Literature DB >> 35890211

Assessing Drug-Induced Mitochondrial Toxicity in Cardiomyocytes: Implications for Preclinical Cardiac Safety Evaluation.

Xiaoli Tang1, Zengwu Wang1,2, Shengshou Hu1,3, Bingying Zhou1.   

Abstract

Drug-induced cardiotoxicity not only leads to the attrition of drugs during development, but also contributes to the high morbidity and mortality rates of cardiovascular diseases. Comprehensive testing for proarrhythmic risks of drugs has been applied in preclinical cardiac safety assessment for over 15 years. However, other mechanisms of cardiac toxicity have not received such attention. Of them, mitochondrial impairment is a common form of cardiotoxicity and is known to account for over half of cardiovascular adverse-event-related black box warnings imposed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Although it has been studied in great depth, mitochondrial toxicity assessment has not yet been incorporated into routine safety tests for cardiotoxicity at the preclinical stage. This review discusses the main characteristics of mitochondria in cardiomyocytes, drug-induced mitochondrial toxicities, and high-throughput screening strategies for cardiomyocytes, as well as their proposed integration into preclinical safety pharmacology. We emphasize the advantages of using adult human primary cardiomyocytes for the evaluation of mitochondrial morphology and function, and the need for a novel cardiac safety testing platform integrating mitochondrial toxicity and proarrhythmic risk assessments in cardiac safety evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiomyocyte; drug toxicity; high-throughput screening; mitochondria; preclinical cardiac safety assessment

Year:  2022        PMID: 35890211      PMCID: PMC9319223          DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14071313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmaceutics        ISSN: 1999-4923            Impact factor:   6.525


1. Introduction

The heart, our central dispatcher of oxygen, nutrients, and drugs, is itself particularly susceptible to drug-induced toxicity. Cardiotoxicity is defined as the side effects of drugs that cause impairment of myocardial performance, which includes myocardial damage, abnormal electrical conduction, and secondary toxicity caused by drug effects on the vascular system or heart valves [1,2]. Cardiovascular toxicities due to therapeutic drugs comprise the group of toxicities with the highest incidence and severity among adverse drug reactions (ADRs) [3,4,5]. For example, 17% of drugs are halted at the preclinical stage due to cardiovascular toxicity [6]. In another report, drug discontinuation in non-clinical or clinical development related to cardiotoxicity reached 27–34% [1]. Despite increasing awareness of the variety of drug toxicities affecting the heart, their incidence in marketed drugs is 15–35% [1]. Notably, nearly 2000 marketed drugs have been associated with cardiovascular side effects, including ones with cardiovascular and noncardiovascular indications [7,8]. Sixty-nine drugs were withdrawn from the market due to serious cardiovascular ADRs between 1950 and December 2014 (Table 1).
Table 1

List of drugs withdrawn from the market due to cardiovascular toxicity and their association with mitochondrial toxicity.

Medicinal ProductClassMechanism of ActionLaunch DateYear WithdrawnSide Effects on Cardiac FunctionMitohondrial Toxicity
AmfepramonePsychostimulantNorepinephrine-releasing agent19571975-Unknown
BenfluorexPsychostimulant, anorectic, and hypolipidemicBlocking of 5-HT2B19762009Valvular heart diseaseDecrease in CPT I expression [46]
Emetine (ipecac syrup)EmeticStimulation of the CTZ, local irritation19121982-Unknown
MephenesinMuscle relaxantSpinal reflex inhibition19481976-Unknown
RofecoxibNSAIDCOX-2 inhibitor19992004MI, cardiovascular thrombotic events, sudden deathUnknown
Adenosine phosphateAntiarrhythmicDirect nodal inhibition19301973-Unknown
AlphacetylmethadolAnalgesicOP1 receptor agonist19932003-Unknown
Bepridil (Bepridil Hydrochlonde)Antiarrhythmic, antianginalCalcium channel blockers19812004Prolonged QT, TdPUnknown
BudipineAntiparkinsonianMuscarinic and NMDA receptor antagonist19792000-Unknown
CliobutinolAntitussiveUnclear19612007-Unknown
DofetilideAntiarrhythmicInhibition of KCNH2, KCNK2, KCNJ1219992004QT prolongation, TdPUnknown
DolansetronPropulsive5-HT3 receptor antagonist19972011-Unknown
EncainideAntiarrhythmicNa channel blocker19851991QT prolongation, TdPUnknown
Grepafloxacin (Grepafloxacin Hydrochloride)AntimicrobialInhibition of DNA gyrase19971999QT prolongationUnknown
IndoraminVasodilatorAlpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonist19812011-Unknown
IsoprenalineCardiac stimulantNon-selective beta-adrenergic agonist19491992-mPTP opening [47]
Inhibition of OXPHOS [48]
LevacetylmethadolAntidoteMu-opioid receptor agonist, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist19952001-Unknown
Nifedipine (10 mg)Antihypertensive, antiemeticCalcium channel blockers19751996Hypertension, angina, MI, CHFInhibition of ATP synthase [48]
Orciprenaline (metaprotenerol)Bronchodilatorβ2 adrenoceptor agonist19612009Tachycardia, palpitationsUnknown
Pergolide MesylateAnti-parkinsonianDopamine receptor agonist20022007Valvular heart diseaseUnknown
RosiglitazoneHypoglycemicGluconeogenesis decrease19992011CHF, MIInhibition of ETC [48]
Increase in mitochondrial oxidative stress, impairment of mitochondrial bioenergetics [13]
Inhibition of complex I; uncoupling of OXPHOS [13]
Sibutramine (Sibutramine Hydrochlonde Hydrate)PsychostimulantSerotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor20012002Myocardial infarctionIncrease in ROS formation [49]
Technetium (99mTc) fanolesomabRadiographyRadioisotope20042005Cardiopulmonary arrestUnknown
Tegaserod (Tegaserod Maleate)Antispasmodic5-HT4 receptor agonist20022007HF, ischemiaUnknown
TerodilineAntispasmodicCalcium channel blockade, blocks cholinergic receptor19651991Ventricular tachycardia, cardiac deathUnknown
SertindoleAntipsychotic5HT and D2 receptor antagonist/blocking of DRD2,HTR2A, HTR2C, HTR619961998QT prolongation, TdP, sudden cardiac deathUnknown
CloforexPsychostimulantSimilar to amphetamine19651967-Unknown
AstemizoleAntihistamineH1-receptor antagonist, inhibition of KCNH219771987long QT syndrome, TdPUnknown
Cisapride monohydrateProkinetic agent5-HT4 receptor agonist; inhibition of KCNH219932000Ventricular arrhythmia, QT prolongation, TdP, cardiac arrestUnknown
TranylcypromineAntidepressantMAOI19611964-Unknown
Bromocriptine mesylateAnti-lactationD2 and D3 agonist19761989-Swollen mitochondria [50]
Domperidone (injectable)PropulsiveDopamine receptor antagonist19791985-Unknown
MepazineAntiepilepticUnclear19551970-Unknown
ClozapineAntipsychoticBlocking of DRD2, HTR2A, DRD1, DRD3, DRD4, HTR1A, HTR1B, HTR1D, HTR1E, HTR2C, HTR3A, HTR6, HTR7, HRH1, HRH4, ADRA1A, ADRA1B, ADRA2A, ADRA2B, ADRA2C, CHRM1, CHRM2, CHRM3, CHRM4, CHRM519721975Cardiomyopathy, MI, myocarditis, arrhythmia, Prolonged QT, TdP, cardiomyopathyInhibition of the ETC [51]
Increase in ROS formation, GSH depletion, mitochondrial dysfunction, and swelling [52]
VincamineNootropicUnclear19551980-Unknown
Lysine amidotriazoateRadiography-19751995-Unknown
TerfenadineAntihistamineH1-receptor antagonist19851997QT prolongation, TdPIncrease in mtROS formation [53]
MMP collapse [54]
Naftidrofuryl oxalate (IV)Vasodilator5HT2 receptor antagonist19741992-Unknown
CobaltHematinicAs cobalamin19511967-Interruption of TCA and interference with the MRC enzymes [54]
MMP collapse [55]
Chloroform (trichloromethane)AnestheticDepression of the respiratory centres18471976-MMP collapse [56]
Megamitochondria [57]
Dithiazanine iodideAntihelminthInterruption of glucose uptake in cells19591964Prolonged QT, TdPUnknown
Epinephrine (topical)AnestheticVasoconstriction18992004-Unknown
Methylhexanamine (DMAA)Nasal decongestantNorepinephrine and dopamine transporter blockade19481983-Unknown
DexfenfluraminePsychostimulantSerotonin receptor agonist19951997Valvular heart disease, cardiac fibrosisUnknown
FenfluraminePsychostimulantSerotonin receptor antagonist19731997valvular heart diseaseMitochondrial fragmentation [58]
ParecoxibAnalgesicCOX-2 inhibitor20022005--
PrenylamineAntianginalCalcium channel blocker19601989QT prolongation, sudden cardiac death, ventricular tachycardia, TdPInhibition of FAO [59]
ProbucolAntioxidantInductor of LDL catabolism19801989QT prolongation, arrhythmiasUnknown
DroperidolAntipsychoticDopamine 2 receptor antagonist19702001-Unknown
ValdecoxibNSAIDCOX-2 inhibitor20012005Cardiomyopathy, CHF, hypertension, angina, arrhythmiaInhibition of OXPHOS, mPTP opening [16]
Celecoxib (Onsenal)NSAIDCOX-2 inhibitor20032011-Decrease in mitochondrial complex IV activity and induces oxidative stress [14]
Increase in ROS formation, MMP collapse, mitochondrial swelling, ATP depletion [60]
Suppression of mitochondrial function [61]
Bismuth saltsAntidyspepsiaUnclear. Forms insoluble complexes18751978-Unknown
LevarterenolVasopressorL-norepinephrine analogue19041973-Unknown
PipradrolPsychostimulantNorepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitor19531982-Unknown
PseudoephedrineSympathomimeticDirect action on adrenergic receptors19592008-Unknown
GallopamilAntiarrhythmicCalcium channel blockers19832001-Decrease in mitochondrial biogenesis and mass [62]
ChlorphenterminePsychostimulantTAAR1 agonist, blocking of 5-HTs19621969Pulmonary heart diseaseInhibition of OXPHOS, uncoupling of OXPHOS [63]
ThioridazineAntipsychotic5HT2 receptor antagonist19592000QT prolongation, TdP, sudden cardiac deathmPTP opening [64]
MMP collapse [65]
BuflomedilVasodilatorA-adrenergic blockade19702006QT prolongation, cardiac arrestUnknown
Ponatinib HydrochlorideAntineoplasticMulti-target kinase inhibitor20122013-Impairment of respiratory chain, increase in ROS formation, MMP collapse, mitochondrial fission [66]
Levomethadyl acetateAnalgesic (central nervous system agents)Activation of OPRM119932002QT prolongation, TdPUnknown
Mesoridazine BesylateAntipsychotic1970--Unknown
Clobutinol HydrochlorideAntitussiveInhibition of GABA receptors19612007QT prolongationUnknown
PhentermineCentral nervous system agentsInhibition of SLC6A2,SLC6A3, SLC6A4; blockingof MAOA, MAOB19591997Valvular heart diseaseUnknown
MibefradilAntihypertensiveCalcium channel blockers19971998QT prolongationUnknown
SparfloxacinAntibioticsInhibits DNA gyrase19972001QT prolongationMMP collapse [67]
EtoricoxibAnti-inflammatory agentsInhibition of COX-220022007thrombotic eventsInhibition of OXPHOS [16]
PropoxypheneCentral nervous system agentsActivation of OP1, OP2, OP319572010QT prolongation, TdPUnknown
LidoflazineCardiovascular agentsBlocking of calcium channels19731989QT prolongationUnknown
The major clinical manifestations of cardiotoxicity are systolic or diastolic dysfunction and arrhythmia, the latter including abnormal cardiac rhythm disturbances in QT interval, bradycardia, and tachycardia [1,5,9,10]. The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines, including ICH S7B [9] and ICH E14 [10], were enacted to develop clinical and preclinical cardiotoxicity screening approaches in 2005, which significantly lowered the proportion of drugs with QT prolongation from 60% in 2005 to 10% in 2012 [11]. However, another 17 cardiotoxic drugs were withdrawn from the market following their implementation, including benfluorex (2009), rosiglitazone (2011), celecoxib (2011), ponatinib (2013), and etoricoxib, which have been reported to cause mitochondria dysfunction [12,13,14,15,16]. Thus far, 29% of withdrawn drugs have been reported to exhibit mitochondrial toxicity (Table 1). All current guidelines for standardizing the detection of cardiotoxicity, however, are still directed at arrhythmic risks. Mitochondria are the metabolic centers of cells, performing fatty acid oxidation, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) for ATP synthesis, heme biosynthesis, and amino acid metabolism. In addition, they also play an important role in the regulation of intracellular homeostasis, such as calcium homeostasis, biologic redox equilibrium, hormonal signaling, and apoptosis [17]. Cardiomyocyte, harboring up to 6000 mitochondria [18] that occupy 30–40% of the cell volume, is one of the highest ATP-consuming cell types. Much of the generated energy is used to sustain contraction [19] to supply blood through the circulatory system [20]. It is this high reliance on energy production that render cardiomyocytes particularly vulnerable to mitochondrial toxicants [21]. Mitochondrial toxicants are compounds that interrupt normal mitochondrial functions, resulting in compromised mitochondrial homeostasis, including disruption of oxidative phosphorylation, permeability transition, and generation of mitochondrial oxidative stress, contributing to energy supply disorder, aberrant intracellular signaling, toxic substances accumulation, autophagy or mitophagy disturbances, and programmed cell death, ultimately decreasing cardiac function [22,23,24,25]. At the organ level, many cardiac abnormalities are induced via these mechanisms, including cardiomyopathy [26,27,28], coronary heart disease [29,30], arrhythmias [31,32], ischemia reperfusion [33,34], and heart failure [35,36]. Mitochondrial impairment can adversely impact cardiomyocyte electrical excitability through mitochondrial gene expression alteration [37], mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) collapse [38], excessive ROS generation [39], and ATP depletion [40], resulting in cardiac arrhythmias [41,42]. Therefore, mitochondria play important roles in the pathogenesis and development of various heart diseases and are common targets in promoting cardiotoxicity in both animal and cell culture [22,43,44,45]. Understanding and monitoring drug-induced mitochondrial cardiotoxicity constitutes a major part of cardiac safety and is critical to modern drug development. It is possible that a standardized approach for assessing non-arrhythmic toxicities, such as mitochondrial toxicity, might mitigate the occurrence of unexpected cardiotoxicity. In this review, we introduce the many aspects of mitochondrial biology and representative drugs that have been associated with cardiac toxicity. We elaborate on currently used detection methods of mitochondrial toxicity and discuss how these assays could be multiplexed in a high-throughput manner in cardiomyocytes. Finally, we propose ways to enhance our ability to identify mitochondrial liabilities of drugs as early as possible in the drug discovery process. List of drugs withdrawn from the market due to cardiovascular toxicity and their association with mitochondrial toxicity.

