Literature DB >> 24146149

Methane emissions, body composition, and rumen fermentation traits of beef heifers differing in residual feed intake.

C Fitzsimons1, D A Kenny, M H Deighton, A G Fahey, M McGee.   

Abstract

This study examined the relationship of residual feed intake (RFI) and performance with methane emissions, rumen fermentation, and digestion in beef heifers. Individual DMI and growth performance were measured for 22 Simmental heifers (mean initial BW 449 kg, SD = 46.2 kg) offered grass silage ad libitum for 120 d. Ultrasonically scanned muscle and fat depth, BCS, muscularity score, skeletal measurements, blood variables, rumen fermentation (via stomach tube), and total tract digestibility (indigestible marker) were measured. Methane production was estimated using the sulfur hexafluoride tracer gas technique over two 5-d periods beginning on d 20 and 75 of the RFI measurement period. Phenotypic RFI was calculated as actual DMI minus expected DMI. The residuals of the regression of DMI on ADG and midtest metabolic body weight, using all heifers, were used to compute individual RFI coefficients. Heifers were ranked by RFI and assigned to low (efficient), medium, or high (inefficient) groupings. Overall ADG and DMI were 0.58 kg (SD = 0.18) and 7.40 kg (SD = 0.72), respectively. High-RFI heifers consumed 9 and 15% more (P < 0.05) than medium- and low-RFI groups, respectively. Body weight, growth, skeletal, and composition traits did not differ (P > 0.05) between low- and high-RFI groups. High-RFI heifers had higher concentrations of plasma glucose (6%) and urea (13%) and lower concentrations of plasma creatinine (9%) than low-RFI heifers (P < 0.05). Rumen pH and apparent in vivo digestibility did not differ (P > 0.05) between RFI groups, although acetate:propionate ratio was lowest (P = 0.07) for low-RFI (3.5) and highest for high-RFI (4.6) heifers. Methane production expressed as grams per day or grams per kilogram metabolic body weight was greater (P < 0.05) for high (297 g/d and 2.9 g/kg BW0.75) compared with low (260 g/d and 2.5 g/kg BW0.75) RFI heifers, with medium (275 g/d and 2.7 g/kg BW0.75) RFI heifers being intermediate. Regression analysis indicated that a 1 kg DM/d increase in RFI was associated with a 23 g/d increase (P = 0.09) in methane emissions. Results suggest that improved RFI will reduce methane emissions without affecting productivity of growing beef cattle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24146149     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-6956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  31 in total

1.  Associations between residual feed intake and apparent nutrient digestibility, in vitro methane-producing activity, and volatile fatty acid concentrations in growing beef cattle1.

Authors:  Jocelyn R Johnson; Gordon E Carstens; Wimberly K Krueger; Phillip A Lancaster; Erin G Brown; Luis O Tedeschi; Robin C Anderson; Kristen A Johnson; Arieh Brosh
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Digestion and metabolism of low and high residual feed intake Nellore bulls.

Authors:  Sarah Figueiredo Martins Bonilha; Renata Helena Branco; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante; Joslaine Noely Dos Santos Gonçalves Cyrillo; Fábio Morato Monteiro; Enilson Geraldo Ribeiro
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Effects of diet on feed intake, weight change, and gas emissions in beef cows.

Authors:  Amanda L Holder; Megan A Gross; Alexandra N Moehlenpah; Carla L Goad; Megan Rolf; Ryon S Walker; James K Rogers; David L Lalman
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

Review 4.  Application of Genetic, Genomic and Biological Pathways in Improvement of Swine Feed Efficiency.

Authors:  Pourya Davoudi; Duy Ngoc Do; Stefanie M Colombo; Bruce Rathgeber; Younes Miar
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Physiological responses and adaptations to high methane production in Japanese Black cattle.

Authors:  Minji Kim; Tatsunori Masaki; Kentaro Ikuta; Eiji Iwamoto; Koki Nishihara; Makoto Hirai; Yoshinobu Uemoto; Fuminori Terada; Sanggun Roh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Rumen methanogenic genotypes differ in abundance according to host residual feed intake phenotype and diet type.

Authors:  Ciara A Carberry; Sinéad M Waters; Sinead M Waters; David A Kenny; Christopher J Creevey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Genetic association among feeding behavior, feed efficiency, and growth traits in growing indicine cattle.

Authors:  Lorena Ferreira Benfica; Leandro Sannomiya Sakamoto; Ana Fabrícia Braga Magalhães; Matheus Henrique Vargas de Oliveira; Lúcia Galvão de Albuquerque; Roberto Cavalheiro; Renata Helena Branco; Joslaine Noely Dos Santos Goncalves Cyrillo; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Quantitative analysis of ruminal methanogenic microbial populations in beef cattle divergent in phenotypic residual feed intake (RFI) offered contrasting diets.

Authors:  Ciara A Carberry; David A Kenny; Alan K Kelly; Sinéad M Waters
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2014-08-22

9.  Plasma Metabolites, Productive Performance and Rumen Volatile Fatty Acid Profiles of Northern Australian Bos indicus Steers Supplemented with Desmanthus and Lucerne.

Authors:  Bénédicte Suybeng; Edward Charmley; Christopher P Gardiner; Bunmi S Malau-Aduli; Aduli E O Malau-Aduli
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-06-02

10.  Examination of the molecular control of ruminal epithelial function in response to dietary restriction and subsequent compensatory growth in cattle.

Authors:  Emma O'Shea; Sinéad M Waters; Kate Keogh; Alan K Kelly; David A Kenny
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2016-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.