| Literature DB >> 32092295 |
Martin I Daily1, Thomas F Whale2, Riitta Partanen3, Alexander D Harrison2, Peter Kilbride4, Stephen Lamb4, G John Morris4, Helen M Picton3, Benjamin J Murray2.
Abstract
Cryopreservation of mammalian cells has to date typically been conducted in cryovials, but there are applications where cryopreservation of primary cells in multiwell plates would be advantageous. However excessive supercooling in the small volumes of liquid in each well of the multiwell plates is inevitable without intervention and tends to result in high and variable cell mortality. Here, we describe a technique for cryopreservation of adhered primary bovine granulosa cells in 96-well plates by controlled rate freezing using controlled ice nucleation. Inducing ice nucleation at warm supercooled temperatures (less than 5 °C below the melting point) during cryopreservation using a manual seeding technique significantly improved post-thaw recovery from 29.6% (SD = 8.3%) where nucleation was left uncontrolled to 57.7% (9.3%) when averaged over 8 replicate cultures (p < 0.001). Detachment of thawed cells was qualitatively observed to be more prevalent in wells which did not have ice nucleation control which suggests cryopreserved cell monolayer detachment may be a consequence of deep supercooling. Using an infra-red thermography technique we showed that many aliquots of cryoprotectant solution in 96-well plates can supercool to temperatures below -20 °C when nucleation is not controlled, and also that the freezing temperatures observed are highly variable despite stringent attempts to remove contaminants acting as nucleation sites. We conclude that successful cryopreservation of cells in 96-well plates, or any small volume format, requires control of ice nucleation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32092295 PMCID: PMC7191264 DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.02.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cryobiology ISSN: 0011-2240 Impact factor: 2.487
Fig. 1Description of 96-plate cryopreservation procedure and manual ice nucleation technique.
Fig. 2Droplet fraction frozen against well ice nucleation temperature for ensembles of 100 μL droplets of purified water prepared in different conditions of sterility and of CPA with and without a cell monolayer in polypropylene 96-well plates. This variability of freezing temperature is representative of uncontrolled nucleation while the expected range of freezing temperatures induced by ice-mist manual nucleation method is depicted for reference. The temperature uncertainty of the IR-NIPI used is ±0.9 °C.
Fig. 3(Left): IR-NIPI temperature log of 96-well plate loaded with 50 μL aliquots of CPA where half of the wells were nucleated manually with ice mist (green lines) and half left to nucleate without control (blue lines). The data gap at around 1300 s is due to the apparatus being disabled to allow the manual nucleation procedure. Right: IR colour map mages of the plate undergoing cooling at progressing time points – manually nucleated wells are on the right half of the plate, uncontrolled on the left. Recently frozen wells having released latent heat appear yellow (temperature-colour scale below is approximate). A plastic film covering the left side of the plate appears as an orange region in the image taken at 1000s. This was placed to protect the wells on this side of the plate from the nucleation inducing ice mist. After manual nucleation was done the film was removed so is no longer visible by the next image at 1500 s. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 4(A): Boxplots of viable granulosa cell number pre- and post-cryopreservation as determined by Neutral Red assays. All treatments within all groups are shown to be significantly distinct by ANOVA post-hoc tests with results of post-hoc analyses between Controlled and Uncontrolled Nucleation treatments for each cell batch shown as p values. Batch g is shown in separate pane with its own y-axis because the cell density was 2–3 times higher than the other batches. n = 24 for each Baseline group and n = 16 for each Controlled Nucleation and Uncontrolled Nucleation group. (B): Cell viability post-thawing relative to Baseline averaged across all cell batches with result of two sample t-test. Values plotted are means ± SEM for the number of replicates shown. (C–E): Micrographs of adhered bovine granulsoa cells stained with Neutral Red dye. Panel C shows cells in the non-cyropreserved control plate at the end of the 72 h incubation period. Panels D and E depict representive morphologies of thawed cells immediately after cryopreservation with and without ice nucleation control respectively. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 5Freezing temperatures of purified water droplet ensembles at a range of volumes with an empirical trend. Boxes denote 25th – 75th percentiles, bars denote medians and whiskers denote range of values. We have plotted literature data [4,5,13,25,34,37] of ice nucleation temperatures of pure water aliquots in various containers and spanning volumes from sub-pL to tens of mL along with a homogenous freezing parameterisation [16]. We also show new data for 100 μL droplets in a 96-well plate (from Fig. 2) and data for 1.0 mL in cryovials (Corning 2.0 mL capacity, Cat No. 430488) and 70 mL in cryobags (Milenyi CD250). We used Hyclone cell culture water. The cryovials assay was performed using the IR-NIPI as previously described (n = 31); while for the cryobags the ice nucleation temperatures (n = 6) were determined using a thermocouple as the bags were cooled while inside aluminium cassettes.