Roberta E Rikli1, C Jessie Jones. 1. Department of Kinesiology, College of Health and Human Development, California State University, Fullerton, EC-646, 800 N. State College Blvd., Fullerton, CA 92834, USA. rrikli@fullerton.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop and validate criterion-referenced fitness standards for older adults that predict the level of capacity needed for maintaining physical independence into later life. The proposed standards were developed for use with a previously validated test battery for older adults-the Senior Fitness Test (Rikli, R. E., & Jones, C. J. (2001). Development and validation of a functional fitness test for community--residing older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 6, 127-159; Rikli, R. E., & Jones, C. J. (1999a). Senior fitness test manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.). METHODS: A criterion measure to assess physical independence was identified. Next, scores from a subset of 2,140 "moderate-functioning" older adults from a larger cross-sectional database, together with findings from longitudinal research on physical capacity and aging, were used as the basis for proposing fitness standards (performance cut points) associated with having the ability to function independently. Validity and reliability analyses were conducted to test the standards for their accuracy and consistency as predictors of physical independence. RESULTS: Performance standards are presented for men and women ages 60-94 indicating the level of fitness associated with remaining physically independent until late in life. Reliability and validity indicators for the standards ranged between .79 and .97. IMPLICATIONS: The proposed standards provide easy-to-use, previously unavailable methods for evaluating physical capacity in older adults relative to that associated with physical independence. Most importantly, the standards can be used in planning interventions that target specific areas of weakness, thus reducing risk for premature loss of mobility and independence.
PURPOSE: To develop and validate criterion-referenced fitness standards for older adults that predict the level of capacity needed for maintaining physical independence into later life. The proposed standards were developed for use with a previously validated test battery for older adults-the Senior Fitness Test (Rikli, R. E., & Jones, C. J. (2001). Development and validation of a functional fitness test for community--residing older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 6, 127-159; Rikli, R. E., & Jones, C. J. (1999a). Senior fitness test manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.). METHODS: A criterion measure to assess physical independence was identified. Next, scores from a subset of 2,140 "moderate-functioning" older adults from a larger cross-sectional database, together with findings from longitudinal research on physical capacity and aging, were used as the basis for proposing fitness standards (performance cut points) associated with having the ability to function independently. Validity and reliability analyses were conducted to test the standards for their accuracy and consistency as predictors of physical independence. RESULTS: Performance standards are presented for men and women ages 60-94 indicating the level of fitness associated with remaining physically independent until late in life. Reliability and validity indicators for the standards ranged between .79 and .97. IMPLICATIONS: The proposed standards provide easy-to-use, previously unavailable methods for evaluating physical capacity in older adults relative to that associated with physical independence. Most importantly, the standards can be used in planning interventions that target specific areas of weakness, thus reducing risk for premature loss of mobility and independence.
Authors: D Santa Mina; D Au; J Brunet; J Jones; G Tomlinson; N Taback; D Field; A Berlingeri; H Bradley; D Howell Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2017-10-25 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Susan L Murphy; James K Richardson; Jennifer Blackwood; Beanna Martinez; Elliot B Tapper Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2020-01-25 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: W N Souza; R Aparicio-Ugarriza; M M Bibiloni; G Palacios; I Aguilar; J A Tur; M González-Gross Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Naoko Muramatsu; Lijuan Yin; Michael L Berbaum; David X Marquez; Donald A Jurivich; Joseph P Zanoni; Katya Y Cruz Madrid; Surrey M Walton Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2018-07-13
Authors: Christopher Sciamanna; Noel H Ballentine; Melissa Bopp; Jennifer S Brach; Vernon M Chinchilli; Joseph T Ciccolo; Molly B Conroy; Abigail Fisher; Edward J Fox; Susan L Greenspan; M Jan De Beur Suzanne; Kalen Kearcher; Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Kathleen M McTigue; Edward McAuley; Natalia E Morone; Anuradha Paranjape; Sol Rodriguez-Colon; Andrew Rosenzweig; Joshua M Smyth; Kerry J Stewart; Heather L Stuckey Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-09-24 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Annabel Biruete; Jacob M Allen; Brandon M Kistler; Jin Hee Jeong; Peter J Fitschen; Kelly S Swanson; Kenneth R Wilund Journal: Top Clin Nutr Date: 2019 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 0.508
Authors: Marko D M Stojanović; Mladen J Mikić; Zoran Milošević; Jovan Vuković; Tatjana Jezdimirović; Vlatko Vučetić Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 2.988