Sathya Karunananthan1, Erica E M Moodie2, Howard Bergman3, Hélène Payette4, Paula H Diehr5, Christina Wolfson6. 1. Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec. Electronic address: sathya.karunananthan@mail.mcgill.ca. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec. 3. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec. 4. Research Centre on Aging, Integrated Academic Health Centre and Social Services in the Eastern Townships, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec. 5. Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 6. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Department of Medicine, McGill University Montreal, Quebec; Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Variation in physical function in older adults over time raises several methodological challenges in the study of its association with survival, many of which have largely been overlooked in previous studies. The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between time-varying measures of physical function and survival in men and women aged 70 years and over, while accounting for the time-varying effects of health and lifestyle characteristics. METHODS: 1,846 women and 1,245 men in the Cardiovascular Health Study followed annually for up to 10 years beginning at age 70-74 years were included. We estimated the effect of gait speed and grip strength on survival over the subsequent year, using age as the timescale. RESULTS: A 0.1m/s higher gait speed was associated with a 12% decrease in the likelihood of death in the subsequent year among women (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.94). There was no statistically significant effect of gait speed on survival among men (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.03), or of grip strength on survival among women (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-1.00) or men (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97-1.01), over one year. CONCLUSIONS: Upon using time-varying measures of physical function while accounting for time-varying effects of health and lifestyle characteristics, higher gait speed was associated with increased survival among the women in our study. We found no evidence of an association between gait speed and one-year survival in men, or between grip strength and one-year survival in women or men.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Variation in physical function in older adults over time raises several methodological challenges in the study of its association with survival, many of which have largely been overlooked in previous studies. The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between time-varying measures of physical function and survival in men and women aged 70 years and over, while accounting for the time-varying effects of health and lifestyle characteristics. METHODS: 1,846 women and 1,245 men in the Cardiovascular Health Study followed annually for up to 10 years beginning at age 70-74 years were included. We estimated the effect of gait speed and grip strength on survival over the subsequent year, using age as the timescale. RESULTS: A 0.1m/s higher gait speed was associated with a 12% decrease in the likelihood of death in the subsequent year among women (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.94). There was no statistically significant effect of gait speed on survival among men (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.03), or of grip strength on survival among women (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-1.00) or men (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97-1.01), over one year. CONCLUSIONS: Upon using time-varying measures of physical function while accounting for time-varying effects of health and lifestyle characteristics, higher gait speed was associated with increased survival among the women in our study. We found no evidence of an association between gait speed and one-year survival in men, or between grip strength and one-year survival in women or men.
Authors: Sari Stenholm; Tommi Härkänen; Päivi Sainio; Markku Heliövaara; Seppo Koskinen Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Susan E Hardy; Subashan Perera; Yazan F Roumani; Julie M Chandler; Stephanie A Studenski Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-10-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jari A Laukkanen; Ari Voutilainen; Sudhir Kurl; Claudio Gil S Araujo; Sae Young Jae; Setor K Kunutsor Journal: Ann Med Date: 2020-04-09 Impact factor: 5.348