayers were also treated with rifampicin (0–100
μM, 48 h), 24 h post-thaw, to induce further CYP activity and
measured as described previously.
Growth Curve
A549 and HepG2 cells were cryopreserved
at a density of 20k and 50k cells/well, respectively, in 24 well plates.
Cells were thawed with warm complete cell media (37 °C) and allowed
to incubate for 24 h. Cells were counted daily until ∼80–90%
confluency was reached, with trypan blue used to stain for membrane
intact cells, and proliferation rates were determined.
Testing Drug Screening Capacity
A549 and HepG2 cells
were seeded at the optimum density determined for resazurin assays
previously explored (10k and 20k cells per well, respectively), on
24 well plates, taking into consideration proliferation rates and
duration of drug screening experiments. Cells were frozen with 40
mg mL–1 of polyampholyte, as described above, and
thawed with warm complete cell media (37 °C) after 24 h of storage
in a −80 °C freezer. Cells were washed with DPBS, 24 h
post-thaw, and incubated with doxorubicin (200–0 μg mL–1) for a further 24 h. Cells were washed with DPBS,
and resazurin solutions (500 μL) were added to the cells. Absorbance
measurements were obtained at 570 and 600 nm every 30 min/1 h for
4 h to monitor the reduction of resazurin to resorufin by viable cells.
Control cells untreated with doxorubicin were also treated with resazurin
solutions to provide a maximum resazurin reduction value of viable
cells, and resazurin solutions without any cells were used to provide
background measurements.
Cell Cycle Analysis
A549, HepG2, and Caco-2 cells frozen
as confluent monolayers were thawed with warm complete cell media
(37 °C) and incubated for 24 h. Cell dissociation was completed
using trypsin (0.25%) and EDTA (1 mM) to harvest 1 × 106 cells mL–1. Cells were centrifuged and resuspended
in cold 70% ethanol (250 μL), added dropwise while vortexing,
and fixed for 30 min at 4 °C. Cells were centrifuged at 300g for 5 min, and the pellet was washed with DPBS. Centrifugation
was performed again, and the resulting pellet was resuspended in a
solution of DPBS containing 20 μg/mL PI and 100 μg/mL
RNase A for 30 min.[59] Nonfrozen cells were
also stained for comparative cell cycle measurements. Flow cytometry
was performed on a BD Accuri C6 equipped with a 488 nm laser and 585/40
filter, and 50,000 events were recorded. BD CSampler Plus software
(v 1.0.34.1) was used for data collection and processing. Cell cycle
analysis was completed using ModFit LT v4.0.
Cell Banking and Transportation Capabilities
A549 and
HepG2 cells were frozen at a density of 200k cells per well, as described
above, and stored for 1 month in a −80 °C freezer or for
5 days in dry ice, to determine the potential for long-term storage
and transportation, respectively. Cells were thawed with warm complete
cell media (37 °C). After 24 h, cells were dissociated with trypsin
(0.25%) and EDTA (1 mM), and the suspended cells were stained with
trypan blue to count membrane intact cells. Percentage cell recovery
was calculated by comparing cell counts immediately before and 24
h after thawing.
Results and Discussion
Our primary aim is to cryopreserve
cells in a format that is ready
to use directly from a −80 °C freezer, with no additional
processing steps, in particular, to remove the need for routine cell
handling, Figure .