2. Main Properties of Mitochondria and Drug-Induced Mitochondrial Toxicity in Cardiomyocytes

2.1. Morphology, Classification, and Structural Features of Mitochondria

The densely packed mitochondria in the cardiomyocyte provide over 95% of the energy for the heart to pump blood around the body [68,69]. They are highly dynamic organelles that quickly adjust their morphology, protein expression, and activity in response to the cellular environment [70,71,72]. Based on intracellular localizations, mitochondria in adult cardiomyocytes are classified into three populations: perinuclear, subsarcolemmal mitochondria (SSMs), and interfibrillar mitochondria (IFMs) (Figure 1) [68]. With distinctive locations, the three populations present unique morphologies and functions for the nucleus, cellular functions, and myofibril contraction, respectively [73,74,75,76]. Mitochondria are double-membrane organelles, consisting of structurally and functionally different membranes, that is, the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) and the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) (Figure 1). The OMM and IMM establish five compartments to provide unique biochemical environments for different functions, including the OMM, intermembrane space (IMS), IMM, cristae, and matrix [77,78]. The OMM forms a unique biochemical environment for diverse functions including coordination of protein import, mitochondrial dynamics, and inter-organellar communication. The IMS, the small volume between OMM and IMM, facilitates the translocation, folding, and post-translational events of nuclear DNA-encoding proteins into the matrix. Unlike the OMM permeabilizing molecules of up to 5 kDa [79], the IMM, a highly selective membrane, tightly controls the exchange of ions and metabolites through specialized molecular machinery. The IMM is essential for electron transport since it is necessary for the development of the proton motive force used for ATP generation. The cristae are formed by extensive inward folding of the IMM, increasing the membrane surface 1.5–2 fold to accommodate multi-enzyme complexes for ATP generation, especially the five bioenergetic complexes constituting the OXPHOS system [80]. The mitochondrial matrix is a complex mixture harboring several metabolic processes, including the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation (mtFAO), OXPHOS, Fe-s cluster biogenesis, heme synthesis, and many others. In addition, the matrix also hosts the mitochondrial genome (mtDNA), RNA, and ribosomes. Together, these five compartments coordinate with each other to perform mitochondrial functions, and their structural integrity is essential for healthy mitochondria.
Figure 1

Mitochondrial morphology and structure in cardiomyocytes. Mitochondria in cardiomyocytes can be categorized into three subtypes, subsarcolemmal mitochondria (SSMs) (in brown), interfibrillar mitochondria (IFMs) (in yellow), and perinuclear mitochondria (in orange), according to their distribution, size, and shape. The mitochondrial double-membrane consists of an outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) (brown) and an inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) (green and orange). The space between the OMM and the IMM is the IMS, and inside the IMM is the matrix. The IMM consists of the inner boundary membrane (orange) and cristae (green), the latter of which are formed by extensive inward folding of the IMM.

Ultrastructural analysis by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is a traditional method for the assessment of mitochondrial architecture. In addition, MitoTracker or fluorescently labeled mitochondrial antibodies have been applied to automated high-content imaging of mitochondria, and the resulting mitochondrial scores correlated well with cytotoxicity [81]. These methods are efficient at detecting several structural abnormalities induced by mitochondrial toxicants, including both oncological and non-oncological drugs. Of the non-oncological drugs, isoproterenol induces mitochondrial swelling, cristae disappearance, and matrix cavitation in cardiomyocytes [82,83]. Mitochondrial swelling and mitochondrial membrane rupture occurred in cardiomyocytes of As2O3-treated mice [84]. Diclofenac [85] and remdesivir [86] treatment also result in mitochondrial damages, as indicated by MitoTracker. Based on immunofluorescence analysis of TOM20, mitochondrial distribution and mitochondrial network disruption, as well as mitophagy, were revealed in nicotine-treated neonatal rat ventricular myocytes [87,88]. Oncological drugs have been frequently reported to cause structural damage to mitochondria. TEM revealed mitochondrial swelling, electron-dense matrix deposits, and matrix clearout in rats given sunitinib, and disrupted mitochondrial cristae in rats given sorafenib [89]. Regorafenib was also reported to induce electron-dense mitochondria and matrix cavitation [90]. MitoTracker indicated mitochondrial damage in cardiomyocytes induced by imatinib [91] and sunitinib [92]. The high sensitivity of mitochondrial structure to functional aberrations makes structural abnormality one of the most commonly observed manifestations of mitotoxicity. The use of DOX, a commonly used chemotherapeutic anti-cancer drug of the anthracycline family, has been greatly limited because one-fourth of patients have experienced DOX-induced cardiotoxicity, including CHF, decreased LVEF, sinus tachycardia, myocarditis, and cardiomyopathy [93]. Numerous animal- and cardiomyocyte-based studies have revealed DOX-induced abnormal mitochondrial morphology and structure. Abnormal mitochondrial morphology, including mitochondrial swelling, cristae disappearance, and matrix cavitation, was found in doxorubicin (DOX) [94,95,96]. Microscopic evaluation by MitoTracker staining of mitochondria pinpointed the distribution of daunorubicin and DOX [97,98]. Based on immunofluorescence analysis of TOM20, mitochondrial distribution and mitochondrial network disruption, as well as mitophagy, were revealed in DOX-treated neonatal rat ventricular myocytes [87,88]. To mimic human anticancer therapy, the administration schedule was conducted by multiple administrations at separate time points, including 3 mg/kg every other day for a cumulative dose of 9 mg/kg [99], twice a week for three weeks to attain a 9 mg/kg cumulative dose [100], 6 doses of 3 mg/kg [101], 2–2.5 mg/kg/48 h over 12 days [94], 2 mg/kg for 10 consecutive days [102], 5 mg/kg once a week to a total of 20 mg/kg [103], or two doses of 10 mg/kg [104]. Of note, a cumulative dose of 20 mg/kg in adult mice roughly corresponds to 120 mg/m2 in humans, which is much lower than the maximum lifelong dose of 400–550 mg/m2 [105]. Yet even at these low dosages, cardiomyocytes had swollen mitochondria, loss of mitochondrial membrane integrity and cristae, cristae disarrangement, and/or clear matrix, suggesting the strong mitochondrial toxicity of DOX. DOX has been reported to cause acute cardiotoxicity when administered at a dose of 15 mg/kg or greater [106]. Mitochondria showed vacuolization, or even complete loss of the cristae, 48 h after a single dose of 20 mg/kg DOX injection into rats [107]. Fourteen days’ administration of DOX (20 mg/kg, single dose) in C57BL/6 mice resulted in mitochondrial oedema [108]. To investigate chronic cardiotoxicity, five doses (3 mg/kg each, bi-weekly) of DOX were given to C57BL/6 mice. Three months after the first dose, the authors observed hyperproliferation of mitochondria in cardiomyocytes [109]. It is evident from these studies that, even with different treatment schedules and dosages, mitochondrial structure is a stable indication for mitotoxicant assessment. Additional details, including maximum serum concentration (Cmax), cardiotoxicity manifestations, experimental models, and so on, of drugs affecting mitochondrial morphology and structure are listed in Table 2.
Table 2

Drugs affecting mitochondrial morphology, structure, MQC, their clinical manifestations, and relevant in vitro and in vivo studies.

ModulesAlterationsPharmacologyDrugsClinical ManifestationsCmaxModelsDoseTimeReferences
MorphologyMitochondrial swellingAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)2&2.5 mg/kg/2 d2 w[94]
Male Wistar rats (IP)2.5 mg/kg/2 d2 w[95]
Male Wistar rats (IV)1 mg/kg/w7 w (started at 11 w, observed at 48 w)[96]
IdarubicinCMP, MI, CHF, VA, decreased LVEF23.22 μMMale SD rats (IV)5 mg/kg/w6 w[110]
MorphologyMitochondrial swellingAlkylating agentCyclophosphamideHMC, CMP143 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg10 d[111]
MorphologyMitochondrial swellingChemotherapeutic agentsCisplatinDecreased LVEF, arrhythmias, ECA, myocarditis, CMP27.54 μMC57BL mice (IV)10 mg/kg/d1 w[112]
MorphologyMitochondrial swellingMonoclonal antibodyTrastuzumabCMP, LVD, CHF2.59 mMFemale white New Zealand rabbits (SC)8 mg/kg, a single dose; 8 mg/kg first w, 6 mg/kg for three additional w4 w[113]
MorphologyMitochondrial swellingTKIsSunitinibDecreased LVEF, QT prolongation, TdP, hypertension, HF, CMP0.25 μMPatient[114]
Male SD rats (oral)10 mg/kg/d3 w[89]
MorphologyMitochondrial swellingNSAIDsDiclofenacHypertension, arrhythmias7.9 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria10 µg/mL1 h[115]
Isolated rat heart mitochondria50 μM1 h[60]
Naproxen-100 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria25 μM1 h[60]
CelecoxibThrombosis, MI, stroke3–5 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria100 μM1 h[60]
MorphologyMitochondrial swellingNRTIsZidovudineCMP4 μMRats (oral)125 mg/kg/d4 w[116]
MorphologyMitochondrial swellingCardiac glycosidesNerium oleander L.PVB, AVB, VT-Guinea pigs (oral)150&300 mg/kg3 h[117]
MorphologyMitochondrial swellingβ-adrenoceptor agonistsIsoproterenolHF0.01 μMMale Wistar rats (SC)100 mg/kg, BID12 h[118]
Male Wistar rats (SC)100 mg/kg, BID12 h[83]
Male Wistar rats (SC)100 mg/kg, BID12 h[82]
PropranololCardiotoxicity0.22 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria5 µg/mL5 min[119]
AtenololCardiotoxicity4.99 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria10 µg/mL5 min[119]
MorphologyMitochondrial swellingMacrolide antibioticsAzithromycinArrhythmia0.32–0.87 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria25 μM1 h[120]
ClarithromycinTdP2.67–13.37 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria50 μM1 h[120]
ErythromycinTdP11 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria25 μM1 h[120]
MorphologyMitochondrial swellingAconitum speciesAconitum sp.VA19.27 μg/mlH9c21 μM[121]
MorphologyMitochondrial swellingDiabetes medicationPioglitazoneHF2.6 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria12.5 µg/mL (30 min), 25 µg/mL (5 min)[122]
MorphologyMorphological damageNRTIsZidovudineCMP4 μMH9c250 μM39 passages[123]
DidanosineCMP12 μMH9c250 μM10 passages[123]
StructureCristae disappearanceChemotherapeutic agentsAs2O3QT prolongation TdP, CMP, tachycardia12.1 μMMale BALB/c mice2 mg/kg14 d[84]
StructureCristae disappearanceAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)2&2.5 mg/kg/2 d2 w[94]
Male Wistar rats (IP)2.5 mg/kg/2 d2 w[95]
Kunming mice (IP)2 mg/kg10 d[102]
Male Wistar rats (IV)1 mg/kg/w7 w (started at 11 w, observed at 48 w)[96]
StructureCristae disappearanceAlkylating agentCyclophosphamideHMC, CMP143 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg10 d[111]
Male Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg10 d[124]
Patient[125]
StructureCristae disappearanceTKIsSorafenibBleeding, hypertension,QT prolongation, CHF, CI, MI16.6 μMMale SD rats (oral)10 mg/kg/d3 w[89]
StructureCristae disappearanceNRTIsZidovudineCMP4 μMRats (oral)125 mg/kg/d4 w[116]
Pregnant CD-1 mice + pups,oral75 mg/kg, BID2 w prior to pregnancy to pups postnatal 28 d[126]
StructureCristae disappearanceβ-adrenoceptor agonistsIsoproterenolHF0.01 μMMale Wistar rats (SC)100 mg/kg, BID12 h[118]
Male Wistar rats (SC)100 mg/kg, BID12 h[83]
Male Wistar rats (SC)100 mg/kg, BID12 h[82]
StructureCristae disorganizationMonoclonal antibodyTrastuzumabCMP, LVD, CHF2.59 mMFemale white New Zealand rabbits (SC)8 mg/kg, a single dose; 8 mg/kg first W, 6 mg/kg for three additional w4 w[113]
StructureOMM or/and IMM disruptionNRTIsZidovudineCMP4 μMRats (oral)125 mg/kg/d4 w[116]
Monoclonal antibodyTrastuzumabCMP, LVD, CHF2.59 mMFemale white New Zealand rabbits (SC)8 mg/kg for first w, 6 mg/kg for three additional w4 w[113]
StructureMatrix clearoutAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μMMale Wistar rats, intraperitoneal(IP)2.5 mg/kg/2 d2 w[95]
StructureMatrix clearoutTKIsSunitinibDecreased LVEF, QT prolongation, TdP, hypertension, HF, CMPMale SD rats (oral)10 mg/kg/d3 w[89]
RegorafenibMI; hypertensionH9c210 μM72 h[90]
Structureβ-adrenoceptor agonistsIsoproterenolHF0.01 μMMale Wistar rats (SC)100 mg/kg, BID12 h[118]
Matrix clearoutMale Wistar rats (SC)100 mg/kg, BID12 h[83]
Male Wistar rats (SC)100 mg/kg, BID12 h[82]
StructureMatrix clearoutChemotherapeutic agentsCisplatinDecreased LVEF, arrhythmias, ECA, myocarditis, CMP27.54 μMC57BL mice (IV)10 mg/kg/d1 w[112]
As2O3QT prolongation TdP, CMP, tachycardia12.1 μMMale BALB/c mice2 mg/kg14 d[84]
MQCExcessive mitophagyAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMPQT prolongation TdP, CMP, tachycardia15.3 μMAC16 cells15.625 nM24 h[127]
Adult rat cardiac myocytes1 μM4 h[128]
MQCExcessive mitophagyChemotherapeutic agentsAs2O312.1 μMHL-16 μM6 h[129]
MQCInhibition of mitophagyAconitum speciesAconitum sp.VA19.27 μg/mlH9c22 μM24 h[121]
MQCInhibition of mitochondrial biogenesisMonoclonal antibodyTrastuzumabCMP, LVD, CHF2.59 mM---
MQCMitochondrial dynamicsTKIsSunitinibDecreased LVEF, QT prolongation, TdP, hypertension, HF, CMP0.25 μM---[130]
RegorafenibMI; hypertension8.08 μMH9c220 μM48 h[90]
MQCMitochondrial dynamicsNRTIsZidovudineCMP4 μMPregnant CD-1 mice + pups, oral75 mg/kg, BID2 w prior to pregnancy to pups postnatal 28 D[126]
TMPK-overexpressing H9c2 cells100 µM24 h[131]
MQCMitochondrial dynamicsNucleoside analoguesRemdesivirBradycardia, QT prologation, CA9 μMhiPSC-CMs2.5 μM3 d[86]
MQCMitochondrial dynamicsAddictive drugsEthanolH9c25 μM0.5 h[132]

Abbreviations: NRTIs: nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; NSAIDs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; TKIs: tyrosine kinase inhibitors; DOX: doxorubicin; CHF: congestive heart failure; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; HF: heart failure; LVD: left ventricular dysfunction; TdP: torsades de pointes; MI: myocardial infarction; CMP: cardiomyopathy; CA: cardiac arrest; CI: cardiac ischemia; ST: sinus tachycardia; HMC: hemorrhagic myocarditis; ECA: electrocardiographic alterations; VA: ventricular arrhythmia; PVB: premature ventricular beats; AVB: atrioventricular block; VT: ventricular tachycardia; IP: intraperitoneal; IV: intravenously; SC: subcutaneously; BID: twice daily; w: week; d: day; h: hours.

