| Literature DB >> 25302578 |
Matias S Attene-Ramos1, Ruili Huang, Sam Michael, Kristine L Witt, Ann Richard, Raymond R Tice, Anton Simeonov, Christopher P Austin, Menghang Xia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial dysfunction has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a variety of disorders including cancer, diabetes, and neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases. Understanding whether different environmental chemicals and druglike molecules impact mitochondrial function represents an initial step in predicting exposure-related toxicity and defining a possible role for such compounds in the onset of various diseases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25302578 PMCID: PMC4286281 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1408642
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Figure 1qHTS concentration response data binned into curve classes 1–4. Concentration response [ratio (590 nm/535 nm)] curves for the FCCP control titrations and > 10,000 substances tested, including all the replicates. FCCP is the positive control, and curve class 4 represents the inactive compounds.
Reproducibility for the MMP and cell viability assays.
| Assay reproducibility | Active match (%) | Inactive match (%) | Inconclusive (%) | Mismatch (%) | AC50 fold change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tox21–88 | |||||
| MMP | 41.88 | 36.65 | 19.09 | 2.39 | 1.46 |
| Cell viability | 8.81 | 80.63 | 10.23 | 0.34 | 1.41 |
| 10K triplicate run | |||||
| MMP | 17.57 | 67.52 | 14.33 | 0.55 | 1.53 |
| Cell viability | 4.78 | 90.80 | 4.39 | 0.03 | 1.42 |
| For each assay, the reproducibility was calculated for the Tox21–88 compounds (duplicates in each plate) and for the 10K library (three copies) with compounds plated in different well locations. | |||||
Figure 2Screening statistics. (A) Stability analysis showing the reproducibility of each curve class, calculated using the ratio readout. High-quality curves (i.e., classes 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2) were more reproducible than other curve types for antagonist activity (inhibitory curve classes); a similar pattern was observed with lower reproducibility for the agonist curves. Class 4 inactive curves were fairly reproducible. (B) Distribution of the results (percent of the total library) based on the combined call using the MMP assay (ratio and independent channels), cell viability, and compound autofluorescence assays.
Figure 3Structure–activity relationship (SAR) of compounds that decreased MMP. All compounds with associated structures present in the library were clustered, based on structural similarity using the self-organizing map (SOM) algorithm (Kohonen 2006). Each cluster was then evaluated for enrichment for active antagonists (compared with the library average) using Fisher’s exact test. Enriched clusters are shown in red and deficient clusters in blue; scale values represent the log p-value for each cluster. Representative scaffolds are shown for some of the more enriched clusters. The red boxes define regions of molecules that share a common substructure.
Figure 4Activity of three hydroxybenzophenone isomers (A) and three parabens (B). (A) Changes in the ability of hydroxybenzophenone isomers to decrease MMP; 3-hydroxybenzophenone was the more potent isomer, and 2-hydroxybenzophenone was inactive in this assay. (B) Decreases in MMP for different paraben molecules; activity increased with increasing length of the side chain (and subsequent increase in hydrophobicity).