The macromolecular cryoprotectant selected to achieve this was a polyampholyte
generated by the ring open polymerization of poly(methyl vinyl ether-alt-maleic anhydride) with dimethylamino ethanol, to produce
a polymer with 1:1 cationic/anionic groups, which has been previously
demonstrated to allow the cryopreservation of A549 monolayers.[54] The proposed workflow for the cryopreservation
and recovery of cell monolayers is displayed in Figure A. Briefly, cells seeded in 24 well plates
were incubated with CPAs (40 mg mL–1 of polyampholyte
and 10% (v/v) DMSO) at RT for 10 min. The CPAs were subsequently removed
so that only a thin coating remains, and the well plate was placed
onto a thermoconductive block in a −80 °C freezer. As
part of the process, the excess cryoprotectant is removed before freezing
to reduce any potential cytotoxicity from the cryoprotectants, increase
freezing rates and facilitate the thawing process. Acker and Mcgann
previously confirmed that rapid freezing by removing CPA is beneficial
to monolayers, and could promote innocuous (nonfatal) IIF.[60] Once required for use, the plates were simply
removed from the freezer, and cells were rapidly thawed with warm
complete cell culture media and placed in an incubator ready to use
the following day (24 h). Rapid thawing was completed to minimize
the growth of ice crystals in the solid state and cell denaturation
due to high electrolyte concentrations.[61] A post-thaw recovery time of 24 h was selected, as shorter times
(4 h) can exaggerate both cell recovery and viability, and programed
cell death pathways can take 12–24 h to complete,[62,63] leading to significant false positive results when discovering innovative
cryoprotectants.[6] For example, a previous
polyampholyte was shown to have high immediate post-thaw viability
but no viable cells after 24 h.[52]
Figure 1
Schematic comparing
the processing of cells following cryopreservation
in (A) suspension format and (B) an “assay-ready” monolayer
format.
Figure 2
Post-thaw cell recovery of cell monolayers. (A) Schematic
of the
monolayer cryopreservation process. (B) Percentage cell recovery of
A549 (n = 4), HepG2 (n = 2), and
Caco-2 (n = 2) cell monolayers following cryopreservation
with 10% v/v DMSO (white bar) or 10% v/v DMSO and 40 mg mL–1 polyampholyte (grey bar). (C) Percentage cell recovery of A549 (white
bar), HepG2 (grey bar), and Caco-2 (dark grey bar) cell monolayers
in selected individual wells (filled in black in the 24-well plate
schematic) following cryopreservation in 10% v/v DMSO and 40 mg mL–1 polyampholyte. Data is presented by average percentage
cell recovery ± SEM of n independent repeats
(ANOVA, Tukey PostHoc; *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01).
Schematic comparing
the processing of cells following cryopreservation
in (A) suspension format and (B) an “assay-ready” monolayer
format.Post-thaw cell recovery of cell monolayers. (A) Schematic
of the
monolayer cryopreservation process. (B) Percentage cell recovery of
A549 (n = 4), HepG2 (n = 2), and
Caco-2 (n = 2) cell monolayers following cryopreservation
with 10% v/v DMSO (white bar) or 10% v/v DMSO and 40 mg mL–1 polyampholyte (grey bar). (C) Percentage cell recovery of A549 (white
bar), HepG2 (grey bar), and Caco-2 (dark grey bar) cell monolayers
in selected individual wells (filled in black in the 24-well plate
schematic) following cryopreservation in 10% v/v DMSO and 40 mg mL–1 polyampholyte. Data is presented by average percentage
cell recovery ± SEM of n independent repeats
(ANOVA, Tukey PostHoc; *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01).To evaluate the cryoprotective effect of this polymer,
A549 (adenocarcinomic
human alveolar basal epithelial cells), HepG2 (human hepatocellular
carcinoma), and Caco-2 (human colorectal adenocarcinoma) cells were
employed, all of which are widely used as model cell lines. The seeded
cells were counted immediately before freezing and 24 h post-thaw
to determine the percentage of cells recovered, as shown in Figure B. Using our optimized
method, remarkably high cell recovery values were obtained for A549
(92.5 ± 4.1%, 4 biological and 20 technical repeats), HepG2 (79.6
± 8.7%, 2 biological and 22 technical repeats), and Caco-2 (79.3
± 8.7%, 2 biological and 18 technical repeats) cells, whereas
freezing with 10% DMSO alone only achieved an average cell recovery
of 49.9% across all cell types, Figure S5. The abnormally high cell recovery values for DMSO alone, compared
to previously reported literature values (≤30%),[16] reflect the optimization of the freezing protocols,
which, together with the selection of cryoprotectant, is crucial for
the successful cryopreservation of nucleated cells. The minimal handling
required to obtain high post-thaw cell recovery values shows the remarkable
potency of polyampholyte as a cryoprotectant, transforming sub-useful
cell recovery levels to near-quantitative. For comparison, proline
preconditioning of A549 cells only achieves a post-thaw cell recovery
of ∼50% for the cryopreservation of monolayers[36] and the post-thaw recovery of HepG2 monolayers cryopreserved
in trehalose supplemented solutions is 42%.[40] Thus, this polyampholyte can protect cell lines that are routinely
difficult to cryopreserve for the future banking of cell libraries.
