Literature DB >> 20181474

Interactions between orbital prefrontal cortex and amygdala: advanced cognition, learned responses and instinctive behaviors.

Elisabeth A Murray1, Steven P Wise.   

Abstract

Recent research indicates that the orbital prefrontal cortex (PFo) represents stimulus valuations and that the amygdala updates these valuations. An exploration of how PFo and the amygdala interact could improve the understanding of both. PFo and the amygdala function cooperatively when monkeys choose objects associated with recently revalued foods. In other tasks, they function in opposition. PFo uses positive feedback to promote learning in object-reward reversal tasks, and PFo also promotes extinction learning. Amygdala function interferes with both kinds of learning. The amygdala underlies fearful responses to a rubber snake from the first exposure on, but PFo is necessary only after the initial exposure. The amygdala mediates an arousal response in anticipation of rewards, whereas PFo sometimes suppresses such arousal. A role for PFo in advanced cognition, for the amygdala in instinctive behavior, and for cortex-subcortex interactions in prioritizing behaviors provides one account for these findings. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20181474      PMCID: PMC2862864          DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol        ISSN: 0959-4388            Impact factor:   6.627


  58 in total

1.  Excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala fail to produce impairment in visual learning for auditory secondary reinforcement but interfere with reinforcer devaluation effects in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  L Málková; D Gaffan; E A Murray
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Human prefrontal cortex: processing and representational perspectives.

Authors:  Jacqueline N Wood; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Neurotoxic lesions of basolateral, but not central, amygdala interfere with Pavlovian second-order conditioning and reinforcer devaluation effects.

Authors:  T Hatfield; J S Han; M Conley; M Gallagher; P Holland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  The frontal cortex-basal ganglia system in primates.

Authors:  S P Wise; E A Murray; C R Gerfen
Journal:  Crit Rev Neurobiol       Date:  1996

5.  Task-set switching deficits in early-stage Huntington's disease: implications for basal ganglia function.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Laura Watkins; Barbara J Sahakian; Stephen Monsell; Roger A Barker; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Hippocampus: memory, habit and voluntary movement.

Authors:  D Gaffan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1985-02-13       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Contrasting roles of basolateral amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex in impulsive choice.

Authors:  Catharine A Winstanley; David E H Theobald; Rudolf N Cardinal; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Retrieving memories via internal context requires the hippocampus.

Authors:  Pamela J Kennedy; Matthew L Shapiro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex is required for performance of a strategy implementation task but not reinforcer devaluation effects in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Mark G Baxter; David Gaffan; Diana A Kyriazis; Anna S Mitchell
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Role of the anterior cingulate cortex in the control over behavior by Pavlovian conditioned stimuli in rats.

Authors:  Rudolf N Cardinal; John A Parkinson; Hosnieh Djafari Marbini; Andrew J Toner; Timothy J Bussey; Trevor W Robbins; Barry J Everitt
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  40 in total

1.  Representations of appetitive and aversive information in the primate orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Sara E Morrison; C Daniel Salzman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Separate value comparison and learning mechanisms in macaque medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  M P Noonan; M E Walton; T E J Behrens; J Sallet; M J Buckley; M F S Rushworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Abstract Context Representations in Primate Amygdala and Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  A Saez; M Rigotti; S Ostojic; S Fusi; C D Salzman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Amygdala Functional and Structural Connectivity Predicts Individual Risk Tolerance.

Authors:  Wi Hoon Jung; Sangil Lee; Caryn Lerman; Joseph W Kable
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Amygdalar Gating of Early Sensory Processing through Interactions with Locus Coeruleus.

Authors:  Cynthia D Fast; John P McGann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Different time courses for learning-related changes in amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Sara E Morrison; Alexandre Saez; Brian Lau; C Daniel Salzman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 7.  Learning About Safety: Conditioned Inhibition as a Novel Approach to Fear Reduction Targeting the Developing Brain.

Authors:  Paola Odriozola; Dylan G Gee
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Orbitofrontal cortex volume in area 11/13 predicts reward devaluation, but not reversal learning performance, in young and aged monkeys.

Authors:  Sara N Burke; Alex Thome; Kojo Plange; James R Engle; Theodore P Trouard; Katalin M Gothard; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Value encoding in single neurons in the human amygdala during decision making.

Authors:  Rick L Jenison; Antonio Rangel; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Affective value and associative processing share a cortical substrate.

Authors:  Amitai Shenhav; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.