2.2. Substrate Catabolism and OXPHOS

The heart consumes about 6 kg of ATP per day, which is mainly generated through mitochondrial OXPHOS from the catabolism of lipids and carbohydrates [133,134,135]. Glucose, lactate, and fatty acids are oxidized in the mitochondrion and produce a common end product (i.e., acetyl-CoA), which then goes through eight enzymatic steps of the Krebs cycle, where electrons are extracted from TCA intermediates in the form of reducing equivalents (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FADH2)) (Figure 2A). The OXPHOS system links substrate oxidation to ATP generation (Figure 2B). It is made up of mitochondrial respiratory chain (MRC) complexes, including NADH:ubichinone oxidoreductase (NADH-dehydrogenase, complex I), succinate dehydrogenase (SDH, complex II), cytochrome c-reductase (complex III), cytochrome c oxidase (complex IV), and ATP synthase (complex V) [136]. Using NADH as a substrate for complex I and succinic acid for complex II, the MRC complexes transfer electrons from NADH and FADH2 to convert O2 to water (complex IV). The energy liberated during this mitochondrial electron transport is used to establish a highly electronegative potential (−140 to −180 mV), termed the MMP, across the IMM by extruding protons at complexes I, III, and IV into the IMS. When intracellular ADP is high, protons are channeled back into the matrix through the F0 portion of ATP synthase, fueling the conversion of ADP into ATP by the F1 portion of this enzyme. This process is tightly regulated, with close coupling of electron transport, membrane potential, and ATP synthesis. ATP is then moved from the mitochondrial matrix to the cytoplasm by the adenine nucleotide transporter (ANT), finally allowing energy to be available for cellular activity [137]. Substrate catabolism and OXPHOS are central to the energy homeostasis of mitochondria, and hence critical for cardiomyocyte functions.
Figure 2

The basic modules of mitochondrial function and major toxicity targets in cardiomyocytes. Substrate catabolism, oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), redox homeostasis, mitochondrial genome (mtDNA), mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP), and mitochondrial quality control (MQC) constitute the major functional units and toxicity targets in cardiomyocytes. (A) Substrate catabolism. Fatty acids, esterificated by fatty acyl-CoA synthase enzymes, are taken up through CPT I, CPT II, and CAT, and are then oxidized into acetyl-CoA inside the mitochondrion. Pyruvate from glycolysis is also oxidized into acetyl-CoA by PDH in the mitochondrion. Acetyl-CoA then goes through TCA cycle to generate reducing equivalents (NADH and FADH2), which fuel OXPHOS to produce ATP. This bioenergetic process can be disturbed by downregulated expression or decreased activities of carriers and enzymes for the TCA cycle and fatty acids β-oxidation. (B) OXPHOS. Electrons are extracted by complex Ⅰ and II from reducing equivalents, and move through ETC complexes, pumping protons into the IMS to generate MMP. MMP in turn drives proton flow back into the mitochondrial matrix through complex V, releasing this energy to generate ATP. Mitochondrial toxicants can reduce the expression and/or activity of ETC complexes, uncouple ETC from ATP synthesis, and impair MMP. (C) Redox homeostasis. mtROS produced in physiological state can be cleared by series antioxidant enzymes, such as GSH, SOD, and CAT. Drugs with mitochondrial toxicity can overproduce mtROS by inhibiting ETC complexes (especially complex Ⅰ and III) or decreasing the levels or activity of antioxidant enzymes, or there may be a combination of both mechanisms. (D) Map of mtDNA. The mitochondrion possesses its own genome, mtDNA, within the matrix, which can be replicated, transcribed, and translated into some of the MRC complexes. mtDNA, topoisomerase II for mtDNA repair, and DNA polymerase for mtDNA replication are all reported targets for toxicants. (E) mPTP. mPTP is a channel whose components have not been fully elucidated. The normal closed state can be triggered into an open state by a series of stresses, especially Ca2+ overload and oxidative stress. mPTP opening induces cytochrome c releasing into the cytoplasm, resulting in the initiation of apoptosis. (F) MQC. Defective mitochondria can be regulated by MQC, mainly including mitochondrial biogenesis and mitophagy. Damaged mitochondria can be cleared by mitophagy though ubiquitin-dependent or -independent pathways. In cardiomyocytes, ubiquitin-dependent pathway (Pink1-Parkin-mediated mitophagy) is induced by MMP depolarization, while the ubiquitin-independent pathway can be directly induced by LIR containing mitophagy receptors located on OMM in cardiomyocytes. Energy depletion after mitophagy activates genome-encoded transcriptional elements, which directly express mitochondrial proteins or regulate mtDNA to express related proteins for the assembly of new mitochondria. Toxicants may influence mitophagy or biogenesis to disturb MQC. Abbreviations: ANT: adenine nucleotide transporter; APAF: apoptotic peptidase activating factor; BNIP3: BCL2 interacting protein 3; C: cytochrome c; CAT: catalase; CPT: carnitine palmitoyltransferase; Complex I: NADH dehydrogenase; Complex II: succinate dehydrogenase; Complex III: cytochrome c reductase; Complex IV: cytochrome c oxidase; Complex V: ATP synthase; CypD: cyclophilin D; ERR: estrogen-related receptor; ETC: electron transport chain; FAs: fatty acids; FADH2: flavin adenine dinucleotide. FUNDC1: FUN14 domain-containing protein 1; FKBP8: FK506 binding protein 8; GPxs: glutathione peroxidase; GSH: glutathione; GSSG: glutathione disulfide; IBM: inner boundary membrane; IFMs: interfibrillar mitochondria; IMM: the inner mitochondrial membrane; IMS: intermembrane space; LC3: light chain 3; LDH: lactic dehydrogenase; LIR: LC3-interacting region; MFN1/2: mitofusin 1/2; MMP: mitochondrial 6membrane potential; MPC: mitochondrial pyruvate carrier; mPTP: mitochondrial permeability transition pore; NADH: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NRFs: nuclear respiratory factors; OMM: outer mitochondrial membrane; OXPHOS: oxidative phosphorylation; PCMs: primary cardiomyocyte; PDH: pyruvate dehydrogenase; PGC-1α: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorγ (PPARγ) coactivator 1α; Q: coenzyme Q; SOD: superoxide dismutase; SOD1: Cu/ZnSOD, copper- and zinc-dependent SOD; SOD2: MnSOD, manganese-dependent SOD; SSMs: subsarcolemmal mitochondria; TCA cycle: tricarboxylic acid cycle; TPx: thioredoxin peroxidase; UCP: mitochondrial uncoupling proteins; VDAC: voltage-dependent anion channel.

Many drugs are known inhibitors of the MRC, interfering with one or more of the complexes (Table 3). Inhibition can be caused by directly inhibiting the activity of MRC complexes. For example, zoniporide [64], naproxen [60,138], dronedarone [139], and mubritinib [140] inhibit complex I; propranolol and atenolol disrupt complex II [119]; celecoxib suppresses complex IV [14]; and As2O3 inhibits complex I, III, and IV [141]. OXPHOS may also be blocked by inhibition of the expression of MRC complexes, such as by mitoxantrone [100]. Additionally, uncoupling electron transport from ATP synthesis by tenidap [64] and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (e.g., nimesulide, meloxicam, and acetylsalicylate) [142] is yet another way to inhibit OXPHOS. Lipophilic drugs can damage phospholipids on the IMM, especially cardiolipin [143], or activate the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP), which are mechanisms [144,145] that lead to pathologic uncoupling of respiration [72]. Bupivacaine has been suggested to interact with phospholipids in the IMM, which often result in increased membrane permeability, electron transport chain disruption, and calcium accumulation [146]. These inhibitory mechanisms of MRC complexes may cause a series of deleterious consequences. Firstly, OXPHOS inhibition can results in MMP dissipation and diminishment, or even abolishment, of ATP production [147]. Another important consequence of MRC inhibition is the secondary impairment of mitochondrial β-oxidation and the TCA cycle. Furthermore, blocking the flow of electrons favors reactive oxygen species (ROS) overproduction, leading to oxidative stress [148,149,150]. The majority of drugs with known mitochondrial liabilities display impairment of MRC function, highlighting it as a key indicator of mitochondrial health. The drugs listed in Table 4 are reported to downregulate the expression of proteins or to directly inhibit enzyme activity in FA oxidation and the TCA cycle.
Table 3

Drugs affecting OXPHOS, MMP and mPTP, their clinical manifestations, and relevant in vitro and in vivo studies.