As a note, HepG2 and Caco-2 cells required collagen-coated plates
to ensure high cell recovery values (Figure S18) by promoting adhesion to the substrate during freezing. To demonstrate
reproducibility, two independent researchers were able to freeze six
24 well plates containing cell monolayers with no impact to cell recovery
values, Figure S7.Rather than aggregated
cell data across the entire plate, the cell
recovery values for a selection of individual wells have also been
reported (along with individual repeat values) to exaggerate any variance
between wells, Figure C. Regardless of the cell type, minimal well-to-well variance was
found in the mean cell recovery values, a crucial factor in screening
assays where there must be confidence that results aren’t artificially
increased or decreased due to variability in cell density across the
well plate.Varying cell seeding densities (12.5k–100k
cells per well)
also had no influence on the cryopreservation outcome, with over 75%
of cells recovered 24 h post-thaw, Figure A. Cryopreservation studies focus on confluent
cell monolayers, as the general belief is that higher recovery values
can be obtained.[60] However, for cell viability
assays, a linear response between cell seeding density and signal
output (usually absorbance or fluorescence) is required to ensure
that cell viability can be accurately determined. Thus, the ability
to cryopreserve cells at multiple cell seeding densities is crucial
for assay development and toxicological screening assays. A resazurin
reduction metabolic assay was completed on nonfrozen and frozen A549
and HepG2 cells, plated at varying seeding densities, to determine
the quantity of cells required to freeze to ensure a linear output
with resazurin reduction to resorufin and, thus, allow its use for
drug screening, Figure B,C, S10, and S11. Both cell lines were
able to metabolize resazurin to resorufin 24 h post-thaw and offered
a linear response between cell density and absorbance/fluorescence.
Although the metabolic activity of A549 cells was undisturbed by the
freezing process, HepG2 metabolic activity was halved 24 h post-thaw.
The reduction in metabolic activity is expected, halving (or more)
of metabolic activity has also been observed for osteoblasts (MG-63),[64] ovarian tissue,[65] and mesenchymal stem cells post-thaw.[66] Despite this, both A549 and HepG2 cells remained functional for
use in cell viability assays required for drug screening, see below.
Figure 3
Assay
optimization and metabolic activity of cryopreserved cells.
(A) Post-thaw percentage cell recovery of A549 (white bar, n = 4), HepG2 (grey bar, n = 3), and Caco-2
(dark grey bar, n = 2) cell monolayers, plated at
different seeding densities, following cryopreservation with 10% v/v
DMSO and 40 mg mL–1 polyampholyte. Data are presented
as average % cell recovery ± SEM of n independent
repeats. A resazurin reduction metabolic assay was completed on frozen
(B) A549 and (C) HepG2 plated cells (blue line), 24 h post-thaw, and
on nonfrozen, conventionally cultured cells (black). The results are
presented as average resazurin reduction ± SEM of 2 independent
repeats.
Assay
optimization and metabolic activity of cryopreserved cells.
