| Literature DB >> 35893320 |
Marcelo de Maio Nascimento1, Élvio Rúbio Gouveia2,3,4, Bruna R Gouveia3,4,5,6, Adilson Marques7,8, Priscila Marconcin7,9, Cíntia França2,3, Andreas Ihle4,10,11.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: With vulnerable aging, gait speed (GS) undergoes progressive changes, becoming slower. In this process, cognitive performance (CP) and physical function (PF) both play an important role. This study aims (1) to investigate the association between CP and PF with GS and (2) to examine whether CP and PF mediate the association between age and GS in a large sample of Brazilian older adults.Entities:
Keywords: aging; cognition; gait; physical functions
Year: 2022 PMID: 35893320 PMCID: PMC9326626 DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics7040073
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Geriatrics (Basel) ISSN: 2308-3417
Main characteristics of the sample.
| Variable | Full Sample | Cognitive | No Cognitive Impairment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 70.35 ± 6.86 | 71.58 ± 7.47 | 69.23 ± 6.05 | <0.001 |
| Sex n (%) | 0.001 | |||
| Female | 430 (61.7) | 183 (55.3) | 247 (67.5) | |
| Male | 267 (38.3) | 148 (44.7) | 119 (32.5) | |
| Education (years) (n) | 5.35 ± 5.54 | 1.97 ± 2.90 | 8.40 ± 5.61 | <0.001 |
| Falls (n) | 0.59 ± 1.32 | 0.68 ± 1.66 | 0.51 ± 0.90 | 0.087 |
| MMSE (n) | 24.40 ± 4.23 | 22.12 ± 4.16 | 26.51 ± 3.03 | <0.001 |
| Cognition (n) | ||||
| COGTEL (score) | 18.95 ± 9.45 | 11.11 ± 4.59 | 26.17 ± 6.59 | <0.001 |
| Physical function (n) | ||||
| PF total (score) | 470.63 ± 96.16 | 461.09 ± 99.95 | 479.40 ± 91.81 | <0.001 |
| Gait (m/s) | ||||
| GS | 1.35 ± 0.47 | 1.12 ± 0.34 | 1.55 ± 0.48 | <0.001 |
Note: MMSE: Mini-mental state examination; PF: physical functions; GS: gait speed; m/s: meters per second. p ≤ 0.005.
Association between physical functions and cognitive performance.
| Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower CP | 0.450 (0.359–0.484) <0.001 | 0.437 (0.347–0.473) <0.001 | 0.296 (0.128–0.302) <0.001 |
| Lower PF | 0.206 (0.125–0.261) <0.001 | 0.188 (0.105–0.247) <0.001 | 0.141 (0.091–0.198) <0.001 |
Note: CP: cognitive performance; PF: physical functions; Model 1: unadjusted; Model 2: adjusted by sex and age; Model 3: adjusted by sex, age, MMSE, and years of education. p < 0.001.
Figure 1Mediation analysis: CP and PF in the relationship between age and GS. Parallel mediation analysis of the effects of age (aging) on GS (m·s−1) through CP (COGTEL, total score) and PF (Senior Fitness Test, total score), adjusted for sex and years of education. The analysis considered the number of bootstrap samples = 5000. The indirect effect was statistically significant at the 95% confidence interval (CI) when the CI did not include 0. Betas (β) are reported as the product of simultaneous regression with substitution of bootstrap: (1) Path a1 and a2 = association between age and CP and PF, respectively, and (2) Path b1 and b2 = association between CP and PF with GS; (3) Path c’ = direct effect (x–y): m1(brown color) and m2 (blue color) associations = indirect effect (x–y) by CP and PF, respectively. NS = not significant; *** p < 0.001, c = total effect; c’ = direct effect; a = path Model 1; b = path Model 2.