ModulesAlterationsPharmacologyDrugsClinical ManifestationsCmaxModelsDoseTimeReferences
OXPHOSInhibition of complex ICholesterol medicationsSimvastatinCardiac atrophy0.02 μMH9c210 μM24 h[151]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex Iβ-adrenoceptor agonistsIsoproterenolHF0.01 μMMale Wistar rats (SC)100 mg/kg, BID12 h[83]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IAlkylating agentCyclophosphamideHMC, CMP143 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg10 d[111]
Male Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg10 d[124]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex INRTIsZidovudineCMP4 μMIsolated mitochondria from H9c250 μM3 passages[152]
DidanosineCMP12 μMIsolated mitochondria from H9c250 μM3 passages[152]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)2.5 mg/kg/2 d2 w[95]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IChemotherapeutic agentsAs2O3QT prolongation TdP, CMP, tachycardia12.1 μMIsolated mitochondria from H9c25 μM24 h[141]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IAnesthesiaPropofolHF, arrhythmia30.13 μMCardiac muscle fibers of Wistar male rats0.025 mM[153]
Halothane (fluothane)-10 μMPig heart submitochondrial particlesDose response curve[154]
Inhibition of complex ITKIsMubritinib--H9c20.5 μM[140]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex INSAIDsNabumetone-2.45 μMSubmitochondrial particles55 nmol/mg protein inhibit 50%[142]
Meclofenamate sodium-3.55 μMMitochontria100 µM (70% inhibition)[138]
Naproxen-100 µMMitochontria200 µM (50% inhibition)[138]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IAddictive drugsCocaineArrhythmias, angina, MI, HF0.76–0.94 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria1 μM[155]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IAnti-arrhythmic drugAmiodaroneLQT, TdP, Hypotension, AV block, Arrhythmia, heart block, SBC, CHF, VF4.65 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondriaIC50 = 5.24 µM[139]
DronedaroneAF, HF0.15–0.26 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondriaIC50 = 3.07 µM[139]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IImmunosuppressant drugCyclosporine ACardiotoxicity0.5–5 µMEnzymes and coenzymes100 µM[156]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IINSAIDsDiclofenacHypertension, arrhythmias7.9 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria10 µg/mL1 h[115]
Naproxen-100 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria50 μM1 h[60]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IIAlkylating agentCyclophosphamideHMC, CMPCardiotoxicity143 μM0.22 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg10 d[124]
Male Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg10 d[111]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IIβ receptor blocker drugsPropranololIsolated rat heart mitochondria10 µg/mL30 min[119]
AtenololCardiotoxicity4.99 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria10 µg/mL30 min[119]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IIMacrolide antibioticsAzithromycinArrhythmia0.32–0.87 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria25 μM20 min[120]
ClarithromycinTdP2.67–13.37 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria50 μM20 min[120]
ErythromycinTdP11 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria25 μM20 min[120]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IIIChemotherapeutic agentsAs2O3QT prolongation TdP, CMP, tachycardia12.1 μMIsolated mitochondria from H9c25 μM24 h[141]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IIITKIsSorafenibBleeding, hypertension, QT prolongation, CHF, CI, MI16.6 μMNRVMs4.5 µM20 min[32]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IIIAlkylating agentCyclophosphamideHMC, CMP143 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg10 d[111]
7.9 µMMale Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg10 d[124]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IIINSAIDsDiclofenacHypertension, arrhythmiasMitochondria isolated from mouse hearts5 µM[157]
Meclofenamate sodium-3.55 μMMitochontria10 µM[138]
Inhibition of complex IIIAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μM-15 mg/kg-[158]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IVAlkylating agentCyclophosphamideHMC, CMPHF143 μM0.01 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg10 d[111]
Male Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg10 d[124]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IVβ-adrenoceptor agonistsIsoproterenolMale Wistar rats (SC)100 mg/kg, BID12 h[83]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IVCholesterol medicationsSimvastatinCardiac atrophy0.02 μMH9c210 μM24 h[151]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IVAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP, QT prolongation TdP, CMP, tachycardia15.3 μM12.1 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)2.5 mg/kg/2 d2 w[95]
Male Wistar rats (IV)1 mg/kg/w7 w(started at 11 w, observed at 48 w)[96]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IVChemotherapeutic agentsAs2O3Isolated mitochondria from H9c25 μM24 h[141]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IVNSAIDsCelecoxibThrombosis, MI, stroke3–5 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria16 µg/mL[14]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IVProteasome inhibitorBortezomibQT prolongation, hypotension0.3 μMMale Wistar rats0.2 mg/kg3 w[159]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex IVImmunosuppressant drugCyclosporine ACardiotoxicity0.5–5 µMEnzymes and coenzymes100 µM[156]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex VChemotherapeutic agentsMitoxantroneCHF, CMP, decreased LVEF, arrhythmia3.3 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria2.5 mg/kg on d 0, 10, and 2022 d[160]
OXPHOSInhibition of complex VAnticonvulsantsPhenytoinBradycardia, hypotension87.21 μMguinea pig heart preparations1.0 nM[161]
OXPHOSDownregulation of complex I expressionTKIsRegorafenibMI; hypertension8.08 μMH9c220 μM72 h[90]
OXPHOSDownregulation of complex I expressionNucleoside analoguesRemdesivirBradycardia, QT prologation, CA9 μMHiPSC-CMs2.5 μM3 d[86]
OXPHOSDownregulation of complex I expressionAddictive drugsEthanolMale C57BL/6J mice10% (v/v)12 w[162]
OXPHOSDownregulation of complex I expressionAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μMMale CD-1 mice (IP)9 mg/kg1 w[100]
MitoxantroneCHF, CMP, decreased LVEF, arrhythmia3.3 μMMale CD-1 mice (IP)6 mg/kg1 w[100]
OXPHOSDownregulation of complexe II expressionAnesthesiaPropofolHF, arrhythmia30.13 μMHiPSC-CMs10 µg/mL48 h[163]
Addictive drugsEthanolMale C57BL/6J mice10% (v/v)12 w[162]
OXPHOSDownregulation of complexIII expressionAddictive drugsEthanolMale C57BL/6J mice10% (v/v)12 w[162]
AnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μMMale CD-1 mice (IP)9 mg/kg1 w[100]
OXPHOSDownregulation of complex IV expressionMitoxantroneCHF, CMP, decreased LVEF, arrhythmia3.3 μMMale CD-1 mice (IP)6 mg/kg1 w[100]
AnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μMMale Wistar rats (IV)1 mg/kg/w7 w(started at 11 w, observed at 48 w)[96]
Addictive drugsEthanolMale C57BL/6J mice10% (v/v)12 w[162]
OXPHOSDownregulation of complex V expressionNucleoside analoguesRemdesivirBradycardia, QT prologation, CA9 μMHiPSC-CMs2.5 μM3 d[86]
OXPHOSDownregulation of complex V expressionTKIsRegorafenibMI; hypertension8.08 μMH9c220 μM72 h[90]
OXPHOSDownregulation of complex V expressionProteasome inhibitorBortezomibQT prolongation, hypotension0.3 μMMale Wistar rats0.2 mg/kg1 w[159]
OXPHOSDownregulation of complex V expressionAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μMMale CD-1 mice (IP)9 mg/kg1 w[100]
MitoxantroneCHF, CMP, decreased LVEF, arrhythmia3.3 μMMale CD-1 mice (IP)6 mg/kg1 w[100]
OXPHOSDownregulation of complex V expressionNucleoside analoguesRemdesivirBradycardia, QT prologation, CA9 μMHiPSC-CMs2.5 μM3 d[86]
OXPHOSDownregulation of complex V expressionAddictive drugsEthanolMale C57BL/6J mice10% (v/v)12 w[162]
OXPHOSInhibition of OXPHOSAnti-arrhythmic drugClofiliumTDP1 μM---[64]
OXPHOSInhibition of OXPHOSAntipsychoticsAripiprazole-2.24 μM---[64]
OXPHOSInhibition of OXPHOSTKIsSorafenibBleeding, hypertension, QT prolongation, CHF, CI, MI16.6 μMHiPSC-CMs10 µM24 h[164]
OXPHOSOCR reductionNSAIDsAcetylsalicylate-0.5–10 mMIsolated rat heart mitochondria5 mM[165]
OXPHOSOCR reductionNRTIsZidovudineCMP4 μMH9c250 μM3 passages[152]
TMPK-overexpressing H9c2 cells100 µM24 h[131]
DidanosineCMP12 μMH9c250 μM3 passages[152]
OXPHOSOCR reductionNucleoside analoguesRemdesivirBradycardia, QT prologation, CA9 μMHiPSC-CMs2.5 μM3 d[86]
OXPHOSOCR reductionCholesterol medicationsSimvastatinCardiac atrophy0.02 μMH9c210 μM24 h[151]
OXPHOSOCR reductionAnalgesicsSalicylic acid-0.5–10 mMIsolated rat heart mitochondria5 mM[165]
OXPHOSOCR reductionLocal anestheticsBupivacaine (marcaine)VF0.7 μMneonatal mouse cardiomyocytes5 μM[166]
OXPHOSReduction in ATP contentAnesthesiaPropofolHF, arrhythmia30.13 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria300 μM[167]
OXPHOSReduction in ATP contentLocal anestheticsLidocaineVF36 μM---[168]
OXPHOSReduction in ATP contentAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μM-15 mg/kg-[158]
OXPHOSReduction in ATP contentChemotherapeutic agentsEtoposideHypotension17 μMhiPSC-CMs30 μM48 h[169]
OXPHOSMitoxantroneCHF, CMP, decreased LVEF, arrhythmia3.3 μM[160]
OXPHOSReduction in ATP contentAlkylating agentCyclophosphamideHMC, CMPCMP, LVD, CHF143 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg1 w[170]
Male Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg1 w[171]
OXPHOSReduction in ATP contentMonoclonal antibodyTrastuzumab2.59 mM---[172]
OXPHOSReduction in ATP contentTKIsImatinib mesylateQT prolongation, CHF, decreased LVEF2.71 μMNRVMs5 μM24 h[91]
SunitinibDecreased LVEF, QT prolongation, TdP, hypertension, HF, CMPBleeding, hypertension, QT prolongation, CHF, CI, MI0.25 μMMale SD rats (oral)10 mg/kg/d3 w[89]
Male Wistar Rats (oral)25 mg/kg/d28 d[173]
NRVMs60% of ATP was depleted at 23 µM24 h[174]
Sorafenib16.6 μMMale SD rats (oral)10 mg/kg/d3 w[89]
RegorafenibMI; hypertension8.08 μMH9c25 μM48 h[90]
OXPHOSReduction in ATP contentNSAIDsNaproxen-100 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria50 μM1 h[60]
CelecoxibThrombosis, MI, stroke3–5 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria25 μM1 h[60]
DiclofenacHypertension, arrhythmias-7.9 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria100 μM1 h[60]
---[142]
---[175]
Piroxicam5 µM---[142]
IndomethacinHypertension6 µM---[142]
Nimesulide-21.08 µM---[142]
MeloxicamHA, stroke6.55 µM---[142]
OXPHOSReduction in ATP contentNRTIsZidovudineCMPBradycardia, QT prologation, CA4 μMRats (oral)125 mg/kg/d4 w[116]
TMPK-overexpressing H9c2 cellsDose response curve(IC50 = 70 μM)4 d[131]
OXPHOSReduction in ATP contentNucleoside analoguesRemdesivir9 μM[176]
OXPHOSReduction in ATP contentAddictive drugsEthanolArrhythmias, angina, MI, HFMale C57BL/6J mice10% (v/v) for first w, 14% (v/v) for second w, 18% (v/v) for third w,12 w[162]
H9c2184.34 mM24 h[177]
CocaineLQT, TdP, Hypotension, AV block, Arrhythmia, heart block, SBC, CHF, VF0.76–0.94 µMH9c21.79 mM24 h[177]
Isolated rat heart mitochondria2*7.5 mg/kg/d7 d[178]
Isolated rat heart mitochondria2*7.5 mg/kg/d7 d[179]
OXPHOSReduction in ATP contentAnti-arrhythmic drugAmiodarone4.65 μMH9c2IC50 = 1.84 µM4 h[139]
DronedaroneAF, HF0.15–0.26 μMH9c2IC50 = 0.49 µM4 h[139]
OXPHOSReduction in ATP contentβ-adrenoceptor agonistsIsoproterenolHF0.01 μMMale Wistar rats (SC)100 mg/kg, BID12 h[82]
OXPHOSReduction in ATP contentCholesterol medicationsSimvastatinCardiac atrophy0.02 μMH9c210 μM (6 h); 100 μM (24 h)[151]
OXPHOSUncoupling of OXPHOSTKIsCrizotinibQT prolongation0.73 μM---[64]
OXPHOSUncoupling of OXPHOSNSAIDsAcetylsalicylate-0.5–10 mMIsolated rat heart mitochondria10 mM[165]
DiclofenacHypertension, arrhythmias7.9 µM---[142]
Piroxicam-5 µM---[142]
IndomethacinHypertension6 µM---[142]
Nimesulide-21.08 µM---[142]
MeloxicamHA, stroke6.55 µM---[142]
tenidap-8.44 µM (30525499)---[64]
OXPHOSUncoupling of OXPHOSNRTIsZidovudineCMP4 μMH9c250 lM18 h[180]
DidanosineCMP12 μM50 lM18 h[180]
OXPHOSUncoupling of OXPHOSAddictive drugsEthanolIsolated mitochondria from rabbit ventricle10 µM2 h[181]
OXPHOSUncoupling of OXPHOSAnti-arrhythmic drugAmiodaroneLQT, TdP, Hypotension, AV block, Arrhythmia, heart block, SBC, CHF, VF4.65 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria1 µM[139]
DronedaroneAF, HF0.15–0.26 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria0.1 µM[139]
OXPHOSUncoupling of OXPHOSAnalgesicsSalicylic acid-0.5–10 mMIsolated rat heart mitochondria10 mM[165]
MMPDissipation of MMPAnthracyclinesDOXCMP, MI, CHF, VA, pericarditis, myocarditis15.3 μMKunming mice (IP)2 mg/kg10 d[102]
KIND-2-derived cardiac cells0.24 μM disrupte 48.3%48 h[182]
Daunorubicin89 μMNeonatal rat cardiac cells4 μM24 h[97]
MMPDissipation of MMPChemotherapeutic agentsCisplatinDecreased LVEF, arrhythmias, ECA, myocarditis, CMPHypotension27.54 μMC57BL mice (IV)10 mg/kg/d1 W[112]
NRVMs200 μM24 h[183]
Etoposide17 μMHiPSC-CMs10 μM48 h[169]
As2O3QT prolongation TdP, CMP, tachycardia12.1 μMH9c25 μM24 h[184]
MMPDissipation of MMPMonoclonal antibodyTrastuzumabCMP, LVD, CHF2.59 mMH9c2200 nM24 h[185]
MMPDissipation of MMPTKIsImatinib mesylateQT prolongation, CHF, decreased LVEF2.71 μMNRVMs5 μM18 h[91]
SunitinibDecreased LVEF, QT prolongation, TdP, hypertension, HF, CMP0.25 μMMale SD rats (oral)10 mg/kg/d3 W[89]
RegorafenibMI; hypertension8.08 μMH9c220 μM72 h[90]
MMPDissipation of MMPNSAIDsDiclofenacHypertension, arrhythmias-7.9 µM--[142]
Isolated rat heart mitochondria10 µg/mL[115]
Mitochondria isolated from mouse hearts10 µg/mL[157]
C57BL/6 mice (oral)15 mg/kg/D[175]
Immortalized human cardiomyocytes100 μM[85]
Piroxicam5 µM--[142]
IndomethacinHypertension6 µM--[142]
Nimesulide-21.08 µM--[142]
MeloxicamHA, stroke6.55 µM--[142]
Meclofenamate sodium-3.55 μMH9c25 µM (40% inhibition)[138]
Naproxen-100 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria25 μM (60 min); 100 μM (30 min)[60]
DiclofenacIsolated rat heart mitochondria50 μM5 min[60]
CelecoxibThrombosis, MI, stroke3–5 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria25 μM5 min[60]
MMPDissipation of MMPNRTIsZidovudineCMP4 μMTMPK-overexpressing H9c2 cells100 µM24 h[131]
MMPDissipation of MMPAnti-arrhythmic drugAmiodaroneLQT, TdP, Hypotension, AV block, Arrhythmia, heart block, SBC, CHF, VF4.65 μMH9c2IC50 = 2.94 μM6 h[139]
DronedaroneAF, HF0.15–0.26 μMH9c2IC50 = 0.5 μM6 h[139]
MMPDissipation of MMPβ receptor blocker drugsPropranololCardiotoxicity0.22 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria5 µg/mL5 min[119]
AtenololCardiotoxicity4.99 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria5 µg/mL5 min[119]
MMPDissipation of MMPAconitum speciesAconitum sp.VA19.27 μg/mlH9c210 μM24 h[186]
MMPDissipation of MMPCholesterol medicationsSimvastatinCardiac atrophy0.02 μMH9c210 μM24 h[151]
MMPDissipation of MMPDiabetes medicationPioglitazoneHF2.6 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria12.5 µg/mL5 min[122]
MMPDissipation of MMPAnesthesiaPropofolHF, arrhythmia30.13 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria300 μM[167]
MMPDissipation of MMPβ-adrenoceptor agonistsIsoproterenolHF0.01 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria85 mg/kg/d2 d[187]
mPTPIncreases in mPTP openingNRTIsZidovudineCMP4 μMTMPK-overexpressing H9c2 cells100 µM24 h[131]
mPTPIncreases in mPTP openingChemotherapeutic agentsAs2O3QT prolongation TdP, CMP, tachycardia12.1 μMMale BALB/c mice2 mg/kg (14 d); 4 mg/kg (3 d)[84]
mPTPIncreases in mPTP openingMonoclonal antibodyTrastuzumabCMP, LVD, CHF2.59 mM---[22]
mPTPLoss of cytochrome cAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria, subcutaneously (SC)2 mg/kg/w7 w[188]
mPTPLoss of cytochrome cChemotherapeutic agentsCisplatinDecreased LVEF, arrhythmias, ECA, myocarditis, CMP27.54 μMNRVMs200 μM24 h[183]
mPTPLoss of cytochrome cTKIsImatinib mesylateQT prolongation, CHF, decreased LVEF2.71 μMNRVMs5 μM24 h[91]
mPTPLoss of cytochrome cNRTIsZidovudineCMP4 μMRats (oral)125 mg/kg/d[116]
mPTPLoss of cytochrome cβ receptor blocker drugsPropranololCardiotoxicity0.22 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria5 µg/mL5 min[119]
AtenololCardiotoxicity4.99 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria10 µg/mL5 min[119]
mPTPLoss of cytochrome cMacrolide antibioticsAzithromycinArrhythmia0.32–0.87 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria50 μM[120]
ClarithromycinTdP2.67–13.37 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria50 μM[120]
ErythromycinTdP11 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria50 μM[120]
mPTPLoss of cytochrome cDiabetes medicationPioglitazoneHF2.6 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria12.5 µg/mL[122]

Abbreviations: OXPHOS: oxidative phosphorylation; MMP: mitochondrial membrane potential; mPTP: mitochondrial permeability transition pore; NRTIs: nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; NSAIDs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; TKIs: tyrosine kinase inhibitors; DOX: doxorubicin; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; HF: heart failure; LVD: left ventricular dysfunction; TdP: torsades de pointes; CHF: congestive hearts failure; MI: myocardial infarction; AF: atrial fibrillation; CMP: cardiomyopathy; VF: ventricular fibrillation; CA: cardiac arrest; CI: cardiac ischemia; ST: sinus tachycardia; HMC: hemorrhagic myocarditis; SBC: sinus bradycardia; ECA: electrocardiographic alterations; VA: ventricular arrhythmia; HA: heart attack; IP: intraperitoneal; IV: intravenously; SC: subcutaneously; BID: twice daily; w: week; d: day; h: hours.

Table 4

Drugs affecting FA oxidation and TCA cycle, their clinical manifestations, and relevant in vitro and in vivo studies.

ModulesAlterationsPharmacologyDrugsClinical ManifestationsCmaxModelsDoseTimeReferences
FA oxidationDownregulation of FA oxidation related proteins expressionAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μMMale CD-1 mice (IP)9 mg/kg1 w[100]
MitoxantroneCHF, CMP, decreased LVEF, arrhythmia3.3 μMMale CD-1 mice (IP)6 mg/kg1 w[100]
FA oxidationDownregulation of FA oxidation related proteins expressionAlkylating agentCyclophosphamideHMC, CMP143 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg10 d[189]
TCA cycleDownregulation of TCA related proteins expressionAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μMMale CD-1 mice (IP)9 mg/kg1 w[100]
MitoxantroneCHF, CMP, decreased LVEF, arrhythmia3.3 μMMale CD-1 mice (IP)6 mg/kg1 w[100]
TCA cycleInhibition of the Krebs cycle enzymeNSAIDsAcetylsalicylate-0.5–10 mMIsolated rat heart mitochondriaDose response curve[165]
TCA cycleInhibition of the Krebs cycle enzymeAnalgesicsSalicylic acid-0.5–10 mMIsolated rat heart mitochondriaDose response curve[165]
TCA cycleInhibition of the Krebs cycle enzymeAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)2.5 mg/kg/2 d2 w[95]
TCA cycleInhibition of the Krebs cycle enzymeAlkylating agentCyclophosphamideHMC, CMP143 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg10 d[124]
Male Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg10 d[111]
TCA cycleInhibition of the Krebs cycle enzymeβ-adrenoceptor agonistsIsoproterenolHF0.01 μMMale Wistar rats (SC)100 mg/kg, BID12 h[83]
TCA cycleLoss of Krebs cycle enzymesAddictive drugsEthanolWistar male albino rats3 g/kg/d10 d[190]

Abbreviations: FA: fatty acid; TCA: tricarboxylic acid; NRTIs: nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; NSAIDs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; DOX: doxorubicin; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; HF: heart failure; CHF: congestive hearts failure; CMP: cardiomyopathy; ST: sinus tachycardia; HMC: hemorrhagic myocarditis; IP: intraperitoneal; SC: subcutaneously; BID: twice daily; w: week; d: day; h: hour.

2.3. Mitochondrial ROS (mtROS)

Mitochondria are the center of cellular aerobic metabolism and are thus also the major source of cellular ROS [191]. Electrons leaked from various sites (mainly complex I and III) of the MRC react with O2 and subsequently form a series of mtROS (Figure 2C) [191,192]. Nine of the eleven types of ROS are found in mitochondria [193]. In addition, studies revealed that extra-mitochondrial ROS could transduce signals into mitochondria and induce the production of mtROS. mtROS can be partly eliminated through antioxidant enzymes and antioxidant molecules, as well as glutathione and thioredoxin [194]. Oxidative stress is induced in response to a decreased level of antioxidant enzymes and increased production of ROS. Mitochondria, while being a primary source of ROS themselves, also suffer from ROS-mediated damages caused by peroxidation of macromolecules including proteins, lipids, and DNA [135,195,196,197]. Therefore, the balance between mtROS production and elimination is critical for mitochondria. The balance of mtROS can be destroyed by toxic drugs decreasing antioxidant enzyme levels, inhibiting antioxidant enzyme activity, or producing mtROS (Table 5). The mitochondrial toxicity of some drugs, including cisplatin [112], azidothymidine [198], cannabinoids, glycosides [36], and pioglitazone [122], seems to be mediated by increases in the production of free radicals. DOX not only induces ROS production by Fe2+/Fe3+ cycling, but also inhibits antioxidant enzymes, including glutathione, glutathione peroxidase, and glutathione reductase [199,200]. Furthermore, ROS levels are elevated when OXPHOS complexes are inhibited [201,202] by drugs such as As2O3 [141]. Such free radicals can directly cause a diverse range of macromolecular damage, resulting in mitochondrial dysfunction. For example, ROS produced by DOX peroxidates cardiolipin, inducing cytochrome c release [188]. Hence, excessive mtROS production is a very common mechanism of mitochondrial dysfunction induced by mitotoxicants.
Table 5

Drugs affecting mitochondrial redox, their clinical manifestations, and relevant in vitro and in vivo studies.