(A) Post-thaw percentage cell recovery of A549 (white bar, n = 4), HepG2 (grey bar, n = 3), and Caco-2
(dark grey bar, n = 2) cell monolayers, plated at
different seeding densities, following cryopreservation with 10% v/v
DMSO and 40 mg mL–1 polyampholyte. Data are presented
as average % cell recovery ± SEM of n independent
repeats. A resazurin reduction metabolic assay was completed on frozen
(B) A549 and (C) HepG2 plated cells (blue line), 24 h post-thaw, and
on nonfrozen, conventionally cultured cells (black). The results are
presented as average resazurin reduction ± SEM of 2 independent
repeats.Optical microscopy images taken of nonfrozen cells
and cells frozen
with both polyampholyte and DMSO, shown in Figure , illustrate that post-thaw cell morphology
is normal and unaffected by the freezing process. A549 and HepG2 cells
remained adhered to the well plate, and confluent monolayers were
observed. Optical microscopy images were also taken of cells frozen
at different cell densities (Figure S8).
Again, cells appeared healthy regardless of cell density and were
ready for use within the 24 h recovery time provided. Cryopreservation
with DMSO alone resulted in spherical cell morphologies associated
with unhealthy cells. The injury phenotype has previously been characterized
as intracellular freezing damage, indicated by the dark cytosol and
disruption of intercellular networks.[21] Standard rapid freezing methods increase the likelihood of IIF by
reducing cell dehydration.[1] Cryomicroscopy
images of A549, HepG2, and Caco-2 cells, Figure S12, confirmed the presence of IIF during freezing (darkening
of the cytosol); however, cells preincubated with both polyampholyte
and DMSO have a lower surface area compared to DMSO alone (Figures S12 and S13), suggesting that polyampholyte
can aid in cellular dehydration as part of their mechanisms of action.
Thus, the polyampholyte is not acting to completely remove IIF but
to minimize the damage caused by it, so that the intracellular ice
formed can be considered innocuous.[60]
Figure 4
Phase
contrast images of A549 and HepG2 monolayers before (nonfrozen)
and 24 h after freeze/thaw. Cells were cryopreserved in either 10%
v/v DMSO or 10% v/v DMSO and 40 mg mL–1 polyampholyte.
Scale bar = 100 μm.
Phase
contrast images of A549 and HepG2 monolayers before (nonfrozen)
and 24 h after freeze/thaw. Cells were cryopreserved in either 10%
v/v DMSO or 10% v/v DMSO and 40 mg mL–1 polyampholyte.
Scale bar = 100 μm.Optical microscopy images were also taken of post-thaw
confluent
A549 and HepG2 cells from different positions within a single well,
to illustrate the low intra-well variance obtained using polyampholyte
and DMSO, Figure .
Cell morphology remained consistently healthy across the different
positions. In the case of HepG2, fewer cells were observed in position
1 compared to the other 2 positions. The variation in cell number
is likely due to natural variation from the initial seeding process,
where traditional seeding methods can result in increased cell aggregation
across the circumference and/or the center of wells compared to other
positions.[67] Confluent monolayers were
observed in all other positions for both A549 and HepG2 cells.
Figure 5
Phase contrast
images of A549 and HepG2 monolayers, cryopreserved
with 10% v/v DMSO and 40 mg mL–1 polyampholyte,
were taken at 3 positions within an individual well. Scale bar = 100
μm.
Phase contrast
images of A549 and HepG2 monolayers, cryopreserved
with 10% v/v DMSO and 40 mg mL–1 polyampholyte,
were taken at 3 positions within an individual well. Scale bar = 100
μm.To evaluate the quality of the cells post-thaw,
a panel of further
assays was undertaken. Membrane integrity is a general measure of
post-thaw recovery and is a vital assessment for the health of liver
cell lines, as enzyme leakage would be detrimental to enzyme activity
assays used in hepatotoxicity screening for the identification of
bioactive drugs and their potential mechanisms.[68,69] A549 and HepG2 cells, both nonfrozen and post-thaw, were stained
with calcein (green, healthy, intact membrane) and ethidium iodide
(EI, red, dead, damaged membrane) to visualize the presence of membrane
damage, Figure A.
