Literature DB >> 35967990

A reinforcement learning application of a guided Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithm for beam orientation selection in radiation therapy.

Azar Sadeghnejad-Barkousaraie1, Gyanendra Bohara1, Steve Jiang1, Dan Nguyen1.   

Abstract

Current beam orientation optimization algorithms for radiotherapy, such as column generation (CG), are typically heuristic or greedy in nature because of the size of the combinatorial problem, which leads to suboptimal solutions. We propose a reinforcement learning strategy using Monte Carlo Tree Search that can find a better beam orientation set in less time than CG. We utilize a reinforcement learning structure involving a supervised learning network to guide the Monte Carlo Tree Search and to explore the decision space of beam orientation selection problems. We previously trained a deep neural network (DNN) that takes in the patient anatomy, organ weights, and current beams, then approximates beam fitness values to indicate the next best beam to add. Here, we use this DNN to probabilistically guide the traversal of the branches of the Monte Carlo decision tree to add a new beam to the plan. To assess the feasibility of the algorithm, we used a test set of 13 prostate cancer patients, distinct from the 57 patients originally used to train and validate the DNN, to solve for 5-beam plans. To show the strength of the guided Monte Carlo tree search (GTS) compared to other search methods, we also provided the performances of guided search, uniform tree search and random search algorithms. On average, GTS outperformed all other methods. It found a better solution than CG in 237 seconds on average, compared to 360 seconds for CG, and outperformed all other methods in finding a solution with a lower objective function value in less than 1000 seconds. Using our guided tree search (GTS) method, we could maintain planning target volume (PTV) coverage within 1% error similar to CG, while reducing the organ-at-risk (OAR) mean dose for body, rectum, left and right femoral heads; mean dose to bladder was 1% higher with GTS than with CG.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 35967990      PMCID: PMC9370063          DOI: 10.1088/2632-2153/abe528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mach Learn Sci Technol        ISSN: 2632-2153


  40 in total

1.  Inverse planning for photon and proton beams.

Authors:  U Oelfke; T Bortfeld
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.482

2.  iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Breedveld; Pascal R M Storchi; Peter W J Voet; Ben J M Heijmen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Lung IMRT planning with automatic determination of beam angle configurations.

Authors:  Lulin Yuan; Wei Zhu; Yaorong Ge; Yuliang Jiang; Yang Sheng; Fang-Fang Yin; Q Jackie Wu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Similar-cases-based planning approaches with beam angle optimizations using water equivalent path length for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  Shu Haseai; Hidetaka Arimura; Kaori Asai; Tadamasa Yoshitake; Yoshiyuki Shioyama
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2020-03-14

5.  A new sparse optimization scheme for simultaneous beam angle and fluence map optimization in radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Hongcheng Liu; Peng Dong; Lei Xing
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Objective function based ranking method for selection of optimal beam angles in IMRT.

Authors:  Natarajan Ramar; S R Meher; Vaitheeswaran Ranganathan; Bojarajan Perumal; Prashant Kumar; Gipson Joe Anto; S Harikrishna Etti
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  Spherical cluster analysis for beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Mark Bangert; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  4π noncoplanar stereotactic body radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: potential to improve tumor control and late toxicity.

Authors:  Jean-Claude M Rwigema; Dan Nguyen; Dwight E Heron; Allen M Chen; Percy Lee; Pin-Chieh Wang; John A Vargo; Daniel A Low; M Saiful Huq; Stephen Tenn; Michael L Steinberg; Patrick Kupelian; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  4π non-coplanar liver SBRT: a novel delivery technique.

Authors:  Peng Dong; Percy Lee; Dan Ruan; Troy Long; Edwin Romeijn; Yingli Yang; Daniel Low; Patrick Kupelian; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Beam selection for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using Cyberknife with multileaf collimation.

Authors:  James L Bedford; Peter Ziegenhein; Simeon Nill; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 2.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.