ModulesAlterationsPharmacologyDrugsClinical ManifestationsCmaxModelsDoseTimeReferences
RedoxDecrease in antioxidant enzyme levelNSAIDsNaproxen-100 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria25 μM[60]
CelecoxibThrombosis, MI, stroke3–5 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria50 μM[60]
Diclofenac-3.55 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria25 μM[60]
RedoxDecrease in antioxidant enzyme levelβ-adrenoceptor agonistsIsoproterenolHF0.01 μMMale Wistar rats (SC)100 mg/kg, BID12 h[118]
RedoxInhibition of antioxidant enzymeAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)2.5 mg/kg/2 d2 w[95]
Kunming mice (IP)2 mg/kg10 d[102]
---[199]
Male BALB/c mice (IP)5 mg/kg/w2 w[200]
Male Wistar rats (IV)45 mg/kg48 h[203]
IdarubicinCMP, MI, CHF, VA, decreased LVEF23.22 μMRats (IV)5 mg/kg/w6 w[110]
RedoxInhibition of antioxidant enzymeAlkylating agentCyclophosphamideHMC, CMP143 μMMale Wistar rats200 mg/kg1 w[170]
Male Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg1 w[171]
RedoxInhibition of antioxidant enzymeChemotherapeutic agentsCisplatinDecreased LVEF, arrhythmias, ECA, myocarditis, CMP27.54 μMNRVMs200 μM24 h[183]
As2O3QT prolongation TdP, CMP, tachycardia12.1 μMBALB/c mice (IV)1 mg/kg/2 d6 d[204]
Isolated mitochondria from H9c25 μM24 h[141]
RedoxInhibition of antioxidant enzymeTKIsSunitinibDecreased LVEF, QT prolongation, TdP, hypertension, HF, CMP0.25 μMNRVMs67% of GSH was oxidized at 23 µM24 h[174]
RedoxInhibition of antioxidant enzymeNRTIsZidovudineCMP4 μMMale OF1 mice (oral)10 mg/kg/d35 d[205]
RedoxInhibition of antioxidant enzymeAddictive drugsCocaineArrhythmias, angina, MI, HF0.76–0.94 µMH9c21.79 mM24 h[177]
RedoxInhibition of antioxidant enzymeβ-adrenoceptor agonistsIsoproterenolHF0.01 μMMale Wistar rats (SC)100 mg/kg, BID12 h[83]
RedoxROS elevationAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μMBeef heart submitochondrial preparations--[206]
---[199]
DaunorubicinCMP, MI, CHF, VA, pericarditis, myocarditis89 μM---[207]
IdarubicinCMP, MI, CHF, VA, decreased LVEF23.22 μM---[207]
RedoxROS elevationChemotherapeutic agentsCisplatinDecreased LVEF, arrhythmias, ECA, myocarditis, CMP27.54 μMNRVMs200 μM24 h[183]
EtoposideHypotension17 μMHiPSC-CMs10 μM48 h[169]
As2O3QT prolongation TdP, CMP, tachycardia12.1 μMMale BALB/c mice2 mg/kg (14 d); 4 mg/kg (7 d)[84]
Isolated mitochondria from H9c25 μM24 h[141]
H9c25 μM24 h[184]
RedoxROS elevationMonoclonal antibodyTrastuzumabCMP, LVD, CHF2.59 mMH9c2200 nM24 h[185]
RedoxROS elevationTKIsSorafenibBleeding, hypertension, QT prolongation, CHF, CI, MI16.6 μMNRVMs4.5 µM10 min[32]
RedoxROS elevationNSAIDsDiclofenacHypertension, arrhythmias3.55 μM7.9 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria25 μM5 min[60]
H9c210 µM1.5 h[157]
Isolated rat heart mitochondria10 µg/mL1 h[115]
C57BL/6 mice (oral)15 mg/kg/d4 w[175]
Immortalized human cardiomyocytes100 μM24 h[85]
Naproxen-100 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria25 μM5 min[60]
CelecoxibThrombosis, MI, stroke3–5 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria25 μM5 min[60]
RedoxROS elevationNRTIsZidovudineCMP4 μMH9c250 μM3 passages[152]
TMPK-overexpressing H9c2 cells100 µM24 h[131]
Human cardiomyocytes10 µM48 h[198]
DidanosineCMP12 μMH9c250 μM3 passages[152]
RedoxROS elevationAddictive drugsEthanolH9c2184.34 mM24 h[177]
CocaineArrhythmias, angina, MI, HF0.76–0.94 µMH9c21.79 mM24 h[177]
Isolated rat heart mitochondria2 × 7.5 mg/kg/d8 d[178]
Isolated rat heart mitochondria2 × 7.5 mg/kg/d7 d[179]
RedoxROS elevationβ-adrenoceptor agonistsIsoproterenolHF0.01 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria85 mg/kg/d2 d[187]
RedoxROS elevationβ receptor blocker drugsPropranololCardiotoxicity0.22 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria5 µg/mL5 min[119]
AtenololCardiotoxicity4.99 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria5 µg/mL30 min[119]
Macrolide antibioticsAzithromycinArrhythmia0.32–0.87 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria25 μM15 min[120]
ClarithromycinTdP2.67–13.37 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria25 μM15 min[120]
ErythromycinTdP11 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria25 μM15 min[120]
RedoxROS elevationDiabetes medicationPioglitazoneHF2.6 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondria12.5 µg/mL5 min[122]
RedoxROS elevationLocal anestheticsBupivacaine (marcaine)VF0.7 μMH9c21 mM24 h[208]
RedoxNitrozative stressAnthracyclinesEpirubicinCHF5.68 mMMale Wistar rats (IP)10 mg/kg10 d[209]
RedoxNitrozative stressAlkylating agentCyclophosphamideHMC, CMP143 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg1 w[171]
Redox8OHdG adducts in mtDNAAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μMSD rats (IP)2 mg/kg/w6 w[210]
RedoxLipid peroxidationAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)2.5 mg/kg/2 d2 w[95]
Male Wistar rats (IV)45 mg/kg48 h[203]
DaunorubicinCMP, MI, CHF, VA, pericarditis, myocarditis89 μMMale SD rats2.5 mg/kg/w5 w[211]
IdarubicinCMP, MI, CHF, VA, decreased LVEF23.22 μMMale SD rats (IV)5 mg/kg/w6 w[110]
RedoxLipid peroxidationAlkylating agentCyclophosphamideHMC, CMP143 μMMale Wistar rats200 mg/kg1 w[170]
RedoxLipid peroxidationChemotherapeutic agentsCisplatinDecreased LVEF, arrhythmias, ECA, myocarditis, CMP27.54 μMNRVMs200 μM24 h[183]
RedoxLipid peroxidationNSAIDsDiclofenacHypertension, arrhythmias7.9 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria50 μM1 h[60]
Isolated rat heart mitochondria10 µg/mL1 h[115]
Naproxen-100 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria100 μM1 h[60]
CelecoxibThrombosis, MI, stroke3–5 µMIsolated rat heart mitochondria100 μM1 h[60]
RedoxLipid peroxidationNRTIsZidovudineCMP4 μMMale OF1 mice (oral)10 mg/kg/d35 d[205]
RedoxLipid peroxidationβ-adrenoceptor agonistsIsoproterenolCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP0.01 μMRat, subcutaneously (SC)100 mg/kg, BID12 h[118]
Male Wistar rats (SC)100 mg/kg, BID12 h[83]

Abbreviations: ROS: reactive oxygen species; NRTIs: nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; NSAIDs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; TKIs: tyrosine kinase inhibitors; DOX: doxorubicin; CHF: congestive heart failure; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; HF: heart failure; LVD: left ventricular dysfunction; TdP: torsades de pointes; MI: myocardial infarction; CMP: cardiomyopathy; VF: ventricular fibrillation; CI: cardiac ischemia; ST: sinus tachycardia; HMC: hemorrhagic myocarditis; ECA: electrocardiographic alterations; VA: ventricular arrhythmia; HA: heart attack; IP: intraperitoneal; IV: intravenously; SC: subcutaneously; BID: twice daily; w: week; d: day; h: hours.

2.4. Replication, Translation, and Transcription of mtDNA

One cardiomyocyte contains up to 6000 mitochondria, each equipped with its own copies of mtDNA. Maintaining the stability, proper replication, transcription, and translation of mtDNA are critical for mitochondrial health [195]. The mtDNA encodes for 2 rRNAs, 22 tRNAs, and 13 proteins, which serve as essential subunits of the MRC complexes (Figure 2D) [78]. mtDNA is characterized by high gene density without introns or only separated by single noncoding nucleotides, thus requiring great accuracy to ensure the functionality of the resulting transcripts. mtDNA is transcribed at a high rate, especially in the highly energetically active heart [212]. The majority of the subunits and proteins in mitochondria are encoded by nDNA, whereas mtDNA only encodes 13 polypeptides of MRC complexes I, III, IV, and V. Translation of these 13 genes is accomplished via the mitochondria’s transcription and translation machinery, which comprises both nuclear-encoded protein factors, mitochondrial encoded RNA components, and mitoribosomes [213]. Critically, unlike nuclear DNA, mtDNA is not tightly packed into nucleosomes and proximal to ROS production sites [214], rendering it particularly susceptible to toxicants. mtDNA can be interfered with by the inhibition of mitochondrial DNA polymerase and topoisomerase II (Table 6). DOX [158], mitoxantrone [215], and daunorubicin [130,207] inhibit DNA topoisomerase II β and disturb mtDNA stability and expression. DOX also decreases mtDNA and mtDNA-encoded subunit COX I in complex IV [96]. In addition, antiviral agents, such as zalcitabine, didanosine, and stavudine are specific inhibitors of the mitochondrial DNA polymerase-gamma, and therefore impair mtDNA replication [216]. It was later observed that nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-mediated mitochondrial toxicity can also occur as a result of direct inhibition of mtDNA-encoded protein synthesis [217,218]. Furthermore, antibiotics impair mtDNA-encoded protein synthesis due to the structural similarity between bacterial and mitochondrial ribosomes [219]. The mechanisms that deplete mtDNA-encoded protein levels eventually lead to decreases in ATP levels [202,220]. Clearly, mtDNA stability and expression are common targets of mitotoxic drugs, including anthracyclines, antiviral agents, and antibiotics.
Table 6

Drugs affecting mitochondrial carriers and mtDNA, their clinical manifestations, and relevant in vitro and in vivo studies.

ModulesAlterationsPharmacologyDrugsClinical ManifestationsCmaxModelsDoseTimeReferences
CarrierDownregulation of CPT I expressionAlkylating agentCyclophosphamideHMC, CMP143 μMMale Wistar rats (IP)200 mg/kg10 d[189]
CarrierDownregulation of CPT I expressionAnesthesiaPropofolHF, arrhythmia30.13 μMHiPSC-CMs10 µg/mL48 h[163]
CarrierDownregulation of CPT I expressionTKIsSunitinibDecreased LVEF, QT prolongation, TdP, hypertension, HF, CMP0.25 μMRats (oral)25 mg/kg/d28 d[173]
CarrierInhibition of CPT1 activityAnti-arrhythmic drugDronedaroneAF, HF0.15–0.26 μMIsolated rat heart mitochondriaIC50 = 40 µM20 min[139]
Carrierloss of carnitineCo-catalystPivalic acidCMP[232]
CarrierInhibition of ANTNSAIDsDiclofenacHypertension, arrhythmias7.9 µMSubmitochondrial particles314 nM/mg protein diminished 76%[142]
NimesulideSubmitochondrial particles259 nM/mg protein diminished 60%[142]
CarrierInhibition of ANTNRTIsZidovudineCMP4 μM[233]
mtDNAInhibition of mitochondrial DNA polymeraseNRTIsZidovudineCMP4 μMCardiac DNA pol-γ1 µM[234]
mtDNAInhibition of topoisomerase IIAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μM---[235]
DaunorubicinCMP, MI, CHF, VA, pericarditis, myocarditis89 μM---[207]
IdarubicinCMP, MI, CHF, VA, decreased LVEF23.22 μM---[207]
mtDNAInhibition of topoisomerase IIChemotherapeutic agentsMitoxantroneCHF, CMP, decreased LVEF, arrhythmia3.3 μM---[215]
mtDNAmtDNA content decreasingAnthracyclinesDOXCHF, decreased LVEF, ST, myocarditis, CMP15.3 μMMale Wistar rats (IV)1 mg/kg/w7 w (started at 11 w, observed at 48 w)[96]
mtDNAmtDNA content decreasingTKIsRegorafenibMI; hypertension8.08 μMH9c25 μM72 h[90]

Abbreviations: NRTIs: nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; NSAIDs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; TKIs: tyrosine kinase inhibitors; ANT: mitochondrial ADP/ATP transport; TCA: tricarboxylic acid; DOX: doxorubicin; CHF: congestive heart failure; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; HF: heart failure; TdP: torsades de pointes; MI: myocardial infarction; AF: atrial fibrillation; CMP: cardiomyopathy; ST: sinus tachycardia; HMC: hemorrhagic myocarditis; VA: ventricular arrhythmia; HA: heart attack; IP: intraperitoneal; IV: intravenously; BID: twice daily; w: week; d: day; h: hours.