Microscopy images immediately revealed few red, EI-positive cells
in both nonfrozen and frozen cells, indicating minimal membrane damage.
Quantification of the percentage of live cells (i.e., stained positive
for calcein), relative to the total number of cells from images, was
completed to compare membrane-damaged cells between nonfrozen and
frozen cells, Figure B. Although a statistically significant decrease in membrane intact
cells was observed in cells post-thaw, intact levels remained at ∼96%
for A549 cells and ∼88% for HepG2 cells. The absence of membrane
damage confirms that physical disruption of cells is avoided during
cryopreservation with polyampholyte and DMSO, which reduces the likelihood
of necrosis cell death and the risks of introducing bias in any downstream
functional assay.
Figure 6
Membrane integrity assessment of cryopreserved cell monolayers.
(A) A549 and HepG2 cells were stained with calcein (green, intact
membrane) and EI (red, damaged membrane) 24 h following freeze/thaw
and imaged. Nonfrozen cells were also stained for comparison. Scale
bar = 100 μm. (B) Average percentage of membrane intact (calcein
positive) A549 and HepG2 cells were determined before (dark grey bar)
and 24 h post-thaw (light grey bar) ± SEM of 2 independent repeats
(ANOVA, Tukey PostHoc; *p ≤ 0.05, ***p ≤ 0.001).
Membrane integrity assessment of cryopreserved cell monolayers.
(A) A549 and HepG2 cells were stained with calcein (green, intact
membrane) and EI (red, damaged membrane) 24 h following freeze/thaw
and imaged. Nonfrozen cells were also stained for comparison. Scale
bar = 100 μm. (B) Average percentage of membrane intact (calcein
positive) A549 and HepG2 cells were determined before (dark grey bar)
and 24 h post-thaw (light grey bar) ± SEM of 2 independent repeats
(ANOVA, Tukey PostHoc; *p ≤ 0.05, ***p ≤ 0.001).Programed cell death (e.g., apoptosis) pathways
were also investigated
as cryopreservation can activate intrinsic, extrinsic, and calpain
apoptosis pathways.[70−72] Hypothermic solutions and general caspase and ROCK
inhibitors (apoptotic inhibitors) have been used to reduce post-thaw
apoptotic cells.[70,73,74] Due to the importance of apoptosis in cryopreservation outcomes,
the induction of executioner caspases 3 and 7 (cysteinyl aspartate-specific
proteases) in post-thaw confluent A549 and HepG2 cell monolayers was
monitored by fluorescence microscopy to visualize the appearance of
apoptotic cells over time, Figures A and S14. Minimal caspase-3/7
positive cells (green) were observed in microscopy images at all timepoints
within the 24 h imaging period. The percentage of caspase-3/7 positive
cells relative to the total number of cells present was quantified, Figure B, confirming that
apoptotic cells were maintained below 10% following freeze/thaw. Apoptotic
inhibitors have previously been used to minimize apoptosis following
the cryopreservation of mesenchymal stem cells due to the high apoptosis
levels (∼40%).[70] Our system offers
cryopreserved monolayer cells with substantially lower apoptosis rates
for the cell lines selected, thus the introduction of apoptosis inhibitors
would provide minimal benefits. The post-thaw recovery time selected
(24 h) is underpinned by these results, to enable apoptotic events
to occur and minimize the potential for false-positive results that
occur when immediate post-thaw recovery/viability is reported.[6]
Figure 7
Evaluation of post-thaw apoptosis in cryopreserved monolayers.
(A) Sample images of A549 and HepG2 cells stained for executioner
caspase-3/-7 activation (green) 24 h post-thaw. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Additional real-time images are provided in the Supporting Information. (B) Average percentage of caspase-positive
cells were determined at different timepoints post-thaw ± SEM
of 2 independent repeats.
