Literature DB >> 24910385

Long-term effects of cryopreservation on clinically prepared hematopoietic progenitor cell products.

Jacob M Winter1, Pam Jacobson1, Brandon Bullough1, Austin P Christensen1, Michael Boyer2, Jo-Anna Reems3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AIMS: The question of how long hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) destined for clinical applications withstand long-term cryopreservation remains unanswered. To increase our basic understanding about the stability of HPC products over time, this study focused on characterizing long-term effects of cryopreservation on clinically prepared HPC products.
METHODS: Cryovials (n = 233) frozen for an average of 6.3 ± 14.2 years (range, 0.003-14.6 years) from HPC products (n = 170) representing 75 individual patients were thawed and evaluated for total nucleated cells (TNCs), cell viability, viable CD34+ (vCD34+) cells and colony-forming cells (CFCs). TNCs were determined by use of an automated cell counter, and cell viability was measured with the use of trypan blue exclusion. Viable CD34 analysis was performed by means of flow cytometry and function by a CFC assay.
RESULTS: Significant losses in TNCs, cell viability, vCD34+ cells and CFC occurred on cryopreservation. However, once frozen, viable TNCs, vCD34+ cells and CFC recoveries did not significantly change over time. The only parameter demonstrating a change over time was cell viability, which decreased as the length of time that an HPC product was stored frozen increased. A significant negative correlation (correlation coefficient = -0.165) was determined between pre-freeze percent granulocyte content and post-thaw percent viability (n = 170; P = 0.032). However, a significant positive correlation was observed between percent viability at thaw and pre-freeze lymphocyte concentration.
CONCLUSIONS: Once frozen, HPC products were stable for up to 14.6 years at <-150°C. Post-thaw viability was found to correlate negatively with pre-freeze granulocyte content and positively with pre-freeze lymphocyte content.
Copyright © 2014 International Society for Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood preservation; cell survival; cryopreservation; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation/methods; hematopoietic stem cells

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24910385     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2014.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytotherapy        ISSN: 1465-3249            Impact factor:   5.414


  6 in total

Review 1.  Taking a bite out of spinal cord injury: do dental stem cells have the teeth for it?

Authors:  John Bianco; Pauline De Berdt; Ronald Deumens; Anne des Rieux
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  How old is too old? In vivo engraftment of human peripheral blood stem cells cryopreserved for up to 18 years - implications for clinical transplantation and stability programs.

Authors:  John Underwood; Mahvish Rahim; Carijo West; Rebecca Britton; Elaine Skipworth; Vicki Graves; Steven Sexton; Hillary Harris; Dave Schwering; Anthony Sinn; Karen E Pollok; Kent A Robertson; W Scott Goebel; Kerry M Hege
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  Evaluation of post-thaw CFU-GM: clinical utility and role in quality assessment of umbilical cord blood in patients receiving single unit transplant.

Authors:  Eiman Hussein; Todd DeFor; John E Wagner; Darin Sumstad; Claudio G Brunstein; David H McKenna
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Assay-ready Cryopreserved Cell Monolayers Enabled by Macromolecular Cryoprotectants.

Authors:  Ruben M F Tomás; Akalabya Bissoyi; Thomas R Congdon; Matthew I Gibson
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 6.978

5.  Automated dry thawing of cryopreserved haematopoietic cells is not adversely influenced by cryostorage time, patient age or gender.

Authors:  Peter Kilbride; Julie Meneghel; Giovanna Creasey; Fatemeh Masoudzadeh; Tina Drew; Hannah Creasey; David Bloxham; G John Morris; Kevin Jestice
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Long-Term Cryopreservation Does Not Affect Quality of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts: A Comparative Study of Native, Short-Term and Long-Term Cryopreserved Haematopoietic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Daniel Lysak; Michaela Brychtová; Martin Leba; Miroslava Čedíková; Daniel Georgiev; Pavel Jindra; Tomáš Vlas; Monika Holubova
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.