2.5. Mitochondrial Membrane Potential (MMP) and mPTP

MMP is both a chief function and key sentinel of the mitochondrial network, indicating the functional metabolic status of mitochondria. Through the establishment of MMP, ADP and inorganic phosphate (Pi) converts to ATP. Besides ATP generation, MMP is broadly required for both ion homeostasis and protein import into the mitochondrial network [221]. MMP dissipation can be dependently or independently induced by mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) opening [222]. Mitochondria are master regulators of cell survival. Ca2+ overload, excessive ROS production, MMP dissipation, fatty acid, and adenine nucleotide pool depletion have all been reported to trigger mPTP opening [223,224]. The opening of mPTP, a non-selective pore, is defined as a sudden increase in the permeability of IMM for small molecules and ions (<1.5 kDa), leading to cellular apoptosis and the occurrence and development of cardiovascular diseases [224,225]. However, the precise molecular composition of the mPTP is currently unknown [223]. ATP synthase, ANT, and cyclophilin D (CypD) have all been recognized as key components of the mPTP (Figure 2E) [226,227,228]. Normal MMP and closed mPTP are essential to healthy mitochondrial respiration and are therefore sentinels of mitochondrial impairment and cell survival. Drugs inducing cardiotoxicity by targeting mitochondria invariably proceed to MMP collapse and mPTP opening (Table 3). Antineoplastic agents, including DOX [73,81,164], As2O3 [84,229], and imatinib [91]; β adrenergic receptor blockers, such as propranolol and atenolol [119]; antiarrhythmic drugs dronedarone and amiodarone [139]; antibiotics erythromycin and clarithromycin; NSAIDs such as naproxen, diclofenac, and celecoxib [60]; and diabetes drug pioglitazone [122] have all been reported to cause these harmful effects. mPTP opening and MMP decrease consequently induce loss of respiratory control and imbalance in ATP production, and loss of mitochondrial components such as ATP, NAD+, and glutathione, leading to water accumulation in the matrix, which causes mitochondrial osmotic swelling, IMM unfolding, and the rupture of the OMM [230,231]. As a gatekeeper of cellular death, the opening of the mPTP eventually results in the release of pro-apoptotic proteins from the IMS into the cytosol, thus stimulating both caspase-dependent and caspase-independent apoptosis [202]. Due to the universality of MMP collapse and mPTP opening induced by mitotoxicants, evaluating their status has become one of the most basic and routine tests in the assessment of drug-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. Drugs affecting mitochondrial carriers and mtDNA, their clinical manifestations, and relevant in vitro and in vivo studies. Abbreviations: NRTIs: nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; NSAIDs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; TKIs: tyrosine kinase inhibitors; ANT: mitochondrial ADP/ATP transport; TCA: tricarboxylic acid; DOX: doxorubicin; CHF: congestive heart failure; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; HF: heart failure; TdP: torsades de pointes; MI: myocardial infarction; AF: atrial fibrillation; CMP: cardiomyopathy; ST: sinus tachycardia; HMC: hemorrhagic myocarditis; VA: ventricular arrhythmia; HA: heart attack; IP: intraperitoneal; IV: intravenously; BID: twice daily; w: week; d: day; h: hours.

2.6. Mitochondrial Carriers

Mitochondrial function (including the TCA cycle; fatty acid oxidation; OXPHOS; amino acid degradation; biosynthesis of amino acid, iron sulfide, urea, heme, and cholesterol; and dissipation of proton gradient for heat production) relies on the exchange of a very diverse set of solutes and metabolites across the IMM and OMM. Mitochondrial carriers located on the IMM ensure that massive transport processes can occur between the mitochondrial matrix and the cytoplasm. These specific carriers are a superfamily of nuclear-encoded proteins including the solute carrier (SLC) family, the sideroflexin family, the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (MPC1/2), ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABCB) isoforms, and splice variants of other solute carriers, as well as recently identified mitochondrial amino acid carriers [236]. Consequently, mitochondrial carriers are fundamental for various mitochondrial functions. Mitochondrial toxicity can occur as a result of inhibition of carriers, such as adenine nucleotide translocator (ANT) for exchanging ADP in for ATP out [237,238,239] and carnitine palmitoyltransferase (CPT) I and II for fatty acyl-CoA transfer into the matrix (Table 6) [202]. Zidovudine impairs ANT activity, which is one of the biochemical processes responsible for cardiomyopathy [233]. Inhibiting the export of ATP causes MRC inhibition, compromising cell function due to energy deficiency [216]. Pivalic-acid-induced cardiomyopathy is the result of CPT activity inhibition, which is responsible for fatty acid oxidation in mitochondria [36,232]. In addition, sunitinib significantly decreased the level of CPT I expression [173]. In addition to ANT and CPT, other carriers potentially targeted by drugs are worth investigation.

2.7. Mitochondrial Quality Control (MQC)

Cardiomyocytes require healthy mitochondrial homeostasis to provide sufficient ATP for maintaining the pump function of the heart. Mitochondrial structure and function are tightly regulated by the MQC system, which is fundamental for sustaining mitochondrial bioenergetics demand and metabolic functions [240]. MQC is a series of processes comprising quality control of mitochondrial proteins, mitochondrial biogenesis, mitochondrial dynamics (fission and fusion), and mitophagy (Figure 2F) [241]. MQC repair or remove dysfunctional and damaged mitochondria; promote mitochondrial regeneration; improve mitochondrial biochemical processes and signaling transduction; maintain mitochondrial morphology, quantity, and function; and promote cell survival [242]. The vast majority of unrepaired damaged proteins are removed through the cytosolic ubiquitin/26S proteasome system (UPS), which has been shown to be crucial in the quality control of mitochondrial proteins [243]. In cardiomyocytes, mitophagy pathways include ubiquitin-dependent pathways, such as the PTEN-induced kinase 1/E3 ubiquitin ligase parkin (PINK1/Parkin) pathway, and ubiquitin-independent pathways, such as the BCL2 and adenovirus E1B 19 kDa-interacting protein 3 and BNIP3-like (Bnip3/Nix) pathway [244]. Due to its critical role in maintaining the mitochondrial network, MQC has recently been found to be vulnerable to unfavorable factors, including disease and toxicants [245]. UPS, mitochondrial biogenesis and dynamics, and mitophagy are reported targets for drug-induced cardiotoxicity (Table 2). Trastuzumab inhibits mitochondrial biogenesis, possibly through Her2-dependent estrogen-related receptor alpha activation [246]. Etoposide [169], zidovudine [131], and remdesivir were reported to disrupt mitochondrial dynamics, promoting mitochondria fragmentation [86]. Mitophagy mediates the clearance of damaged mitochondria with excessive mtROS marked by MitoSOX or/and decreased MMP indicated by JC-1 [247,248]. Mitophagy can be visualized in vivo using mitophagy-associated fluorescence proteins, such as mt-keima, mito-QC, and RFP/GFP-LC3 [249]. Colocalization of mitochondria (marked by MitoTracker or mitochondrial-specific fluorescent antibody) and autophagosomes (indicated by GFP-LC3) or lysosomes (dansylcadaverine, LysoTracker, or lysosome-specific fluorescent antibody) under fluorescence microscope, as well as immunoblotting of Parkin, LC3II/I, ubiquitin, Atg5, Beclin1, and p62 are widely used methods for mitophagy detection in vitro [247,250,251,252,253]. Based on these methods, sunitinib and sorafenib were shown to impair mitophagy via inhibition of ribosomal S6 kinase and AMPK. As2O3 induced parkin-dependent UPS activation [129]. Excessive mitophagy induced by the Parkin/PINK pathway contributed to DOX-induced toxicity [127,128]. On the other hand, mitigation of BNIP3-dependent mitophagy by aconitine induced cardiomyocyte damage [121]. Recently, increasing numbers of drugs interrupting MQC have been reported, indicating MQC impairment as a potentially critical criterion for mitotoxicant identification.

2.8. Other Mitotoxicants and Their Targets

Most mitochondria-related toxins and their targets are searchable in MitoTox [51]. In addition to the above-mentioned targets for mitotoxicity, several other toxicological mechanisms have been implicated in mitochondrial dysfunction but require further interrogation in cardiomyocytes. Ion channels and transporters on the IMM are associated with redox regulation and electrical and contractile dysfunction of cardiomyocytes [254]. H+/Na+ antiporters can be inhibited by amiloride analogs [255]. Inner membrane anion channels that are permeable to a variety of anions and anionic metabolites can be blocked by amiodarone, dibucaine, propranolol, amitryptiline, and clonazepam [254,256]. However, not all of these ion channels and transporters have been confirmed as a mechanism mediating mitochondrial toxicity in cardiomyocytes. The mitochondrial unfolded protein response (mtUPR) that is induced upon stress serves an important protective role in the heart by ameliorating mitochondrial dysfunction [257]. Although activated mtUPR resists statin toxicity in C. elegans [258], there is still a lack of evidence for the association between mtUPR and mitochondrial toxicants, especially in cardiomyocytes. Many other emerging molecular processes are gaining attention as mechanisms underlying mitochondrial dysfunction, and thus could be potential mediators of toxicity. Protein post-translational modifications (PTMs) were found to contribute to heart failure progression by regulating mitochondrial function [259]. Of the many proteins regulated by PTMs, mPTP is gaining attention as a potential mechanism underlying mitochondrial dysfunction and has as many as 55 PTM sites [260]. It is, therefore, possible that PTM of mPTP may contribute to mitochondrial toxicity in the heart.

3. Limitations of Current Preclinical Models for Assessing Cardiotoxicity

The successful development of a new drug takes about 14 years, at an average cost of USD 403 million, with roughly one-third spent on preclinical studies and the rest on clinical trials [261,262]. As a leading cause of attrition, drug-induced toxicity appears at all stages of drug development [263]. Even when drugs pass through the series of preclinical evaluations for drug safety, only 11% make it through clinical studies [264]. More strikingly, 462 marketed drugs were withdrawn due to ADRs from 1953 to 2013 [264]. Among all types of drug toxicity, cardiovascular toxicity constitutes 30% of all organ-toxicity-caused attritions [265], as well as 14% of all drug-toxicity-related withdrawals. Still, there remains 15–35% of drugs in the market with cardiovascular ADRs, which may contribute to the high and still increasing morbidity and mortality rates of CVDs, which claimed over 17.6 million lives in 2016 alone worldwide [266]. Therefore, drug-induced cardiac toxicity has caused serious financial losses for the pharmaceutical industry, as well as harm to patients’ well-being. The high rate of cardiotoxicity-related drug attrition, withdrawal, and ADRs are attributed to the insufficient cardiac safety evaluation system. Given that a 10% improvement in toxicity prediction at the preclinical stage could save $100 million per drug [263], improvements in early cardiotoxicity identification may have a profound impact on costly late attrition. It also helps to avoid unexpected ADRs that may threaten patients’ lives [263].

3.1. Limitations in the Current Workflow of Cardiac Safety Testing

Currently, drug-induced arrhythmia, especially QT prolongation leading to life-threatening complications including torsade de pointes, ventricular tachycardia, and sudden cardiac death, is the predominant concern during drug development. Arrhythmia can be induced by a wide range of drug classes including both non-antiarrhythmic drugs and, paradoxically, antiarrhythmic drugs [267]. In order to identify proarrhythmic drugs, the nonclinical ICH S7B (in vitro human ether-a-go-go-related (hERG) current and in vivo QT assays) and clinical ICH E14 (thorough QT study) guidelines were issued in 2005, which effectively precluded drugs with QT prolongation effects from further development [268]. According to these guidelines, in vitro hERG current measurement is mostly performed in immortalized heterologous cell lines stably expressing hERG channels using the patch-clamp technique, while in vivo QT assays are performed in animal models via electrocardiography. However, QT prolongation is not a robust surrogate for arrhythmogenic risk, and drugs blocking the hERG current do not always cause arrhythmias, resulting in nearly 60% of promising compounds being mistakenly eliminated during development [269]. In August 2020, ICH released an updated guideline combining S7B and E14 Questions and Answers (Q&As) to define an appropriate and efficient assessment of drug-induced corrected QT interval prolongation. The comprehensive in vitro proarrhythmia assay (CiPA) is a new strategy to determine the arrhythmogenic effects of drugs by evaluating a variety of cardiac repolarization-related currents in heterologous expression systems, reconstructing cardiac electrophysiologic activity in silico, followed by validations in human induced pluripotent-stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) and supplementation with data from phase I clinical trials. Although these guidelines have proven effective at pro-arrhythmic risk assessment, the complexity of drug-induced cardiotoxicity goes far beyond abnormal heart rhythm. Mitochondrial toxicity is increasingly implicated in drug-induced cardiotoxicity. Over 50% of clinical drugs causing cardiovascular adverse events, eliciting black box warnings from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), are caused by mitochondrial liabilities [147]. However, mitochondrial toxicity testing has not been incorporated into routine safety testing procedures during drug development. Another caveat of the current cardiac safety evaluation system is the failure to identify hidden cardiotoxicity. Hidden cardiotoxicity is a type of toxicity that goes undetected in healthy individuals, and only reveals itself under disease conditions [262]. Diseased hearts are loaded with function alterations involving ion channels, mitochondria, and electro-mechanical coupling, and are often more vulnerable to drugs. For example, cardiac arrhythmias may only be revealed in preclinical models of cardiovascular disease (e.g., myocardial infarction) [270]. This could be one of the reasons for the high rate of cardiotoxicity-related drug attrition, withdrawal, and ADRs. Although these aspects are important, given the focus of this article, we will only discuss viable measures to detect mitochondrial toxicity preclinically.

3.2. In Vitro Models for Cardiac Toxicity Assessment

Understanding the advantages and limitations of cardiac models is critical for proper cardiac risk assessment. To assess and confirm mitochondrial toxicity, physiological relevance ranked from high to low is as follows: human data, animal models, organ models, cell models, and organelle models. However, animal and organ models are not only low-throughput, expensive, and time-consuming, but also frequently incapable of directly reporting mitochondrial impairment. Isolated mitochondria provide a useful in vitro experimental system for mechanistic analysis, with the advantage of allowing extensive control over experimental conditions, such as measuring toxic effects on mitochondrial oxygen consumption without interference from other physiological processes [271]. Mitochondria subtypes, including SSMs and IFMs, can be either jointly or individually [272,273] isolated from cultured cardiomyocytes and heart tissues. However, their low yield, lack of physiological environment, and biased extraction of healthier ones from the sample [271] make isolated mitochondria not suitable for HTS. In contrast, intact cardiomyocytes exhibit several advantages over other models for evaluating drug-induced cardiotoxicity. In contrast with whole-heart preparations and tissue slices, cardiomyocyte cultures rule out signal contamination from other cell types, thereby identifying cell-type-specific toxicity. Unlike isolated mitochondria, cardiomyocytes provide a more physiologically relevant cellular environment, including materials for mitochondrial import and export, normal subcellular arrangements and structures of mitochondria, all mitochondrial subtypes with specific subcellular localizations, and so on. At present, three cell models are used according to the new E14/S7B draft guideline, including cell lines stably expressing hERG channels, hiPSC-CMs, and human primary cardiomyocytes (hPCMs). Heterologous hERG-expressing cell lines, while useful for single-channel screening, do not recapitulate the complex electrical activities seen in cardiomyocytes. By contrast, intact cardiomyocytes are more physiologically relevant for evaluating drug-induced cardiotoxicity. Currently used cardiomyocyte models include H9c2 cardiomyoblasts, stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes, and primary cardiomyocytes (PCMs).

3.2.1. H9c2 Cardiomyoblasts

The H9c2, derived from the ventricular part of the embryonic BDIX rat heart [274], is an immortalized myoblast cell line used as cardiomyocytes due to its biochemical, electrophysiological, and hormonal signaling properties [274,275]. By sequential selective passaging and culturing with all-trans retinoic acid and 1% serum media, they may overexpress L-type calcium channels, mimicking the adult cardiac muscle phenotype [276,277]. H9c2 cardiomyoblasts have been used for mitochondrial toxicity assessment of DOX, and demonstrated increased mitochondrial swelling [278], mtROS [279], mitochondrial fission [280], decreased MMP [281], and OCR and ATP production [282], whereas trastuzumab led to increased mtROS and decreased MMP [185]. Treatment of H9c2 cells with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as imatinib, sorafenib, and sunitinib, resulted in mitochondrial swelling, cristae loss, MMP reduction, inhibition of MRC complexes, superoxide accumulation, and cellular GSH depletion [283,284,285]. Similar mitochondrial impairments were also observed with other toxicants, such as As2O3 [286] and simvastatin [151]. H9c2 was utilized in HTS to identify compounds potentially conferring protection from DOX-induced damage [287]. However, H9c2 cardiomyoblasts have a lower predictive value than hESC-CMs with regard to ATP levels, MMP, Ca2+ mobilization, and endoplasmic reticulum integrity with therapeutic concentrations of toxic drugs [288]. Furthermore, drug responses may vary with differentiation state [289,290]. Ultimately, H9c2 cells are not of human origin, with differences including mitochondrial content and metabolism potentially affecting their translational capability, thus limiting their use as a model targeting mitochondrial toxicity [69].