Evaluation of post-thaw apoptosis in cryopreserved monolayers.
(A) Sample images of A549 and HepG2 cells stained for executioner
caspase-3/-7 activation (green) 24 h post-thaw. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Additional real-time images are provided in the Supporting Information. (B) Average percentage of caspase-positive
cells were determined at different timepoints post-thaw ± SEM
of 2 independent repeats.Membrane permeability and apoptosis measurements
offer an assessment
of immediate cell health post-thaw; however, growth curve measurements
are required to determine if cells are healthy long-term. Nonfrozen
and post-thaw cells were counted daily, until 80–100% confluency
was reached, to determine if the proliferation times of monolayer
frozen cells were affected by the freeze/thaw process and have been
reported in Figure . No significant difference was found between the doubling time of
A549 cells before and after freezing; however, HepG2 doubling time
increased from 29 to 38 h. Despite this, HepG2 doubling rates of 48
h have been reported, and our lab has also experienced similar doubling
rates, so the proliferation rate of post-thaw HepG2 cells is within
the normal range expected.[75]
Figure 8
Post-thaw growth
curve measurements. Nonfrozen and post-thaw (A)
A549 and (B) HepG2 cells were counted daily until fully confluent
to determine proliferation rates. Cell counts were normalized relative
to the final count and reported ± SEM of 2 independent repeats.
Post-thaw growth
curve measurements. Nonfrozen and post-thaw (A)
A549 and (B) HepG2 cells were counted daily until fully confluent
to determine proliferation rates. Cell counts were normalized relative
to the final count and reported ± SEM of 2 independent repeats.Cryopreservation may significantly alter cell cycle
populations
up to 48 h post-thaw; however, there are limited reports on this.[76] Previous cell recovery and viability measurements
confirm that, after freezing, cells maintain a “healthy”
state, but gaining information into cell cycle population distributions
offers additional insight into proliferation capacity,[77] apoptotic cells,[78] and cells undergoing repair processes.[79] Cell cycle population distributions were measured by univariate
analysis of cellular DNA following propidium iodide staining, flow
cytometry, and deconvolution of the cellular DNA content frequency
histograms.[77] Histograms can be found in
the Supporting Information, Figure S15,
and the cell cycle populations have been reported in Table . Apoptotic cells were not observed
in the cell cycle histograms, which are usually present in the sub
G0/G1 fluorescence range (due to loss of DNA content). The majority
of A549 and Caco-2 cells were either in the S or G2/M phase, a clear
distinction from HepG2 cells, which is considered an indicator for
increased proliferative potential. Post-thaw, all cell types experienced
a decrease in G0/G1 cells and an increase in S-phase cells, a clear
indicator that cells are not in G0/G1 arrest (apoptosis indicator)[78,80] and retain proliferative capacity.[77] A549
and Caco-2 cells retained similar cell cycle population distributions
before and after freezing (24 h post-thaw), whereas clear differences
were observed with HepG2 cells which could reflect the changes in
proliferation rates between nonfrozen and frozen HepG2 cells previously
observed. Regardless, proliferative capacity was retained for all
cell types, with minimal indicators of apoptosis found, confirming
that cells are functional for use following freeze/thaw.
Table 1
Cell Cycle Analysis From Flow Cytometry
G0/G1 (%)
G2M (%)
S-phase (%)
A549. nonfrozen
28.0
4.6
67.5
A549. post-thaw
21.5
1.5
77.0
HepG2. nonfrozen
68.5
22.4
9.1
HepG2. post-thaw
54.8
12.8
32.4
Caco-2. nonfrozen
43.1
8.0
48.9
Caco-2. post-thaw
39.5
8.0
52.5
A primary aim of this research program was to provide
a scalable
method of freezing cells in the monolayer format for use in screening
applications, eliminating the need for extensive cell culturing and
handing. Obtaining dose–response information, which involves
the core principles of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, is essential
for drug screening, to determine the required drug dosage and frequency,
as well as its therapeutic index. Thus, a proof-of-concept drug screening
experiment was carried out with doxorubicin (a chemotherapeutic) using
the previously optimized resazurin reduction cell viability assay.
