Literature DB >> 20858916

Spherical cluster analysis for beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning.

Mark Bangert1, Uwe Oelfke.   

Abstract

An intuitive heuristic to establish beam configurations for intensity-modulated radiation therapy is introduced as an extension of beam ensemble selection strategies applying scalar scoring functions. It is validated by treatment plan comparisons for three intra-cranial, pancreas, and prostate cases each. Based on a patient specific matrix listing the radiological quality of candidate beam directions individually for every target voxel, a set of locally ideal beam angles is generated. The spherical distribution of locally ideal beam angles is characteristic for every treatment site and patient: ideal beam angles typically cluster around distinct orientations. We interpret the cluster centroids, which are identified with a spherical K-means algorithm, as irradiation angles of an intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plan. The fluence profiles are subsequently optimized during a conventional inverse planning process. The average computation time for the pre-optimization of a beam ensemble is six minutes on a state-of-the-art work station. The treatment planning study demonstrates the potential benefit of the proposed beam angle optimization strategy. For the three prostate cases under investigation, the standard treatment plans applying nine coplanar equi-spaced beams and treatment plans applying an optimized non-coplanar nine-beam ensemble yield clinically comparable dose distributions. For symmetric patient geometries, the dose distribution formed by nine equi-spaced coplanar beams cannot be improved significantly. For the three pancreas and intra-cranial cases under investigation, the optimized non-coplanar beam ensembles enable better sparing of organs at risk while guaranteeing equivalent target coverage. Beam angle optimization by spherical cluster analysis shows the biggest impact for target volumes located asymmetrically within the patient and close to organs at risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20858916     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/19/025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  11 in total

1.  Optimization approaches to volumetric modulated arc therapy planning.

Authors:  Jan Unkelbach; Thomas Bortfeld; David Craft; Markus Alber; Mark Bangert; Rasmus Bokrantz; Danny Chen; Ruijiang Li; Lei Xing; Chunhua Men; Simeon Nill; Dávid Papp; Edwin Romeijn; Ehsan Salari
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sarkar Siddique; James C L Chow
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-05-06

Review 3.  From analytic inversion to contemporary IMRT optimization: radiation therapy planning revisited from a mathematical perspective.

Authors:  Yair Censor; Jan Unkelbach
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  A data-driven approach to optimal beam/arc angle selection for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Yang Sheng; Taoran Li; Yaorong Ge; Hui Lin; Wentao Wang; Lulin Yuan; Q Jackie Wu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-12

5.  Comparison of non-coplanar optimization of static beams and arc trajectories for intensity-modulated treatments of meningioma cases.

Authors:  Tiago Ventura; Humberto Rocha; Brigida da Costa Ferreira; Joana Dias; Maria do Carmo Lopes
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2021-10-07

6.  A reinforcement learning application of a guided Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithm for beam orientation selection in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Azar Sadeghnejad-Barkousaraie; Gyanendra Bohara; Steve Jiang; Dan Nguyen
Journal:  Mach Learn Sci Technol       Date:  2021-05-13

7.  A surrogate-based metaheuristic global search method for beam angle selection in radiation treatment planning.

Authors:  H H Zhang; S Gao; W Chen; L Shi; W D D'Souza; R R Meyer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Recent developments in non-coplanar radiotherapy.

Authors:  Gregory Smyth; Philip M Evans; Jeffrey C Bamber; James L Bedford
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Approach and assessment of automated stereotactic radiotherapy planning for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Xue Bai; Guoping Shan; Ming Chen; Binbing Wang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 10.  Machine learning applications in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Matthew Field; Nicholas Hardcastle; Michael Jameson; Noel Aherne; Lois Holloway
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.