3.2.2. Stem-Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes

Stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes, including human embryonic stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CMs) and hiPSC-CMs, are derived from blastocysts or reprogrammed somatic cells, respectively, with a series of differentiation processes [264]. They resemble in vivo cardiomyocytes in terms of ultrastructure [291], electrophysiology, and contraction [3], and are widely used as surrogates for native human cardiomyocytes [3], providing a promising platform for cardiotoxicity assessment [292]. However, hESC-CMs are limited by ethical concerns and regulatory restrictions. hiPSC-CMs, while circumventing these problems, face other challenges, the most prominent of which is immaturity [293]. Fortunately, many techniques are being developed that aim at enhancing cardiomyocyte maturation [294,295,296,297,298], thus improving drug response [299,300,301]. Other efforts are directed at the mass production of hiPSC-CMs for screening purposes. Approximately 1.5–2.8 billion cardiomyocytes per bioprocess can be generated by two-dimensional (2D) and 3D culture systems [302,303], and this number can be increased a hundred-fold through the inhibition of the glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) pathway [301], meeting the demands of HTS [304,305]. Downstream screening, and advances in computational methods, such as artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, are being developed to more accurately define endpoints, as has already been implemented for Ca2+ transients [306] and cardiomyocyte structure [307]. hiPSC-CMs, a human-based cardiomyocyte model with patient- and disease-specific characteristics, are versatile tools for phenotypic or target-based screening in lead compound discovery, as well as preclinical arrhythmia detection as required by CiPA. 2D hiPSC-CMs achieved 90% sensitivity, 74% specificity, and 82% accuracy in detecting drugs blocking ion channels and contraction [308]. Similarly good performance was also reached when profiling drugs using metabolic and viability endpoints [309]. Toxicities induced by anticancer therapies, including anthracyclines and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, were also successfully recapitulated in 2D hiPSC-CMs [301]. Chronic cardiotoxicity usually emerges between one month and decades after administration of treatment doses and might only be discovered during post-market monitoring [8]. Cardiotoxicity studies performed with single and relatively short exposure periods (up to 48 h) do not reflect the true mechanisms of chronic cardiotoxicity [310]. Given that delayed-onset cardiotoxicity may take longer to detect [21], long-term cultured cells with long-term recording are required [311]. hiPSC-CMs can beat spontaneously with stable baseline functions for months [312,313], rendering them more suited for assessing chronic toxicity. Notably, hiPSC-CMs have been widely used as a cellular model for evaluating the chronic effects of anticancer drugs and nucleoside analogs [23,293,295,297,298]. However, there is increasing awareness of the differences between hiPSC-CMs and their primary counterparts (i.e., hPCMs) concerning metabolism, structure, and function [293,314]. hiPSC-CMs remain similar to other cell lines in terms of their mitochondrial morphology, distribution, and function. In hiPSC-CMs, mitochondria occupy only about 5% of the cell volume and are located around the nucleus. Morphologically, they assume a rounded shape with poor cristae. Metabolically, they mostly rely on glucose for ATP production (~85%) [314]. All of these result in resistance to mitochondrial toxicity measurements [315].

3.2.3. hPCMs

PCMs are directly harvested from the native tissue and are considered to possess all properties of normal cardiomyocytes in the heart. Therefore, they are well suited for pharmacological evaluation of cellular morphology, function (e.g., electrophysiology, calcium handling, contraction), and subcellular structures, such as mitochondria [316,317]. Additionally, they are exceptional tools with regard to disease modeling, because they can be directly isolated from target animals or patients, eliminating the need for external manipulations, as is routine with all other biological models [3]. PCMs can be isolated from the embryonic, neonatal, or adult stages of animals and humans. However, owing to species differences, PCMs derived from humans and animals vary significantly in their functional and molecular characteristics [318]. hPCMs probably bear the highest degree of resemblance to native cardiomyocytes and are thus well suited for cardiotoxicity assessment. Preserving the donor’s genetic background, clinical manifestation, and medical history is a particular advantage of hPCMs, as drugs may induce unexpected effects in an old, diseased, and susceptible heart that is hidden in the healthy one [262]. Most of the current cardiotoxicity detection platforms for measuring contractility, calcium transient, membrane potential, and mitochondrial functions in hiPSC-CMs can also be applied to hPCMs [293,319]. Twenty-six inotropes (17 positive, 9 negative) were identified in adult hPCMs based on contractility transients [320]. It is worth noting that compared with hPCMs, hiPSC-CMs exhibited higher rates of false-positive and negative results for 33 multi-ion channel-blocking drugs [321]. Except for limited availability and technical challenges in handling, hPCMs are ideal tools for high-throughput assays examining the effects of compounds on mitochondria, due to their abundance, subtype distribution, shape, and substrate utilization [299,305,308]. Mitochondria occupy 30% of the hPCM cell volume and are distributed between myofibrils, under sarcolemma, and at the two longitudinal poles of the nucleus. They are also more reliant on fatty acids (80%) as the metabolic substrate, whose oxidation process for ATP production is reliant upon mature mitochondria [314]. Based on higher mitochondrial content, an elevated ROS level after doxorubicin treatment in more mature cardiomyocytes was detected compared to immature cardiomyocytes [322]. However, despite recent progress in hPCM isolation [323,324,325] and culture [326,327], they have not been used for mitochondrial toxicity screening to date.

3.2.4. 3D Cardiomyocyte Models

3D cardiac models are a promising class of models in that they are of human origin, reflect in vivo cardiomyocyte physiology and function, comprise multiple cell types, are suited for evaluation of both acute and chronic toxicities, and are available in high-throughput format [328,329]. Cardiac spheroids are a type of self-assembled ball shape structure comprising one or multiple cell types. They have been used to verify the cardiotoxicity of DOX, sunitinib, verapamil, and quinidine at clinically relevant concentrations, assessed by cell viability, contractility, MMP, and endoplasmic reticulum integrity [283,317,318]. Currently, cardiac spheroids can be easily generated in microscale platforms, such as 96/384-well plates [300,330], to decrease the number of cardiac cells. Cardiac organoids are hollow 3D structures of relevant cardiac cells, including cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and so on, in the presence of extracellular matrix proteins. Cardiac organoids resemble the human heart by exhibiting similar ultrastructure and physiology, including oxidative metabolism, force-frequency relationship, and calcium handling [298]. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that cardiac organoids share the highest degree of similarity with human adult myocardium compared with 2D, 3D hiPSC-CMs, and fetal myocardium [331]. Small-size engineered heart tissue platforms have also been described [332]. Measurements using cardiac organoids can also be conducted in a high-throughput manner and are compatible with the detection of electrophysiological abnormalities, contractile dysfunction, and structural toxicity [333,334]. More importantly, cardiac organoids showed drug evaluation results similar to the adult heart [316,323,324]. The reactivity of cardiac organoids induced by clinical compounds, including antibiotic, antidiabetic, and anticancer drugs, was shown to be more physiologically relevant compared with 2D-cultured hiPSC-CMs [335,336]. Based on a panel of eight metrics, cardiac organoids responded appropriately to pro-arrhythmic stimuli and effectively differentiated between high- and low-risk hERG-inhibiting compounds, meeting the critical demand in pro-arrhythmic cardiotoxicity prediction [337]. In addition to electrophysiology, cardiac organoids are also sensitive to drugs affecting cardiac contractility and can be applied in HTS format using a customized image acquisition workflow and optical flow analysis methods [329,335]. Structural parameters, including cell membrane permeability, MMP, endoplasmic reticulum integrity, and cellular viability, can be measured in cardiac organoids using high-throughput assays as well [332,334]. Therefore, 3D cardiomyocyte models hold great promise for cardiotoxicity screening. However, the technical challenges are still relatively high. As a 3D structure, organoids frequently present a necrotic core owing to the heterogeneous diffusion of nutrients. Similarly, drugs not evenly distributed by diffusion in the cardiac organoids also influence the accuracy of toxicity prediction [328]. Furthermore, the production of sufficiently large quantities and sufficient uniformity of generated organoids for high-throughput assays is a challenging task. Thus, additional work is needed to make these models available to the pharmaceutical industry.

4. Proposed Preclinical Model of Cardiomyocytes for Assessment of Drug-Induced Mitochondria Toxicity

4.1. In Vitro Cell Culture for Cardiotoxicity Assays

H9c2 can be either self-differentiated or purchased from cell banks (e.g., American Tissue Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) [185,279] and Cell Bank of the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China) [280,282]) and cultured with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM; Gibco) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. In addition, 2D hiPSC-CMs can be self-differentiated and cultured with RPMI + B27 with insulin [338,339], or purchased from biotechnology companies (e.g., Cellular Dynamics International (Madison, WI, USA) [308] and FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc (FCDI, Madison, WI, USA) [309]), and maintained in culture according to their protocols. As for 3D cardiomyocyte models, hiPSC-CMs are the most common type of cardiomyocytes used in cardiac organoids. Other non-cardiomyocytes can be either induced from hiPSCs [332] or isolated from human tissue. Cardiac organoids are cultured with 50% cardiomyocytes maintenance medium and 50% endothelial basal medium when endothelial cells are included in organoids [300,329]. Alternatively, a 100% cardiomyocytes maintenance medium is used when cardiac organoids only consist of cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts [298]. hPCMs are isolated from human heart samples during surgical procedures such as coronary artery bypass surgery, valve replacement, and so on, and may be cultured with ACCITT3 culture medium [327]. The carbon source in the culture media of cardiomyocytes is one of the most critical determinants of reliable mitochondrial toxicity evaluation. Cells grown in media containing glucose may cause the ‘Crabtree effect’ [340], allowing high levels of glycolysis with minimal OXPHOS, and altered mitochondrial physiology. This artificial shift in metabolism undermines the effectiveness of HTS assays examining mitochondrial toxicity. On the contrary, when grown under conditions of low-glucose or glucose-free media with abundant oxygen supply, cardiomyocytes are forced to use OXPHOS for ATP production [340], exhibiting mitochondrial respiration comparable to in vivo conditions [341]. Cardiomyocytes, including H9c2 [283,284,285,342], hESC-CMs [140], and hiPSC-CMs [343], grown in galactose become susceptible to mitochondrial toxicants [344,345]. None of the H9c2 cells cultured in galactose survived troglitazone treatment, whereas those in high-glucose medium were unaffected 24 h post-treatment [346]. Owing to the 2–3 orders of magnitude higher sensitivity to various mitotoxicants with galactose culture [345], the differential sensitivities of glucose- versus galactose-grown cells were therefore used as an identifier of specific drug-induced mitochondrial impairment. Specifically, a ratio of half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of a drug, based on ATP production as a readout, in glucose- and galactose-grown cells (IC50 Glucose: IC50 Galactose), of >3 is taken as an indication of mitochondrial toxicity [345,346]. Mitochondrial liabilities for members of the biguanide family as well as certain antidepressants (nefazodone) were identified in this manner [347], and the approach has since found widespread use across the pharmaceutical industry. Of note, this method worked particularly well for inhibitors of ETC complexes I and III, but was useless for uncouplers [345] and other toxic effects, including mitochondrial ion channels inhibition and DNA damage [267].

4.2. Mitochondrial Target as Readouts in Cardiotoxicity Assays

4.2.1. Mitochondrial Morphology, Structure

Mitochondria toxicity can be detected by its abundance, arrangement, and morphology alterations. Traditionally, these changes are detected by transmission electron microscopy [348], a method providing only a snapshot in a specific space and time. Nowadays, changes in mitochondrial dynamics can be visualized directly by high-content screening (HCS) in 96- and 384-well plates. Multiple fluorescent probes, mitochondria-tagged fluorescent proteins, or immuno-labelling with antibodies can indicate mitochondrial abundance, arrangement, morphology (e.g., swollen, punctate, etc.). Fluorescent probes, such as nonyl-acridine orange (NAO), measuring mitochondrial cardiolipin content, and Mito Tracker, which determines MMP, are used to characterize subpopulations of mitochondria by HCS [349]. Mito Tracker is retained in fixed mitochondria and is therefore compatible with antibody-based imaging [350]. Constructs expressing fluorescent proteins (i.e., GFP, RFP, YFP) fused with specific sequences are also used for mitochondrial analysis by targeting the OMM, IMM, or matrix [351,352]. Immuno-labeled antibodies targeting specific proteins, such as MRC complexes or TOM20 on the OMM, can also be used for HCS [353]. Systematic image analysis software now makes it possible to quantify mitochondria in cardiomyocytes in a high-throughput manner [307].

4.2.2. Oxygen Consumption Rate (OCR)

Oxygen consumption, one of the classic end points of assessing the metabolic implications of drug treatment, provides direct information on the activity of OXPHOS. OCR is highly sensitive to perturbations in mitochondrial function [354]. Traditionally, OCR measurements on isolated mitochondria are performed using Clark-type oxygen electrodes [355,356]. Today, Seahorse Bioanalyzers represent a significant advance in OCR assessment, improving both throughput and sensitivity [357,358,359]. By orderly injection of chemical probes including oligomycin, FCCP, rotenone, and antimycin A, a series of readouts, including basal respiration, proton leak, non-mitochondrial oxygen consumption, maximal respiration, ATP production, spare respiratory capacity, and coupling efficiency, can be calculated to reveal OXPHOS damage. Reductions in OCR can result from altered control mechanisms (e.g., MMP decline), diminishments in the supply of reducing equivalents, inhibition of individual MRC complexes, or ANT inhibition. Therefore, the primary mechanism for such reduction needs to be identified as the next step. When necessary, the activity of individual complexes can be interrogated through the use of specific respiratory substrates and inhibitors [345,360].

4.2.3. ATP

Determining cellular ATP levels is an effective and robust way to assess compound toxicity [361]. Since mitochondria are the sites for ATP production in cells, decreases in ATP levels indicate impaired mitochondrial function. During apoptosis, reductions in ATP are usually accompanied by decreases in the MMP. As a secondary measurement for mitochondrial function [362], ATP content is frequently used as an indicator of cellular viability in HTS [339]. ATP content can be measured by colorimetry, fluorescence, luminescence, or isotopes. Photoluminescence measurement on microplate readers is the most popular method at present [363,364,365,366], due to its superior detection sensitivity and operational convenience. A rhodamine-based spirolactam ATP sensor was developed to specifically monitor mitochondrial ATP in real time and has already been applied to human and mouse skin fibroblasts [367].

4.2.4. Redox Homeostasis

The balance between the generation and neutralization of ROS is another important determinant of mitochondrial health. Therefore, the functional state of mitochondria can be reflected by detecting the level of ROS, especially mtROS [362]. ROS is adapted to HTS platforms with probes including MitoPY1 [365], MitoSox [368], and CellRox [369]. MitoSOX, a mitochondrially targeted fluorescent dye [370], is widely used for the measurement of O2 formation in active mitochondria. Another ROS probe, Amplex UltraRed, is oxidized by H2O2 to form a fluorescent product and is specifically used in monitoring H2O2 production [371,372]. Upon detection of aberrantly high ROS levels, dysfunction of the antioxidant system is frequently interrogated as a potential mechanism. For example, SOD activity can be determined by pyrogallol autoxidation, while glutathione levels can be assessed through its oxidation by 2-nitrobenzoic acid. Furthermore, downstream of ROS overproduction, ROS-mediated damage-induced peroxidation of macromolecules is also an indicator of mitochondrial toxicity. For example, the levels of malondialdehyde, one of the final products of polyunsaturated fatty acids peroxidation, can rise as a consequence of an increase in free radicals. Its reaction with thiobarbituric acid provides a colorimetric approach to evaluating lipid peroxidation [373].