The drug screening workflow is illustrated in Figure A. Briefly, cells were cryopreserved, using
our system, at the optimal density required to ensure accurate % cell
viability calculations. Following 24 h storage, cells were thawed
with warm complete cell media and incubated for 24 h, and doxorubicin
solutions were added (0–200 μg mL–1) for 24 h. Resazurin solutions were subsequently added, and the
reduction of resazurin to resorufin was measured at 570 and 600 nm
to calculate percentage cell viability and generate dose–response
curves, Figure B.
A sigmoidal relationship was found between log10 of doxorubicin
concentrations and % cell viability, with plateaus at the bottom and
top of the response, allowing the accurate determination of doxorubicin’s
IC50 value (the concentration of doxorubicin required to
reduce cell viability to 50%). HepG2 cells are the most widely used
line for the toxicological screening of new drugs and are currently
deployed in automated/high throughput systems.[56,57] The ability to generate dose–response curves and calculate
IC50 values using monolayer cryopreserved cells confirms
their suitability for drug screening applications, finding biologically
active compounds, and providing a way to increase automation through
minimal cell-handling procedures.
Figure 9
Post-thaw drug screening tests on cryopreserved
cell monolayers.
(A) Schematic of the drug screening process used on cryopreserved
monolayers. (B) Cell viability of A549 (black) and HepG2 (blue) monolayers
was monitored by resazurin reduction following treatment with doxorubicin
(0–250 μg mL–1, 24 h). Percentage cell
viability was calculated relative to an untreated control sample ±
SEM from 2 independent repeats.
Post-thaw drug screening tests on cryopreserved
cell monolayers.
(A) Schematic of the drug screening process used on cryopreserved
monolayers. (B) Cell viability of A549 (black) and HepG2 (blue) monolayers
was monitored by resazurin reduction following treatment with doxorubicin
(0–250 μg mL–1, 24 h). Percentage cell
viability was calculated relative to an untreated control sample ±
SEM from 2 independent repeats.HepG2 cytochrome p450 (CYP) activity was also assessed
between
nonfrozen and monolayer preserved cells 24 h post-thaw, Figure S16. CYP enzymes are vital in drug metabolism,
with CYP3A4 being responsible for 50% of all drug metabolism.[81] Thus, many drug screening applications rely
on monitoring the inhibition of CYP enzymes, which could slow drug
metabolism time resulting in undesired drug–drug interactions.[82,83] Although insignificant, CYP3A4 activity of cells post-thaw was slightly
suppressed post-thaw compared to nonfrozen cells, whereas CYP2C9 levels
remained either unaffected or marginally higher. The innate expression
of CYP enzymes was low for HepG2 cells and remained low even with
the use of an inducer (rifampicin), Figure S17, which is consistent with previous studies.[84] The selection of future cells with greater response to CYP inducers,
with improved predictability for human hepatotoxin detection, will
be explored to expand our library of cryopreserved monolayer cells.
However, the data presented here clearly demonstrates that HepG2 monolayers
can be cryopreserved in an assay-ready format, potentially enabling
the first direct from storage to automated screening platform.To ensure that a sustainable supply of monolayer cryopreserved
cell lines is possible, the long-term storage of cells is required.
Although cells cryopreserved in suspension can be stored long-term
at temperatures less than or equal to −80 °C, retaining
>90% viability post-thaw,[8,85] no reports were found
on the medium-to-long term storage of cells cryopreserved as monolayers
in a −80 °C freezer. Confluent A549 and HepG2 monolayers
were cryopreserved as previously described and stored for 1 month
in a −80 °C freezer. Optical microscopy images were taken
of the confluent monolayers directly before freezing and 24 h post-thaw, Figure A. No changes to
cell morphology were observed post-thaw and cells remained as confluent
monolayers. A decrease in % cell recovery was found following long-term
storage suggesting there may be some cell detachment during thawing
or cell death, Figure B. However, no cell debris was found, and a cell recovery of ∼70%
was obtained, which is sufficient to allow cells to be used for desired
applications. Longer-term storage could be improved by conventional
liquid N2 methods. Cells were also stored in dry ice for
over 5 days, with no significant decrease in cell recovery (Figure S18), which provides a route for the transportation
of cryopreserved plated cell monolayers.
