| Literature DB >> 35889038 |
Samantha Gartley1, Brienna Anderson-Coughlin1, Manan Sharma2, Kalmia E Kniel1.
Abstract
As more fresh fruits and vegetables are needed to meet the demands of a growing population, growers may need to start depending on more varied sources of water, including environmental, recycled, and reclaimed waters. Some of these sources might be susceptible to contamination with microbial pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes. Surveys have found this pathogen in water, soil, vegetation, and farm animal feces around the world. The frequency at which this pathogen is present in water sources is dependent on multiple factors, including the season, surrounding land use, presence of animals, and physicochemical water parameters. Understanding the survival duration of L. monocytogenes in specific water sources is important, but studies are limited concerning this environment and the impact of these highly variable factors. Understanding the pathogen's ability to remain infectious is key to understanding how L. monocytogenes impacts produce outbreaks and, ultimately, consumers' health.Entities:
Keywords: bacteria; contamination; environment; foodborne illness
Year: 2022 PMID: 35889038 PMCID: PMC9323950 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10071319
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Presence and factors attributing to Listeria monocytogenes in water environments.
| Country | Positive/Total Samples | Type of Water | Factors Contributing to Presence | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USA | 605/1405 | Lake, stream, river, pond | Point-source, roaming animals, high run-off from heavy rains | [ |
| USA | 48/174 | Surface and engineered | Farm, season, sample type, temperature | [ |
| USA | 22/74 | Irrigation (engineered, pond, river) and non-irrigation (pond, ditch, river) | Water source (non-irrigation vs. irrigation) | [ |
| Canada | 32/134 | Surface (river) | Proximity to upstream dairy farm, degree of crop land | [ |
| Germany | 24/36 | Creek and pond | Area rich in agriculture and plant life | [ |
| Austria | 0/68 | River and pond | Proximity to agricultural lands, urban environments | [ |
| South Africa | 19/36 | Irrigation canal and river | High chemical oxygen demand detected | [ |
| India | 8/100 | River Water | Proximity to large human population | [ |
| Canada | 56/329 | Rural and urban watersheds (river and lake) | Rural agricultural watersheds | [ |
| USA | 10/33 | Irrigation (well, pond) and non-irrigation (ditch creek) | Sources of water, more likely in non-irrigation sources | [ |
| USA | 53/171 | Pond, non-tidal fresh, tidal fresh, tidal brackish, reclaimed | Water source (environmental vs. reclaimed) | [ |
| Switzerland | 25/191 | River, stream, inland canal | Agricultural area and dense human populations | [ |
| Denmark | 2/26 | Stream, freshwater fish farm, seawater fish farm, municipal water | Prevalence increased with | [ |
| USA | 86/209 | Pond, stream, and wildlife fecal samples | Small farm with wildlife intrusion | [ |