Literature DB >> 33026437

Effects of feeding level on efficiency of high- and low-residual feed intake beef steers.

Emily M Andreini1, Sheyenne M Augenstein1, Carrie S Fales1, Roberto D Sainz1, James W Oltjen1.   

Abstract

Comparing heat production after ad libitum (ADLIB) and restricted (RESTRICT) feeding periods may offer insight into how residual feed intake (RFI) groups change their energy requirements based on previous feeding levels. In this study, the authors sought to explain the efficiency changes of high- and low-RFI steers after feed restriction. To determine RFI classification, 56 Angus-cross steers with initial body weight (BW) of 350 ± 28.7 kg were individually housed, offered ad libitum access to a total mixed ration, and daily intakes were recorded for 56 d. RFI was defined as the residual of the regression of dry matter intake on mid-test BW0.75 and average daily gain. High- and low-RFI groups were defined as >0.5 SD above or below the mean of zero, respectively. Fourteen steers from each high and low groups (n = 28) were selected for the subsequent 56-d RESTRICT period. During the RESTRICT period, intake was restricted to 75% of previous ad libitum intake on a BW0.75 basis, and all other conditions remained constant. After the RESTRICT period, both RFI groups had decreased maintenance energy requirements. However, the low-RFI group decreased maintenance energy requirements by 32% on a BW0.75 basis, more (P < 0.05) than the high-RFI group decreased maintenance requirements (18%). Thus, the low-RFI steers remained more efficient after a period of feed restriction. We conclude that feed restriction decreases maintenance energy requirement in both high- and low-RFI groups that are restricted to the same degree.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beef cattle; efficiency; residual feed intake

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33026437      PMCID: PMC7751143          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  14 in total

1.  A dynamic model of metabolizable energy utilization in growing and mature cattle. II. Metabolizable energy utilization for gain.

Authors:  C B Williams; T G Jenkins
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Growth, carcass quality, and protein and energy metabolism in beef cattle with different growth potentials and residual feed intakes.

Authors:  F C P Castro Bulle; P V Paulino; A C Sanches; R D Sainz
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Physiological basis for residual feed intake.

Authors:  R M Herd; P F Arthur
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Relationships of feedlot feed efficiency, performance, and feeding behavior with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle.

Authors:  J D Nkrumah; E K Okine; G W Mathison; K Schmid; C Li; J A Basarab; M A Price; Z Wang; S S Moore
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Predicting carcass composition and individual feed requirement in live cattle widely varying in body size.

Authors:  T C Perry; D G Fox
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Repeatability of feed efficiency, carcass ultrasound, feeding behavior, and blood metabolic variables in finishing heifers divergently selected for residual feed intake.

Authors:  A K Kelly; M McGee; D H Crews; T Sweeney; T M Boland; D A Kenny
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 7.  Review of some aspects of growth and development of feedlot cattle.

Authors:  F N Owens; D R Gill; D S Secrist; S W Coleman
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Effect of previous nutrition on body composition and maintenance energy costs of growing lambs.

Authors:  C L Ferrell; L J Koong; J A Nienaber
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.718

9.  Compensatory growth and carcass quality in growth-restricted and refed beef steers.

Authors:  R D Sainz; F De la Torre; J W Oltjen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Mitochondrial abundance and function in muscle from beef steers with divergent residual feed intakes.

Authors:  E E Fernandez; J W Oltjen; R D Sainz
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of diet on feed intake, weight change, and gas emissions in beef cows.

Authors:  Amanda L Holder; Megan A Gross; Alexandra N Moehlenpah; Carla L Goad; Megan Rolf; Ryon S Walker; James K Rogers; David L Lalman
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.