Figure 10
Long-term storage of
cryopreserved cell monolayers. (A) Optical
microscopy images were taken of A549 and HepG2 cell monolayers before
freezing and 24 h post-thaw following 1 month of storage in a −80
°C freezer. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Average percentage
cell recovery of A549 (white bar) and HepG2 (grey bar) cell monolayers
following 1 and 30 days of storage in a −80 °C freezer
were reported ± SEM from 2/3 independent repeats (ANOVA, Tukey
PostHoc; ns: p > 0.05,*p ≤
0.05).
Long-term storage of
cryopreserved cell monolayers. (A) Optical
microscopy images were taken of A549 and HepG2 cell monolayers before
freezing and 24 h post-thaw following 1 month of storage in a −80
°C freezer. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Average percentage
cell recovery of A549 (white bar) and HepG2 (grey bar) cell monolayers
following 1 and 30 days of storage in a −80 °C freezer
were reported ± SEM from 2/3 independent repeats (ANOVA, Tukey
PostHoc; ns: p > 0.05,*p ≤
0.05).
Conclusions
Here we introduce truly “assay-ready”
cryopreserved
adherent cells, ready to be used directly from a freezer within industry
standard microplates, removing the need for standard handling, manipulations,
management, and other time- and resource-expensive activities associated
with cell culture and biomedical testing. This overcomes a historical
challenge and perception that cells cannot be stored and distributed
in monolayer format. The key component to enable such reproducible
monolayer freezing was the use of a synthetic polyampholyte which,
when used alongside the standard CPA DMSO, leads to dramatic increases
in post-thaw cell yield and viability of up to 93%, compared to ∼50%
using DMSO alone. Initial data suggests that the polyampholyte supports
the cellular dehydration process during freezing, reducing the damaging
effects of IIF. In addition to the macromolecular cryoprotectant,
the freezing and thawing conditions were optimized to minimize well-to-well
variance, ensuring homogenous cell recovery within and between microplates.
Successful monolayer cryopreservation was demonstrated for A549, HepG2,
and Caco-2 cells, representing a diverse range of commonly used cell
lines within biomedical research and toxicology testing. To confirm
that the cells were functional and healthy, a large panel of assays
was undertaken. Post-thaw membrane damage and necrosis indicators
were kept minimal and only a small increase in cells displaying apoptosis
markers was observed. Cell cycle analysis and post-thaw growth curves
confirmed that cells retained proliferative capacity. Cryopreserved
A549 and HepG2 cell monolayers were subjected to a model assay development
and toxicological challenge, to demonstrate that the cells are truly
“assay ready” 24 h post-thaw and can be used for the
testing of pharmaceutically active compounds. Overall, we have demonstrated
that cells can be cryopreserved as “assay-ready” monolayers,
in a scalable and versatile manner, which will enable the development
of new screening technologies, enhance automation, and reduce the
experimental burden on researchers.
Data Access Statement
The research data supporting
this publication is found in the Supporting Information and any additional data
can be found at http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk.
Authors: Laia Tolosa; M José Gómez-Lechón; Gabriela Pérez-Cataldo; José V Castell; M Teresa Donato Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 2013-02-09 Impact factor: 5.153
Authors: Christopher Stubbs; Kathryn A Murray; Toru Ishibe; Robert T Mathers; Matthew I Gibson Journal: ACS Macro Lett Date: 2020-02-07 Impact factor: 6.903