4.2.5. MMP

Assays using fluorescent probes to quantify disruption of MMP have been validated as an effective method for assessing mitochondrial toxicity and have been adopted for HTS [374]. Although cell models vary in their responses to mitochondrial toxicants, MMP is a steady criterion to indicate mitochondrial dysfunction [375]. MMP-dependent lipophilic and cationic dyes, including rhodamine 123, tetramethylrhodamine methyl (TMRM) [376], tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester (TMRE), 5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethylbenzimidazolycarbocyanine iodide (JC-1), and JC-10 [375] are widely used to assess MMP [377]. The widely used probe JC-1 and its modified, water-soluble version, JC-9, accumulate in mitochondria MMP-dependently and exhibit a shift in emission wavelength from green (monomers) to red (J-aggregates), providing a readout of the potential difference across the IMM. Although MitoTracker MMP-dependently labels mitochondria [378], it is more generally used as a mitochondrion-specific probe to track mitochondria, for example in colocalization experiments with ROS indicators [379,380,381] or lysosomes indicators [382]. However, MMP quantification alone cannot distinguish whether such loss is due to inhibition of MRC complexes, uncoupling, or mitochondrial permeability transition, so complementary assays are required to determine the underlying causes [362].

4.3. High-Throughput Assessment of Mitochondrial Toxicity

Owing to the diverse range of drugs that can cause cardiac mitochondrial toxicity (Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6), and due to the varying degrees and types of toxic manifestations, it would be desirable to screen for such toxicity in a high-throughput manner. As discussed above, mitochondrial toxicities are classified into several categories (i.e., effects on ROS production, MMP depolarization) that are likely intertwined. Therefore, HTS for mitochondrial liabilities of drugs provides a means of accurate classification of such toxicities, which may prove critical to safety pharmacology. HTS techniques for mitochondrial liability detection usually include a self-defined combination of the following assays: HCS for mitochondrial content, arrangement, shape, MMP, and so on; microplate reader-based assays for ATP and ROS detection; and Seahorse assay for OCR measurement. HTS for mitochondrial liabilities is widely applied in a variety of cell types [354,365,368,383,384,385]. However, the use of HTS to detect cardiac mitochondrial toxicity is still in its infancy. Multiparametric analyses were performed by HCS to show the effects of the drugs on mitochondria in hiPSC-CMs [81]. An antibody against translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 20 (TOM20) indicated mitochondrial changes similar to sarcomeres and nuclei induced by aspirin, doxorubicin, erlotinib, and sorafenib. Most notably, mitochondrial structure changes were detected at lower concentrations compared to the loss of contractility and cell count [386]. Furthermore, concentration–effect profiles of mitochondria-related changes correlated well with cell viability induced by cardiotoxic drugs [387]. Twenty-three cardiotoxicants were identified in 69 environmental hazards based on MMP evaluation by JC-10 staining in hiPSC-CMs [388]. Mitochondrial respiration analyzed by Seahorse assay was found to be a very sensitive and robust means of detecting mitotoxicity in hiPSC-CMs, and thus can be used both as a screening method and validation tool [307]. Several technical details are worth paying attention to when planning an HTS for mitotoxicity. Drug concentration and incubation time are critical for the identification of mitochondrial toxicity, and distinguishing them from cytotoxicity, in HTS assays. However, the existing literature does not fully distinguish between mitotoxicity and cytotoxicity, as evidenced by the frequent use of mitochondrial parameters as a surrogate of cellular conditions. Therefore, no consensus has yet been reached concerning the threshold separating these two entities. For example, 80% of drugs with hepatocyte toxicity were identified at a concentration of 100 μM or 30-fold of Cmax with 3 days of incubation. TMRM staining indicated that 70% of those with cytotoxicity exhibited mitochondrial toxicity [383]. In cardiotoxicity drugs, the percentage of mitochondrial toxic drugs increased with increasing concentrations of drugs, ranging from 1 to 100 fold of Cmax, as evaluated by the glucose/galactose model in rat liver mitochondria [64], an insensitive mitotoxicity measurement [345]. Exposure of up to 100 fold of Cmax over a period of 72 h was found to be essential for cytotoxicity examination of slower-acting toxicants in HCS [389]. On the contrary, the combined use of four metabolic biomarkers of toxicity (three of which were pertinent to mitochondria) achieved 90% sensitivity and 79% specificity in an assay using 10 fold of Cmax in hiPSC-CMs [309]. Therefore, a concentration lower than that used to induce cytotoxicity would be useful for identifying compounds with primary actions on mitochondria. A shorter incubation time of 1 to 6 h [357,390] or 24 h (if requiring metabolism for mitochondrial toxicity) [359] also helps to distinguish mitochondrial toxicity from cytotoxicity. It is noteworthy that when the concentration of drug needed to induce mitochondrial toxicity is not significantly lower than that needed to induce cytotoxicity (IC50 ratio ≤ 3), it is difficult to determine whether mitochondrial toxicity is a primary or secondary effect of drug action, and further validation is therefore required to dissect the underlying mechanisms [390]. More detailed information on drug metabolism is also worthy of attention. Drugs, especially prodrugs, may be metabolized into active forms in cells, which do not easily diffuse back into the extracellular matrix and are thus accumulated in the cytoplasm, inducing a higher drug concentration than Cmax [391]. This type of toxicity, including both mitochondrial toxicity and cytotoxicity, may not be discovered by exposing cells to the Cmax concentration.

4.4. Proposed Integrated Assays for Drug-Induced Mitochondria Toxicity of Cardiomyocytes

The prevalence of drug-induced mitochondrial cardiotoxicity warrants a more rigorous, systematic, and comprehensive evaluation of compounds early in the drug discovery process. HTS is a commonly used method for drug screening, and thus can also be utilized for the detection of mitochondrial liabilities of drugs. Since arrhythmia and mitochondrial dysfunction exist as two distinct entities in cardiotoxicity, we suggest an independent screening module that can be performed in parallel for proarrhythmic risk assessments to enhance predictive capabilities for cardiotoxicity (Figure 3). The choice of cellular model is pivotal to HTS. As discussed above, 2D and 3D hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and hPCMs models each have their advantages and drawbacks. On one hand, 2D hiPSC-CMs have been widely used due to their ease of scaled production, but do not sufficiently resemble the in vivo condition; on the other, hPCMs, while of native origin, can face practical problems, including tissue availability, isolation quality, and compatibility with HTS. According to our unpublished data, approximately three million hPCMs can be isolated from one milligram of heart tissue, and they can be further cultured and cryopreserved without morphological and functional alterations, indicating their compatibility with HTS. While 3D cardiomyocyte model assemblies are structurally and functionally advanced, however, their uniformity and scalability still need optimization.
Figure 3

Proposed workflow of mitochondrial toxicity evaluation during preclinical cardiotoxicity profiling. Mitochondrial toxicity assays can be conducted in parallel with the existing proarrhythmic risk assessments to aid the selection of safer drugs for subsequent clinical studies. In our proposed workflow, 2D hiPSC-CMs, hPCMs, and 3D hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes models can be cultured in 96- or 384-well assay plates, and treated with candidate drugs for primary screening, secondary screening, and subsequent validation, respectively. Primary assays can be performed firstly by PrestoBlue staining for measurement of reduction potential. Then, the fluorescent images can be captured in a high-content manner after MitoTracker and TMRM staining. Secondary screening combines microplate reading, HCS, and OCR measurement. Validation can be conducted with HCS and OCR measurement. These readouts (reduction potential, mitochondrial mass, distribution, morphology, MMP, and OCR) can be subsequently quantified to identify mitochondrially safe drugs. Abbreviations: ADME: absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion; hERG: human ether-a-go-go-related current; 2D hiPSC-CMs: two-dimensional human induced pluripotent-stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes; HCS: high-content screening; HTS: high-throughput screening; OCR: oxygen consumption rate.

An HTS approach for drug-induced mitochondrial toxicity can incorporate many of the aforementioned parameters. For example, primary screening can be performed by 2D hiPSC-CMs combining microplate reading and HCS of a variety of readouts, including mitochondrial reduction potential, mass, arrangement, length, length-to-width ratio, and MMP. In particular, cardiomyocytes cultured in 96- or 384-well assay plates can be firstly tested by PrestoBlue for reduction potential, then detected by HCS for the rest of the readouts (MitoTracker for mitochondrial mass and morphology, TMRM for MMP). Secondary screening and subsequent validation can be conducted in the hPCM and 3D cardiomyocyte models, respectively, by combining microplate reading, HCS, and OCR measurement. A mitochondrial toxicity index can be calculated as a weighted average of these readouts and can guide ranking of the cardiomyocyte-specific mitochondrial toxicity of compounds, and when combined with data from proarrhythmic risk assessment, can provide evidence for decisions regarding further development. Even if mitochondrial toxicity does not reach the level of discontinuation of drug development, the resultant data will provide an early warning sign of potential adverse reactions in a clinical setting, and may indicate measures for monitoring potential adverse events, such as lipoatrophy and peripheral neuropathy [392], and inform patient care. The combined preclinical cardiotoxicity assessments may also be useful for dissecting mechanisms of toxicity, such as the relationship between mitochondrial toxicity and excitation-contraction coupling or arrhythmias. Another benefit of screening for mitochondrial toxicity early in the drug discovery process is the early identification of structure–toxicity relationships to minimize or circumvent this liability from a chemical perspective. The recently identified 1,3-nitrogen motif in anticancer drugs was shown to inhibit MRC complex I in cardiomyocytes [140].

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Mitochondria in cardiomyocytes ensure the proper functioning of the heart by producing energy and regulating redox balance, calcium homeostasis, and cell death [393,394]. Due to their mass and their central roles in cellular function, mitochondria in cardiomyocytes are particularly vulnerable to mitochondrial toxicants [22]. Cancer therapies, antiviral compounds, antibiotics, antidiabetic drugs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, local anesthetics, and many other therapeutics often impair mitochondrial function [22]. Mitochondrial dysfunction is known to cause a broad spectrum of CVDs, including cardiomyopathies, arrhythmias, and abnormalities of the conduction system [395]. Therefore, cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, and heart failure are the most common presentations of mitochondrial cardiotoxicity [36]. Up to 26% of patients treated with DOX exhibit cardiotoxicity with symptoms of cardiomyopathy [396], arrhythmia [397], and heart failure [398]. In addition, existing CVDs can also be aggravated by mitochondrion-toxic agents [36]. Despite the prevalence of mitochondrial toxicity and its impact on the heart, current clinical assessments of cardiac function are not able to detect subclinical myocardial dysfunction, let alone the underlying pathophysiology (e.g., mitochondrial toxicity) [399]. Nuclear imaging-based strategies with mitochondrial-potential- and ROS-targeted tracers for mitotoxicity in vivo have not yet achieved the desired sensitivity and molecular specificity for clinical assessments, but have the potential for future translation [400]. Here, we proposed a preclinical screening model for drug-induced mitochondrial toxicity of cardiomyocytes in HTS format, which can be performed in parallel with current proarrhythmic risk assessments for cardiac safety. Although this proposed workflow potentially improves and perfects the cardiac safety screening system, it is not intended to provide solid evidence of human cardiac toxicity, or lack thereof, in areas that exceed the scope of such screening (e.g., chronic toxicity). While the mechanisms of drug toxicity are heavily studied in animal hearts, the real effect and mechanisms in human cardiomyocytes are less well understood [36], which prompted the development of HTS for mitochondrial toxicants in human-relevant platforms. In addition to drug-induced mitochondrial toxicity, accumulating studies have pointed out that environmental toxins, including various pesticides and heavy metals, may also induce cardiotoxicity [401,402]. Hence, HTS may be useful in applications beyond the regular drug discovery pipeline. In addition to cardiac safety assessment, HTS can be utilized to search for cardioprotective drugs and provide clues to their pharmacological actions. By applying mitochondrial toxicants with distinct mechanisms of action, the screen is capable of identifying different categories of cardioprotectancts. On the other hand, unexpected hits from such screens may be indicative of previously unknown drug actions. In a similar vein, since mitochondrial dysfunction is a common feature of many CVDs, HTS is a viable approach to finding mitotherapeutics for disease treatment, such as cardiomyopathy [403,404]. Screens intended to determine the mitochondrial liability of drugs may also reveal inter-relations of different toxicity phenotypes. For example, mitochondrial impairment by cardiotoxins was found to be an underlying cause of structural cardiotoxicity in hESC-CMs and H9c2 cells [288]. Given that Ca2+ handling, ATP production, and ROS signaling in mitochondria have all been shown to play important roles in arrhythmia, such as atrial fibrillation [401], it might be worth deciphering the relationship between drug-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and drug-induced arrhythmia. Furthermore, it is crucial to determine whether mitochondrial toxicants affect non-cardiovascular organ systems or the heart, particularly cardiomyocytes. For example, sertraline caused hepatotoxicity by uncoupling OXPHOS and inhibiting MRC complexes I and V [405]. Whether they also exert the same effects in cardiomyocytes is unclear. Screening for potential cardiac mitochondrial toxicity will contribute to identifying hidden cardiotoxicity and guiding clinical medication.
  403 in total

1.  Effect of the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib, dasatinib, sunitinib, and sorafenib on mitochondrial function in isolated rat heart mitochondria and H9c2 cells.

Authors:  Yvonne Will; James A Dykens; Sashi Nadanaciva; Brad Hirakawa; Joseph Jamieson; Lisa D Marroquin; James Hynes; Shem Patyna; Bart A Jessen
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Trial watch: phase II and phase III attrition rates 2011-2012.

Authors:  John Arrowsmith; Philip Miller
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Diclofenac induces proteasome and mitochondrial dysfunction in murine cardiomyocytes and hearts.

Authors:  Rajeshwary Ghosh; Sumanta K Goswami; Luis Felipe B B Feitoza; Bruce Hammock; Aldrin V Gomes
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Mitochondrial toxicity of selective COX-2 inhibitors via inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation (ATP synthesis) in rat liver mitochondria.

Authors:  Muzeeb Syed; Christian Skonberg; Steen Honoré Hansen
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  A high-throughput respirometric assay for mitochondrial biogenesis and toxicity.

Authors:  Craig C Beeson; Gyda C Beeson; Rick G Schnellmann
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 6.  The biochemistry and toxicity of atractyloside: a review.

Authors:  M J Stewart; V Steenkamp
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.681

7.  Evaluation of the phytochemical composition and protective activities of methanolic extracts of Centaurea borysthenica and Centaurea daghestanica (Lipsky) Wagenitz on cardiomyocytes treated with doxorubicin.

Authors:  Agnieszka Korga; Aleksandra Józefczyk; Grażyna Zgórka; Mateusz Homa; Marta Ostrowska; Franciszek Burdan; Jarosław Dudka
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Cardioprotective Effect of the Mitochondrial Unfolded Protein Response During Chronic Pressure Overload.

Authors:  Ioannis Smyrnias; Stephen P Gray; Darlington O Okonko; Greta Sawyer; Anna Zoccarato; Norman Catibog; Begoña López; Arantxa González; Susana Ravassa; Javier Díez; Ajay M Shah
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  ArrhythmoGenoPharmacoTherapy.

Authors:  Arpad Tosaki
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  The nuclear receptor RORα preserves cardiomyocyte mitochondrial function by regulating caveolin-3-mediated mitophagy.

Authors:  Ju Youn Beak; Hong Soon Kang; Wei Huang; Rishi Deshmukh; Seok Jae Hong; Nishi Kadakia; Amir Aghajanian; Kevin Gerrish; Anton Jetten; Brian Jensen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.