Literature DB >> 35952719

Effects of diet on feed intake, weight change, and gas emissions in beef cows.

Amanda L Holder1, Megan A Gross1, Alexandra N Moehlenpah1, Carla L Goad2, Megan Rolf3, Ryon S Walker4, James K Rogers4, David L Lalman1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the effects of diet energy density on ranking for dry matter intake (DMI), residual feed intake (RFI), and greenhouse gas emissions. Forty-two mature, gestating Angus cows (600 ± 69 kg body weight [BW]; body condition score [BCS] 5.3 ± 1.1) with a wide range in DMI expected progeny difference (-1.38 to 2.91) were randomly assigned to two diet sequences; forage then concentrate (FC) or concentrate then forage (CF). The forage diet consisted of long-stem native grass hay plus protein supplement (HAY; 1.96 Mcal ME/kg DM). The concentrate diet consisted of 35% chopped grass hay and 65% concentrate feeds on a dry matter basis (MIX; 2.5 Mcal ME/kg DM). The GreenFeed Emission Monitoring system was used to determine carbon dioxide (CO2), oxygen (O2), and methane (CH4) flux. Cow performance traits, ultrasound back fat and rump fat, feed DMI, and gas flux data were analyzed in a crossover design using a mixed model including diet, period, and sequence as fixed effects and pen and cow within sequence as random effects. For all measured traits excluding DMI, there was a diet × sequence interaction (P < 0.05). The correlation between MIX and HAY DMI was 0.41 (P = 0.067) and 0.47 (P = 0.03) for FC and CF sequences, respectively. There was no relationship (P > 0.66) between HAY and MIX average daily gain (ADG), regardless of sequence. Fifty-seven percent of the variation in DMI was explained by metabolic BW, ADG, and BCS for both diets during the first period. During the second period, the same three explanatory variables accounted for 38% and 37% of the variation in DMI for MIX and HAY diets, respectively. The negative relationship between BCS and DMI was more pronounced when cows consumed the MIX diet. There was no relationship between MIX and HAY RFI, regardless of sequence (P > 0.18). During the first period, correlations for CO2, CH4, and O2 with MIX DMI were 0.69, 0.81, and 0.56 (P ≤ 0.015), respectively, and 0.76, 0.74, and 0.64 (P < 0.01) with HAY DMI. During the second period, correlations for CO2, CH4, and O2 with MIX DMI were 0.62, 0.47, and 0.56 (P ≤ 0.11), respectively. However, HAY DMI during the second period was not related to gas flux (P > 0.47). Results from this experiment indicate that feed intake of two energy-diverse diets is moderately correlated while ADG while consuming the two diets is not related. Further experimentation is necessary to determine if gas flux data can be used to predict feed intake in beef cows.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beef cows; dry matter intake; greenhouse gas emissions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35952719      PMCID: PMC9527298          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.338


  27 in total

1.  The relationships among body weight, body composition, and intramuscular fat content in steers.

Authors:  K W Bruns; R H Pritchard; D L Boggs
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Genetic parameters and genome-wide association study regarding feed efficiency and slaughter traits in Charolais cows.

Authors:  Pauline Martin; Sébastien Taussat; Aurélie Vinet; Daniel Krauss; David Maupetit; Gilles Renand
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Towards an improved estimation of the biological components of residual feed intake in growing cattle.

Authors:  D Savietto; D P Berry; N C Friggens
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Relationships among carbon dioxide, feed intake, and feed efficiency traits in ad libitum fed beef cattle.

Authors:  Paul F Arthur; Tracie Bird-Gardiner; Idris M Barchia; Kath A Donoghue; Robert M Herd
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effects of feeding level on efficiency of high- and low-residual feed intake beef steers.

Authors:  Emily M Andreini; Sheyenne M Augenstein; Carrie S Fales; Roberto D Sainz; James W Oltjen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Phenotypic relationships among methane production traits assessed under ad libitum feeding of beef cattle.

Authors:  T Bird-Gardiner; P F Arthur; I M Barchia; K A Donoghue; R M Herd
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Beef Species Symposium: difficulties associated with predicting forage intake by grazing beef cows.

Authors:  S W Coleman; S A Gunter; J E Sprinkle; J P S Neel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  The effect of residual feed intake classification on forage intake by grazing beef cows.

Authors:  A M Meyer; M S Kerley; R L Kallenbach
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Methane emissions, body composition, and rumen fermentation traits of beef heifers differing in residual feed intake.

Authors:  C Fitzsimons; D A Kenny; M H Deighton; A G Fahey; M McGee
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  1 in total

1.  Retained energy in lactating beef cows; effects on maintenance energy requirement and voluntary feed intake.

Authors:  Emma A Briggs; Amanda L Holder; Megan A Gross; Alexandra N Moehlenpah; Jared D Taylor; R R Reuter; Andrew P Foote; Carla L Goad; David L Lalman
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-08-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.